Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
Shandong Haobang Bio-Energy Limited Liability Company, Zouping 256200, China
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 September 2011
Accepted 26 October 2011
Available online 6 November 2011
Keywords:
Activated carbon
Cotton linter bers
Fused NaOH activation
Oxytetracycline
a b s t r a c t
The objective of this research is to produce high surface areaactivated carbon derived from cotton linter
bers by fused NaOH activation and to examine the feasibility of removing oxytetracycline (OTC) from
aqueous solution. The cotton linter bers activated carbon (CLAC) was characterized by N2 adsorption/
desorption isotherms, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and scanning electron microscope
(SEM). The results showed that CLAC had a predominantly microporous structure with a large surface
area of 2143 m2/g. The adsorption system followed pseudo-second-order kinetic model, and equilibrium
was achieved within 24 h. The equilibrium data were described well by Langmuir isotherm. Thermodynamic study showed that the adsorption was exothermic reaction at low concentration and became
endothermic nature with the concentration increasing. Competitive adsorption took place in the weakly
acidic to neutral conditions. Under the strong acidity or strong alkaline condition, the adsorption of the
oxytetracycline was hindered by electrostatic repulsion. The adsorption mechanism depended on the pH
of the solutions as well as the pKa of the oxytetracycline.
2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
With the rapid development of Chinese textile industry, more
and more wastes and by-products are generated in the production
process. Cotton linter is the by-product from cotton textile production. As an essentially regenerative natural resource, it has been
applied widely owing to its low cost.
Activated carbon is a promising material for contaminant
adsorption because of its efciency, stability, and potential for reuse. However, the extensive use of activated carbon was restricted
due to the high cost. How to prepare high-quality activated carbon
at low cost became a hot topic. The textual and chemical characteristics of the activated carbon depend on the nature of the precursor
used as well as the methods and conditions of production. Activated carbon can be produced by all kinds of carbonaceous materials as precursors [1]. Production of activated carbons from ber
could be another appropriate solution for cotton linter utilization.
Previous studies showed that NaOH could be successfully used to
develop activated carbons with large surface area and micropore
volumes [2]. The most important advantages over KOH are lower
price and less corrosive behavior. However, none of the researches
have prepared activated carbon by fused NaOH. By this method,
522
Y. Sun et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 368 (2012) 521527
by a UVvis spectrophotometer (UV-754, Shanghai) at the maximum absorption wavelength. To control the experiments, the
OTC solutions without adsorbents were conducted under the same
condition.
In desorption experiments, the spent CLAC in kinetics experiments (OTC initial concentration 530.03 mg/L) was collected. Distilled water, HCl, NaOH, and acetic acid were used as desorption
agent. The percentage of desorption was calculated as follows:
%Desorption
md
100
ma
523
Y. Sun et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 368 (2012) 521527
700
1.0
0.4
650
600
%Transmittance
0.6
0.8
550
500
450
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
p/p0
0.2
0.0
0
10
12
14
16
18
90
88
86
84
82
80
78
76
74
72
70
68
66
64
62
60
4000
before
after
3000
2000
1000
Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Fig. 2. Pore size distribution curves of the adsorbent and the insert gure is N2
adsorption/desorption isotherms.
[3] and aliphatic amine (mCAN) (not aromatic amine with peek at
13801250 cm1) due to the attachment of the OTC species and
the adsorbent. This result indicated that OTC was immobilized onto
the AC samples probably by chemical bonding.
lnqe qt ln qe k1 t
t
1
1
t
qt k2 q2e qe
2
3
qt kpi t 1=2 C i
Table 1
Porous structure parameters of CLAC.
SBET
Smic
Vtot
Vmic
(m2/g)
(m2/g)
(%)
(m2/g)
Sext
(%)
(cm3/g)
(cm3/g)
(%)
Vext
(cm3/g)
(%)
Dp
(nm)
2143
1408.1
65.7
734.9
34.3
0.948
0.875
92
0.073
1.77
SBET: BET surface area, Smic: micropore surface area, Sext: external surface area, Vt: total pore volume, Vmic: micropore volume, Vmec: external volume, Dp: mean pore diameter
(mode).
524
Y. Sun et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 368 (2012) 521527
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
308 mg/L
364 mg/L
530 mg/L
350
300
250
200
150
100
-200
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
time (min)
Fig. 4. Adsorption of OTC on CLAC as a function of contact time at different
concentrations. T = 25 C, natural pH (3.103.36) and CLAC dose 1 g/L.
where qe and qt (mg/g) are the amounts of OTC adsorbed at equilibrium and at time t (min); k1 (g/(mg min)), k2 (g/(mg min)), and kpi
are the pseudo-rst-order rate constants, pseudo-second-order rate
constants, and intra-particle diffusion rate constant of stage i,
respectively; Ci is the intercept at stage i. The plots of log (qeqt) versus t, t/qt versus t and qt versus t1/2 give the values of k1 and qe, k2
and qe, and kpi and Ci.
The correlated parameters at three concentrations were summarized in Table 2. It was observed that OTC adsorption onto CLAC
followed the pseudo-second-order reaction with high correlation
coefcients (R2 > 0.999), and the adsorption capacity (qe,cal) from
the pseudo-second-order model was much closer to the experimental data (qe,exp), which suggested that the process controlling
the rate may be a chemical sorption [19]. These observations were
consistent with sorption mechanisms, which proposed latter that
strong electrostatic interaction or ion exchange occured on the
adsorbent surface. The plots tted by intra-particle diffusion model
presented multi-linearity, which revealed that three steps occurred
in the adsorption process: (i) fast initial adsorption of the adsorbate from the bulk to outer surfaces of the adsorbent, (ii) penetration by slow diffusion into interlayer of the adsorbent, and (iii)
interactions with the surface atoms of the solid leading to chemisorption (strong adsorbateadsorbent interactions equivalent to
covalent bond formation) or weak adsorption (weak adsorbate
adsorbent interactions, very similar to van der Waals forces); in
the latter case, desorption may be the ultimate result [15]. This
result was in keeping with the universally recognized adsorption
Ce
1
1
Ce
qe qm K l qm
1
ln qe ln kF ln C e
n
qe A ln K T A ln C e
5
6
7
Table 2
Estimated kinetic model constants for OTC adsorption.
Kinetic models
Parameters
C0 (mg/L)
308.2
363.7
530.3
Pseudo-rst-order parameters
qe,exp (mg/g)
qe,cal (mg/g)
K1 (g/(mg min))
R2
512.6
144.6
0.00807
0.972
603.1
203.0
0.00503
0.974
738.5
389.30
0.00388
0.9778
Pseudo-second-order parameters
qe,exp (mg/g)
qe,cal (mg/g)
K2 (g/(mg min))
R2
512.6
515.5
0.00044
1
603.1
606.1
0.00016
0.99996
738.5
746.3
0.000044
0.9998
59.59
120.35
0.983
8.48
401.65
0.965
56.31
142.78
0.986
13.92
380.70
0.999
34.78
176.76
0.9855
5.748
557.37
0.980
525
Y. Sun et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 368 (2012) 521527
Table 3
Isotherm parameters for the removal of OTC by CLAC at different temperatures.
1.0
OTC
OTC
OTC
Parameters
Temperature (C)
19
35
50
Langmuir
qm (mg/g)
Kl (L/mg)
R2
869.57
0.1171
0.9993
1025.18
0.0791
0.9986
1340.82
0.0572
0.9989
Freundich
KF (mg/g (L/mg)1/n)
n
R2
433.31
8.791
0.9065
391.24
6.401
0.9136
293.92
3.820
0.938
Temkin
KT (L/mg)
B
R2
830.58
66.74
0.9395
36.30
102.62
0.9571
1.801
200.83
0.9798
0.8
Isotherms
0.6
0.4
OTC
-2
0.2
0.0
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
pH
DH (KJ/mol)
DS (J/mol K)
212.43
419.10
621.07
827.74
1040.67
1247.34
44.54
20.63
34.28
20.40
14.27
11.17
106.75
34.59
155.53
103.21
80.72
69.09
DG (KJ/mol)
292 K
308 K
323 K
13.44
10.20
11.38
9.92
9.40
9.09
11.50
10.75
13.03
10.95
10.35
9.91
10.15
9.02
16.28
13.18
11.94
11.26
C0 (mg/L)
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
2
10
12
Initial pH
Fig. 5. OTC chemistry and solution speciation (a), and pH-sorption prole of OTC
onto CLAC (b).
800
Table 4
Thermodynamic parameters for the uptake of OTC on CLAC calculated under standard
conditions.
700
600
NaNO3
500
CaCl2
400
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
C (mol/L)
Fig. 6. Effect of ion strength for the adsorption of OTC onto CLAC (C0 = 575 mg/L,
CLAC dosage = 0.6 g/L, pH = 3.03, temperature = 293 K, t = 24 h).
C Ad
Ce
DG RT ln K c
DS DH
ln K c
R
RT
Kc
8
9
10
526
Y. Sun et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 368 (2012) 521527
a
H+
OTC +00
OTC +0
H+
OTC +0
OTC +00
H+
OTC +00
OTC +0
H+
Adsorption
OTC +0
H+
H+
H+
H+
OTC +00
H+
H+
Adsorbent surface
Adsorbent surface
b
OTC +00
H+
OTC +0
OTC +
H+
OTC
OTC +0
OTC +0
H+
OHAdsorption
OH_
OTC +00
_
Adsorbent surface
OTC +0
_
Adsorbent surface
Fig. 7. Schematic diagrams for ion exchange and electrostatic attraction interactions between OTC and CLAC surface at pH below 4.8 (a) and at pH above 4.8 (b).
Y. Sun et al. / Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 368 (2012) 521527
electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, or hydrophobic attraction were responsible for the adsorption. It can also be seen that
the ionic strength from 0 to 0.01 mol/L led to a sharp decrease in
the OTC uptake and that the increase in ionic strength from 0.01 to
0.1 mol/L did not result in a signicant decrease in OTC adsorption.
This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that a certain amount
of surface interactions were in the form of outer sphere complexes,
and there was little change to the inner-sphere surface complexes
that also existed in the surface interactions when the ionic strength
increased. In addition, the effect of Ca2+ was more apparent than that
of Na+. This was because Ca2+ had more positive charge, thus exhibiting a higher inhibition of OTC adsorption than Na+.
527
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]