The "Group Statistics" table provides the means and standard deviations along with
precise information regarding the formation of the groups. The table also includes
the number of respondents that gave the test (N=31).
Group Statistics
Name of Restaurant
Variety in menu
Mean
Std. Deviation
Sukhdev
31
3.65
.950
.171
Haveli
31
3.45
.995
.179
Sukhdev
31
3.32
.871
.156
Haveli
31
2.97
.482
.087
31
3.42
.886
.159
money
31
3.26
.815
.146
31
3.29
.783
.141
Haveli
31
3.39
.803
.144
Sukhdev
31
3.48
.926
.166
Haveli
31
3.55
1.060
.190
Sukhdev
31
3.32
.979
.176
Haveli
31
3.35
.950
.171
Sukhdev
31
3.19
.873
.157
Haveli
31
3.84
1.003
.180
Sukhdev
31
3.19
.749
.135
offered
Haveli
31
2.97
.482
.087
Sukhdev
31
3.94
1.063
.191
Haveli
31
3.61
.989
.178
Sukhdev
31
3.90
1.012
.182
Haveli
31
3.65
.950
.171
Sukhdev
31
3.39
.919
.165
Haveli
31
3.10
.539
.097
Sukhdev
31
3.48
.926
.166
Haveli
31
3.45
.961
.173
Prices on menu
Haveli
Hygiene of food
Quality of service
Ambience in restaurant
Taste of food
Sig.
df
Mean
tailed) Difference
Std. Error
Difference
Difference
Lower
Upper
.393
.533 .783
60
.437
.194
.247
-.301
.688
.783 59.876
.437
.194
.247
-.301
.688
60
.052
.355
.179
-.003
.713
1.984 46.786
.053
.355
.179
-.005
.715
60
.459
.161
.216
-.271
.594
.746 59.589
.459
.161
.216
-.271
.594
60
.633
-.097
.201
-.500
.306
-.480 59.961
.633
-.097
.201
-.500
.306
60
.799
-.065
.253
-.570
.441
-.255 58.949
.799
-.065
.253
-.570
.441
assumed
Equal
variances not
assumed
Prices on menu Equal
variances
12.739
.001 1.984
assumed
Equal
variances not
assumed
Does the food
Equal
variances
money
assumed
1.199
.278 .746
Equal
variances not
assumed
Food Ingredients Equal
of the food
variances
.304
.583 -.480
assumed
Equal
variances not
assumed
Hygiene of food Equal
variances
1.665
.202 -.255
assumed
Equal
variances not
Null Hypothesis: The mean of both the variables are equal. For example
Tastes, variety of food and nutritional value of food of the two restaurants are
equal.
Alternate hypothesis:
It means that the means of the 2 restaurants are statistically significantly unequal
for all the variables. The confidence level is at 95% degree of freedom is 30. When
the p value is less than 0.05, the null hypotheses is rejected, and alternative
hypothesis is accepted. That is to say that the means of two restaurants are not
equal if the significant value is less than 0.05.
The analysis of the Group Statistics table shows that :
Variety in menu
Prices on menu
Does the food give value for money
Nutritive value of food offered
Restaurant serving time
Connectivity Via Road
Order serving time
Taste of food
Ambience in restaurant
A t-test for independent groups is useful when the same variable has been
measured in two independent groups and the researcher wants to know whether
the difference between group means is statistically significant. "Independent
groups" means that the groups have different people in them and that the people in
the different groups have not been matched or paired in any way. A t-test for related
samples or a t-test for dependent means is the appropriate test when the same
people have been measured or tested under two different conditions or when
people are put into pairs by matching them on some other variable and then placing
each member of the pair into one of two groups.
Sig.
Null
Hypothe
sis is
Interpret
ation
Variety in
menu
Prices on
menu
Food
Ingredients of
the food
Hygiene of
food
Quality of
service
Ambience in
restaurant
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
0.393
12.739
1.199
0.304
1.665
0.009
10.87
Accepte
0.533 d
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
0.001 Rejected
significa
nt
differenc
e
Accepte
0.278 d
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
Accepte
0.583 d
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
Accepte
0.202 d
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
Accepte
0.923 d
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
0.002 Rejected
significa
nt
differenc
e
Nutritive
value of food
offered
Restaurant
serving time
Connectivity
Via Road
Order serving
time
Taste of food
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
4.526
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
3.094
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
3.415
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
13.768
Equal variances
assumed
Equal variances
not assumed
0.018
0.038 Rejected
significa
nt
differenc
e
Accepte
0.084 d
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
Accepte
0.07 d
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
0 Rejected
Accepte
0.895 d
significa
nt
differenc
e
no
significa
nt
differenc
e
Null
Hypothesis
is
Variety in menu
0.7
83
0.7
83
0.437 Accepted
0.437 Accepted
Interpretation
no significant difference in
the mean values
no significant difference in
the mean values
Prices on menu
Does the food give
value for money
Food Ingredients of
the food
Hygiene of food
Quality of service
Ambience in
restaurant
1.9
84
1.9
84
0.7
46
0.7
46
0.4
8
0.4
8
0.2
55
0.2
55
0.1
32
0.1
32
2.7
02
2.7
02
1.4
11
1.4
11
1.2
37
1.2
37
1.0
35
1.0
35
1.5
17
1.5
17
0.459 Accepted
no significant difference
the mean values
no significant difference
the mean values
no significant difference
the mean values
no significant difference
the mean values
0.633 Accepted
no significant difference in
the mean values
0.633 Accepted
no significant difference in
the mean values
0.799 Accepted
no significant difference in
the mean values
0.799 Accepted
no significant difference in
the mean values
0.896 Accepted
no significant difference in
the mean values
0.896 Accepted
no significant difference in
the mean values
0.009 Rejected
0.052 Accepted
0.053 Accepted
0.459 Accepted
0.009 Rejected
0.163 Accepted
0.164 Accepted
0.221 Accepted
0.221 Accepted
0.305 Accepted
0.305 Accepted
0.135 Accepted
0.136 Accepted
in
in
in
in
Taste of food
0.1
35
0.1
35
0.893 Accepted
0.893 Accepted
no significant difference in
the mean values
no significant difference in
the mean values
We observe that there is no significant difference in the mean values of the two
distributions against all the measured parameters, except for the Ambience of
restaurant. Thus, if we get the ratings for a parameter other than Ambience of
restaurant in one restaurant, the corresponding ratings in the other restaurant can
be interpreted.