TSU
CHAPTER 3
DESIGN OF THE STUDY
The study in this report will primarily rely on the published literature including scientific papers,
technical reports and Internet WebPages about various traffic simulation models. The entire
evaluation will be conducted through two-steps: initial screening and in-depth evaluation. The
initial screening will generate a shorter but more specific list of traffic simulation models. The
in-depth evaluation of each model on the shorter list will eventually identify which model is
suitable for what part of ITS applications. The evaluation of traffic simulation models for ITS
development needs a series of criteria to be based upon. Key points within the criteria identify
user requirements that were included in the listed criteria. These requirements include
functionality, relevance, and ITS modeling ability. The following provides the criteria that will
be used in the 2-step process in this study.
3.1
A general research of traffic simulation models yielded more than 80 models. In order to screen
models with no potential for use with ITS applications, criteria for initial screening were
developed. Models were judged based on their ability to meet or be modified to meet these
standards. These criteria are listed as follows:
1.
2.
3.
The ability to output measures of performance such as travel times and speeds.
4.
5.
3.2
In-depth evaluation attempts to identify more specific features and limitations of models selected
from the initial screening process. The following criteria were established for in-depth
evaluation:
SWUTC/00/167602-1
1.
TSU
Must be capable of incorporating in the model the corresponding traffic devices such as
detectors, traffic lights, VMS, etc.
2.
Must also be able to imitate the functions of traffic devices, which includes providing the
specific traffic measurements at the required time intervals, increasing the phase timing in
a given amount of time and implementing a traffic calming strategy.
3.
4.
Must have the ability to model different traffic flow conditions at a higher level of detail
(e.g. uncongested, congested, and incident).
5.
Must simulate the variability in traffic demand in time and space, and model the
growth/interaction and decay of traffic queues, as well as capacity reductions due to
incidents and bottlenecks.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Must predict network flow patterns over the near and medium terms in response to
various contemplated information dissemination strategies.
10.
11.
Must have the ability to model both freeway and surface street traffic.
12.
In this evaluation, the most desirable model would encompass all the above criteria. However,
some of the features, although desirable, can be considered optional while others are strictly
essential. In Table 2, the criteria are rated based on their relative importance.
SWUTC/00/167602-1
TSU
Criterion
Importance
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Rating
**
**
****
****
****
****
****
***
****
****
****
**
1
2
Model
A1MSUN2
ANATOLL
Developer
Universitat Politechnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
ISIS and Centre dEtudes Techniques de lEquipment,
Classification
Integrated
ETC
3
4
5
6
7
ARCADY2
AUTOBAHN
AVENUE
CARSIM
CASIMIR
France
Department of Transport, UK
Benz Consult GMBH, France
Tokyo Metropolitan University, Japan
No available information
Institut National de Recherche sur lis Transports et la
Signal
Freeway
Signal
Signal
Signal
Securite,France
TRL and Mott McDonald
Integrated
Developer
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), USA
Classification
Integrated
CONTRAM
Table 3 Cont.
Model
CORSIM
SWUTC/00/167602-1
10
DRACULA
TSU
Integrated
UK
11
12
13
FLEXYT II
FOSIM
FREE VU
14
15
16
17
18
Signal
Freeway
Freeway
FRESIM
HIPERTRANS
HUTSIM
ICARUS
Integrated
Integrated
Signal
INTEGRATION
19
20
21
22
23
INTRAS
JAM
MELROSE
METROPOLIS
MICROSIM
24
25
26
27
MICSTRAN
MIMIC
M1TS1M
MIXIC
28
29
30
31
32
NEMIS
NETSIM
OLSIM
PADSIM
PARAMICS
33
34
35
PELOPS
PHAROS
PLANSIM-T
36
37
ROADSIM
SATURN
38
39
40
41
SHIVA
SIGSIM
SIMCO2
SIMDAC
Table 3. Cont.
Freeway
Signal
Signal
Integrated
Freeway
Signal
Signal
Safety
Integrated
Freeway
Integrated
Integrated
Freeway
Freeway
Integrated
Integrated
Signal
Freeway
Rural
Integrated
Other
Signal
Freeway
Freeway
SWUTC/00/167602-1
44
45
Model
SIMNET
SIMTRAFFIC
C1
SISTM
SITRA-B+
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
SITRAS
SIMARTAHS
SMARTPATH
SOUND
SPEACS
STEER
STREETSIM
TEXAS
TEXSIM
TRAFFICQ
TRANSIMS
TRGMSM
TRITRAM
59
60
61
63
64
65
THOREAU
UTSS
VEDENS
VISSIM
WATSIM
WEAVSIM
42
43
TSU
Developer
Technical University of Berlin, Germany
Trafficware, The Traffic Signal Software Company,
USA
Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, UK
ONERA Centre dEtudes et de Recherche de Toulouse,
France
University of New South Wales,, Wales
University of California Berkley, USA
University of California Berkley, USA
University of Tokyo, Japan
Prometheus Program, UK
Network Control Group at University of York, UK
Not Available
University of Texas, USA
Texas Transportation Institute, USA
MVA, USA
Los Alamos National Laboratory, USA
J. Wu and M. McDonald, USA
CSRIO and Roads and Traffic Authority of New South
Wales, Wales
MITRE Corporation, USA
Hong-Cha University, China
AEA Technology, USA
PTV System Software and Consulting GMBH, France
KLD Associates, USA
FHWA, USA
Classification
Freeway
Signal
Freeway
Integrated
Integrated
Unknown
Freeway
Integrated
Freeway
Freeway
Signal
Signal
Signal
Signal
Freeway
LRT
Free2way
Integrated
Signal
Integrated
Integrated
Integrated
ARTWORK
AUTOS
CORFLO
FREFLO
FREQ
KRONOS
METACOR
METANET
NETFLO 1
NETFLO 2
NET VACI
PASSER-II
No Available Data
Georgia Tech Research Institute, USA
Federal Highway Administration, USA
Federal Highway Administration, USA
No Available Data
No Available Data
No Available Data
Technical University of Munich, Germany
FHWA, USA
FHWA, USA
No Available Data
Texas Transportation Institute (TTI), USA
Traffic
Freeway
Integrated
Freeway
Freeway
Unknown
Unknown
Freeway
Signal
Signal
Unknown
Signal
SWUTC/00/167602-1
78
79
80
81
TSU
PASSER-IV
TRANSYT-7F
TRANSYT/10
TEXAS
TTI, USA
FHWA, USA
MVA, USA
University of Texas, USA
Signal
Signal
Signal
Signal
DYNAM1T
DYNEMO
DYNASMART
Integrated
Integrated
Integrated
1
X
Criteria
2
3
4
X X X
X
MICSTRAN
MIMIC
MITSIM
X
X
Criteria
3
4
X
X
X X
MIXIC
NEMIS
NETSIM
NETFLO
NETVACI
OLSIM
PADSIM
PARAMICS
PASSERII
PASSERIV
PELOPS
PHAROS
PLANSIM-T
ROADSIM
SATURN
SHIVA
SIGSIM
SIMCO2
SIMDAC
SIMNET
SIMTRAFFIC
SITRA B+
SITRAS
SMARTAHS
SMARTPATH
Model
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Model
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
Criteria
X
X
X
X
Model
5
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
x
x
Criteria
3 4
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X X
Criteria
Model
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
TRAFFICQ
TRANSIMS
TRANSYT7F
TRANSYT
10
VEDENS
VISSIM
WATSIM
WEAVSIM
1
X
x
x
Criteria
x
x
x
SWUTC/00/167602-1
TSU
1
KRONO
MELROSE
METACOR
METANET
METROPOL
MICROSIM
X
X
X
X
X
2
X
X
X
X
3
X
X
4
X
X
X
X
1
SOUND
SPEACS
STEER
STREETSIM
TEXAS
THOREAU
2
X
X
4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
VISSIM
PARAMICS
HUTSIM
X
X
X
X
X
FLEXYTII
INTEGRATION
CORSIM
CORFLO
CONTRAM
AIMSUN 2
X
X
X
X
X