Designers Responsibility
It is recommended that staggered splices are
only used when they are essential to the design
of a structure due to the complexity they add to
both the detailing and placement of the reinforcement. When they are required, it is the designers
responsibility to clearly define the staggered lap
Stagger Distance
Code Section
40 db minimum
Section 7.6.6.4
No length specified
Section 12.14.2.2
Mechanical or welded splices that do not meet the 1.25 yield strength
requirement.
24 in. minimum
Section 12.15.5.1
30 in. minimum
Section 12.15.6
Class A tension lap splices in columns where half or fewer of the bars
are spliced at any section.
d minimum
Section 12.17.2.2
No length specified
Section 12.17.4
d minimum
Section 19.4.12
With respect to Option 2, where is the stagger measured from? Is it from the end of the bars or centerline of
the spliced bars? The lap splice note in Figure 4 seemingly creates more confusion than providing clarity.
The designer also needs to clearly define how the lap
splice details apply to the structure in two ways.
1. Describe what elements need to be detailed with staggered lap splices - walls, slabs, beams, etc. This can
be done through a clarifying note next to the detail.
2. Describe how the lapped reinforcing bars within each
element are required to be staggered.
a. Is the stagger condition only required for lap splicing bars in a single parallel layer? This should be
clearly communicated through a graphical detail
similar to Figure 3.
b. Do lap splices in different layers within a single element have to stagger with respect to each other?
(An example of this condition would be the top and
bottom layers in a foundation mat or inside and
outside faces in a wall) This situation should be
clearly communicated through a graphical detail
similar to Figure 5.
Stckl [1972] studied the effect that different staggered lap splice configurations
had on the width of flexural cracks at the
ends of lap splices. Three configurations
of lap splice stagger tested by Stckl are
shown in Figure 8. Note that the staggered
lap splice layout in Figure 2(B) was studied
by Stckl, as shown in Figure 8(a). Transverse reinforcement in the region of the lap
splices may provide confinement and reduce
the crack width, but providing a gap between
the ends of the staggered lap splices is more
desirable, as shown in Figure 8(b).
Summary
References
(b) Avoiding superposition reduces crack width
Contributors: The principal authors of this publication are Robbie Hall, Greg Rohm, Michael
Ugalde, Anthony L. Felder, and Neal S. Anderson, with review by members of the CRSI Reinforcement Anchorages and Splices Committee.
Keywords: Contact, cracking, lap splice, reinforcing bar, stagger
Reference: Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute - CRSI [2013], Staggered Lap Splices, CRSI
Technical Note ETN-C-3-13, Schaumburg, Illinois, 4 pp.
Historical: None. New technical note
Note:This publication is intended for the use of professionals competent to evaluate the significance and limitations of its contents and who will accept responsibility for the application of the
material it contains. The Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute reports the foregoing material as a
matter of information and, therefore, disclaims any and all responsibility for application of the stated
principles or for the accuracy of the sources other than material developed by the Institute.