INTRODUCTION
Preslaughter stunning is conventionally used in the
European poultry industry to achieve the legal requirement of immobilizing and rendering birds insensible to
pain before death by exsanguination (Wask, 1955). However, stunning is not required (in the United Kingdom)
if slaughter is instantaneous, as with decapitation or dislocation of the neck. Electrical stunning is the most common
method used prior to slaughter in commercial poultry
plants. Although five types of electrical stunning systems
are available (Gregory, 1989), the most common system
is electrical water bath stunning (Bilgili, 1992). Although
electrical stunning is beneficial on a welfare basis, a number of downgrading conditions were observed in European Union (EU) countries when high electrical currents
were used (Harris and Carter, 1977; Gregory, 1987; Wilkins and Scott, 1987; Veerkamp, 1988; Wabeck, 1988;
Gregory and Wilkins, 1989a,b; Kettlewell and Hallworth,
1990). Gregory and Wilkins (1989a) found that some defects appeared to be affected by the level at which the
stunning current was applied. The incidence of shoulder
hemorrhages and red wing tips was highest between 111
1796
1797
Slaughter Procedures
Electrical Stunning. Electrical stunning was applied
using 80mA, 50Hz sinusoidal AC for 3 s. All birds were
stunned individually by being inverted on a shackle connected to ground and manually lowered into an electrified water bath. A constant current stunner2 was used
to provide sufficient current for stunning. Current and
voltage were measured with calibrated Fluke 8060A True
multimeters3, and cardiac function was measured with
a Mingograph 34 ECG meter4. On average, half of the
electrically stunned birds had ventricular fibrillation,
whereas the other half had normal rhythm. After stunning, birds were placed on a static shackling wire, and
then neck cutting was performed about 5 s after stunning.
Mechanical Stunning. A mushroom-headed, nonpenetrative captive bolt gun5 (Cash special), with 3-grain
brown, labeled, short super cash cartridges5, was used
to stun the birds. The birds were put into a bleeding cone
and shot on the head from behind. Immediately after
stunning, birds were killed using a full ventral neck cut.
The restrained birds were allowed to bleed in the cone,
whereas concussion-stunned, unrestrained birds were
moved to shackles after stunning and before neck cutting.
Bleedout. Birds were weighed 120 s after neck cutting
to determine blood loss. They were then passed through
a scalding tank (51 C, 2 min 40 s) and mechanical picker6
for 1 min 20 s, eviscerated, placed in an air chiller (1 C)
immediately after processing, and kept in the chiller for
24 h.
Filleting. Three hours after neck cutting, left breasts of
half of the birds (82) were manually deboned, vacuum-
Statistical Analysis
All data were analyzed using the Statsview package on
an Apple Macintosh computer. The significant differences
were found by using Statxact-3, chi-square, and ANOVA
tests. The experimental design was a 2 2 3 latin square.
Each treatment (concussive stun plus restraint, concussive stun with no restraint, or electrical stunning) was
applied on four separate occasions over a 2-d period,
giving four replications. Significant differences between
means were tested using Fisher PLSD and Scheffe F-test.
RESULTS
Downgrading Measurements
Broken Bones and Bone Hemorrhages. Electrically
stunned birds had a higher incidence of broken coracoid
KSOY ET AL.
GO
1798
Concussion
stunning
Electrical
stunning
Broken bones
Bone hemorrhages
Breast hemorrhages
Shoulder hemorrhages
Red wing tips
(n = 80)
8b
1b
3b
11a
31a
37a
20a
30a
1b
10b
(n = 85)
a,b
Numbers in the same row with no common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).
DISCUSSION
Broken Bones and Hemorrhages
The higher incidence of broken bones in the electrically
stunned group compared with the concussion-stunned
group showed that electrical stunning resulted in a higher
incidence of broken bones around the collar region. Similar results were found by Mohan Raj et al. (1992) when
electrical stunning, as practiced in the European Union
(EU), was compared with gas stunning. Such breaks to
the collar region are one of the most important problems
for the poultry industry because they contaminate the
final products with hemorrhages and bone splinters. It
follows that the short but severe tonic spasms during
Electrical stunning
Defect
Nonfibrillated
Fibrillated
40
45
Restrained
Unrestrained
40
40
(%)
Broken bones
Coracoid
Furculum
Hemorrhages
Scapula
Coracoid
Furculum
Nonbone breast muscle
hemorrhages
Appearance defects
Shoulder hemorrhages
Red wing tips
20.0
17.5
20.0
17.8
0
10.0
0
10.0
17.5
15.0
5
11.1
17.8
8.9
0
0
2.5
0
0
0
42.5
28.9
2.5
0
10.0
2.3
13.3
17.5
27.5
10.0
50.0
1799
Electrical stunning
Variable
Nonfibrillated
n
Blood loss, %
pH (10 min)
pH (24 h)
Shear value at 3 h postmortem
Shear value at 24 h postmortem
3.18a
6.48b
5.81
3.71a
2.72ab
Fibrillated
40
Restrained
45
(0.49)
(0.16)
(0.11)
(1.56)
(0.57)
2.69bc
6.66a
5.90
3.71a
2.99a
Unrestrained
40
(0.70)
(0.14)
(0.12)
(1.56)
(0.83)
2.81b
6.15b
5.89
2.80b
2.42b
40
(0.58)
(0.19)
(0.14)
(0.88)
(0.66)
2.49c
6.08c
5.86
2.79b
2.81ab
(0.56)
(0.23)
(0.13)
(0.82)
(0.77)
Numbers in the same row with no common superscript differ significantly (P < 0.05).
a,b,c
electrical current flow result in a higher incidence of broken bones and cause hemorrhages related to bone breaks
after EU electrical stunning. Mohan Raj et al. (1992) observed that tetanic convulsions that occurred during EU
electrical stunning had a detrimental effect on breast muscle. Super contractions during EU electrical stunning rupture blood vessels, causing a high incidence of breast
muscle hemorrhages (Hillebrand et al., 1996).
According to Gregory and Wilkins (1989a,b, 1990), red
wing tips can develop because of the flapping of wings
before death, stunning currents in the range of 110 to 150
mA per bird, poor bleeding, or harsh plucking in cardiacarrested birds. In our experiments, unrestrained, concussion-stunned birds had the highest incidence of red wing
tips; these birds were observed to show severe wing
flapping immediately after stunning and had the poorest
blood loss at exsanguination. Both these factors may have
contributed to the red wing tip condition.
Blood Loss
After neck cutting, chickens lose between 35 and 50%
of their total blood, which is about 4% of live weight
(Newell and Shaffner, 1950). In this experiment, birds lost
between 2.49 and 3.20% of their BW in a 2-min bleeding
time. Our results showed that electrically stunned, nonfibrillated birds had the highest blood loss (P < 0.05). This
result might be due to the effect of a beating heart during
bleeding. Concussion-only stunning had the lowest
bleed-out percentage, which agreed with results of Davis
and Coe (1954) in which mechanically stunned birds gave
the second poorest bleed-out of five methods used, including 1) single carotid artery and jugular vein cut, 2)
both carotid arteries and jugular veins cut, 3) beheading,
4) debraining, and 5) striking the head with a stick and
then both carotids and jugulars cut. Kotula and Helbacka
(1966) found that concussion-stunned birds (penetrative
captive bolt stunning) and birds slaughtered by a standard cut lost significantly more blood than birds electrically stunned using a head-only application. These differences might be the result of different mechanical stunning
methods used. In addition, our electrical stunning treatments were applied using a conventional water bath stunner, which necessarily involves passage of the stunning
current through the whole body of the bird.
pH and Texture
Muscular activity accelerates glycolysis, causing the accumulation of lactic acid in the muscle tissue and thus
lowering pH (Khan and Nakamura, 1970). In contrast,
EU electrical stunning delays postmortem glycolysis or
reduces early lactic acid accumulation because of the suppression of perimortem struggle (Papinaho et al., 1995).
Hot filleting of broilers has been found to cause increased
toughness in a large proportion of breasts; and 3 to 10 h
of postmortem aging was needed prior to breast muscle
removal for development of an adequate degree of tenderness (Lyon et al., 1985). Rapid chilling immediately
after slaughter may be associated with cold shortening
and tough meat (Smith et al., 1969).
In birds mechanically stunned, with or without restraint and filleted at 3 h postmortem, breast muscle texture was significantly better in comparison to fillets from
electrically stunned birds, both fibrillated and unfibrillated. When filleting was carried out at 24 h postmortem,
these differences were less evident. The lower pH values
10 min after slaughter in the mechanically stunned group,
with or without restraint, indicate an earlier development
of rigor, possibly caused by the observed long-term convulsions, than in the electrically stunned group, both fibrillated and nonfibrillated. Early rigor development in
mechanically stunned birds would avoid any cold- or
nontension-induced toughening and thus allow earlier
filleting than is currently practiced in the United
Kingdom.
CONCLUSION
Concussion stunning of poultry resulted in improved
carcass and meat quality relative to EU electric stunning
conditions. However, bleed-out rate was not as fast as
that of the EU electrically stunned, normal rhythm group.
Concussion-stunned birds had less broken or dislocated bones than the electrically stunned birds, which was
associated with fewer hemorrhages. Hence, this method
could reduce downgrading problems. A further advantage would appear to be an earlier onset of rigor and
tenderization of the meat, which would allow earlier deboning, saving on chiller space.
KSOY ET AL.
GO
1800
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The first author would like to thank Adnan Menderes
University, Aydin-Turkey, for support of graduate studies, thus enabling these studies to be carried out.
REFERENCES
Bilgili, S. F., 1992. Electrical stunning of broilersBasic concepts
and carcass quality implications: A review. J. Appl. Poult.
Res. 1:135146.
Blackmore, D. K., 1979. Nonpenetrative percussion stunning of
sheep and calves. Vet. Rec. 20:372375.
Daly, C., N. G. Gregory, and S. B. Wotton, 1987. Captive bolt
stunning of cattle: Effects of brain function and role of bolt
velocity. Br. Vet. J. 143:574580.
Davis, L. L., and M. E. Coe, 1954. Bleeding of chickens during
the killing operations. Poultry Sci. 33:616619.
Gregory, N. G., 1987. Turkey slaughtering. Turkeys 35(4):19.
Gregory, N. G., 1989. Stunning and slaughter. Pages 3163 in:
Poultry Processing, G. C. Mead ed. Elsevier Applied Sci.,
London, UK.
Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins, 1989a. Effect of stunning
current on carcass quality in chickens. Vet. Rec. 124:530532.
Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins, 1989b. Effect of slaughter
method on bleeding efficiency in chickens. J. Sci. Agric.
47:1320.
Gregory, N. G., and L. J. Wilkins, 1990. Broken bones in chickens:
Effects of stunning and processing in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci.
31:5358.
Gregory, N. G., L. J. Wilkins, S. D. Eleperuma, A. J. Ballantyne,
and N. D. Overfield, 1990. Broken bones in domestic fowls:
Effect of husbandry system and stunning method in end-oflay hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:5969.
Gregory, N. G., and B. S. Wotton, 1990. Comparison of neck
dislocation and percussion of the head on visual evoked
responses in the chickens brain. Vet. Rec. 126:570572.
Harris, E., and T. Carter, 1977. Broiler blood losses with manual
and mechanical killers. Poultry Sci. 56:18271831.
Hillebrand, S.J.W., E. Lambooy, and C. H. Veerkamp, 1996.
The effect of alternative electrical and mechanic stunning
methods on haemorrhaging and meat quality of broiler breast
and thigh muscles. Poultry Sci. 75:664671.
Kettlewell, P., and N. Hallworth, 1990. Electrical stunning of
chickens. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 47:139151.
Khan, A. W., and R. Nakamura, 1970. Effects of pre- and postmortem glycolysis on poultry tenderness. J. Food Sci.
35:266267.
Kotula, A. W., and N. V. Helbacka, 1966. Blood retained by
chicken carcasses and cut-up parts as influenced by slaughter
method. Poultry Sci. 45:404410.
Lyon, C. E., D. Hamm, and J. E. Thomson, 1985. PH and tenderness of broiler breast meat deboned various times after chilling. Poultry Sci. 64:307310.
Mohan Raj, A. B., N. G. Gregory, and L. J. Wilkins, 1992. Survival
rate and carcass downgrading after the stunning with carbon
dioxide-argon mixtures. Vet. Rec. 130:325328.
Newell, G. W., and C. S. Shaffner, 1950. Blood loss by chickens
during killing. Poultry Sci. 29:271275.
Papinaho, P. A., D. L. Fletcher, and R. J. Buhr, 1995. Effect of
electrical stunning amperage and peri-mortem struggle on
broiler breast rigor development and meat quality. Poultry
Sci. 74:15331539.
Smith, M. C., Jr., M. D. Judge, and W. J. Stadleman, 1969. A
cold shortening effect in avian muscle. J. Food Sci. 34:4246.
Veerkamp, C. H., 1988. What is the right current to stun and
kill broilers. Poult.-Misset June/July:3031.
Wabeck, C., 1988. How stunning affects product quality. Poult.
Int. February:4852.
WASK, 1955. The Welfare of Animals (Slaughter or Killing)
Regulations. MAFF, U.K.
Wilkins, L. J., and C. A. Scott, 1987. The effect of stunning on
poultry carcass quality. Meat Hygienist December:3132.