Scanners
Donna M. Stevens, MS
Imaging Physics Department
Diagnostic Imaging Division
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas
Water
$$$$$$
Structural loading
Shielding
2
Project Planning
Neighboring spaces
An administrator
administrators office is adjacent to a CT scan
room. The administrator sits 4m from the scanner.
How much shielding is required?
:FJCQW
9C
7G
6Q
Workload estimate
-UGE CUJFQH
3 mm Pb
Neighboring spaces
MECHANICALMechanical
Preliminary Information
CT Control
CT Scan
Tech Corridor
1
2
'
2
'
Scanner Location
Workload Estimates
10
Barrier Determination
11
12
CTDI Method
CTDI Method
Pitch = table/beam
Beam width: Tb or (nT
(nT))
Rotation time
Peripheral CTDI100
measure (can scale by kVp2)
Look on ImPACT website
= x
L
p
mAs/Rotation
Scan kV
CTDI kV
13
CTDI Method
9x10-5 cm-1
3x10-4 cm-1
14
ImPACT (the UK
UKs CT
evaluation center)
15
16
W, in mA*min
mA*min per week
!
Determine weekly exp at shielded point
Pay attention to
Where:
(body)
Beam width
kVp and mAs
phantom
17
18
2.1 m
Question
21
Method
Example
180 Procedures/week
L= 60cm + 0.4*30cm
L= 1.4 * 15cm
13.0
13.0 (4.2 m) ceiling height (finished floor to
finished floor)
Dsec= 3.7m
GE LightSpeed 16
22
24
Protocols
Head
Body
kVp
mA
120
240
120
265
0.938
20
Head
18.75
CTDIVol
DLP
(mGy)
Scan Length
(L, cm)
(mGy-cm)
60
20
1200
Body
15
Abdomen
25
Pelvis
25
35
525
25
625
20
500
Body
(Chest, Abdomen,
or Pelvis)
MDACC Imaging Physics
25
26
30 head procedures/wk
150 body procedures/wk
Dsec= 4.2 m + 0.5 m 1 m = 3.7 m
550
28
Ksec * T
P = Maximum permissible weekly exposure
T = Occupancy Factor
0.02 mGy
29
3.37 mGy * 1
= 5.9x10-3
30
Existing Shielding
Transmission
1.00E-01
1.00E-02
5.9x10-3
1.00E-03
1.00E-04
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
1.37
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
mmThickness (mm)
Lead
31
1.00E+00
Existing Shielding
9x10-2
1.00E-02
1.00E-03
1.00E-04
0.0
50.0
53 mm
100.0
150.0
200.0
250.0
Concre te (mm)
= 1.37 mm 0.45 mm
1.00E+00
= 0.9 mm
Transmission
Transm ission
1.00E-01
32
1.00E-01
9x10-2
Round up to 1/16
1/16 Pb
1.00E-02
1.00E-03
1.00E-04
0.0
0.5
0.45 mm
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Answer:
Comparison of Methods
DLP
YES!!!
34
CTDI100
NCRP 147
Scatter plot
K1sec @ 1m
4.5
42
2.0
101
Body
2.9
95
Weekly
kerma
@ 3.7m
3.37
7.53
7.11
Total Barrier
(mm Lead)
1.4
1.7
1.7
36
Acceptable exposures
outside of this line
Ceiling Considerations
0.5 m aff
8th floor
Lead
Lead
Lead
Lead
Drop Ceiling
12'
9
7th floor
Led
7th floor
1/8 Lead
Acceptable exposures
outside of this line
1/8
Lead
6th floor
1/16 lead
@ 11 AFF
Pb behind penetrations
CT
Attended
waiting
Driveway
Current kerma in
labs OK, but close
to limit
New PET-CT
New PETPET-CT to be
added adj to
existing CT
MDACC Imaging Physics
Lab space
47
Existing CT
New PET-CT
48
Thank you!
Acknowledgements:
Jeff Shepard
Bud Wendt
49