LIST OF TABLES

TABLE 2.1: Some facts concerning tires in USA

(Rubber Manufacturers Association, 2000)
TABLE 2.2: Shredded tires and their approximate cost range
(Hammer 2004)
TABLE 2.3: Compressive strength of concrete with rubber aggregates
TABLE 2.4: Splitting Tensile strength of C 20 Type Concrete with addition of rubber chips
(Topcu, 1995)
TABLE 3.1 Mixing Design Used for Concrete Samples
TABLE 3.2: Permeability Test Results of PRC
TABLE 3.3: Compressive Strength Results of PRC
TABLE 3.4: Flexural Strength Results of PRC

10
10
12
14
26
33
35
36

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE 2.1: Typical Pervious Concrete Pavement Section

FIGURE 3.1: Theoretical Framework
FIGURE 3.2: Scrap Tire Chips Aggregates
FIGURE 3.3: Gravel Aggregates
FIGURE 3.4: Weight Percentage of each Component
FIGURE 3.5: Sample formworks for Flexural Strength Test Sample
FIGURE 3.6: Concrete Samples for Compressive Strength Test with their Formworks
FIGURE 3.7: Primary Set-up of the Permeability Test Method
FIGURE 3.8: Concrete Sample at Compressive Strength Test
FIGURE 3.9: Concrete Sample at Flexural Strength Test
FIGURE 3.10: Effects of Tire Chips on PRC Relative to Hydraulic Conductivity
FIGURE 3.11: Effects of Tire Chips on PRC Relative to Compressive Strength
FIGURE 3.12: Effects of Tire Chips on PRC Relative to Flexural Strength
FIGURE 3.12a: At Normal Condition
FIGURE 3.12b: Slab curling downward
FIGURE 3.12c: Slab curling upward
FIGURE 3.13: Coefficient of Thermal Expansion Values in different Types of Concrete
FIGURE 3.14 Fitted Line: Hydraulic Conductivity versus Rubber Content Percentage
(Linear Model)
FIGURE 3.15 Fitted Line: Compressive Strength versus Rubber Content Percentage
(Linear Model)
FIGURE 3.16 Fitted Line: Flexural Strength versus Rubber Content Percentage
(Linear Model)
FIGURE 3.17 Fitted Line: Hydraulic Conductivity versus Rubber Content Percentage
(Cubic Model)
FIGURE 3.18 Fitted Line: Compressive Strength versus Rubber Content Percentage
(Cubic Model)
FIGURE 3.19 Fitted Line: Compressive Strength versus Rubber Content Percentage
(Cubic Model)

5
23
24
24
25
26
27
29
30
31
33
35
37
38
39
39
38
41
42
43
44
45
46