SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
482
FIRST DIVISION.
483
483
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015699c1481f4c4edf6b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
1/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
484
2/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
considered,
judgment
is
hereby
SO ORDERED.
78.
2
Ibid.
Ibid.
485
3/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
CA Rollo, p. 83.
Id., at p. 100.
10
Id., at p. 113.
486
486
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015699c1481f4c4edf6b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
Sheriff IV
4/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
11
Sheriff IV
THRU
:
PROVINCIAL SHERIFF
GREETINGS:
_______________
11
Rollo, p. 24.
12
487
5/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
488
6/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
amount deposited to the Office of the Clerk of Court VI, RTC, Pili,
Camarines Sur by defendant Luisa Briones so that the mortgage
may now be deemed released or cancelled.
That until this time the said plaintiff[s] failed and or did not
bother to withdraw the said amount deposited by defendant Luisa
Briones despite letter of advice and the alias writ of execution
having been personally received by them.
Cadlan, Pili, Camarines SurSeptember 9, 1997.
For the Clerk of Court and
ExOfficio Sheriff
by:
(signed)
EDDIE M. ROSERO13
Sheriff IV
Rollo, p. 27.
489
489
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015699c1481f4c4edf6b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
February 23, 2000.
7/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
17
Rollo, p. 28.
15
Id., at p. 30.
16
Id., at p. 31.
17
Id., at p. 36.
18
Id., at p. 37.
490
490
SO ORDERED.
2000, DENYING
CLARIFICATORY
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015699c1481f4c4edf6b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
8/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
Rollo, p. 42.
20
Id., at p. 43.
21
Id., at p. 8.
491
491
the highest Court of the land. The only recognized exceptions are
the correction of clerical errors or the making of socalled nunc pro
tunc entries which cause no22prejudice to any party, and, of course,
where the judgment is void.
9/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
Nual vs. Court of Appeals, 221 SCRA 26, 32 (1993), citing Manning
492
10/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
Supplied) .
24
Ibid.
493
493
11/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
494
494
12/13
8/18/2016
SUPREMECOURTREPORTSANNOTATEDVOLUME450
27
495
SO ORDERED.
Davide, Jr. (C.J., Chairman), Quisumbing, Ynares
Santiago and Carpio, JJ., concur.
Petition dismissed.
Note.It is well settled that after the decision has
become final and executory it can no longer be amended or
corrected by the court except for clerical errors or mistakes.
(Jose Clavano, Inc. vs. Housing and Land Use Regulatory
Board, 378 SCRA 172 [2002])
o0o
Copyright2016CentralBookSupply,Inc.Allrightsreserved.
http://central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000015699c1481f4c4edf6b003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False
13/13