ZTE UMTS Network Planning Report For Etisalat 3G Project

ZTE UMTS Radio Network Planning
Report for Etisalat 3G Project
Annex1.1 TABLEOFCONTENTS
ZTEUMTSRadioNetworkPlanningReportforEtisalat3GProject....................
1
OVERVIEW..................................................................................................................1
NETWORK PLANNING PROCEDURE.............................................................................2
3
3.1
3.2
SYSTEM REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS..............................................................................3

TrafficForecast...................................................................................................................3
InputParameters...............................................................................................................3
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
COVERAGE PLANNING................................................................................................6
CoveragePlanningProcess................................................................................................6
Propagationmodel............................................................................................................7
LinkBudgetProcess...........................................................................................................7
5
5.1
5.2
CAPACITY ESTIMATION PROCESS.............................................................................10

CapacityEstimationProcess............................................................................................10
CapacityAnalysisResults.................................................................................................10
6
6.1
SITES DISTRIBUTION.................................................................................................11
SitesDistribution.............................................................................................................11
7
7.1
7.2
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.2.4
7.2.1
7.3
7.3.1
7.3.2
7.3.3
7.3.4
7.3.5
7.4
7.4.1
7.4.2
7.4.3
7.4.4
7.4.5
SIMULATION..............................................................................................................13
IntroductionoftheSimulation........................................................................................13
SimulationResultsforKabul............................................................................................15
BestServer.......................................................................................................................15
PilotStrength...................................................................................................................15
PilotEc/Io........................................................................................................................17
PilotPollution..................................................................................................................18
EffectiveHSDPAserviceRate...........................................................................................19
SimulationResultsforKandahar.....................................................................................19
BestServer.......................................................................................................................19
PilotStrength...................................................................................................................20
PilotEc/Io........................................................................................................................22
PilotPollution..................................................................................................................23
SimulationResultsforJalalabad......................................................................................24
BestServer.......................................................................................................................24
PilotStrength...................................................................................................................25
PilotEc/Io.........................................................................................................................27
PilotPollution..................................................................................................................28
ZTEConfidentialProprietary
2010ZTECorporation.Allrightsreserved.
SUMMARY.................................................................................................................29
Annex1.2 TABLES
Table1
Table2
Table3
Table4
Table5
Table6
Table7
Table8
Table9
Table10
Table11
Table12
Table13
Table14
Table15
Table16
Table17
NodeBNumberofthe7cities...........................................................................................1
SubscriberNumber.............................................................................................................3
TrafficModel.......................................................................................................................3
Inputparameters................................................................................................................4
PropagationModelforDifferentClutterType....................................................................7
UplinkbudgetprocessCS12.2K.........................................................................................8
DownlinkbudgetprocessCS12.2K....................................................................................8
CellRadiusfromcoverage..................................................................................................9
PilotStrengthStatistics.....................................................................................................16
PilotEc/IoStatistics..........................................................................................................17
PilotPollutionStatistics....................................................................................................18
PilotEc/IoStatistics..........................................................................................................22
PilotEc/IoStatistics...........................................................................................................27
Annex1.3 FIGURES
Figure1Radionetworkplanningworkflow...............................................................................................2
Figure2Coverageplanningprocess..........................................................................................................6
Figure4SitesdistributionofKabul..........................................................................................................11
Figure5SitesdistributionofKandahar...................................................................................................12
Figure6SitesdistributionofJalalabad....................................................................................................13
Figure7ThePatternsoftheAntennas....................................................................................................14
Figure8BestServer.................................................................................................................................15
Figure9PilotStrength.............................................................................................................................16
Figure10PilotEc/Io.................................................................................................................................17
Figure11PilotPollution..........................................................................................................................18
Figure12EffectiveHSDPAserviceRate...................................................................................................19
Figure13BestServer...............................................................................................................................20
II
Figure14PilotStrength...........................................................................................................................21
Figure15PilotEc/Io.................................................................................................................................22
Figure18BestServer...............................................................................................................................25
Figure19PilotStrength...........................................................................................................................26
Figure20PilotEc/Io..................................................................................................................................27
III
OVERVIEW
2ndgenerationsystemslikeGSM,wereoriginallydesignedforefficientdeliveryofvoice
services.UMTSnetworksare,onthecontrary,designedfromthebeginningforflexible
deliveryofanytypeofservice,whereeachnewservicedoesnotrequireparticularnetwork
optimisation.Inadditiontotheflexibility,theWCDMAradiosolutionbringsadvanced
capabilitiesthatenablenewservices.Suchcapabilitiesare:
y
Highbitratestheoreticallyupto2Mbpsin3GPPRelease99,andbeyond10Mbps
in3GPPRelease5;
Lowdelayswithpacketroundtriptimesbelow200ms;
Seamlessmobilityalsoforpacketdataapplications;
QualityofServicedifferentiationforhighefficiencyofservicedelivery;
Simultaneousvoiceanddatacapability;
InterworkingwithexistingGSM/GPRSnetworks.
Thepurposeoftheradionetworkplanningistoachievetherequirednumberofsitesand
sitesconfigurations,whichfulfillstherequirementsofcoverage,capacityandqualitybased
onthefrequencyresources,equipmentperformanceandeconomicfactors.
TheIslamicRepublicofAfghanistanisalandlockedandmountainouscountryin
southcentralAsia.ThisreportpresentstheUMTSnetworkdimensioningprocessand
simulationresultof7cities.Thesitenumbersof7citiesareshownasfollowed:
Table 1
Province
Capital
NodeBNumber
Kabul
Kabul
97
Nangarhar
Jalalabad
32
Qandahar
Kandahar
38
Ghazni
Ghazni
14
Parwan
Charikar
Wardak
MeydanShahr
Laghman
MehtarLam
Total
NodeBNumberofthe7cities
190
NETWORK PLANNING PROCEDURE

ZTEadoptsanetworkplanningstrategyofHolisticplanning,constructionbystages,and
makesmostuseofoperatorspresentnetworkresourcestogetmostvaluablereturnwith
leastinvestment.
ThedestinationofHolisticplanningistobuildabestnetworkquickly.constructionby
stagesisanimportantmethodtoguaranteethisdestination.Thefirstphaseistosolvethe
problemofcoverage.Thecoverageinfirstphaseshouldachievethefinalcoveragetargetof
networkplanningaspossibleascan.Thenextphasesaretoexpandthenetworkcapacity
smoothly.Itisalsoacontinuousoptimizationprocesstoensurethenetworkkeepingitsbest
stateofcoverage,capacityandservice.
ZTEfollowsthefollowingworkflowforradionetworkplanning:
Requirement Analysis
Propagation Model
Testing and Tuning
Propagation Model
Number of
Sites
Dimension Estimation
Site
Selection
Site Survey
Site Deployment
Simulation
Site Adjusting
N
Network Planning Report
Figure 1 Radio network planning workflow
Astheabovepictureshows,thewholeradionetworkplanningprocessisverycomplicated
andcontainsaworkloopoftesting,analysisandoptimization.Inthisdocument,wemainly
focusonthepreplanningpartwhichincludesrequirementanalysis,propagationmodel
testing,dimensionestimation,siteselectionandsimulation.
SYSTEM REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS
3.1
Traffic Forecast
FollowingistheSubscriberNumberinthisproject.
SubscriberNumber
Table 2
City
SubscriberNumber
Noofsites
userspersite
Totalusers
Kabul
75249
97
1500
145500
Nangarhar
15541
32
1500
48000
Qandahar
7895
38
1500
57000
Ghazni
7537
14
1500
21000
Parwan
5854
1500
6000
Wardak
2387
1500
3000
Laghman
3996
1500
4500
Thetrafficmixinthisprojectisasfollows(AsforR99Service,itsnotbeconsidered
accordingtoETsreqirement)
Table 3
Service
ErlPeruser
TrafficModel
QOS
PenetrationRate
CS12.2
0.02
2%
100%
CS64
0.002
2%
10%
HSDPA
DataThroughputPerUser[kbps]
3.6
HSUPA
PenetrationRate
20%
DataThroughputPerUser[kbps]
0.9
PenetrationRate
20%
HSDPA online users simultaneously per site: 12

HSUPA online users simultaneously per site: 12
Soft HO ratio: 30%
3.2
Input Parameters
Thenecessaryinputparametersforcoverageandcapacityestimationarelistedhere,and
theirexplanationcouldbereferredinthefollowingchapter.
Inputparameters
Table 4
Parameter
Value
Spectrumband(UpLink)
19201980
MHz
Spectrumband(DownLink)
21102170
MHz
GOS:AirInterface
2%
DesiredvoicevocoderTypes
12.2
kbps
DesiredSoftHandOffPercentage
30%
DesiredNODEBAntennaHeight
DenseUrban
25
Urban
25
Suburban
30
Desired Cell Area Coverage

ConfidenceLevelforvoiceandvideo 95%
Desired Cell Area Coverage

ConfidenceLevelforData
95%
Desiredseamlesscoverageservice
CS12.2k
PenetrationLoss:
DenseUrban
20
dB
Urban
15
dB
Suburban
12
dB
CoverageCriteria
DenseUrban
Indoor
Urban
Indoor
SubUrban
Indoor
OrthogonalityFactor
0.65
AntennaGain
18
dBi
UENoiseFigure
dB
BodyLoss
Voice
dB
Video
dB
Data
dB
Unit
MobileTransmitPower
24
dBm
FrequencySpectrumAvailable
MHz,FDD
Lognormalstandarddeviation
DU
10
dB
Urban
dB
SubUrban
dB
Propagationmodel
Cost231Hata
ChannelTypes(ITU)
DenseUrban
TU3
Urban
TU3
SubUrban
TU50
NodeBCableLoss
CellLoadingDL
75%
CellLoadingUL
50%
dB
4
4.1
COVERAGE PLANNING
Coverage Planning Process
Figure 2 Coverage planning process
Thecoverageestimationprocessisasfollows:
PLu,PLd,PLpfromLinkbudget
Continuousservicesinuplink,downlink,andPCPICHsmaxallowablepathlossbylink
budget;
C=max(PLu,PLd,PLp)
Maximumoneoftheaboveuplink,downlinkandPCPICHsresult;
R=propagationmodel(C):
Cellradiusfrompathlossbasedonpropagationmodel;
OneNodeBscoveringacreage;
NodeBnumber=Totalacreage/E
4.2
Propagation model
Thepropagationmodeldescribestheaveragesignalpropagationincertainenvironment.It
oftendenotesthepathlossasafunctionofdistanceoftheseparationbetweenthe
transmitterandthereceiver.ZTEproposetoadoptStandardMacroCellModel,whichis
supportedbythesimulationsoftwareEnterprise,Aircom,withthefollowingformulas:
Pathloss =k1+k2log(d)+k3(Hms)+k4log(Hms)+k5log(Heff)+k6log(Heff)log(d)+k7Diffn
+C_loss
here:
d
Distancefromthebasestationtothemobilestation(km).
Hms
Heightofthemobilestationaboveground(m).
Heff
EffectiveNodeBantennaheight(m).
Diffn DiffractionlosscalculatedusingeitherEpstein,Peterson,DeygoutorBullington
Equivalentknifeedgemethods.
k1
Intercept
k2
Slope
k3,k4Correctionfactorofmobileantennaheight
k5,k6CorrectionfactorofeffectiveAntennaHeight
k7
Correctionfactorofdiffraction.
C_loss Correctionfactorofdifferentcluttertype.
Thepropagationmodelcanbetunedbyapplyingamathematicalfittingalgorithmtothe
rawdatacollectedfromdrivetestthusthatthemostproperkfactorscanbededuced.
ForthisUMTSpreplanningprojectofEcuador,currentlynopropagationmodeltestingand
tuningisperformed,thusZTEselectthepropagationmodelsaccordingtotheclutter
distributionandthesitedistanceoftheexistingWCDMAsites,whichareshownbelow
(HerewedividedtheplanningareaintoDenseurban,UrbanandSuburban).
Table 5
4.3
K1
PropagationModelforDifferentClutterType
K2
K3
K4
K5
K7
K6
DenseUrban
158.16
44.9
13.82
6.55
Urban
156.36
44.9
13.82
6.55
Suburban
150.16
44.9
13.82
6.55
Link Budget Process

Thelinkbudgetbetweentheuplinkanddownlinkisdifferent,becausetherearesome
parametershavedifferentvaluesbetweendownlinkanduplink,suchastransmitpower,
Eb/No,receiverNoiseFigureetc.
WCDMAisanuplinkcoveragelimitedsystem,generallyonlyuplinkbudgetistakeninto
consideration.
Thetablebelowisagenerallinkbudgetprocess:
UplinkbudgetprocessCS12.2K
Table 6
UE
NodeB
Margin
Outdoor
Indoor
Parameter
DU
MU
TxPower[dBm]
24
24
24
AntennaGain[dBi]
BodyLoss[dB]
EIRP[dBm]
21
21
21
ThermalNoiseDensity[dMm/HZ]
174
174
174
ThermalNoise[dBm]
108.16
108.16
108.16
ReceiverNoiseFigure[dB]
1.8
1.8
1.8
ReceiverNoise[dBm]
106.36
106.36
106.36
BitRate[kbit/s]
12.2
12.2
12.2
RequiredEb/No[dB]
4.2
4.2
4.8
ReceiverSensitivity[dBm]
127.14
127.14
126.54
InterferenceMargin[dB]
3.01
3.01
3.01
FeederandConnectorLoss(dB)
2.8
2.8
3.1
TMAgain(Optional)[dB]
AntennaGain[dBi]
18
18
18
ReceiverEconAntenna(dB)
139.33
139.33
138.43
FastFadingMargin[dB]
1.8
1.8
OutdoorShadowFadingMargin[dB]
6.66
4.70
3.85
IndoorShadowFadingMargin[dB]
7.16
5.11
3.95
Penetration Loss[dB]
20
15
12
MaxAllowableOutdoorPathLoss[dB]
151.87
153.83
155.58
OutdoorCoverageCellRadius[km]
2.31
2.95
5.41
MaxAllowableIndoorPathLoss[dB]
131.37
138.42
143.47
IndoorCoverageCellRadius[km]
0.62
1.09
2.45
Table 7
SU
DownlinkbudgetprocessCS12.2K
Parameter
NodeB
UE
Margin
DU
33
33
33
FeederandConnectorLoss(dB)
2.8
2.8
3.1
AntennaGain[dBi]
18
18
18
EIRP[dBm]
48.2
48.2
47.9
ThermalNoiseDensity[dMm/HZ]
174
174
174
ThermalNoise[dBm]
108.16
108.16
108.16
ReceiverNoiseFigure[dB]
ReceiverNoise[dBm]
101.16
101.16
101.16
BitRate[kbit/s]
12.2
12.2
12.2
ProcessGain[dB]
24.98
24.98
24.98
RequiredEb/No[dB]
7.5
7.5
7.9
ReceiverSensitivity[dBm]
118.64
118.64
118.24
InterferenceMargin[dB]
3.01
BodyLoss[dB]
ReceiverEconAntenna(dB)
109.64
109.64
110.33
FastFadingMargin[dB]
Outdoor Shadow Fading Margin 5.16

[dB]
3.20
2.35
IndoorShadowFadingMargin[dB]
5.66
3.61
2.45
Penetration Loss[dB]
20
15
12
154.64
157.78
3.11
6.25
Max Allowable Indoor Path Loss 132.18

[dB]
139.23
145.67
IndoorCoverageCellRadius[km]
1.15
2.83
OutdoorCoverageCellRadius[km]
Table 8
Coverage
2.44
0.65
CellRadiusfromcoverage
DU
MU
SU
CellRadius(km)
0.62
1.09
2.45
DistanceofSite(km)
0.93
1.63
3.67
SU
TxPower[dBm]
Max Allowable Outdoor Path Loss 152.68

Outdoor [dB]
Indoor
MU
5
5.1
CAPACITY ESTIMATION PROCESS

Capacity Estimation Process
Figu
re3CapacityEstimationProcess
Step1:inputtrafficmodel,andotherparameterswhichareneglectedhere,likehandover
percentage,Eb/No,etc.Setaninitialnumber(generallyfrom1).
Step2:calcualtetheuplinkanddownlinkinterferenceload,consumeddownlinkpowerby
allservices.
Step3:comparetheaboveresultwiththeirrespectivethreshold.Ifalltheresultsareunder
thethresholds,thenmoveonthenextstep;ifanyoneofthemisnot,increasesubs/siteand
returntostep2.
Step4:usetheabovesubs/siteandtotalforecastsubsnumber,tocalculatethesitenumber.
5.2
Capacity Analysis Results

Withthetrafficmodelandforecastedsubscribernumber,wecouldworkoutthatthe
coveragesitesnumberscansatisfythecapacityrequirement.Sointhisproject,thesitesare
limitedbycoveragerequirements.
10
SITES DISTRIBUTION
6.1
Sites Distribution
Whenweplanthesitelocation,weconsiderthecoveragerequirementand2Gsites
asamainfactor.Thesitedistributionisasfollows:
Figure 4 Sites distribution of Kabul
11
Figure 5 Sites distribution of Kandahar
12
Figure 6 Sites distribution of Jalalabad
7
7.1
SIMULATION
Introduction of the Simulation
AIRCOM Enterprise V6.2 is the simulation tool ZTE adopted for this project. AIRCOM
Enterprise is the market leading network planning tool for the design and operation of
GSM/UMTS/CDMAcellularnetworks.
Antenna: ThisAntennaisadoptedinthesimulation.Thepatternsoftheantennasareprovided
asfollows:
AntennaGain:18dBi
13
Horizontal Vertical
Figure 7 The Patterns of the Antennas
Digital Map: Theresolutionofthedigitalmapusedinthesimulationis20m,PLANETformat.

The explanation for the deviation of simulation:
Networksimulation,whichisusedtopredicttheperformanceofwirelessnetwork,canbethe
validationandreferenceforplanningscheme.However,becausesimulationdataisnotthedrive
test data obtained from the real network, there are some deviations between the simulation
resultandactualtestingresult.Thefactorsthatcouldresultinthedeviationbetweenthemare
listedasfollows:
y
Thecomplexityofradiopropagationenvironment;propagationfeatureshasgreatdifference
indifferentenvironment;
Approximate prediction methods are used in simulation system, which can leads to the
deviationbetweenthem;
Engineeringqualityalsocouldleadtothesimulationdeviation;
Trafficspreadinsimulationisdifferentfromtheloadinginthepracticalnetwork;
Changesinbuildingsdevelopmentbroughtaboutbyfasteconomicprogresstookplaceafter
the purchase of digital map, the new changes cannot be reflected in the digitalmap; and
14
thereisnoexactbuildingheightinthedigitalmapwith20mor50mresolution,whichare
usuallyused.Consequently,thereflectionanddiffractioncannotbeexactlycalculatedinthe
simulation.Thelimitationsofdigitalmaplistedabovealsocanbringdeviation.
7.2
Simulation Results for Kabul
7.2.1
BestServer
The concept of best server represents the best serving cell for each pixel by pilot power.
Hereapixelstandsforaspecificlocationinthemaprasteroftheareaunderplanning.The
most likely server at a pixel is the cell with the biggest pilot power. Best servers for each
NodeBareillustratedinthefollowingpicture.
Figure 8 Best Server
7.2.2
PilotStrength
The following pilot strength graph displays the pilot strength in dBm for a specific
15
carrierandissusefulwhendeterminingpilotquality.Mostofstrengthintheareais
higherthan100dBm.
Figure 9 Pilot Strength
Thestatisticsofthepilotstrengthispresentedasfollows.
Table 9
PilotStrengthStatistics
MU
DU
>=100dBm
99.95%
100.00%
>=95dBm
98.37%
100.00%
>=90dBm
92.56%
100.00%
>=85dBm
78.61%
99.75%
>=70dBm
51.18%
83.10%
>=0dBm
1.61%
4.77%
16
7.2.3
PilotEc/Io
The following pilot Ec/Io graph displays the achieved pilot Ec/Io for each pixel, and
its commonly regarded as the quality indicator for each base station. Most of the
valuesarehigherthan10dB.
Figure 101 Pilot Ec/Io
ThestatisticsofthepilotEc/Ioispresentedasfollows.
Table 10 PilotEc/IoStatistics
MU
DU
>=14dB
99.99%
100.00%
>=12dB
99.92%
100.00%
>=10dB
99.27%
99.92%
>=8dB
89.64%
92.29%
>=6dB
55.97%
55.51%
>=4dB
7.69%
7.14%
17
7.2.4
PilotPollution
Thefollowingpilotpollutiongraphdisplaysthenumberofpollutedpilotforeachpixel,and
its commonly regarded as the quality indicator for pilot quality. When pilot pollution
numberislessthan3,thenetworkwillbeonastablestation.Aswecanseeinthefollowing
graph,thepilotpollutionnumberislessthan2formostarea.
Figure 21 Pilot Pollution

Table 11 PilotPollutionStatistics
MU
DU
>=0
100.00%
100.00%
>=1
42.74%
51.39%
>=2
14.76%
18.19%
>=3
4.99%
6.16%
>=4
0.83%
0.97%
>=5
0.08%
0.08%
18
7.2.1
EffectiveHSDPAserviceRate
ThefollowingpictureshowstheEffectiveHSDPAserviceRate(outdoor,03km/h),which
cangetahighrate(6M7M)attheareanearthesite.
Figure 3 Effective HSDPA service Rate
7.3
Simulation Results for Kandahar
7.3.1
BestServer
19
7.3.2
PilotStrength
carrierandisusefulwhendeterminingpilotquality.Mostofstrengthintheareais
higherthan100dBm.
20
Table 12 PilotStrengthStatistics
MU
SU
>=100dBm
100.00%
99.69%
>=95dBm
99.76%
99.69%
>=90dBm
97.76%
96.21%
>=85dBm
85.97%
85.33%
>=80dBm
57.05%
67.98%
>=70dBm
20.12%
47.38%
>=0dBm
1.40%
11.04%
21
7.3.3
PilotEc/Io

MU
SU
>=14dB
100.00%
99.69%
>=12dB
100.00%
99.69%
>=10dB
100.00%
99.69%
>=8dB
98.40%
99.62%
>=6dB
82.39%
95.08%
>=4dB
41.45%
63.97%
22
7.3.4
PilotPollution

MU
SU
>=0
100.00%
100.00%
>=1
35.15%
21.82%
>=2
9.86%
1.74%
>=3
2.80%
0.13%
>=4
0.46%
0.00%
>=5
0.07%
0.00%
23
7.3.5
ThefollowingpictureshowstheEffectiveHSDPAserviceRate(outdoor,03km/h),whichcan
getahighrate(6M7M)attheareanearthesite
7.4
Simulation Results for Jalalabad
7.4.1
BestServer
24
7.4.2
PilotStrength
carrierandisusefulwhendeterminingpilotquality.Mostofstrengthintheareais
higherthan100dBm.
25
Table 15 PilotStrengthStatistics
MU
SU
>=100dBm
100.00%
100.00%
>=95dBm
100.00%
97.97%
>=90dBm
100.00%
93.31%
>=85dBm
99.78%
87.96%
>=80dBm
93.69%
77.36%
>=70dBm
50.22%
52.72%
>=0dBm
2.76%
4.22%
26
7.4.3
PilotEc/Io

MU
SU
>=14dB
100.00%
100.00%
>=12dB
100.00%
100.00%
>=10dB
100.00%
99.95%
>=8dB
98.04%
98.21%
>=6dB
74.76%
92.17%
>=4dB
25.54%
65.34%
27
7.4.4
PilotPollution

MU
SU
>=0
100.00%
100.00%
>=1
45.58%
22.17%
>=2
14.55%
4.96%
>=3
4.02%
2.19%
>=4
0.69%
0.32%
>=5
0.10%
0.02%
28
7.4.5
ThefollowingpictureshowstheEffectiveHSDPAserviceRate(outdoor,03km/h),whichcan
getahighrate(6M7M)attheareanearthesite
SUMMARY
Accordingtothesimulationresultsabove,mostofthePilotStrengthintheareasishigher
than90dBm,PilotEc/Ioishigherthan10dB,whichcouldsatisfythecoveragerequirement.
Inthisdocument,ZTEprovidestheUMTSnetworkplanningproposalof7citiesforEtisalat.
ThisdocumentdescribestheradionetworkplanningforUMTSnetworkbasedonthe
informationdefinedbyEtisalatandparametersproposedbyZTE.190NodeBsareproposed
tocovertheplanningarea.
ZTEishighlyexperiencedinradionetworkplanningandoptimization.ZTEhasrich
experienceinUMTSR&Dandhasaccomplishedlotsofnetworkplanningprojectsinthe
29
worldmarket.
TheresultsofradionetworkplanningaresubmittedtoEtisalatforreferenceinthe
constructionoffuturenetwork.Extensivecooperationisearnestlyexpected.
30

ZTE UMTS Network Planning Report For Etisalat 3G Project

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

ZTE UMTS Network Planning Report For Etisalat 3G Project

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

ZTE UMTS Radio Network Planning

Report for Etisalat 3G Project

NETWORK PLANNING PROCEDURE.............................................................................2

SYSTEM REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS..............................................................................3

CAPACITY ESTIMATION PROCESS.............................................................................10

NETWORK PLANNING PROCEDURE

Figure 1 Radio network planning workflow

SYSTEM REQUIREMENT ANALYSIS

HSDPA online users simultaneously per site: 12

Desired Cell Area Coverage

Desired Cell Area Coverage

Figure 2 Coverage planning process

Link Budget Process

Outdoor Shadow Fading Margin 5.16

Max Allowable Indoor Path Loss 132.18

Max Allowable Outdoor Path Loss 152.68

CAPACITY ESTIMATION PROCESS

Capacity Analysis Results

Figure 4 Sites distribution of Kabul

Figure 5 Sites distribution of Kandahar

Figure 6 Sites distribution of Jalalabad

Digital Map: Theresolutionofthedigitalmapusedinthesimulationis20m,PLANETformat.

Simulation Results for Kabul

Figure 8 Best Server

Figure 9 Pilot Strength

Figure 101 Pilot Ec/Io

Figure 21 Pilot Pollution

Figure 3 Effective HSDPA service Rate

Simulation Results for Kandahar

Figure 43 Best Server

Figure 54 Pilot Strength

Figure 15 Pilot Ec/Io

Figure 16 Pilot Pollution

Figure 17 Effective HSDPA service Rate

Simulation Results for Jalalabad

Figure 18 Best Server

Figure 19 Pilot Strength

Figure 20 Pilot Ec/Io

Figure 21 Pilot Pollution

Figure 22 Effective HSDPA service Rate

Anda mungkin juga menyukai