Anda di halaman 1dari 19

ComparisonsonAPI

RP2A WSD21st edition


2000Publicationvs.2007Publication
StrengthofTubularJoints

All right reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form without
prior written permission of Engineering Dynamics, Inc.

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

Overview
Theold(wewillcallitAPI2000):
APIRP2A WSD21st edition2000
Publication

Andthelatest(wewillcallitAPI2007):
APIRP2A WSD21st edition2007Publication
(API2007)

Recommended Practice for Planning, Recommended Practice for Planning,


Designing and Constructing Fixed
Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore
Offshore Platforms Working Stress Platforms Working Stress Design
Design
Upstream Segment
Upstream Segment
API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 2A-WSD (RP 2A-WSD)
API RECOMMENDED PRACTICE 2A-WSD (RP TWENTY-FIRST EDITION, DECEMEBER 2000
2A-WSD)
ERRATA AND SUPPLEMENT 1, DECEMBER 2002
TWENTY-FIRST EDITION, DECEMEBER 2000 ERRATA AND SUPPLEMENT 2, SEMPTEMBER 2005
ERRATA AND SUPPLEMENT 3, AUGUST 2007

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

Conclusions
1.

2.

3.

Thelatest.ThenewAPIRP2A WSD21st editionwithErrataand


Supplement1,2an3hasmadewiderangingchangesontubular
connections,fatigueandfoundationsoverthe2000publication.Thenew
codeshouldbeusediftheAPIRP2A WSD21st editionisselectedasdesign
code.
Onestopsolution,nointerfacehandling.Basedon35+yearsexperiencein
supplyingoffshorestructuresoftwaresystem,EDIistheleadingsoftware
companywithintegratedgraphicsmodeling,preprocessing,solvingand
graphicspostprocessingcapabilities.
Demandthebest.Fullyimplementedinpostprocessor,jointcanandfatigue
programsinSACS5.3release,thenewAPIRP2A WSD21st editionwith
ErrataandSupplement1,2and3isnowanessentialpartinthe most
comprehensiveoffshorepackageintheworld.

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

StrengthofTubularJoints
CodeContents
API2000

API2007

4 Connections
4.1 Connections of Tension and Compression
Members
4.2 Restraint and Shrinkage
4.3 Tubular Joints

4 Strength of Tubular Joints


4.1 Application
4.2 Design Considerations
4.3 Simple Joints
4.4 Overlapping Joints
4.5 Grouted Joints
4.6 Internally Ring-stiffened Joints
4.7 Cast Joints
4.8 Other Circular Joint Types
4.9 Damaged Joints
4.10 Non-circular Joints

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

StrengthofTubularJoints
Background
Fact:
Lastmajorupdatetojointstrengthprovisions
was14th edition.Theguidanceessentially
remainedunchangedforalleditionsupto
21st.

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

StrengthofTubularJoints
Background
Fact:
Muchfurtherknowledge,includingbothexperimental
dataandnumericalstudies,hasbeengainedonthe
behaviorofjointssince14th editionissued.Overthe
period1994to1996MSLengineering,underthe
auspicesofajointindustryproject,undertookan
updatetothetubularjointdatabaseandguidance.
Thisworkhadmorerecentstudies,notablybyAPI/EWI
andtheUniversityofIllinois,haveformedthebasisof
thetubularjointstrengthprovisionsofISO.
6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

StrengthofTubularJoints
Background
Fact:
TheISOdraftingcommitteetook,asastarting
pointfordrafting,therelevantprovisionsfrom
APIRP2ALRFD1st edition(similartoAPIRP2A
WSD20th edition)becauseISOisinLRFDformat.
Forthepurposeofthesupplementtothe21st
editionofAPIRP2A,thedraftISOprovisions,in
turn,havebeenusedasastartingbasis.
6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
Minimum Capacity Check Revised

API2000

API2007

InSACSprogramthefollowingequationisused:

InwhichPaiscalculatedasfollowswithFS=1.0

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
SafetyFactorRecalibrated

API2000

API2007

SF=1.7CorrespondedtoanLRFD
resistancefactorof0.95.

SF=1.6CorrespondedtoanLRFD
resistancefactorof1.0

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
The2/3limitsontensilestrengthrelaxed

API2000

API2007

Section4.1
Fyc theyieldstrengthofthechord
memberatthejoint(or2/3ofthe
tensilestrengthifless)

Section4.2.1
Thevalueofyieldstressforthechord,
inthecalculationofjointcapacity,
shouldbelimitedto0.8timesthe
tensilestrengthofthechord for
materialswithayieldstressof72
ksi(500MPa)orless.

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

10

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
Additionalguidanceondetailingpractice

API2000

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

11

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
Additionalguidanceondetailingpractice continued

API2007
6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

12

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
Punchingshearapproachremoved

API2000

API2007

Theadequacyofthejointmaybe
determinedonthebasisof(a)
punchingshearor(b)nominalloads
inthebrace.

Thejointinteractionratio,IR,foraxial
loadsand/orbendingmomentsin
thebraceshouldbecalculated
usingthefollowingexpression,

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

13

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
NewStrengthfactorQu formulations

API2000
API2007

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

14

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
NewchordloadfactorQf formulations

API2000

6/24/2010

API2007

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

15

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
StrengthforaxiallyloadedYandXjointswithshortcanlengthsreduced

API2000

API2007

N/A

Forsimple,axiallyloadedYandXjointswherea
thickenedjointcanisspecified,thejoint
allowablecapacitymaybecalculatedas
follows,

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

16

StrengthofTubularJoints
MajorUpdate
ImplementationintoSACSjointcanprogram

API2000

API2007

Fullyimplemented

Fullyimplemented

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

17

StrengthofTubularJoints
Example
SimpleTjoint:
Brace34:16x0.375 5.0ft
Chord13&32:24x0.375 8.25ft
Can:24x0.625 1.75ft
AllFy =36ksi
Loadatbracejoint4:
Fx=10.0kip
Fy=7.5kip
Fz=50.0kip

Loadatconnectingjoint3:
Fx=400.0kip
Fy=50.0kip
MemberLengthshowninft

6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

18

StrengthofTubularJoints
ExampleResultsCompared
API2000 Punchingshearjointcheckwithfinalunitycheckratio=0.974
* * J O I N T

C A N
D E T A I L
(JOINT ORDER)

COMMON CHORD BRACE ****** CHORD ***** JOINT GAP *** BRACE **
JOINT JOINT JOINT O.D.
WT
FY TYPE
O.D.
WT
(IN) (IN) (KSI)
(IN) (IN) (IN)
3

24.00 0.625

36.0

16.00 0.375

R E P O R T * *

CHORD
*
ACTING STRESSES
* ***
PUNCHING SHEAR
BRACE LOAD *CHORD**
BRACE
*
ALLOWABLE STRESSES
ANGLE CASE SRSS
FA
OPB
IPB
FA
OPB
IPB
(DEG)
(KSI) (KSI) (KSI) (KSI) (KSI) (KSI) (KSI)

***
UNITY
CHECK

90.00

0.974

11.51

-1.63

3.84

5.12

3.66

6.65

11.15

API2007 Braceloadsinteractioncheckwithfinalunitycheckratio=1.168
* * J O I N T

EFFT.
COMM CHRD BRCE ****** CHORD **** CHORD JNT
JNT JNT JNT O.D.
WT
FY LNGTH TYP
IN
IN
KSI
FT
3

24.00 0.625

36.0

3.5

GAP
IN

C A N
D E T A I L
(UNITY CHECK ORDER)

CHORD
*** BRACE **
O.D.
WT
IN
IN
16.00 0.375

R E P O R T * *

*
ACTING STRESSES
BRACE LOAD *CHORD**
BRACE
ANGLE CASE STRESS
FA
OPB
DEG
KSI
KSI
KSI

* ***
PUNCHING SHEAR
*
ALLOWABLE STRESSES
IPB
FA
OPB
IPB
KSI
KSI
KSI
KSI

***
UNITY
CHECK

90.00

8.54

1.168

1 -11.51

-2.72

6.40

7.20

10.16

21.30

JointCanLength
6/24/2010

EngineeringDynamics,Inc

19

Anda mungkin juga menyukai