In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Course
English 2
By
Jharil P. Camposano
BSBA Marketing Management
October 2015
PH history as construct
Mainstream Philippine history has been socially constructed and tied to
the structure of power. As a construct, its language and texts are framed and
carefully selected to correspond to the culture of power operating in the sites of the
production of knowledge.
The reconstructed Philippine history is without significant meaning to the Muslims
because an essential portion of the past, that of the history of the Muslims in the
Philippines, has been exteriorized, if not excluded in the mainstream writing of
Philippine historical narratives.
As expressed by McM Santamaria, thus: Our apparently biased dominant Christian
discourse seems to disable us from recognizing the great achievements of the
(Moros)the setting up of state organizations beyond the level of the barangay and
the maintenance of military might with the well-tested capability to resist the West.
(Business Mirror, July, 16, 2008)
History of Sovereignty
The Philippine Muslims had, for centuries, maintained their sovereign independence.
An account in Book Three of Blair and Robertson (p. 190) reveals that the Spanish
accounts from the 16th and 17th centuries readily acknowledged that the Muslim
rulers in Mindanao and Sulu unlike those of Luzon are accustomed to power and
sovereignty.
One Muslim polity, the Maguindanao Sultanate, reached the zenith of its glory
during the time of Sultan Kudarat in the 1630s and 1640s when it had controlled
most parts of Mindanao.
As to the Sultanate of Sulu, it was the richest settlement in pre-Spanish Philippines.
Sulus strategic location and possession of rich maritime and forest resources made
it a primary center of international trade. At the height of its glory, the rulers of Sulu
controlled vast territories, including parts of Borneo, such as Sabah and Kalimantan.
In international relations, the Sulu Sultanate signed several diplomatic treaties with
foreign powersSpain, Great Britain, France and the United States. What the Sulu
leaders signed was a treaty, strictly so-called that is one between two sovereign
and independent states, each is recognized as such by the other, a Jesuit scholar
wrote in 1935. (H. de la Costa S.J. 1935/1965. p. 97)
Dispossession
How the Muslims lost their lands to the settlers is described by Dr. Peter Gowing:
The Muslims have been protesting against the sending of settlers into their
territories They resented the steady occupation of (their) fertile lands by (these
newcomers). In some cases, powerful business interests or wealthy Christians, in
cooperation with corrupt bureau officials, took advantage of Muslims ignorance or
indifference to Philippine land laws and grabbed from them large tracts of their best
lands (Gowing. 1978. p. 190).
In 1963, the Senate committee on national minorities reported that lands applied
[for] by the natives were awarded to Christians and that government surveyors do
not pay attention to the minorities. (Philippine Senate, 1963. p. 4)
In 1971, the Senate committee on national minorities reported that Through either
indifference, insincerity or lack of foresight, the seeds of discord were sown when
the Commonwealth Government embarked on a policy of bringing settlers from
Luzon and Visayas to Mindanao without a parallel program of helping the natives
legitimize their landholdings (and) the prior rights of the natives were
disregarded and even trampled upon. (Philippine Senate, 1971. pp. 22-23)
Anomalous treaty
Aside from land grabbing (Gowing. 1978. p. 190), another critical point of historical
injustice was the Treaty of Paris of Dec. 10, 1898. The anomalous incorporation of
the Muslims into the Philippines through this treaty is an ugly chapter in Philippine
history.
In this regard, Dr. O.D. Corpuz writes: In Paris in 1898, when Spain and the new
imperialist United States were selling and buying a country and people, Spain sold
something it did not own or possess (Corpuz. 1989. p. 507). It was through this
unjust and anomalous treaty that Muslim Mindanao was forcibly incorporated into
what is now the Philippines.
Another reflection of this unjust colonial transaction is presented by a Mindanao
scholar as follows: [T]he supposed transfer of the Spanish possession to the
Americans by the Treaty of Paris and the further transfer of the same by the
Americans to the Republic of the Philippines is an exercise of the Regalian Doctrine,
plain and simple (F)or the Republic of the Philippines to base its possessory rights
from the Americans is [a] complete disregard of the historical realities before them.
The Philippine possession is to sustain the Regalian Doctrine and uphold
colonialism. Worse, this colonial act is enshrined in the Philippine Constitutions of
1935, 1973 and 1986 (Rodil. 1987. p. 28).
This historical wrong is being remedied by minimum concession through the
proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law.
Nation-state construct
The idea of the nation-states territorial integrity or national sovereignty held to
be unnegotiable could be reassessed and reconsidered in light of history and
contemporary experience with this constructed unit of the international system. The
nation-state construct was a creation of the Treaty of Westphalia, signed in 1648, to
end the 30 years of religious wars between the Protestants and the Catholics.
The construction of the nation-state system did not take into consideration the
importance of other peoples history and culture, more so of the Muslims, in
delineating territorial boundaries.
Abraham P. Sakili. Historical truth and Bangsamoro autonomy. Philippine Daily Inquirer.
I.
500 MILF members attend Bangsamoro accord signing at Palace Inquirer News.
II.
Bangsamoro Basic Law: General Principles and Policies House Bill No. 4994.pdf
Bangsamoro through consultations and continuing negotiations in a nonadversarial manner. All unresolved issues shall be elevated to the
President, through the Chief Minister. (Article VI Section 4) The draft Basic
law also provides for a Philippine Congress- a Bangsamoro Parliament
Forum for purposes of cooperation and coordination of legislative
initiatives (Article VI Section 8).
6
Frequently Asked Questions draft of the Bangsamoro Basic Law GMA News
Sep.10,2014Sep.30,2015.
<http://www.opapp.gov.ph./milf/news/frequently-asked-questions-draftbangsamoro-basic-law>
D. Bangsamoro Parliament
According to the House Bill No. 4994 Article VII Section 1-3, the
powers of the government shall be vested to the Bangsamoro Parliament
which has the legislative and executive authority that should be exercise
those powers granted in this Bangsamoro Basic Law for the power and
good governance and development of the Bangsamoro. The legislative
authority is to enact laws to be implemented according to the matters
within its power. Moreover, the executive function shall be exercised by
the Cabinet, which shall be headed by a Chief Minister. The Chief Minister
who heads the ministerial government of the Bangsamoro shall be elected
by a majority vote of the Parliament from among its members. The Chief
Minister shall appoint the Deputy Chief Minister from among the members
of the Parliament, and the members of the cabinet, majority of whom shall
also come from the parliament.9
9
Article VII:The Bangsamoro Government House Bill No. 4994.pdf Sep. 30,2015
<www.opapp.gov.ph>
settler communities. Women shall also have a reserved seat (Article VII
Section 4-5)10
10
"Frequently Asked Questions on draft of the Bangsamoro Basic Law"
Sep.10,2014 Sep. 30,2015.
<httpshttp://www.opapp.gov.ph./milf/news/frequently-asked-questionsdraft-bangsamoro-basic-law>
III. Is BBL consistent with the 1987 Constitution?
A. Definition of Constitution
A constitution is the written instrument enacted by direct action
of the people by which the fundamental powers of the government are
established, limited and defined, by which those powers are distributed
among the several departments for their safe and useful exercise for the
benefit of the body politic. Its purpose is to prescribe the permanent
framework of a system of government, to assign to the several
departments their respective powers and duties, and to establish certain
first principles on which the government is founded. 11
11" Ronald M. Corpuz, Lorna V. Wy, and Rogelio G. Dela Cruz. Philippine History
and Constitution. Manila: Mindshapers Co Inc., 2008
B. Bangsamoro's Preamble & The 1987 Cobstitutional Preamble
Bangsamoro Preamble
We, the Bangsamoro people and other inhabitants imploringbthe aid of