Submitted by:
BAOAS, CHRISTINE B.
DIONISIO, CHARLES AMIEL P.
MADRIAL, ANDREA COLEEN E.
SIM, TRISTAN JAMES G.
Submitted to:
ENGR. MILAGROS R. CABANGON
August 2016
Table of Contents
Chapter I
Background of the Study
Statement of the Problem
Objectives
Significance of the Study
Definition of Terms
Scope and Limitation
Chapter II
Review of Related Literature
Review of Related Studies
Chapter III
Research Design
Research Methods
Research Participants
Data Collection
Chapter IV
Chapter V
Appendix
References
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
A. General Objective
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the implementing policies and
practices on electronic waste management in selected universities of Metro Manila.
policies
that
govern
e-waste
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Electronic Waste (e-waste) may be defined as discarded computers, office electronic
equipment,
entertainment
phones,
television
sets,
and refrigerators. This includes used electronics which are destined for reuse, resale,
salvage, recycling, or disposal.
Practicing university an institution or a university which adopts, implements, and
regulates policies or practices pertaining to proper management and disposal of
electronic wastes.
Non-practicing university an institution or university that has no specific policy
or practice pertaining to proper management and disposal of electronic wastes.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES
Lamps
Examples
Refrigerators,
freezers,
air
monitors,
laptops,
notebooks, tablets
Straight
fluorescent,
compact
fluorescent,
intensity
fluorescent,
discharge, LED
high
machines,
copying
equipment,
photovoltaic panels
Microwaves,
ventilation
vacuum
cleaners,
toys,
small
electrical
and
Mobile
phones,
GPS,
Fig. 1. Hierarchy of legal frameworks for the management of e-waste in the Philippines
Basel Convention on the
Control of Transboundary
Basel
Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal
Convention
Toxic Substances and Hazardous and Nuclear
Waste Control of 1990
RA 6969
DAO
2013-22
Management of Hazardous Wastes
DAO
1994-28
Materials Containing Hazardous Substances
RA 9003
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
I.
RESEARCH FRAMEWORK
A. Design
Research design a logical sequence that connects the empirical data to a studys
initial research questions and, ultimately, to its conclusions (Yin, 2003). To answer the
proposed problem in Chapter I, this study will employ a four-part methodology. First,
secondary research done by doing a desk review of e-waste management in the
Philippines gave the researchers a valuable perspective and context of the problem.
Second, the researchers will identify gaps, problematic areas, or key areas where
improvement in the university can or should be made. Third, primary data from the
stakeholders will be obtained through distribution of questionnaires and by employing
structured interviews with people of recognized authority. Fourth, (1) a comparison and
analysis of the gathered data against existing national or international laws on the
management of e-waste will be done on practicing universities, and (2) policy
recommendations will be made for non-practicing universities.
B. Research Method
The exploratory study used secondary research employing a qualitative
methodology. Secondary research was done through desk review. Desk review is a
recognized form of research method that involves an intensive literature search, review,
and synthesis of all relevant documents concerning the topic of research (Uson, 2012).
Among the documents which have been analyzed and have produced valuable
C. Research Participants
This descriptive study will be conducted among selected engineering universities
in Metro Manila namely, Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila (PLM), Universidad de
Manila (UDM), Technological University of the Philippines (TUP), Mapua Institute of
Technology (MIT), De La Salle University (DLSU), and Adamson University (AdU).
Information such as policies and programs and inventory of e-waste generation will be
gathered from the duly-recognized department which concerns the wastes disposal.
Other information may be obtained from informal interviews and the researchers
personal observations.
D. Data Collection
In particular, this study is cross-sectional in nature, that is, the analysis of data is
based only upon the period of time in which such data were gathered. Aside from the
secondary information obtained from the desk review, the researchers are planning to
employ a (1) one-on-one structured and standardized e-waste questionnaire and (2) a set
of interview questions for choice persons.
E. Statistical Treatment
To determine the population to be surveyed, Slovins formula is employed with an
allowable 5% margin of error.
n=
N
N
=
2
1+ N e 1+ N ( 0.05 )2
II.
University
Policies
/Legislations
The
university's
legal
framework
needs to be
understood by
collecting
information
related to
policies and
legislations
specific or
related to ewaste
Stakeholders
Assessment
Simple Mass
Flow Charts
B. Stakeholders Assessment
As stated recently, assessment of the stakeholders is usually the first step in the ewaste management assessment ladder. The purpose of stakeholders assessment is to
In this study, the specific stakeholders are narrowed down into the school
administration, particularly individuals in the sanitary and sustainability
departments. The policies that prompt these particular departments to act on ewaste management come from the higher administrative departments, who can be
sought for by invitations for a formal interview.
C. Simple Mass Flow Charts
To visualize how e-wastes go downstream in the campus, mass flow charts
will be employed. Mass flow system charts show graphically how the e-waste flows
circulation between different actors (UNEP, 2012). The actors may be defined as the
stakeholders.
Date:
Location:
Interviewer:
Interview introduction
I am . (name of interviewer) coming from .
We are collecting data on e-waste management and assessment in order to fulfill the
objectives of our study.
Can we ask you some questions about e-waste? Thank you for your eager participation.
1.1
Are you aware about the environmental hazards caused by discarded electronic
1.2
1.3
Do you have a waste management, specifically electronic waste, program that is being
implemented in your university?
a. If yes, what are the policies and practices being implemented?
I. Do these policies and practices conform to that of the standard policies of the
Philippines?
II. How do you dispose the collected electronic waste?
b. If no, what are the contributing factors as to why there are no policies implemented?
I. Are there proposals of programs or policies on electronic waste management?
1.4
Does the university keep inventories of the electric and electronic equipment it
discards/stores? Enhance replies with comments, details, suggestions, etc.
1.5
Are you aware of what happens to the equipment you have discarded? Enhance replies
with comments, details, suggestions, etc.
1.6
From your point of view, what are the main obstacles for a proper e-waste treatment?
(e.g. costs, lack of infrastructure and/or policy within the university, absence of recycling
solutions, absence of collection system, etc.) Enhance replies with comments, details,
suggestions, etc.
D. Assessment of Practices
It can also be possible that the particular educational institution does enforce ewaste management policies yet handlers or collectors may not abide by them. Also,
the university may practice e-waste disposal methods but such procedures may be
Location:
Respondent
Name
Policy Awareness
YES
NO
1.1
1.2
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
1.3
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
1.4
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
_________________
Administration's activity
Students' participation
Utility workers' participation
Not labor intensive
Others (please specify)
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______
Handling
1.2
Is the handling of
electronic waste labor
intensive?
1.3
1.1
1.4
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
Electronic Waste
1.1
1.2
School offices
engineering laboratories
other laboratories
school cafeteria
Broken appliances/parts
Broken electronic gadgets/parts
Electrical components
Electronic components
Others (please specify)
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
______________________________________________
Awareness
YES,
1.1
I am fully aware
I am fairly aware
I am not
particularly aware
NO
1.2
I am fully aware
I am fairly aware
I am not
particularly aware
REFERENCES
NO