ABSTRACT
The aim of this paper is to present the results of an experiment which was conducted in order to study the ingestion and
digestion effects that some predators from South America, both wild and in captivity, produce on their prey bones. This
taphonomic analysis is based on the theoretical and methodological framework proposed by Andrews (1990) and aims to
classify predators from the Pampean region according to the modifications that they produce on the bones of their prey. The
archaeological record from the Interserrana Bonaerense (Pampean region, Argentina) area is rich in small mammal bones.
However, very few taphonomic studies on micromammals have been carried out in this area and there is little knowledge
about their role in the archaeological record.
RESUMEN
En este trabajo se presentan los resultados de un experimento realizado a fin de estudiar los efectos de la ingestin y
digestin que determinados predadores de Amrica del Sur en cautiverio y en estado salvaje producen sobre sus presas. El
anlisis tafonmico se realiz bajo los conceptos tericos y metodolgicos diseados por Andrews (1990) con el propsito
de realizar una categorizacin de predadores de la regin Pampeana a travs de las modificaciones que ellos producen sobre
los huesos de sus presas. El registro arqueolgico del rea Interserrana Bonaerense (regin Pampeana, Argentina) posee
una gran riqueza de restos de pequeos mamferos, de los cuales escasos estudios tafonmicos han sido realizados y poco
se conoce acerca de su ingreso en el registro arqueolgico.
INTRODUCTION
Archaeological research in the Interserrana Bonaerense area
(Pampean region, Argentina) has identified a large quantity
of bone remains from different micromammal species; many
of them related to diverse cultural activities that range from
the end of the Pleistocene to historical times (Politis and
Madrid 1988; Quintana 2004, 2005; Quintana and Mazzanti
2001). It is also necessary to remark, the abundance in general
terms, of these kinds of bone remains, which have been
used as environmental indicators (Crivelli Montero et al.
1987-1988; Pardias 1991).
The objective of this paper is to present and discuss the
results of an experiment carried out with different predator
species from the Pampean region and other areas of
Argentina, in order to evaluate their ingestion and digestion
effects on microfaunal bones.
1. Numerical data
This analysis comprises the accounting of relevant traits,
for example, the anatomic representation, taphonomic
features and digestion traces.
The analysis of variations on the representation between
postcranial and cranial elements was done applying two
kinds of rates: pc/c (Andrews 1990), which compares the
number of all major postcranial elements (i.e., femur, tibia,
humerus, radius and ulna) with cranial elements (mandible,
maxilla and isolated molars). The second rate is f+h/md+mx
(Andrews 1990), which compares the number of proximal
limb elements (femur and humerus) with the number of
mandibles and maxillae. These rates give a clear view of the
conservation state of cranial elements, from which it is
possible to make inferences about post-depositional effects.
Another rate that was used is that which measures the limbs
preferential distal element loss (t+r)/(f+h) (tibia + radius) /
(femur + humerus).
Milvago chimango
Polyborus plancus
Canis (Pseudalopex) gimnocercus
Puma concolor
Oncifelis geoffroyi
Herpailurus yagouaroundi
Conepatus chinga
Didelphis albiventris
Chimango
Crested caracara
Pampas fox
Puma
Geoffroys cat
Otter cat
Skunk
Opossum
2 pellets
2 pellets
2 scats
2 scats
2 scats
3 scats
2 scats
2 scats
Strong: there are some areas where the enamel has vanished
but the dentine has not been affected. The surfaces that
previously appeared pecked are at present more evident.
Tyto alba
Pellets: 4
Maxilla
Mandible
Scapulae
Humerus
Radius
Ulna
Pelvis
Femur
Tibia
Fibula
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Calcaneus
Talus
Rib
Metapodial
Phalange
Total
MNI
Pc/c
f+h/md+mx
t+r/f+h
Isolated
molar
Isolated
incisor
Relative
Abundance
3. Comparative study
Images from SEM, belonging to Dr. Fernndez Jalvo and
from Dr. Andrewss collection were used in order to identify
different taphonomic traits and their origin. These images
belong to several collections that have different
proveniences, and are formed by present-day and fossil
samples. Is it important to remark that none of these images
refer to materials collected in South America.
MNE
44
45
40
39
37
41
57
50
46
37
618
23
86
27
20
240
129
180
1,759
29
195
100
93
75.9
77.6
69.0
67.2
63.8
70.7
98.3
86.2
79.3
63.8
59.2
19.8
24.7
46.6
34.5
34.5
22.2
11.1
Asio flammeus
Pellets: 1
Maxilla
Mandible
Scapulae
Humerus
Radius
Ulna
Pelvis
Femur
Tibia
Fbula
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Calcaneus
Talus
Rib
Metapodial
Phalange
Total
MNI
pc/c
F+h/md+mx
T+r/f+h
Isolated molar
MNE
4
6
5
4
23
4
6
5
7
5
79
2
11
4
3
32
15
59
274
12
328
90
333
79
16,7
25,0
20,8
16,7
95,8
16,7
25,0
20,8
29,2
20,8
18,3
4,2
7,6
16,7
12,5
11,1
6,3
8,8
42
67
Isolated incisor
58
22,6
Relative abundance
59.9
Table 2. Cranial and postcranial elements from Tyto alba and Asio
flammeus pellets.
60
40
20
"
phalanges
metapodials
molars
incisors
vertebrae
fibula
tibia
femur
pelvis
ulna
radius
humerus
scapula
mandible
maxillas
80
Mwz
P
Mml
Mil
mc
Arb
Ibb
mml
mil
Imb
Iib
%
100
100
100
38
45
10
98
83
-
Cb
20
52
22
16
19
46
20
-
%
91
79
100
80
95
77
100
-
Hj
4
12
4
1
1
3
1
-
%
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
-
Cch
4
12
4
1
11
4
3
25
%
100
100
100
25
92
100
11
89
Da
6
18
4
1
3
2
14
6
19
%
100
100
67
17
50
33
78
100
70
Table 3. Cranial elements obtained from the pellets and scats. Ta: Tyto alba; Af: Asio flammeus;
Bv: Bubo virginianus; Ac: Athene cunicularia; Cb: Circus buffoni; Hj: Herpailurus jaguaroundi;
Cch: Conepatus chinga; Da: Didelphis albiventris; Mwz: Maxillas with zygomatic; P: Palate;
Mml: Maxilla molars lost; Mil: Maxilla incisors lost; mc: mandible complete; Arb: Ascending
ramus broken; Ibb: Inferior border broken; mml: mandible molars lost; mil: mandible incisors
lost; Imb: Isolated molars broken; Iib: Isolated incisors broken.
Tyto alba
Femur proximal
Humero distal
Isolated incisor
Molar in situ
Isolated molar
Asio flammeus
Femur proximal
Humerus distal
Incisor in situ
Isolated molar
Bubo virginianus
Femur proximal
Humerus distal
Isolated incisor
Isolated molar
Athene cunicularia
Femur proximal
Humerus distal
Incisor in situ
Isolated incisor
Isolated molar
Circus buffoni
Femur proximal
Humerus distal
Isolated incisor
Molar in situ
Isolated molar
Milvago chimango
Isolated incisor
Isolated molar
Oncifelis geoffroyi
Femur proximal
Isolated incisor
Isolated molar
Herpailurus jaguaroundi
Humerus distal
Isolated incisor
Isolated molar
Conepatus chinga
Femur proximal
Humerus distal
Isolated incisor
Didelphis albiventris
Femur proximal
Humerus distal
Isolated incisor
Isolated molar
N
49
38
23
61
86
digested
17
6
4
5
5
%
35
16
17
8
6
Light
17
6
2
5
4
%
35
16
9
8
5
Moderate
1
1
5
4
7
11
1
1
4
2
20
25
57
18
1
1
4
2
20
25
57
18
% Great % Extreme %
4
1
-
16
11
32
38
5
4
8
11
31
36
25
29
5
4
4
-
31
36
13
-
4
5
13
13
11
24
25
5
54
66
10
11
4
5
42
42
44
80
9
64
10
11
4
1
33
42
44
80
2
50
4
9
7
14
4
2
42
30
65
2
2
33
21
46
50
100
79
70
71
2
2
5
-
50
100
12
-
12
10
24
29
33
37
12
8
12
29
27
18
4
3
10
10
10
15
1
2
1
1
100
50
50
1
6
12
1
6
7
100
100
58
1
-
100
-
3
3
50
25
2
4
33
33
1
-
17
-
1
6
11
1
6
11
100
100
100
1
-
100
-
3
3
50
27
2
4
33
36
1
-
17
-
5
6
28
2
4
13
40
67
46
2
4
5
40
67
18
21
7
7
27
34
2
4
20
20
29
57
74
59
2
4
7
-
29
57
26
-
7
8
26
24
5
10
19
29
1
2
4
6
Table 4. Digested cranial and postcranial elements obtained from pellets and scats.
Tyto alba
Complete
Proximal
Distal
Proximal + Shaft
Distal + Shaft
Shaft
Asio flammeus
Complete
Proximal
Distal
Proximal + Shaft
Distal + Shaft
Shaft
Bubo virginianus
Complete
Proximal
Distal
Proximal + Shaft
Distal + Shaft
Shaft
Athene cunicularia
Complete
Proximal
Distal
Proximal + Shaft
Distal + Shaft
Shaft
Circus buffoni
Complete
Proximal
Distal
Proximal + Shaft
Distal + Shaft
Shaft
Conepatus chinga
Complete
Proximal
Distal
Proximal + Shaft
Distal + Shaft
Shaft
Didelphis albiventris
Complete
Proximal
Distal
Proximal + Shaft
Distal + Shaft
Shaft
Femuri
49
1
-
Humeri
36
1
1
2
-
Tibia
45
1
-
Ulna
41
-
% Femuri
98
2
-
% Humeri
92.3
2.6
2.6
5.1
-
% Tibia
97.8
2.2
-
% Ulna
100
-
5
-
4
-
4
2
1
4
-
100
-
100
-
57.1
28.5
14.2
100
-
12
3
1
1
8
3
1
2
-
13
1
5
1
-
8
2
1
1
70.6
17.6
5.9
5.9
57.1
21.4
7.1
14.3
-
65
5
25
5
-
66.6
16.6
8.3
8.3
23
1
1
-
19
1
1
5
3
1
26
3
2
4
12
7
2
2
92
4
4
-
63.3
3.3
3.3
16.7
10
3.3
74.3
8.6
5.7
11.4
52.2
30.4
8.7
8.7
2
2
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
50
50
66.7
33.3
33.3
66.7
33.3
33.3
66.7
1
4
1
-
8
6
2
1
-
5
8
2
3
6
3
4
-
16.7
66.7
16.7
-
47.1
35.3
11.8
5.9
-
20.8
33.3
8.3
12.5
25
42.9
57.1
-
3
4
1
-
4
2
3
2
-
2
2
1
1
4
4
2
1
1
37.5
50
12.5
-
36.4
18.2
27.3
18.2
-
20
20
10
10
40
50
25
12.5
12.5
Table 5. Postcranial elements obtained from pellets and scats of nocturnal and diurnal birds and small mammals.
MNE
13
12
12
14
13
12
27
17
20
12
17
32
38
11
7
46
55
79
437
14
193
124
106
52
128
46.4
42.9
42.9
50
46.4
42.9
96.4
60.7
71.4
42.9
3.4
57.1
22.6
39.3
25
13.7
19.6
10.1
40.9
Athene
cunicularia
Pellets: 11
Maxilla
Mandible
Scapulae
Humerus
Radius
Ulna
Pelvis
Femur
Tibia
Fibula
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Calcaneus
Talus
Ribs
Metapodial
Phalange
Total
MNI
pc/c
f+h/md+mx
t+r/f+h
Isolated molar
Isolated incisor
Relative
Abundance
MNE
19
29
13
30
21
23
62
25
35
22
299
54
66
17
17
116
82
117
1,047
31
188
115
102
46
126
30.6
46.8
21
48.4
33.9
37.1
100
40.3
56.5
35.5
26.8
43.5
17.7
27.4
27.4
15.6
13.8
6.7
35.45
$
#
"
!
m
ax
ill
ar
s
m
an
di
bl
es
sc
ap
ul
as
hu
m
er
i
ra
di
ou
s
ul
na
s
fe
m
or
i
tib
ia
s
ve
rte
br
ae
in
ci
so
rs
m
ol
ar
m
s
et
ap
od
ia
ls
ph
al
an
ge
s
Bubo
virginianus
Pellets: 9
Maxilla
Mandible
Scapulae
Humerus
Radius
Ulna
Pelvis
Femur
Tibia
Fibula
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Calcaneus
Talus
Rib
Metapodial
Phalange
Total
MNI
pc/c
F+h/md+mx
T+r/f+h
Isolated molar
Isolated incisor
Relative
Abundance
&
Pellets: 4
Maxilla
Mandible
Scapulae
Humerus
Radius
Ulna
Pelvis
Femur
Tibia
Fibula
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Calcaneus
Talus
Rib
Metapodial
Phalange
Total
MNI
Pc/c
F+h/md+mx
T+r/f+h
Isolated molar
Isolated incisor
Relative Abundance
MNE
22
20
0
3
1
3
1
4
3
0
34
42
65
1
1
2
32
55
289
11
21
17
57
68
100
18.8
%
100
90
0
13.6
4.5
13.6
4.5
18.2
13.6
0
8.6
95.5
49.2
4.5
4.5
0.8
14.5
8.9
With respect to the cranial material, all the incisors are missing
from their alveoli (Table 3). No mandible is complete, and
the fragments have a broken inferior border and there is a
high frequency of broken ascending ramus. Isolated broken
molars are scarce and there is no record of in situ broken
molars. A 50% of the isolated incisors are broken.
'
Milvago chimango
Pellets: 2
Mandible
Femur
Incisor
Molar
Phalange
Total
Poliborus planctus
Pellets: 2
Maxilla
Vertebrae
Molar
Total
Canis (Pseudalopex)
gimnocercus Scats: 2
Maxilla
Scapulae
Vertebrae
Incisor
Total
Puma concolor
Scats: 2
Femur
Tibia
Rib
Metapodial
Phalange
Total
Oncifelis geoffroyi
Scats: 2
Femur
Tibia
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Metapodial
Total
Herpailurus
jaguaroundi Scats: 3
Maxilla
Mandible
Humerus
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Talus
Rib
Metapodial
MNE
1
1
1
2
3
8
50
50
25
16.7
5.4
MNI
pc/c
f+h/md+mx
Isolated molar
Isolated incisor
Relative Abundance
53
100
67
100
6.5
1
67
3.3
1
1
2
4
50 Isolated molar
2.8 Relative Abundance
16.7
1
1
5
1
8
50 Isolated incisor
50 Relative Abundance
13.9
25
1
1
1
1
2
6
50
50
4.2
5
3.6
pc/c
t+r/f+h
Relative Abundance
1
3.2
1
7.05
2
1
6
6
12
1
34
50
25
8.3
75
50
2.5
pc/c
t+r/f+h
Relative Abundance
2
40
50
5.7
4
1
1
7
6
11
1
2
5
100
25
25
9.7
75
45.8
25
25
12.5
pc/c
f+h/md+mx
Isolated molar
Isolated incisor
Relative Abundance
1
33
7.1
2
10
20
73
120
13.4
MNE
4
4
6
17
12
7
17
6
24
4
114
28
27
10
10
73
68
188
619
12
302
288
157
117
350
16.7
16.7
25
70.8
50
29.2
70.8
25
100
16.7
26.4
58.3
18.8
41.7
41.7
25.3
28.3
28
38.3
Didelphis
albiventris Scats: 2
Maxilla
Mandible
Scapulae
Humerus
Radius
Ulna
Pelvis
Femur
Tibia
Fibula
Vertebrae
Incisor
Molar
Calcaneus
Talus
Rib
Metapodial
Phalange
Total
MNI
Pc/c
F+h/md+mx
T+r/f+h
Isolated molar
Isolated incisor
Relative
Abundance
MNE
6
6
10
11
5
8
18
8
10
4
123
27
34
6
5
38
58
74
451
9
146
158
79
106
270
33.3
33.3
55.6
61.1
27.8
44.4
100
44.4
55.6
22.2
38
75
31.5
33.3
27.8
17.6
32.2
14.7
40.1
Figure 3. SEM image from a proximal tibia recovered from Conepatus chinga scats. This
element shows a great digestion degree associated to breakage.
DISCUSSION
Following Andrews methodology (1990),
it is interesting to compare the different
samples from owls, diurnal prey birds and
carnivore mammals to have a wider view of
the behaviour of South American species
in the dispersion graphics and to therefore
establish which category they are in. It must
be remarked, however, that this analysis was
limited to the sample obtained from the
Pampean region. In Figure 6 there are spots
with the postcranial/cranial proportions and
their relative abundances.
Figure 5. SEM image from a Mus musculus incisor recovered from Didelphis albiventris
scats. This element shows a moderate digestion degree.
CONCLUSIONS
350
12
300
pc/c
250
4
200
150
7
100
9
50
5
11
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Relative abundance
Figure 6. Plot graphic between relative abundante and pc/c values obtained from South
american predators. 1: Tyto alba; 2: Asio flammeus; 3: Bubo virginianus; 4: Athene
cunicularia; 5: Circus buffoni; 6: Milvago chimango; 7: Didelphis albiventris; 8: Conepatus
chinga; 9: Oncifelis geoffroyi; 10: Canis (Pseudalopex) gimnocercus; 11: Herpailurus
yaguaroundi; 12: Puma concolor.
350
7
300
f + h / md. + mx.
250
200
6
150
100
50
10
0
0
8
10
5
20
30
40
50
60
70
Relative abundance
Figure 7. Plot graphic between relative abundante and f+h/md+mx values obtained from
South american predators. 1: Tyto alba; 2: Asio flammeus; 3: Bubo virginianus; 4: Athene
cunicularia; 5: Circus buffoni; 6: Didelphis albiventris; 7: Conepatus chinga; 8: Oncifelis
geoffroyi; 9: Herpailurus yaguaroundi; 10: Canis (Pseudalopex) gimnocercus.
Figure 8. SEM image shows bone fragment (no micromammal) with a high digestion degree
produced by Puma concolors gastric juices.
!
R elative
A bundance
Pc/c
T+r/f+h
Postcranial
Breakage
M axilla with
zygom atic
M axilla
Loose teeth
M andible
Breakage
M andible
Loose teeth
C ategory 1
Tyto alba
C ategory 2
Bubo
Virginianus
D idelphis
abiventris
Bubo virginianus
Asio flam m eus
Tyto alba
Athene cunicularia
Asio flam m eus
Conepatus
Chinga
Bubo virginianus
Tyto alba
Athene cunicularia
Asio flam m eus
Tyto alba
C ategory 3
Athene cunicularia
Circus buffoni
M ilvago chim ango
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
O ncifelis geoffroyi
D idelphis
albiventris
Athene
cunicularia
Bubo
virginianus
Bubo virginianus
Asio flam m eus
D idelphis
albiventris
Conepatus chinga
C ategory 4
Circus buffoni
Asio flam m eus
Conepatus
chinga
D idelphis
albiventris
Conepatus
chinga
Athene
cunicularia
Puma concolor
C ategory 5
Canis Pseudalopex
gym nocercus
M ilvago chim ango
and felids
Circus buffoni
O ncifelis
geoffroyi
Puma concolor
D idelphis
albiventris
O ncifelis geoffroyi
Pum a concolor
M ilvago chim ango
Tyto alba
Asio flam m eus
Bubo
virginianus
D idelphis
albiventris
Conepatus
chinga
Asio flam m eus
D idelphis
albiventris
Athene
cunicularia
Bubo virginianus
Circus buffoni
D idelphis
albiventris
Conepatus
chinga
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
Circus buffoni
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
M ilvago
chimango
Tyto alba
D idelphis
albiventris
Circus buffoni
Athene
cunicularia
Bubo virginianus
Circus buffoni
D idelphis
albiventris
Conepatus
chinga
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
M ilvago
chimango
"
Isolated teeth
C ategory 1
Tyto alba
Asio flam m eus
B reakage
T eeth
Tyto alba
Asio flam m eus
M olars w ith
digestion
Incisors w ith
digestion
C ategory 2
M ilvago
chim ango
Bubo
virginianus
C ircus buffoni
Bubo
virginianus
Asio flam m eus
Tyto alba
Tyto alba
Postcranial
w ith
digestion
C ategory 3
Athene cunicularia
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
Bubo virginianus
C ategory 4
C onepatus
chinga
D idelphis
albiventris
C onepatus
chinga
C ategory 5
C ircus buffoni
M ilvago chim ango
C onepatus
chinga
D idelphis
albiventris
Athene cunicularia
C ircus buffoni
C onepatus
C hinga
O ncifelis G eoffroyi
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
C ircus buffoni
O ncifelis geoffroyi
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
M ilvago chim ango
D idelphis
albiventris
Poliborus planctus
M ilvago chim ango
O ncifelis geoffroyi
H erpailurus
jaguaroundi
Acknowledgements
Denys, C.
1985 Noveaux critres de reconnaissance des concentrations
de microvertbrs dapres lestude des pelotes de
chouettes du Bostwana (Afrique australe). Bulletin
Museum Naturale Historie Naturale 7(4):879-933.
REFERENCES CITED
Andrews, P.
1990 Owls, Caves and Fossils. Natural History Museum
Publications, London.
#
Denys, C.
Pardias, U. F. J.
1991 Roedores, Marsupiales y Edentados en la secuencia
de Fortn Necochea, General Lamadrid, Buenos Aires.
Implicancias paleoambientales. Boletn del Centro
2:139-153.
Fernndez Jalvo, Y.
Quintana, C.
$
%