Bioresource Technology
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w.e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b i o r t e c h
h i g h l i g h t s
Multi-level hydrothermal process was studied to optimize lignocellulosic conversion.
Semi-flow system offers separate and long residence times to undissolved materials.
Dissolution of amorphous compounds at 195200 C without affecting cellulose.
Cellulose dissolution ratios higher than 75% are achieved at 245250 C.
Soluble sugars can be further obtained after the hydrolysis of dissolved cellulose.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 25 March 2016
Received in revised form 28 April 2016
Accepted 29 April 2016
Available online 2 May 2016
Keywords:
Cellulose hydrolysis
Hydrothermal process
Lignocellulosic waste
Multi-level dissolution
Semi-flow reaction system
a b s t r a c t
The hydrothermal process is efficient in lignocellulosic conversion and is beneficial to potential
bioethanol production. In batch- and flow-type processes, concurrent dissolution and hydrolysis of
lignocellulose result in product loss and inhibitory intermediates. Therefore, multi-level hydrothermal
conversion of corn stalks was implemented with a semi-flow system to provide different residence times
to undissolved compounds and facilitate dissolution or hydrolysis at respective optimal conditions. Firststage dissolution dissolved amorphous hemicellulose and lignin at 195200 C. Xylan, acid soluble lignin,
and part of Klason lignin were dissolved without affecting glucan. In second-stage dissolution, the
crystallinity of the undissolved materials suddenly decreased at 245250 C. The cellulose dissolution
ratio was higher than 75%. Soluble sugars were obtained after the hydrolysis of dissolved cellulose at
280 C. The results provide significant information on the multi-level hydrothermal process and its
potential applications for recovering valuable chemicals from lignocellulosic waste.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Biofuel production from biomass conversion has received
increasing attention as a promising renewable energy that can
overcome the disadvantages of fossil fuel, such as climate change
and limited availability. As the most commonly produced biofuel
in the world, bio-ethanol is traditionally obtained from foodbased sources, such as agricultural crops with high contents of
carbohydrates, which are facing the problem of competition for
food requirement (Bommarius et al., 2008). As a result, interest
in second-generation processes utilizing low-cost feedstock, such
as lignocellulosic materials, has emerged (Sittijunda et al., 2013).
Cellulose, one of the main components in lignocellulose, can be
converted into fermentable saccharides and fermented into
Corresponding author.
E-mail address: yanzhao@bnu.edu.cn (Y. Zhao).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.135
0960-8524/ 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
49
Y. Zhao
Y. Zhao
et al.
et/ al.
Bioresource
/ Bioresource
Technology
Technology
214 214
(2016)
(2016)
496503
496503
lignocellulose (Gullon et al., 2012). Several studies have also presented hydrothermal technologies for lignocellulosic liquefaction,
gasification, and carbonization (Resende et al., 2007; Funke and
Ziegler, 2010; Tymchyshyn and Xu, 2010; Hoekman et al., 2011).
Several researchers previously reported the hydrothermal
dissolution and hydrolysis of lignocelluloses with relatively high
temperatures, especially with the involvement of supercritical
water (above 374
C and 22.1 MPa) and subcritical water
(normally above 300 C and 10 MPa) (L and Saka, 2012; Zhao et
al., 2012). However, many of them found that monosaccharides
decompose rapidly into unfermentable products during cellulose
dissolution and hydrolysis, resulting
in
the loss
of
fermentable sugars (Kumar and Gupta, 2008; Zhao et al., 2015).
This result is mainly attributed to the synchronous dissolution
and hydrolysis of cellu- lose, especially in the conventional batchor flow-type hydrother- mal
process for
lignocellulosic
conversion
(Zhao
et al.,
2012). Moreover, synchronous
dissolution and hydrolysis of
lignocellu- lose
at
high
temperatures result in the formation of various intermediates,
such as
phenolic and furfural, which are
derived from
hemicellulose and lignin degradation and inhibit cellulose
hydrolysis or subsequent yeast fermentation (Qing et al., 2010;
Kont et al., 2013).
To avoid the disadvantages caused by product degradation,
considerable attention has been devoted to the reaction mechanisms of lignocellulosic dissolution and hydrolysis during
hydrothermal treatment. According to previous studies, the
decomposition of lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose can be
characterized by temperature as follows: hemicellulose mainly
decomposes between 200 C and 400 C, cellulose decomposes
at high temperatures of 300400 C, and lignin gradually decomposes between 180 C and 600 C (Libra et al., 2011). Several
researchers reported that all hemicellulose, 3560% of lignin,
and 422% of cellulose can be dissolved with flow-type
hydrothermal treatment at 200230 C, 34.5 MPa, and 15 min
(Mosier et al., 2005). Therefore, different treatment temperatures
can be utilized for hemicellulose and cellulose hydrolysis separately, given that cellulose is more resistant to hydrolysis than
hemicellulose (L et al., 2009). The multi-step hydrothermal process has been applied to convert biomass waste, such as rapeseed straw, and depolymerization of hemicellulose, cellulose,
and lignin has been implemented with a batch system at
210 C, 270 C, and 330 C, respectively (Pinkowska and Wolak,
2013). L and Saka also reported that the semi-flow hydrothermal system, which is superior to the batch system in the respect
of total saccharide production, provides the maximum saccharides from hemicellulose and cellulose in Japanese beech at
230 C and 270 C, respectively (L and Saka, 2010). However,
clear fundamental understanding of the process, especially
multi-level dissolution and hydrolysis with the semi-flow process, remains lacking (Kumar et al., 2010). In addition, no standard process conditions exist; as a result, each raw material
should be individually studied and optimized (Rostagno et al.,
2015).
To overcome the problem in the synchronous dissolution and
hydrolysis of lignocellulosic compounds, a semi-flow reaction system was
applied in this study to implement a multi-level
hydrothermal process for lignocellulosic conversion. The semiflow system keeps the undissolved materials in the dissolution
unit as stationary phase and discharges the dissolved compounds
from the system as mobile phase. This system structure offers
different residence times to undissolved and dissolved compounds
and thus avoids their insufficient dissolution and excessive
degradation, respectively. Furthermore, the multi-level operation
benefits the dissolution or hydrolysis of the major compounds in
their respec- tive
optimal
conditions. To
examine the
mechanisms of asyn- chronous dissolution and hydrolysis of
lignin, hemicellulose, and
49
T
T
Fig. 1. Apparatus diagram of the semi-flow hydrothermal reaction system. 1. water tank; 2. metering pump; 3. preheating unit; 4. dissolution unit (equipped with filters);
5. hydrolysis unit; 6. termination unit (equipped with a water cooling jacket); 7. temperature controller; 8. check valve; 9. thermocouple; 10. counterbalance valve; 11.
pressure meter.
Table 1
Reaction temperatures for the different experimental strategies.
Experimental strategy
Unit
Temperature interval
First-stage dissolution
First-stage dissolution
Second-stage dissolution and hydrolysis
180215 C
Null
5 C
Null
First-stage dissolution
Second-stage dissolution
Hydrolysis
205 C
230250 C
280 C
Null
5 C
Null
74.68%
80
70.58%
70
CI (%)
The water content of the corn stalks was calculated by measuring weight loss after oven drying at 105 C for 24 h, and the ash
content was further calculated by measuring weight loss after furnace ignition at 600 C for 2 h. The compositions, including cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, of the raw materials and solid
residues after treatment were determined to be polymeric carbohydrates and acid insoluble and soluble lignin through highperformance anion exchange chromatography (ICS3000, Dionex,
USA) and UVvis spectroscopy following two-step acid hydrolysis
62.83%
73.04%
72.82%
64.63%
61.80% 61.93%
60
50
45.66%
40
Raw materials180 C
185 C
190 C
195 C
200 C
205 C
210 C
215 C
Fig. 2. Crystallinity indexes of raw corn stalks and undissolved materials in the
first-stage dissolution.
yacetone, and 5-HMF, were quantified through HPLC (Agilent Technologies 1260 Infinity, USA) with a special sugar column (Shodex,
Sugar KS-801, Japan) at 50 C and 1.0 mL min 1.
1
3. Results and discussion
Table 2
Chemical compositions of raw corn stalks and undissolved materials in the first-stage dissolution (%).
Temperature
Glucan
Arabinose
Galactose
Xylan
Klason lignin
Sum
Raw materials
180 C
185 C
190 C
195 C
200 C
205 C
210 C
215 C
35.74
63.94
63.71
66.29
67.95
65.77
64.91
74.30
65.88
1.98
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
0.63
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
16.91
4.24
5.49
6.84
2.67
2.76
1.17
1.06
1.00
15.75
16.67
14.02
13.90
12.16
12.99
10.61
8.26
7.67
2.31
0.66
0.65
0.87
N.D.
0.67
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
73.32
85.52
83.87
87.90
82.77
82.19
76.69
83.62
74.55
Table 3
Cellulose
Hemicellulose
Lignin
Sum
35.74
35.74
35.74
35.74
35.74
35.74
35.74
35.74
19.52
2.37
3.08
3.69
1.40
1.50
0.64
0.51
18.06
9.69
8.23
7.96
6.40
7.42
5.84
3.97
73.32
47.80
47.05
47.39
43.54
44.66
42.23
40.22
4.16
Raw materials
180 C
185 C
190 C
195 C
200 C
205 C
210 C
215 C
40.44
35.74
0.54
80
73.84%
72.90%
69.79%
CI (%)
70
68.92%
60
50
Table 4
Chemical compositions of raw corn stalks and undissolved materials in the secondstage dissolution.
45.66%
36.33%
Temperature
Glucan
(%)
Xylan
(%)
Klason
lignin (%)
Sum
(%)
230 C
63.12
0.16
11.66
74.94
40
30
Raw materials 230 C
235 C
240 C
245 C
250 C
Fig. 3. Crystallinity indexes of raw corn stalks and undissolved materials in the
second-stage dissolution.
235 C
240 C
60.50
52.57
0.31
0.39
18.56
33.13
79.37
86.09
3.26
1.59
245 C
250 C
61.59
74.33
0.79
N.D.
24.53
6.79
86.91
2.51
81.12
10.95
100
80
60
40
Possible dissolution ratio
20
0
230 C
235 C
240 C
245 C
250 C
Table 5
Substance concentrations in liquid hydrolysates collected after combining dissolution and hydrolysis with different temperatures of the second-stage dissolution (mg/L).
Substance
230 C
235 C
240 C
245 C
250 C
Cellopentaose
Cellotriose
Cellobiose
Glucose
Fructose
Glyceraldehyde
Dioxyacetone
HMF
35.07 6.68
28.72 3.14
25.50 2.02
5.36 0.35
28.38 6.99
26.08 2.86
15.37 1.53
1.75 0.11
36.90 7.45
23.09 4.85
23.30 3.41
4.71 1.25
47.15 24.16
33.05 10.86
13.45 2.88
1.63 0.26
56.94 3.49
36.82 2.19
27.29 0.13
9.22 0.67
45.08 10.21
38.61 4.86
16.67 2.37
3.07 0.32
88.70 9.20
32.42 2.67
54.42 5.25
13.83 2.73
111.43 5.32
49.87 3.12
17.76 2.83
2.41 0.06
135.00 3.26
30.21 1.06
51.28 12.35
14.68 3.27
88.98 23.34
44.87 6.33
28.02 0.12
3.84 1.30
Table 6
Collected yields of soluble sugars in the hydrolysates after combining dissolution and hydrolysis with different temperatures of the second-stage dissolution.
Item
230 C
235 C
240 C
245 C
250 C
2.71 0.03
123.03 0.46
147.64 0.55
5.45
2.75 0.07
135.15 31.42
168.18 37.70
6.12
2.70 0.01
175.35 16.70
210.42 20.04
7.79
2.71 0.01
300.79 9.18
360.95 11.01
13.32
2.71 0.02
320.14 34.64
384.17 41.57
14.18
Funke, A., Ziegler, F., 2010. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and
discussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuel Bioprod.
Biorefin. 4, 160177.
Gullon, P., Romani, A., Vila, C., Garrote, G., Parajo, J.C., 2012. Potential of
hydrothermal treatments in lignocellulose biorefineries. Biofuel Bioprod.
Biorefin. 6, 219232.
Hoekman, S.K., Broch, A., Robbins, C., 2011. Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) of
lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Fuel 25, 18021810.
Jiang, W., Peng, H.D., Li, H.Q., Xu, J., 2014. Effect of acetylation/deacetylation on
enzymatic hydrolysis of corn stalk. Biomass Bioenergy 71, 294298.
Kang, S.M., Li, X.L., Fan, J., Chang, J., 2013. Hydrothermal conversion of lignin: a
review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 27, 546558.
Kont, R., Kurasin, M., Teugjas, H., Valjamae, P., 2013. Strong cellulase inhibitors from
the hydrothermal pretreatment of wheat straw. Biotechnol. Biofuels 6, 135
148.
Kruse, A., 2008. Supercritical water gasification. Biofuel Bioprod. Biorefin. 2, 415
437.
Kumar, S., Gupta, R.B., 2008. Hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose in subcritical
and supercritical water in a continuous flow reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47,
93219329.
Kumar, S., Gupta, R., Lee, Y.Y., Gupta, R.B., 2010. Cellulose pretreatment in
subcritical water: effect of temperature on molecular structure and enzymatic
reactivity. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 13371347.
Li, H.J., Pu, Y.Q., Kumar, R., Ragauskas, A.J., Wyman, C.E., 2014. Investigation of lignin
deposition on cellulose during hydrothermal pretreatment, its effect on
cellulose hydrolysis, and underlying mechanisms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 111,
485492.
Libra, J.A., Ro, K.S., Kammann, C., Funke, A., Berge, N.D., Neubauer, Y., Titirici, M.M.,
Fuhner, C., Bens, O., Kern, J., Emmerich, K.H., 2011. Hydrothermal carbonization
of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, processes and
applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2, 71106.
L, X., Saka, S., 2010. Hydrolysis of Japanese beech by batch and semi-flow water
under subcritical temperatures and pressures. Biomass Bioenergy 34, 1089
1097.
L, X., Saka, S., 2012. New insights on monosaccharides isomerization, dehydration
and fragmentation in hot-compressed water. J. Supercrit. Fluid 61, 146156.
L, X., Yamauchi, K., Phaiboonsilpa, N., Saka, S., 2009. Two-step hydrolysis of
Japanese beech as treated by semi-flow hot-compressed water. J. Wood Sci. 55,
367375.
Mosier, N., Wyman, C., Dale, B., Elander, R., Lee, Y.Y., Holtzapple, M., Ladisch, M.,
2005. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic
biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 673686.
Pinkowska, H., Wolak, P., 2013. Hydrothermal decomposition of rapeseed straw in
subcritical water. Proposal of three-step treatment. Fuel 113, 340346.
Qing, Q., Yang, B., Wyman, C.E., 2010. Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of
cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 96249630.
Rasmussen, H., Sorensen, H.R., Meyer, A.S., 2014. Formation of degradation
compounds from lignocellulosic biomass in the biorefinery: sugar reaction
mechanisms. Carbohydr. Res. 385, 4557.
Resende, F.L.P., Neff, M.E., Savage, P.E., 2007. Noncatalytic gasification of cellulose in
supercritical water. Energy Fuel 21, 36373643.
Rostagno, M.A., Prado, J.M., Mudhoo, A., Santos, D.T., Forster-Carneiro, T., Meireles,
M.A.A., 2015. Subcritical and supercritical technology for the production of
second generation bioethanol. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 35, 302312.
Sittijunda, S., Tomas, A.F., Reungsang, A., O-Thong, S., Angelidaki, I., 2013. Ethanol
production from glucose and xylose by immobilized Thermoanaerobacter
pentosaceus at 70 C in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
Bioresour. Technol. 143, 598607.
Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., Crocker, D., 2008.
Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Laboratory
Analytical Procedure. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-51042618.
Tolonen, L.K., Penttila, P.A., Serimaa, R., Kruse, A., Sixta, H., 2013. The swelling and
dissolution of cellulose crystallites in subcritical and supercritical water.
Cellulose 20, 27312744.
Tymchyshyn, M., Xu, C.C., 2010. Liquefaction of bio-mass in hot-compressed water
for the production of phenolic compounds. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 24832490.
Xiao, X., Bian, J., Li, M.F., Xu, H., Xiao, B., Sun, R.C., 2014. Enhanced enzymatic
hydrolysis of bamboo (Dendrocalamus giganteus Munro) culm by hydrothermal
pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 159, 4147.
Yoo, C.G., Kim, H., Lu, F.C., Azarpira, A., Pan, X.J., Oh, K.K., Kim, J.S., Ralph, J., Kim, T.H.,
2016. Understanding the physicochemical characteristics and the improved
enzymatic saccharification of corn stover pretreated with aqueous and gaseous
ammonia. Bioenergy Res. 9, 6776.
Zhao, X.Y., Chen, J., Chen, F.L., Wang, X.C., Zhu, Q.J., Ao, Q., 2013. Surface
characterization of corn stalk superfine powder studied by FTIR and XRD.
Colloid Surf. B 104, 207212.
Zhao, Y., Lu, W.J., Wang, H.T., Li, D., 2009a. Combined supercritical and subcritical
process for cellulose hydrolysis to fermentable hexoses. Environ. Sci. Technol.
43, 15651570.
Zhao, Y., Lu, W.J., Wang, H.T., Yang, J.L., 2009b. Fermentable hexose production from
corn stalks and wheat straw with combined supercritical and subcritical
hydrothermal technology. Bioresour. Technol. 100, 58845889.
Zhao, Y., Lu, W.J., Wu, H.Y., Liu, J.W., Wang, H.T., 2012. Optimization of supercritical
phase and combined supercritical/subcritical conversion of lignocellulose for
hexose production by using a flow reaction system. Bioresour. Technol. 126,
391396.
Zhao, Y., Zhang, S.Y., Chen, J.J., 2015. Mechanisms of sequential dissolution and
hydrolysis for lignocellulosic waste using a multilevel hydrothermal process.
Chem. Eng. J. 273, 3745.