Part 11-14

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED
PRACTICES FOR ASSURING STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY

ON OCTG PRODUCTS
F. Daguerre, M. Merliahmad, M. Tivelli

Technical Assistance - South East Asia
Introduction
Conceptual Vision
Well Challenges
Failure Lack of Structural Reliability
Well Design
(Load cases
Environment )
Exploration Drilling
(Associated
services)
Casing +
Cementing
Completion
Production
etc
DMF 4th Petroleum Forum
Federico Daguerre
Introduction
Conceptual Vision
Well Challenges
Well Design
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
(Load cases
Environment )
Casing +
Cementing
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
9Fluid dynamics
or
ki
ng
(Associated
services)
9Thermal profile
W
9Interaction fluids &

Mechanical
Properties
materials
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin Life ncy
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
9Multiaxial Loads
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Completion
Production
etc
Federico Daguerre
Introduction
From needs to requirements
Well Challenges
Well Design
Casing +
Cementing
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
NACE MR0175
/ISO15156
API 5C3 / ISO 10400
or
ki
ng
(Associated
services)
API 5CT/ISO 11960
API 5C5 / ISO13679

Proprietary specs.
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin Life ncy
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
(Load cases
Environment )
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Completion
Production
etc
Federico Daguerre
Introduction
Well Challenges
Well Design
Casing +
Cementing
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
NACE MR0175
/ISO15156
API 5C3 / ISO 10400
or
ki
ng
(Associated
services)
API 5CT/ISO 11960
API 5C5 / ISO13679

Proprietary specs.
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin Life ncy
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
(Load cases
Environment )
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Completion
Production
etc
Federico Daguerre
Material Performance
Material Properties
API 5CT/ISO 11960
Federico Daguerre
Material Properties
API 5CT/ISO 11960

Ys Range [ksi]
40 45 50 55 60 65
Group I
H40
70
75
80
85
90
95
100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150
Max HRC
J55 - K 55
N80 Type1 & N80Q
Group II
22
M65
23
L80
25,4
C90
C95
T95
Group III
P110
Group IV
25,4
Q125
Federico Daguerre
Material Properties
API 5CT/ISO 11960
or
ki
ng
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
6.2 Heat Treatment

7.1 Chemical Composition
7.10. Hardenability
7.11 Grain size
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
Federico Daguerre
Federico Daguerre
10
Material Properties
API 5CT/ISO 11960
or
ki
ng
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
6.2 Heat Treatment

7.1 Chemical Composition
7.10. Hardenability
7.11 Grain size
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
7.2 Tensile properties

7.3-7.-6 Charpy V-notch test
7.8 Hardness variation
7.14 Sulfide stress cracking
Federico Daguerre
11
Sulfide Stress Cracking Resistance
NACE MR0175 /ISO15156-2
Federico Daguerre
12
NACE MR0175 /ISO15156
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
9In environments containing H2S, hydrogen embrittlement,

Sulfide Stress Cracking could suddenly occur
Federico Daguerre
13
Factors interacting in the performance of steels
1. Chemical composition, method of manufacture, product form, strength,
hardness of the material and its local variations, amount of cold work,
heat-treatment condition, microstructure, microstructural uniformity,
grain size and cleanliness of the material;
2.
H2S Partial pressure in gas or equivalent concentration in water phase.
3. Acidity (in situ pH) of the water phase.

4. Chloride ion concentration in the water phase
5. Presence of sulfur or other oxidants
6. Exposure to non-production fluids
7. Exposure to temperature
8. Total tensile stress: applied stress plus residual stress.
9. Exposure time.
Federico Daguerre
14
H2S pp > 0,3Kpa (0,05psi)
Federico Daguerre
15
Material Properties
API 5CT/ISO 11960
Federico Daguerre
16
Material Properties
API 5CT/ISO 11960

Risk Concern ?
Supplementary
Requirements
Product specification
Level
Improve Structural Reliability
Mechanical Properties
Statistical testing
NDT acceptance criteria
Inspection Frequencies
9SR12. Statistical analysis of impact testing

9SR16. Impact testing (Charpy V-notch) for pipe
9H.2.2 Grade N80Q, PSL-3 (6.2.2). Only N80Q shall be furnished for PSL-3.
9H.4. PSL2 C90, T95, Q125. Chemical composition shall be Type 1.
9H.5 Yield strength - Q125, PSL-3. The maximum yield strength shall be 140 ksi
9H.6.1. PSL2. Charpy, minimum 75% shear area.
9H.7. PSL2 L80 Type 1: Hardenability 90%. PSL3 C90 & T95: 95%
9H.9 Sulfide stress-cracking - PSL-3. Method A testing with a load of 90% SMYS.
Federico Daguerre
17
Structural Performance
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
18
API 5C3 / ISO 10400
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
19
API 5C3 / ISO 10400

9Classical approach, deterministic, smooth body continuous mechanics
9Statistical approach, realizing the variability of product parameters
depending no actual process control capabilities
9Influence of imperfections and material fracture toughness in the
product rupture.
Federico Daguerre
20
API 5C3 / ISO 10400

6 Triaxial yield of pipe body
7 Ductile rupture of the pipe body
8 External pressure resistance
9 Joint strength
Annex B (inf.) Discussion of equations for ductile rupture
Annex D (inf.) Discussion of equations for fracture
Annex F (inf.) Development of probabilistic collapse performance properties
Annex G (inf.) Calculation of design collapse strength from collapse test data
Annex K (inf.) Tables of calculated performance properties in SI units
Federico Daguerre
21
API 5C3 / ISO 10400

6 Triaxial yield of pipe body
Internal Yield
Internal Pressure
_ Ys
Ys
Compression
Tension
External Yield
External Pressure
23 May 2011
Federico Daguerre
22
API 5C3 / ISO 10400

Annex F (inf.) Development of probabilistic collapse performance properties
Federico Daguerre
23
API 5C3 / ISO 10400

7 Ductile rupture of the pipe body
Annex B (inf.) Discussion of equations for ductile rupture
Annex D (inf.) Discussion of equations for fracture
9Final failure must consider the imperfection acceptance levels
9Annexes K and L: Burst for P110 at 12,5 % and at a 5 % NDT
inspection level.
9Supplementary requirements, like SR2, or PLS 2 /3 in API 5CT
ISO 11960 for a higher structural reliability becomes evident.
9Rupture could be ductile or fragile, with different mechanisms
and quite different load levels.
9H2S will affect the actual toughness and then special formulas
are to be considered. Several work is ongoing in this regards.
Federico Daguerre
24
API 5C5 / ISO 13679
or
ki
ng
W
Mechanical
Properties
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
t
rfo er tion
s
rm ial
an
ce
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Federico Daguerre
25
API 5C5 / ISO 13679

For API connections, round and buttress, the main
characteristics are covered in API TR 5C3 / ISO TR 10400
and tabulated in Annexes K and L.
The type of conditions in which they are used and their
limitations to low pressure, no critical services are
widely recognized.
API 5C5 / ISO 13679, that establishes minimum design
verification testing procedures and acceptance criteria for
casing and tubing premium connections
Federico Daguerre
26
API 5C5 / ISO 13679

It categorizes test severity into four test classes.
9Cal I, for liquid service, testing at room temperature
without external pressure and bending optional.
9Cal II adds thermal cycling with a cumulative exposure of
5 h to gas at 135 C.
9Cal III, for gas and liquid service, includes external
pressure in the cycling testing.
9Cal IV, for most severe application includes bending, and
thermal/pressure-tension cycling with cumulative exposure
of about 50 h to gas at 180 C.
Federico Daguerre
27
Validation Tests
GALLING RESISTANCE
ISO 13679 Galling Evaluation & Seal capacity under combined loads
Specimen preparation
Specimen 1
Specimen 2
Specimen 3
Thread-seal interference
H-L
L-L
H-H
Thread taper
PSBF
PSBF
NOM-NOM
PFBS
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
H/L
H/H
H/H
RRG (B)
7.2.4
L/H
Make and
Specimen 4
Specimen 5
Specimen 6
Specimen 7
H-L
L-H
L-H
PSBF
PSBF
PFBS
PFBS
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
MU (A)
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
7.2.2
H/H
H/L
H/H
H/L
H/L
RRG (B)
RRG (B)
RRG (B)
7.2.4
7.2.4
7.2.4
L/H
L/H
L/H
L-H
H-L
8 SPECIMENS
Specimen 8
break properties
Amount thread
compound/torque shown in
each block
MBG (B)
MBG (B)
MBG (B)
MBG (B)
7.2.3
7.2.3
7.2.3
7.2.3
L/H
L/H
L/H
L/H
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
FMU (B)
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
7.2.5
H/L
H/H
H/H
H/H
H/L
H/H
H/L
H/L
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
Bake
CAL II, III, IV
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
7.3.2
T/C pi/po
T/C pi/po
T/C pi/po
T/C pi/po
7.3.3
7.3.3
7.3.3
7.3.3
COMBINED
LOADS
FMU (B)
Series A
Series B
T/C pi w B
T/C pi w B
T/C pi w B
7.3.4
7.3.4
7.3.4
7.3.4
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Thermal Cycle
7.3.5
Failure test
pih+T to F
Failure test
C+po to F
Failure test
CAL
Failure test
po+C to F
Failure test
T+pi to F
IV & III
7.5.1
7.5.2
7.5.3
Path No.
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
Series C
Structural tests
th
T/C pi w B
DMF 4 Petroleum Forum
T to F
FAILURE
TESTS7.5.5
7.5.4
Federico Daguerre
Failure test
pi+C to F
Failure test
po to F
Failure test
pil+T to F
7.5.6
7.5.7
7.5.8
P6
P7
P8
28
API 5C5 / ISO 13679

20.0
Load Points
Collapse Pressure
15.0
95% VMES
Pressure [ksi]
100% VMES (Y ield)
-3,000
10.0
5.0
0.0
-2,000
-1,000
1,000
2,000
3,000
-5.0
-10.0
-15.0
-20.0
Test Failure
Axial Load [kips]
Federico Daguerre
29
Conclusions
Co
nd
M
Pe a
i
rfo ter tion
i
s
rm al
an
ce
or
ki
ng
9The application of these documents requires

a sound engineer judgment for each
application.
9Some cases are not considered in these

Mechanical
documents, and as stated in API 5CT / ISO
Properties
11960 introduction:
s
on
iti
nd
Co
g
kin
fe ncy
i
L
or
a
W
ct
pe
ex
9International Standards and Recommended

Practice assure the structural reliability.
Corrosion&
Cracking
Resistance
Product
Performance
Structural
Performance
Dimensions
Working Conditions
Users of this International Standard should be aware that further or

differing requirements may be needed for individual applications.
Federico Daguerre
30
Lessons Learned & Best Practices :

Chevron Thailand Shore Base Project
Sansana Malaiarisoon
Assistant Manager - Corporate Responsibility
Chevron Thailand Exploration and Production, Ltd.
4th Petroleum Forum
May 27, 2011
2010 Chevron
May 2011
Outline
I.
Project Rationale and Description
II.
Stakeholder Engagement Framework vs Chevron Project

Development and Execution Process (CPDEP) & Environmental,
Social and Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA)
III. Best Practices and lesson Learned
2010 Chevron
Potential Impacts on Local Fishery
Complimentary Initiatives
Public Scoping (PP1) vs Public Review Sessions (PP2)
I.
Project Rationale and Description
Project Rationale
Offshore platforms of Chevron Thailand are

located in the Gulf of Thailand
Offshore platforms are serviced by two shore

bases: Songkla and Sattahip , Chonburi
provinces
Capacity of both bases are insufficient
Possibilities to expand are limited
We will see increased activity in the near future
2010 Chevron
I.
Project Rationale and Description (contd)
Project Area: 395 rai ( 64 acres)

Land Part: Warehouse
Marine Part: Trestle and Jetty for berthing
2010 Chevron
II. Stakeholder Engagement Framework Vs CPDEP
Chevrons Vision : to be the energy company most admired for its people, partnership and performance
Chevrons OEMS Vision : to be recognized and admired by industry and local communities for its world-class performance on safety, health, the
environment, reliability and efficiency
Degree of Support Change
Chevron Project Development and Execution Process (CPDEP)

Phase 1 :
Phase 2 :
Phase 3 :
Phase 4 :
Phase 5 :
Opportunity
Develop
Alternatives
Develop
Preferred
Alternative
Execute
Operate
and
Evaluate
Acceptance /
EIA submission
Commitment /
EIA/HIA and Permit
approval
Understanding
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
Awareness
2008
2010
Continual
Improvement
2013
Stakeholder Engagement & Participation

Environmental, Social & Health Impact Assessment (ESHIA)
2010 Chevron
III. Best Practices & Lesson Learned:

Stakeholder Engagement Strategy
The Case of CTSB (January 2008 - April 2011)
No. of Visits
People
Engaged with
27
440
Public Hearing Meetings
2,258
Attitude Survey
467
In Depth Interview
1,147
18,655
86
2,706
213
368
> 10,000
11
343
Focus Group Meeting

Regulatory
Requirement (EIA)
Within
5 km Radius
Regular Visits
Stakeholder
Engagement
Focus Group Meeting s(Informal)

Open House Trips
Beyond
5 km Radius
2010 Chevron
Regular Visits
Open House Trips

Stakeholder Engagement Strategy (contd)
Vision: To improve the lives of people wherever we work and to be neighbor of choice
Committed to
companys
vision & the
Chevron Way
Sincere &
Respectful to
community
opinions
Transparent &
easily
accessible
2010 Chevron
Strategy
Lessons
Lessons Learned
Learned &
& Share
Share Information
Information with
with Project
Project
Team
Team
Principles
Stakeholder Engagement Plan

(Identification & Prioritization)
Early engagement prior to commencement
of project
Outcomes
Community Participation from inception
of the project
Community needs/concerns &
suggestions revealed and listened to
Regular and continual visits
Community participation in design of

project & mitigation measures
Focus groups &

community outreach activities
Community has correct understanding of

the project & Chevron
Monthly community meetings & regular

engagement via tea shop visits
Community participation in construction

of quality of life development plan
Seek communitys advice & give correct

project information
Community participation in M&E of

Chevrons performance in response to
EIA commitment
Open House Trips

Public relations and dissemination of
information via community board, local
radio and print publications
Better quality of life and well-being for

local community
Community accepts Chevron as a good
neighbor

Potential Impact on Local Fishery
April 2008: Eight focus group meetings with different groups of stakeholders to present the design and seek their feedback
Key Concern: Obstruction of breakwater on fishing and sailing routes & Obstruction of public beach
2010 Chevron

Potential Impact on Local Fishery (contd)
Solution: Revision of the Marine Part design from a breakwater sheltered harbor to an extended jetty with wave wall.
2010 Chevron

Potential Impact on Local Fishery (contd)
Impacts were significant since

the majority of local community
are fishermen
Impacts have been mitigated
Community concerns were

incorporated in our assessment
and planning
ESHIA is not only a checklist, but

strictly enforced
Gains TRUST from local

community
With the new design, fishing boats can go under the jetty, alleviating any
obstruction and the public beach is no longer obstructed
2010 Chevron
10

Complimentary Initiatives - Fisheries Working Committee
Objectives
To oversee the well-being of fisheries who will be
directly affected by the CTSB project
Members 222 members from 4 villages
Roles and Responsibilities
Set framework and criteria for compensation to fisheries
Monitor Chevrons performance on CTSB in response
to EIA commitment
Develop fishery community development plan
Current Status
6 meetings organized
Developing alternative occupation plan for fishery
groups
Serve as a representative on Bi-party Committee
2010 Chevron
11

Complimentary Initiatives - Community Advisory Committee
Objectives
To monitor Chevrons performance on CTSB in response
to our commitment to EIA
Members 24 members from all sectors:
Community leaders and local experts
Academics, health, local administrations, fisheries,
agriculture and local occupational community
Committees consultant (from community)
Roles and Responsibilities
Monitor CTSBs performance in response to EIA
commitment
Safeguard benefits for local community
To serve as a focal point that echoes communitys
concerns and complaints
Current Status
8 meetings organized
Recruiting local community as committee consultants
We want to transform committee from bi-party to tri-party
2010 Chevron
12

Complimentary Initiatives - CTSB CSR Plan
The plan is categorized into seven categories:
1. Education, Culture and
Youth Development
2. Community & Quality

of Life Development Plan
3. Community Cooperative Plan
4. Biodiversity Action Plan
5. Health & Safety

Promotion Plan
6. Local Community and
Public Participation
7. Fishery Development Plan
This plan covers the construction period, up until commencement of operation
2010 Chevron
13

Public Scoping Meeting (PP1) vs. Public Review Meeting (PP2)
Key Success Factors
No. of participants
(1,600 PAX)
1.
Intensive Stakeholder Engagement

Early, regular & continuous engagement with
key stakeholders
Various focus groups meetings (Govt,
community & medias)
Songkhla Open House Trips
Early engagement with Fishery Group
Establishment of working committee with local
community
Economic benefits & costs study
CSR project as social mitigation measures
2010 Chevron
14

Public Scoping Meeting (PP1) vs. Public Review Meeting (PP2) (contd)
Participants on August 5, 2010 (PP2)
Key Success Factors
2.
Strategic Preparation & Planning

Teashop dialog & consistent visit
Community meeting (i.e. village fund meeting,
elderly group meeting and village health
volunteer meeting)
Update information and dissemination via
community boards
3.
CTSB Model & Animation

Clear picture for local people to see how they
could live close to CTSB project and continue
their livelihood.
4.
Good Collaboration & Teamwork

Project Team, HES, PGPA, External
Consultants & Experts
2010 Chevron
15
2010 Chevron
16
New Life to Jasmine Field

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum Bangkok
26th_27th May 2011
Val Kienast and Rattana W.
Presentation Outline
Why New Life to Jasmine Field

X
Production history (arrested the decline and improved reserves replacement)
2010-2011 Infill drilling program results
How
X
Seismic and well integration for well placement , interpretation and reservoir mapping
Enhancing recovery through horizontal wells
Employing some newer technologies on the market to improve oil recovery
Conclusion & Acknowledgements
B5/27 Jasmine Field Location
Pattani
Basin
Jasmine
field
Jasmine and Ban Yen Highlights

2010-2011 To-date ...
Production
X
Produced 35 Millionth Barrel in March 2011
Slowed decline rate and maintained production

Development Drilling
X
11 Development Wells drilled in 2010

Delivering above expectation
11 Development Wells drilled in 2011

9 wells currently online, remaining waiting for tie-in or completion
Utilized all slots from all platforms
Reserves
X
2P Reserves Replacement Ratio (RRR) of 0.9 for both years
B5/27 Oil &Water Production
Wells / Online Year
2P
2P
1P
latf
or
latf
or
ms
latf
or
ms
Increasing Well Complexity ...

WPD
WPD
WPB
WPB
WPA
WPA
WPC
WPC
BYA
BYA
2010 infill well

Existing well
2011 infill well

Existing well
Infill Drilling EUR Delivery 2010 Wells ...
10 Wells online and delivering above expectation.

One dry well bold test of a similar stratigraphic trap as encountered by BYA-14
Red#. Future WO.
Infill Drilling EUR Delivery 2011 Wells ...
9 Wells online (C-17,18,19,20,22,23,BYA-09,10 & 23)
Red#. Future WO.
1 wet (C-21) bold test of new fault block

1 gassy (C-23)
BYA 24 is being evaluated and completed
Emerge data for Well Placement and Interpretation

Emerge PHIE cube provide log-type image, top-base sand not peak-trough, easy to
work and understand.
The faults are more visible in Emerge data
PHIE
C20
PSTM_FINAL_NO_WHITING
C20
Reservoir Maps Integrated Emerge Data

PHIE Mean Window Extraction
660_1&2 penetration point
660_1&2 Net Sand Map overlaid by structural contours
660_1&2 penetration point
Strong correlation between seismic and net sand observed from existing wells
Net Sand map is conditioned by seismic attribute
Reservoir Maps Integrated Emerge Data

Structural Modeling
Reservoir Mapping
Net Gas (ft)
Net Oil (ft)
JAS D24 Pre and Post Drill Comparison

Reservoir Map Overlaid by Structural contour
Reservoir Map Overlaid by Structural contour
D24
D24
D24ST
Existing penetration
Existing penetration
Expected : Thicker sand trend along NNW-SSE direction

36 ft of net reservoir is expected
Actual
proven
: Thicker sand trend along NNW-SSE direction is

31 ft f
i i f
Increasing Use of Horizontal Wells ...

C23
TD @ 12934ftMD
WPA
C16
C22
TD @ 11077ftMD
TD @ 10343ftMD
Infill drilling
Three Long-reach horizontal / high angle wells

Primary targets were 50 sands, post drill result
opens up more opportunities, north of A
platform
WPC
50 Reservoir Interval
140
HS
Intra HS
50
Enhancing Recovery Through Horizontal Wells

N
680
B15ST
B20
660
640-2
Infill drilling
B15ST
N
680
660
640-2
Increasing oil recovery of reservoirs with defined fluid contacts through horizontal wells
B20
Refined Reservoir Definition & Recovery

Optimisation ...
BYA09
BYA
BYA04
BYA-09
Infill drilling
Advanced mapping technique to better indentify

prospect.
Advanced well and reservoir management through use
of ICDs in Horizontal Wells
BYA-04
D-17
D-16
D-14
Maximizing Recovery Well Optimisation

& Application of New Technologies
Periscope -To steer horizontal wells
C16 Periscope
Stethoscope - Pressure measurement while

drilling
Tractor - Perforation on C-19 high deviated well

and cased hole logging.
ICD - BYA-09
Integration of Static and Dynamic data to develop
full field reservoir model
Seismic,
Exploration,
Appraisal
Raw Data
Hierarchical
Rock Model
Property
Model
UpUp-scaled
Simulation
Model
New Life to Jasmine Field

Summary
Taking a new look at seismic helped to target smaller reservoirs and better define
the larger established reservoirs.
Applying good Development Geology and Reservoir Engineering techniques

combined with some of the newer technology on the market arrested the decline and
improved the reserve replacement ratios.
Next step is to apply the static and dynamic modelling for evaluation of the potential
for IOR -- specifically utilizing produced water for water-flooding 050 reservoir.
Acknowledgements
Val Kienast (Co-Author)
Manora Team leader
Piyatad Tabmanee
Jasmine PE
Theeranun Limniyakul
Jasmine PE
Carlos Rodriguez
Jasmine Senior PE
Fred Houtzager
Jasmine Team leader/Chief PE
Christopher Platt
Chief Petrophysicist
Jason McClure
Supervising Drilling Engineer
Chris Oglesby
Chief Geologist
David Carter
Chief Geophysicist
Mike Pine
VP Development
Ian Anderson
Senior VP Exploration
David Johnson
President
20
The End
5 Year Plan Presentation to DMF April 2011
21
2. EMERGE Multi-Attribute Analysis

The Objective of the EMERGE Program:
EMERGE is a program that analyzes
well log and seismic data.
It finds a relationship between the log
and seismic data at the well locations.
It uses this relationship to predict or
estimate a volume of the log property at all
locations of the seismic volume.
The Data that EMERGE uses:

A seismic volume (usually 3D).
A series of wells which tie the volume.
Each well contains target log, such as porosity, which is to be predicted.
Each well also contains the information for converting from depth to time, usually in the
form of a check-shot corrected sonic log.
(Optional) One or more external attributes in the form of seismic 3D volumes.
22
2011 Jasmine C Drilling Results

C23
C17
7 wells drilled
6 wells completed
C22
One dry well, tested new fault block

C18
C20
Utilized all slots in C platform

Primary targets were 50 sands, post drill
result opens up more opportunities, north
of A platform
Oil Producer
C21
C19
Well
Fault Block
Sands
Pre /Post Drill EUR

(MSTB)
Initial Rate/Status
C-17
Del-6B
390/50
180/336
>650
C-18
Del-6C
50
250/156
Wait for flowline
C-19
Del-6D
HS
200/200
530
C-20
Del-6
245/200/HS/50
125/170
190
C-21
New Fault Block
216/0
P&A
HS/50(Gas/Wet)
C-22(H)
Jas A_CW
50
230/321
>600
C-23(H)
Jas A_East
50
275/To be evaluated
500
23
2011 Ban Yen A Drilling Results
4 wells drilled and completed
BYA09
Utilized all slots in

platform
Production expected to be better

than pre drill predictions
BYA24
BYA10
Well
Fault Block
Ban Yen
BYA23
Oil Producer
Sands
Pre /Post Drill EUR

(MSTB)
Initial Rate/Status
BYA-9(H)
Main
250
300/300
1370 (ESP)
BYA-10
South
245/200/180/160
240/470
500 (ESP)
BYA-23
South/BY2D
460/50
330/316
620 (ESP)
BYA-24
Main
540/50
300/To be evaluated
Wait for completion

Part 11-14

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Part 11-14

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDED

PRACTICES FOR ASSURING STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY

F. Daguerre, M. Merliahmad, M. Tivelli

Failure Lack of Structural Reliability

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

9Interaction fluids &

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

API 5CT/ISO 11960

API 5C5 / ISO13679

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

API 5CT/ISO 11960

API 5C5 / ISO13679

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5CT/ISO 11960

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5CT/ISO 11960

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5CT/ISO 11960

6.2 Heat Treatment

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5CT/ISO 11960

6.2 Heat Treatment

7.2 Tensile properties

NACE MR0175 /ISO15156-2

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

NACE MR0175 /ISO15156

9In environments containing H2S, hydrogen embrittlement,

H2S Partial pressure in gas or equivalent concentration in water phase.

3. Acidity (in situ pH) of the water phase.

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5CT/ISO 11960

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5CT/ISO 11960

Improve Structural Reliability

9SR12. Statistical analysis of impact testing

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C3 / ISO 10400

API 5C5 / ISO 13679

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C5 / ISO 13679

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

API 5C5 / ISO 13679

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum

CAL II, III, IV

DMF 4 Petroleum Forum

API 5C5 / ISO 13679

100% VMES (Y ield)

Axial Load [kips]

DMF 4th Petroleum Forum