0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
12 tayangan2 halaman
The document summarizes a symposium on the heterotrophic plate count (HPC) test for measuring microorganisms in drinking water. Over 180 participants from 27 countries addressed issues like the relationship between HPC levels and health risks. The historic use of the HPC test dates to 1883 but it does not distinguish pathogens from non-pathogens. While high HPC levels can affect taste and odor, evidence links no illness to non-pathogenic bacterial growth. The included WHO Expert Panel Report provides consensus on interpreting HPC data in water management and distribution.
The document summarizes a symposium on the heterotrophic plate count (HPC) test for measuring microorganisms in drinking water. Over 180 participants from 27 countries addressed issues like the relationship between HPC levels and health risks. The historic use of the HPC test dates to 1883 but it does not distinguish pathogens from non-pathogens. While high HPC levels can affect taste and odor, evidence links no illness to non-pathogenic bacterial growth. The included WHO Expert Panel Report provides consensus on interpreting HPC data in water management and distribution.
The document summarizes a symposium on the heterotrophic plate count (HPC) test for measuring microorganisms in drinking water. Over 180 participants from 27 countries addressed issues like the relationship between HPC levels and health risks. The historic use of the HPC test dates to 1883 but it does not distinguish pathogens from non-pathogens. While high HPC levels can affect taste and odor, evidence links no illness to non-pathogenic bacterial growth. The included WHO Expert Panel Report provides consensus on interpreting HPC data in water management and distribution.
International Journal of Food Microbiology 92 (2004) 239 240
www.elsevier.com/locate/ijfoodmicro
Editorial
Heterotrophic Plate Count
IJFM Introduction The HPC, or standard plate count, is the internationally accepted test for measuring heterotrophic microorganism populations in drinking water. HPC tests, however, do not distinguish between pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms, and they account for only a small and undefined portion of the organisms that are present. This special issue of the Journal contains 13 of the 40 papers presented at the NSF International/World Health Organization Symposium on HPC Bacteria in Drinking WaterHealth Implications held in Geneva, Switzerland from April 22 to 24, 2002. The Symposium addressed the role of the Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC) measurement in drinking water quality management. More than 180 participants from 27 countries representing academia, government, industry, public health organizations, water supply and trade associations participated in this symposium. These, as well as the other 27 papers, formed the background for the WHO Expert Meeting examining the HPC issue on April 25 and 26, 2002 at WHO Headquarters in Geneva. The WHO Expert Panel Consensus Report is included in this special issue. The major issues addressed at the NSF/WHO Symposium included:
the relationship between HPC in drinking water
(including that derived from in-line treatment systems, dispensers and bottled water) and health risks for the general public; the role of HPC as an indirect indicator or index for pathogens in drinking water; the role of HPC in assessing the efficacy and proper functioning of water treatment and supply processes; and 0168-1605/$ - see front matter D 2004 Published by Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.08.004
the relationship between HPC and the aesthetic
acceptability of drinking water.
The historic origin of the HPC test dates back to
1883 and the pioneering work of Robert Koch. The HPC test medium exists in many formulations, but a particularly widely used version was developed in 1985 by Donald Reasoner and Edwin Geldreich. Koch saw no evidence of the presence of pathogens among the common microorganisms measured in the test. Early on he warned of the danger of false conclusions of health risks based upon those colony counts alone. He did show, however, that his test was valuable as an indicator of the performance of filtration systems which, in their proper operation, could reduce pathogens in treated drinking water and therefore the incidences of waterborne disease. Although some pathogens can be isolated from drinking water on HPC media, most, if not all, of the microorganisms detected with this test are not human pathogens. Furthermore, there is no constant ratio of pathogens to heterotrophic bacteria and, therefore, the HPC test is not an effective means of indicating the presence of pathogens in drinking water. This finding has been confirmed by health studies that have shown that human populations exposed to heterotrophic bacteria did not exhibit excess illness or infections. High levels of microbial growth can affect the taste and odor of drinking water and may well indicate the presence of nutrients and biofilms, as well as the possibility that some event has interfered with the normal production of the drinking water. HPC counts also routinely increase in water that has been treated by an in-line device such as a carbon
240
Editorial
filter or softener, in water-dispensing devices and in
bottled waters and indeed in all water that has suitable nutrients and does not have a residual disinfectant. However, there is no firm evidence that non-pathogenic bacterial growth as measured by HPC is accompanied by increased risk of illness among consumers. On the other hand, there is some evidence that the presence of the indigenous non-harmful bacteria may challenge the survival of pathogens that may be present in biofilms and on surfaces. There is concern that some immuno-compromised persons may be at risk from exposure to otherwise harmless bacteria if exposure is excessive. Consequently, there is honest debate among professionals as to the need, utility or quantitative basis for health-based standards or guidelines relating to HPC-measured micro-organisms in drinking water. The WHO Expert Panel Report, supported in part by the papers presented at the Symposium, addressed that debate and provided consensus conclusions that we hope will provide a basis for appropriate interpretation of HPC data that are produced from water. As indicated above, that Report is included in this special issue. We hope that the papers presented in this special issue provide additional useful information and perspective on the utility and the limitations of HPC data in the management and operation of piped water systems as well as other means of providing drinking water to the public. We acknowledge the efforts of all of the committee members and authors, and to the major sponsors NSF International and the World Health Organization. The WHO Expert Panel Meeting and Report were funded in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Health Canada, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the American Waterworks Association Research Foundation, and the NSF Center
for Public Health Education. We also acknowledge the
Symposium sponsorship by stakeholder associations who contributed to the success of the Symposium, and are listed in the event summary on the web at http:// www.nsf.org/conference/hpc/hpc_report.html. Jamie Bartram * World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva 1211, Switzerland E-mail address: bartramj@who.int Joseph Cotruvo1 J. Cotruvo Associates/NSF International, 5015 46th Street NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA E-mail address: joseph.cotruvo@verizon.net Al Dufour 2 US EPA, 26 W Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA E-mail address: Dufour.alfred@epa.gov Stan Hazan3 NSF Center for Public Health Education, 789 North Dixboro Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA E-mail address: hazan@nsf.org Bob Tanner4 NSF International-Brussels, 148 Avenue Grand Champ, 1150 Brussels, Belgium E-mail address: btanner@nsf.org
Empty Buckets and Overflowing Pits: Urban Water and Sanitation Reforms in Sub-Saharan Africa – Acknowledging Decline, Preparing for the Unprecedented Wave of Demand