0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
PAGE
1
2
1.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
2.0 TABLE OF CONTENT
3.0 INTRODUCTION
3.1 INDUSTRIAL TRAINING
4
5
7
8
13
16
23
26
27
29
3.0
INTRODUCTION
3.1
INDUSTRIAL TRAINING
Industrial Training program is one of the important components in the degree syllabus offered by Bachelor of
Chemical Engineering, Universiti Technology Mara (UiTM Shah Alam). The industrial training program is
compulsory to all engineering students as they will be trained at any selected engineering company, covering
a wide range engineering fields and industries. The training at Schaefer Kalk Sdn Bhd was commenced from
23rd Jun until 5th September 2014. The duration was 11 weeks. The main reason for this industrial training
program is to help students to achieve objectives stated below:
1)To provide early exposure to students in order to adapt to the working environment.
2)To create a special bond or relationship between the employment sector and universities.
3)To introduce future graduates with the quality of the field and themselves to prospective
employers.
4)To give students opportunity to put into practice the theories they have learned in the real job
situation.
5)To improve students skills and increase the efficiency of communication with employers and
working colleagues.
6)To increase self-confidence to act as a professional engineer in the working environment.
3.2
TRAINING SCHEDULE
3
WEEK
1
DATE
18/07/201622/07/2016
25/07/201629/07/2016
01/08/201603/08/2016
04/08/16
05/08/16
SUMMARY ACTIVITIES
Briefing about safety and the company
Visit around the plant (limestone storage, kiln,
hydration, PCC, packing plant and warehouse)
Briefing on kiln and hydration plant
Kiln and Hydration plant analysis
Draw and understand process flow
08/08/201610/08/2016
11/08/201612/08/2016
15/08/2016
16/08/201619/08/2016
22/08/201626/08/2016
29/08/201602/09/2016
05/09/201609/09/2016
12/09/201616/09/2016
10
19/09/201623/09/2016
Presentation preparation
Presentation to SKM
4.0
COMPANY BACKGROUND
Established in 1995, Schaefer Kalk (M) Sdn Bhd is 100% owned by Schaefer Kalk GmbH & Co. KG,
Germany. Based on Diez, 70 kilometres northwest of Frankfurt, Schaefer Kalk has been involved in
producing calcium products since 1860. The German company employs 700 staff and produces a wide
range of high-quality calcium-based products. The research and development department based in
Henstatten develops many products to match specific demands from costumers, as does Schaefer Kalk
(Malaysia)s research and development facilities in Kuala Ketil, Kedah. Schaefer Kalk has established a fully
automatic production process to produce high quality calcium products. Capacity is 50 000 tons annually of
precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC), 80 000 tons per year of calcium hydroxide with purity above 98 %.
Producing High Quality Precipitated Calcium Carbonate and highly reactive Calcium Hydroxide using the
highest technology, with customers being worldwide leaders in various ranges of applications from paper,
toothpaste, paint and plastics to pharmaceuticals, oil refinery processes and waste treatment. This company
runs 3 plant in producing high quality precipitate calcium carbonate and highly reactive calcium hydroxide.
The process involve are:
REACTION IN KILN:
CaCO3
CaO + CO2
(Quicklime)
CaO + H2O
Ca(OH)2
(Hydrated Lime)
Ca (OH) 2 + CO2
CaCO3 + H2O
(PCC)
SCHAEFER KALK has been producing precipitated calcium carbonates since 1954. They are marketed
under the brand name SCHAEFER PRECARB.
In our modern production plants we are able to manufacture a range of qualities that meet the exacting
requirements of our customers.
We always focus on our customers and their individual needs. We develop specific solutions to products and
processes in close cooperation with them.
Crystal Design
Precipitated calcium carbonate (PCC) can be produced as various crystal modifications and granule forms.
The physical parameters for each of these precipitation products are optimized according to desired
application, e.g.
particle size and granule size distribution
single particles or agglomerations of primary crystals
specific surface, pore volume, absorptive capacity (oil number)
4.1
AND 2:
To find how many PCC produced from each reactor and power used forMILL
each 1reactor
To reduce size of the grits to
<45m
To find whether amount of PCC produced is in range amount
Above are the sample images of reactor. Reactors are only used in PCC plant. There are 6 reactor available
in the plant. There are small reactors and large reactors. Reactor 1, 3 and 5 are labelled as small reactor
which only consist of feed pump and agitator which uses power. Reactor 2, 4 and 6 are labelled as large
reactor which uses blower and agitator as source of power.
Every sample from each reactor needs to be taken and then those samples are used to find how many solid
contents are available in those samples. Three trials were taken for each sample and thus average was
obtained.
TRIAL 1
REACT
UNIT
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
OR
Ca(OH)2
TOTA
L
g/L
200.2
215.52
192.09
173.27
186.49
164.66
m3/batch
16.5
36.19
12.5
40.57
14
31.47
L/batch
16500
36190
12500
40570
14000
31470
Total
(min/batc
195
199
158
224
173
181
Batchin
h)
16940
39194.3
15196.
31381.
15091.
28629.
99
98
68
01
24.40
56.44
21.88
45.19
21.73
41.23
210.87
1.02
2.35
0.91
1.88
0.91
1.72
8.79
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
TOTA
Solid
Content,
Volume
per
batch,
g Time
Rate of
g/min
Producti
on
ton/day
Average
146434
TRIAL 2
REACT
UNIT
OR
Ca(OH)2
L
g/L
226.23
197.8
220.12
192.69
190.19
204.8
m3/batch
16.4
35.84
13.67
34.35
13.89
27.02
L/batch
16400
35840
13670
34350
13890
27020
Total
(min/batc
175
203
165
182
138
170
Batchin
h)
21200.
34921.
18236.
36367.
19143.
32551.
Solid
Content,
Volume
per
batch,
g Time
Rate of
g/min
162421
Producti
on
ton/day
Average
98
93
61
59
04
15
50.29
26.26
52.37
27.57
46.88
233.89
50.29
1.23
2.10
1.10
2.18
1.15
1.95
9.75
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
TOTA
TRIAL 3
REACT
UNIT
OR
Ca(OH)2
L
g/L
Solid
220.7
226.73
226.53
220.22
221.02
211.51
35.9
13.6
34.57
21.06
30.7
Content,
Volume
m3/batch
per
16.88
6
batch,
L/batch
16886
35900
13600
34570
21060
30700
Total
(min/batc
196
210
152
233
195
232
Batchin
h)
19015
38760.0
20268.
32673.
23870.
27988.
162576.
.7
47
84
16
61
27.38
55.81
29.199
47.05
34.37
40.30
234.11
1.14
2.32
1.21
1.96
1.43
1.67
9.75
g Time
Rate of
g/min
Producti
on
Average
ton/day
All these three trial were taken at different time and date. It is to ensure that these reactors are applicable
and can be investigate. Then, the average was calculated from these trials. From there the value of Ton PCC
can be obtained. For a day, range of PCC obtained from PCC plant are 200 ton PCC. Thus, the objectives in
this experiment are to obtain the value of ton PCC must above 200.
10
AVERA
UNIT
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
TOTA
GE
L
Ton/day
27.44
54.18
25,77
48.20
27.89
42.80
226.29
Ton/hr
1.14
2.26
1.07
2.01
1.16
1.78
9.43
Ton PCC
3.6
7.7
2.8
7.1
3.3
5.7
30.20
In conclusion from this performance, it shows that total of Ton PCC per day exceeds 200 which are 226.29
Ton PCC. Next we going to discuss on the power used for each reactor.
TRIAL
R1
FEED
R3
AGITATOR
PUMP
FEED
R5
AGITATOR
PUMP
FEED
AGITATOR
PUMP
16
832
19
448
28
643
17
642
10
511
25
592
20
724
11
455
32
702
AVERAG
17
733
10
472
28
646
304
196
12
268
E
KWHR
TOTAL
311
200
280
TRIAL
R2
R4
R6
FEED
AGITATOR
PUMP
FEED
AGITATOR
PUMP
FEED
AGITATOR
PUMP
228
367
203
169
149
299
300
504
183
409
146
262
247
378
211
482
210
214
AVERAG
258
416
199
420
168
259
11
E
KWHR
300
TOTAL
504
183
311
409
146
619
262
427
R1
R2
R3
R4
R5
R6
86.9
87.9
70,7
87.3
84.6
74.4
R
kWhr/ton
PCC
The above data shows that the most efficient reactor between those 6 reactor is R3 because it used less
power to produce PCC and to conserve energy.
MILL
AND 2: to be
Phosphate is one of the agent or catalyst which are added in PCC to control
the 1structure
To reduce size of the grits to
much more refined.
<45m
12
TRIAL
pH VALUE
PCC TANK
RECEIVING TANK
10.10
13
10.14
9.53
9.96
9.76
9.19
The data shows that even after phosphate added, the data still shows an increasing pH value although it
should shows decreasing value. Thus another experiment was conducted which include Buchner funnel
Procedure
Shake the sample vigorously and pour the solution through the Buchner funnel onto the filter paper
Filter the solution with the aid of vacuum pump or water pump jet until the water is filtered out
Then dry those sample in oven about 1 hour
Mix the powder with distilled water and pH value was measured.
NUMBER OF TRIAL
pH VALUE
14
PCC TANK
RECEIVING TANK
9.48
9.67
9.42
9.86
9.25
9.46
The data still shows no decreasing sign thus in conclusion phosphate cannot reduce the pH value.
Phosphate only acted as buffer solution to control viscosity.
15
MILL 1 AND 2:
To reduce size of the grits to
<45m
16
Silo 4 was unused due to construction of kiln 3 in one year. By attaching screw belt conveyor connected to
silo 4 area, bulk truck can be pass underneath silo 4. These are the most approvable design between other
two proposal which include less costly and can use recycle screw belt conveyor ,
Silo 5 area needs to be enlarged thus screw belt conveyor can be attached. The screw belt conveyor
transports the kiln dust directly to rotary feeder. The bulk truck can pass through underneath silo 5 and the
loading of kiln dust can be achieved. Actually these proposals are the most rejected due to area of silo 5
cannot fir screw belt conveyor.
A new hopper 30 meter cube is attached at hydration plant with purpose loading kiln dust into bulk tank.
Blower from pendulum mill section is alternately used to transport kiln dust from silo 5 to the hopper.
20
These are the additional PFD in terms of proposal 3. In conclusion, between all these three proposal, the
most effective proposal will be proposal will be Proposal 1 due to less costly, less renovation and less work
compare to other two proposal.
HAZOP
GUIDEWORDS
FLOW
PROCESS
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
EXISTING
RECOMMENDED
DEVIATION
CAUSES OF
CONSEQUENCES
SAFEGUARDS
ACTION
DEVIATION
Power
Loss
Make
outage
production
NO
of
backup
power
LESS
HIGH
silo
Monitor
the
Do regular check-
operator
current
and
ups
Loss of production
alarm
Preventive
chute
Monthly check-ups
maintenances
on ROF
Operator
checklist
knocker
Always check and
in silo
Transfer chute
Injuries
blockage
ROF less flow
to
the
due to flight
blockage
chute
Manual
gate fails
Injuries
in
slide
has
prepared
Level alarm in
No production
worn out
Partially
sure
to
the
operator
Overfeed
of
kiln
Operator
dust
Injuries
to
the
training
Stop
21
the
on
transfer
operator
production
in
procedure
silo
GUIDEWORDS
PROCESS
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
EXISTING
RECOMMENDED
DEVIATION
CAUSES OF
CONSEQUENCES
SAFEGUARDS
ACTION
DEVIATION
PRESSURE
HIGH
Too
Stops
the
loading of kiln
at
dust
transfer
chute
22
MILL 1 AND 2:
To reduce size of the grits to
<45m
To save and increase the profit of kiln dust by using unused vibrating screen in warehouse
PROPOSAL DESIGN
HYDRATION
PLANT
This design is based on proposal 3. This idea is to collect all the waste from big bag back into silo
5. It will be mixed with kiln dust and can be selling. This design will be using unused screening
which obtained from warehouse to reduce cost of renovation.
23
Above is the image of unused screening that can be recycle to use for kiln dust silo 5. Besides
these equipment, the hopper that we gonna use in this design are also recycle so that the cost can
be reduced. This project will be hold until the renovation of kiln 3 that will be added next year.
HAZOP
GUIDEWORDS
PROCESS
POSSIBLE
POSSIBLE
EXISTING
RECOMMENDED
DEVIATION
CAUSES OF
CONSEQUENCES
SAFEGUARDS
ACTION
Hopper
Spill to the
overfills
building floor
be swept and
There are
Potential to
reprocessed
Steep sided
No further action
clumps in
damage the
hopper
required
hopper
hopper and
minimises the
causes blockages
risk of
DEVIATION
FLOW
HIGH
LOW
24
NO
Hopper
No production
empty
Process
No further action
controls come
required
into effect to
trip
downstream
fired
Feeder fails
Hopper full of
appliances
Routine
Preventive
material.
checks on belt
maintenance
Confined space
feeder during
procedures
entry to unblock
shutdowns,
25
Products
P230
Take
P110
Moisture content (%)
46.33
50.79
45.51
52.25
46.32
50.27
46.47
52.92
P110 has small in size, thus moisture content is high around 50-55%. While, P230 has bigger size, thus
moisture content is low around 45-48%. Thus, P230 has higher productivity than P110 per day.
Bigger size will give lower moisture content because the water trapped inside together with the products
easily suck in into central duct. Bigger size gives larger void space. Therefore, water molecules easily diffuse
out through the filter cloth while water is hardly pass through the small size particles.
By using mass balance, the water removal from dryer is high for high moisture content (small size particle).
Thus, larger amount of product are produced from the dryer as less water contain in the cake.
26
Accuracy To successfully park in a bay within the lines and not too close to a car on either side.
Control By keeping the cars speed under control by use of clutch control and by use of effective
steering.
27
28
11.0 CONCLUSION
These 11 weeks of internship programme starting from 18 nd July 2016 to 23rd Sept 2016 had ended with a
success. I have gained a lot of technical and non-technical skills which will help me to prepare for working
environment. I have learned much unit operation, wastewater treatment and to verify the specification that
we need in lab. Actually, the industrial training program has strengthened my soft skills include adaptability
and flexibility, time management, priority management and problem solving skill.
As conclusion, I would like to say that Schaefer Kalk (M) Sdn Bhd is one of the best places for University
Technology Mara student especially those who pursue chemical engineering to do their internship
programme. I strongly believe the experience gained will prepare me as a better engineer in the future.
29
APPENDICES
30