A: Interpretation
Debaters shouldn't be allowed to impose necessary but insufficient
burdens (NIBs).
B: Violation
The negative placed a NIB upon me to respond to.
C: Standards
1. Reciprocity.
Our burdens are not equal. I effectively have 2 because I have to
prove the resolution true and while effectively warding off his
NIB, whereas my opponent only has to prove disprove the
affirmative. This violates fair ground due to my opponent having
less to respond to and easier ballot access, making it harder for
me to win. Reciprocal burdens must be adhered to for both sides
to engage in a fair and enjoyable debate.
2. Time Skew.
I am forced to spend time answering the NIB because it's a
voting issue while my opponent can just drop it at his discretion.
The time spent on my arguments are useless as he can just
ignore it and go for the NIB. This adds to the negative time skew,
for the negative has a vast amount of time to make responses to
my case, whereas I only have a mere 4 minutes to make
responses. The NIB is stretching my time constraints.
3. Ground Skew.
I have to prove the whole of the resolution true while he can just
go for small assumptions to win, vastly skewing ground. Having
unequal ground takes away from fairness by allowing my
opponent easier ballot access and making it harder for me to
win. Equal offensive ground must be adhered to for both sides to
engage in a fair and enjoyable debate.
D: Voters
Fairness.
Debate as an activity is designed to find out who the better debater is
regardless of external factors, and structural inequalities that NIBs
impose prevent that from happening.
This
gives all parties, in some sense, an equal opportunity to
display or acquire those criteria deemed meritorious. Obviously,
Broome 19901991, p. 90) or as the result of past performances (as in the case where competitors are seeded).
the notion of equality of opportunity is itself a complex and contested one (Williams 1973; Radcliffe Richards 1997). Nonetheless, it
should be clear that a competition differs from a lottery because it is supposed to test some attribute deemed relevant to success,
rather than making victory depend on chance alone.