2.
3.
contaminants from a soil matrix into their root and shoot tissue
Phytostabilisation: plant-mediated immobilisation or binding
of
plants with high biomass production is that it is valuable after harvesting but little
pollutants are accumulated.
Figure 2 is the process flow diagram where the pollutants are accumulated in the
shoots and then harvested to be turned to biomass. This biomass can be used to
generate fuel.
Economic Considerations
Because phytoremediation is an emerging technology, standard cost information is not
readily available. David Glass (1998) and others have estimated that total system costs
for some phytoremediation applications will be 50 to 80% lower than alternatives.
Each application of plants will yield a separate performance evaluation including rate
and extent of clean-up and cost. Subsequently, the ability to develop cost comparisons
and to estimate project costs will need to be determined on a site specific basis. Two
considerations influence the economics of phytoremediation: the potential for
application, and the cost comparison to conventional treatments. Care must be taken
to compare whole system costs, which includes:
Design costs:
Site characterization
Work plan and report
Treatability and pilot testing
Installation costs:
Site preparation
Facilities removal
Debris removal
Utility line removal/relocation
Soil preparation
Physical modification: tilling
Chelating agents
pH control
Drainage
Infrastructure
Irrigation system
Fencing
Planting
Seeds, plants
Labor
Protection
Operating costs:
Maintenance
Irrigation water
Fertilizer
pH control
Site preparation Chelating agent
Facilities removal Drainage water
disposal
Debris removal Pesticides
Utility line removal/relocation
Fencing/pest
control
Soil preparation Replanting
Monitoring
Soil nutrients
Soil pH
Soil water
Plant nutrient status
Plant contaminant status
roots, shoots, stems, leaves
Tree sap flow monitoring
Air monitoring (leaves, branches,
whole
tree, area)
Weather monitoring