1.0 Introduction
Metalworking fluids are used as lubricant, coolant, cutting fluids, machining
fluids or hydraulic oil (Ross, 2004). Metalworking fluids can helps in preventing metal
corrosion and act as a metal scrap remover while undergoes machining process
(NIOSH. 1998). It comprises of four types; straight oil, soluble oil, synthetic and semisynthetic metalworking fluids (NIOSH. 1998). The usage of metalworking fluids
potentially produced contaminants such as bacteria and fungi, and also soluble metal
ions such as chromium, nickel and cobalt in alloyed steel and hard metal (Suuronen et
al, 2007). These fluids are extensively used as industrial lubricants to facilitate the
lubricating and cooling of metalworking operations by reducing friction at tool-work
piece interfaces, thus reducing heat. MWF are also used to wash away waste metal
debris, subsequently improving the machining performance and as a result, prolonging
the life of the cutting tool.
The National Occupational Exposure Survey in 1981-1982 of National Institute
for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of United Stated reported that potentially
workers exposed to metalworking fluids was estimated around 1.2 million (Wenhai et.
al, 2006), while the global demand of metalworking fluids for 2010 was 2.2 million tons
and there was increased consumption of metalworking fluids in Asia reported from
2007 until 2010 with 3.3% annual rate (Byers, 2011). Usually high capacity usage of
metalworking fluids was related to automotive, commercial aircraft and heavy
machinery industries (Cohen et.al, 2006). During the application of metalworking
fluids, aerosol of metalworking fluids consists of metal, chemical residues or physical
contaminants such as chips and fines will dispersed into the surrounding during the
operation (NIOSH, 1998).Water-based MWFs are most frequently used in the
machining industry, thus the primary concern is the presence of contaminants that
encourage the growth of bacteria and fungi.
Exposures to MWFs were associated to various health diseases such as cancer,
respiratory outcome and skin disease (Park et al., 2009). Dermatitis is the most common
complaint associated with MWFs. Respiratory effects such as upper respiratory
irritation, asthma and hypersensitive pneumonitis (HP) are caused by exposure to
diluted MWFs, microbial contaminants and chemical contaminants of the fluids (Park et
al., 2009). Based on a National Occupational Exposure Survey (NOES) by the National
Safety and Health, it is estimated that 1.2 million workers are potentially exposed to
MWFs (NIOSH, 1983). Workers were exposed to the MWFs by inhalation of the diluted
fluids mist (aerosol) or skin absorption of fluids through contact with the MWFs during
the handling with the workpieces coated with fluids (NIOSH, 1998).
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is increasingly used as a non-invasive
measure of airway inflammation (Johansson et. al., 2013). The aim of this study was to
determine the relationship between the airway inflammation as indicated by the
fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) with the microbial contaminants in MWF aerosol
and the workers reported health symptoms.
2.0 Methodology
2.1 Study population
The cross-sectional study was conducted at one of the factory located in Negeri
Sembilan, Malaysia. The studied factory is a bearing manufacturing factory in which
MWF were extensively used during the metal working process. The inclusion criteria in
this study were workers ranging in age between 20 and 58 years old, healthy and had
been employed for more than 6 months. After screening for specific criteria, 138
workers who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly selected to participate in this
study. Approval from the factory and written consents from all participants were also
obtained. The study was approved by the Medical Research Ethic Committee,
University Putra Malaysia prior to data collection (FPSK (FR14) P002).
2.2 Workplace and Metalworking Fluids
There were about 4 main sections in the factory based on the production of products
namely the self-aligning ball bearing (SABB), deep groove ball bearing (DGBB),
spherical roller bearing (SRB), large size roller (LSR) and 12 subsections which were
SABB 1, SABB 2, SABB 3, DGBB 1, DGBB 2, DGBB 3, SRB 1, SRB 2, SRB 3, SRB
4, SRB 5 and LSR. All of the sections except for SRB used almost similar types of
MWF. The distribution of MWF used in each section is shown in Table 1 below. (Table
1)
Most of the respondents were from the age range between 20 years old to 29
years old which comprised of 40.6% from the total respondents and most of the selected
respondents were overweight (42.0%). About 43.5% of the total respondents were
smoker and 5.8% of them takes alcohol in their daily life (Table 2). Beside that, the
working informations of the respondents were also gathered as shown in Table 3. As for
current working information, majority of the respondents have been working in the
factory for 6 months to 5 years (47.1%) (Table 3).
Based on Table 4, there were about 12 work sections in which the metalworking
fluids were used in the machining section. Majority of the selected respondents worked
at DGBB 1 (13%). The distributions of respondents work station, number of number of
machine and distance between each MWFs machine are shown in the Table 4. Reported
health symptoms of the respondents were also collected during the interview (Table 5).
The levels of microbial contaminants were measured in different job sections.
The microbial levels were obtained by measuring the bacterial and fungal concentration
in the environment and from the MWFs machines. Table 6 showed the level of
microbial contaminants in different job sections. Based on 6, Section SABB has highest
bacterial and fungal level in the environment. After conducted the descriptive analysis,
the total mean value for the environmental bacteria and fungus in all job section were
285.83 cfu/m3 and 231.2 cfu/m3 respectively. Whereas, the total means value for
microbial contamination in MWF were 37916.7 cfu/ml (bacteria) and 38833.3 cfu/ml
(fungus) (Table 6).
The high level of microorganism in the environment and MWFs machine in
SABB job section might be due to many factors, such as the distance between the
metalworking fluids machine in the section. The distance between metalworking fluids
machine at SABB section were close to each other which were within 3 meter and less.
The bacteria and fungus levels in the air decreased when the distance between the
metalworking fluids machine were increased. Findings showed that the total number of
bacteria collected with a Reuter centrifugal sampler in the air surrounding machines was
inversely related to the distances from the machines (Laitinen et al., 1999).
Besides the distance of MWFs machine, the numbers of MWFs machine in the
job section were also contributed to the high level of microorganism in the environment
and MWFs machine. Job Section SABB 2 had the highest number of water-based
metalworking fluids machines in the factory. The higher the number of metalworking
fluids machines in a section, the higher would be the environmental contaminants. This
is due to the accumulation of microorganism concentration from the MWFs machine in
the job section.
Table 7 shows the distribution of FeNO level of respondents at different job
section. Result shows that SRB job section had the highest mean value of FeNO level
which was 34.46 ppb. Workers in SRB 1 had the highest mean value of FeNO level
which was 43.00 ppb. As shown in Table 7, a comparison test was conducted to
determine the significant difference between the FeNO levels between each sub-section.
One way ANOVA test shows there were significant difference between job sections for
FeNO level (p=0.01).The high mean values of FeNO level in SRB job section were due
to the high total number of sub-section and also respondents in the section. Besides that,
SRD job section had the highest number of machine which contributed to the high level
study should be discussed. In previous study,it has been shown that FeNO of steroid
smoker asthmatics is lower than non-smoker asthmatics and that generally smoking
reduces the levels of FeNO (Sato et. al.,2008). However, our result showed that
smoking does not affect the FeNO level.
Based on Table 10, there was significant relationship between FeNO levels with
cough. Airway symptoms were reported in 39% of the workers exposed to MWF
although the measured levels of MWF substances in the work place air were low.
Besides that, workers that operated machines using MWFs had significantly higher
prevalence of work-related nasal irritation and coughing compared to unexposed
workers at the same factory (Fornander et. al., 2013).According to Kennedy et. al.,
incidence rate for a clinically relevant increase in airway inflammation accompanied by
asthma like symptoms such as cough and chest tightness was over twice as high among
the machinists compared with other apprentices (Kennedy et al., 1999). Based on a
study, elevation of FeNO level helps to make a final diagnosis of chronic cough
(Gordan,2008). Another study by Sato et. al., also concluded that FeNO measurements
could be used as a diagnostic marker of prolonged cough, especially for the differential
diagnosis bronchial asthma and cough variant asthma from eosinophilic bronchitis
without asthma and others (Table 10).
4.0 Conclusion
In conclusion, this study shows that airway symptoms among machining
workers exposed to MWF is a common problem. Risk factors from the workplace such
as the number of machines and their closeness to them and high environmental bacteria
colonies and longer employment years had significant relationships with the airway
inflammation (FeNO). Exposure to MWF also resulted in significantly frequent cough.
Thus, FeNO test is useful for making the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of chronic
cough in clinic practices.
5.0 Acknowledgement
This research was funded by the E-Sciences grant scheme (MOSTI) with Project
code: 06-01-04-SF1203. The author would like to express her gratitude to all the
researchers who have contributed to this review paper
6.0 References
Aerocrine AB (2008) NIOX MINO Quality Control Procedure User Manual. Retrieved
April 12, 2012, from website: http://www.akumed.no/1862/MINO_manual.pdf
American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society (2005) ATS/ERS
recommendations for standardized procedures for the online and offline
measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide, 2005.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 171, 8, 912-930.
Byers, J.P. (2011) . Current Metalworking Fluids Issues [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved
from http://www.docstoc.com/docs/163111581/Current-Metalworking-Fluid-Issues.
Cohen H, White EM (2006) Metalworking Fluid Mist Occupational Exposure Limits: A
Discussion of Alternative Methods. Journal of Occupational and Environmental
Hygiene 3: 501-507.
Wenhai X., Shane S., Que H. (2006) . Permeation of a straight oil metalworking fluid
through a disposable and a chemically protective nitrile glove. Journal of Hazardous
Materials A137. 709715.