Difference Between Motive and Intention

Motive vs Intention
Motive and intention are both aspects in the field of law and justice. They are also
associated with a suspect with the particular purposes of proving or disproving a
particular case or crime.
Motive refers to the reason or the why the crime was committed. It is often the
background of the suspect in committing the alleged crime. As a background,
motive comes before intent. Unlike intent, motive can be determined, but its
existence doesnt exactly prove guilt. It can be refuted by evidence or an alibi on a
suspected persons part (often referred to as a person of interest in criminal
jargon). A motive is often based on the probability that the person has reason to
commit the crime but no supporting evidence that the motive was carried out in the
action. Motive is an initial factor but not a conclusive action to link a person to the
crime.
Motive is also based in the realm of psychology. Motive, as a psychological term, is
also known as the drive and is often classified into two main types the
physiological motives and the psychological or social motives.
Intent, on the other hand, is the supposed action or purpose of the crime. It is the
result of the motive and has a higher level of culpability since a harmful action was
committed. Intent is characterized as a deliberate action and conscious effort
to break the law and commit the offence. Intent resides in the field of law where it is
defined as the planning and longing to perform an act. It is present in both criminal
law and tort law.
To be specific, a scenario of intent in criminal law often involves the prosecutor in a
court of law filing a charge of a crime against a suspect with veritable motive and
intent. Since the intent is the final goal of the motive, it needs to be proven in order
to prove that the suspect did to commit the crime. Intent has more legal standing
and weight compared to motive in a court of law and is a requirement to make a
case along with the means and opportunity.
As for criminal intent, there are four levels as described in the Moral Penal Code:
(1) Purposely At this level, the suspect expresses his purpose to commit a specific
crime against a particular person.
(2) Knowingly The suspect has knowledge and consciousness that his actions will
be considered a crime in the eyes of the law. However, the suspect can inflict a
crime on a person who is not his intended victim.
(3) Recklessly The suspect knows the risks involved in his actions and the situation
but disregards the risk and continues to perform the crime regardless.
(4) Negligently The suspect does not take into account various possible scenarios

that will happen during the action of the crime which often leads to losing control of
the situation and probably causing more casualties.

Summary:
1.Motive and intent are very closely related to each other. Motive precedes intent in
terms of action.
2.Motive is mainly in the field of psychology whereas intent is nestled in the field of
law.
3.Motive is the reason behind the intent while intent is the background of the
committed crime.
4.Both motive and intent should be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, but intent
has a weightier standing and bearing in a court of law compared to motive.
5.Intent is part of the three aspects to prove the crime (with means and
opportunity) while motive can stand for itself.
6.Motive applies to all persons of interest which can include the suspect. However,
intent can be solely focused on the suspect.
7.Motive is very arbitrary. It cannot prove or justify guilt or the actions pertaining to
the crime. A person with a motive can be eliminated or solidified with the help of
the evidence or alibi. In the case of intent, the evidence or alibi solidified the case
against the suspect.