Doug Hagmann On Benghazi 2012-2013, PDF

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/print-f...
Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up
Benghazi explained: Interview with an

Intelligence Insider
By Doug Hagmann Thursday, November 29, 2012
This is part one of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately

familiar with the events that took place in Benghazi. In this part, he provides
important background, and explains this administration is engaged in a
massive cover-up.
DH: Its been a while since
weve discussed Benghazi. What have you heard lately?
II: Before I answer that, I want to get a few things o my chest. Every
politician, whether its a congressman senator, diplomat, or their
spokespeople and the media are lying to the American public every time they
call the location of the attack a consulate. It was not. There was absolutely no
diplomatic consulate in Benghazi. None. Words are important here. They can
create a wrong image, an incorrect picture of what was really going on. The
property where our Ambassador and other Americans were murdered was a
rented villa consisting of a primary residence with a couple of outbuildings
behind the actual house. The reason theyre still calling it a consulate is to
subtly divert any questions about our activities there.
DH: Lets go over this again; exactly what was taking place at
Benghazi?
II: As I said, the place where the attack happened is one of the largest, one of
the most active CIA operation centers in North Africa, if not in the entire
Middle East. It was not a diplomatic station. It was a planning and operations
center, a logistics hub for weapons and arms being funneled out of Libya.
Unlike the embassy in Tripoli, there was limited security in Benghazi. Why?
So the operation did not draw attention to what was going on there.
DH: So in reality there were no actual security issues?
II: Oh yes, there were, in Tripoli. Diplomatic cables show that. But it was for
the embassy in Tripoli, the Ambassador and the diplomatic staff in general,
not specifically for the Benghazi location for two reasons. First, the Benghazi
location was a CIA operation, not a diplomatic one. Visible security at that
location would draw unwanted attention there. They had to blend in.
1 of 4
11/30/2012 10:50 AM
Remember, the villa was located in a somewhat residential area, sort of like
the suburbs. Secondly, additional manpower was not needed there, at this
CIA center, as the operation was already winding down.
DH: I know youve gone over this before, but lets get into the
specics of the operation at Benghazi.
II: Good, I want to be clear. After Gadda was taken out, there was the matter
of his weapons and arms that were hidden all over Libya, including chemical
weapons - gas weapons. According to Obama and Hillary Clinton, we were in
Libya to collect and destroy these weapons to make for a safer Libya. Thats
what they were telling the American public. Thats not really what was going
on, though, and it seems like all of the other nations except the average
American knew it. Anyway, you can nd pictures and videos of weapons
caches being destroyed, but that is strictly for the publics consumption.
What was really happening, before Gaddas body was even cold, is that we
had people locating caches of weapons, separating the working from those
that werent, and making a big show of destroying the weapons, but only the
weapons that were useless. The working weapons were being given to Islamic
terrorists. They were being funneled through Libya, crisscrossing Libya on a
Muslim Brotherhood managed strategic supply route. In fact, Michael
Reagan called it the modern day equivalent of the Ho Chi Minh Trail in a
recent article he wrote, and he is correct.
The entire arms and weapons running operation was headquartered in
Benghazi, The weapons were actually being shipped out of Libya from the
port city of Dernah, located about a hundred miles east of Benghazi. That was
the choke point of the weapons being shipped out. Remember the Lusitania?
Think in those terms, ships carrying weapons hid among humanitarian aid.
By the time of the attacks, an estimated 30-40 million pounds of arms were
already transported out of Libya.
From there, the weapons were being sent to staging areas in Turkey near the
Syrian border, for use by the Free Syrian Army and other ragtag terrorist
groups to fight against Assad. The objective was and still is to destabilize the
Assad government.
Why Syria, why not Iran?
II: Its both, but Syria is the primary target here for this operation. First, look
at the bigger picture, look at the so-called Arab Spring. Who benets and
by default, who doesnt? Who is the architect for whats going on throughout
the Middle East and North Africa? Whose agenda is being implemented? To
specically address Benghazi, though, look at the bigger picture here and
what is trying to be accomplished.
The Obama administration is playing the role of Saudi Arabias private army. I
think if Americans knew this, they would be outraged. Our service men and
women are being sold out as mercenaries for the wants and desires of the
Royal family, for the Saudis interests. Its about religious dominance and oil.
2 of 4
11/30/2012 10:50 AM
Who is really benetting from, say, whats going on in Egypt? Mubarek is out,
and the Muslim Brotherhood is in. Who does that benet? Saudi Arabia.
Look at what we see happening in Egypt. Destabilization. Do you think the
Russians want that? Hell no. Syria is Russias red line in the sand, as you
earlier wrote. If Syria is lost to the Muslim Brotherhood by the actions of
Obama, Hillary Clinton and others in this administration, what happens? Well,
it will have an adverse impact on Russia from a military standpoint. They will
likely lose access to their Mediterranean deep water port in Syria, which is
Tartus.
But think further - three dimensionally. Russia is still the worlds largest oil
producer, and thats Russias primary source of income. Then theres Turkey,
adjacent to Syria. A large amount of Russian oil and gas, consumed by the
West, ows through Turkey, which is also a player in this operation.
So, the destabilization of Syria which is exactly what Obama and Clinton are
trying to do, presents a direct military and economic threat to Russia. Assad
at least has kept things in check in Syria. Can you imagine Assad being
replaced by someone like Morsi? That would strike at the very heart of
Russias economic health and military capabilities. Think of whats at stake
here. Do Americans want a regional war? World War III? Has Obama or
Clinton asked the American people if this is what they want?
Make no mistake, we are doing the bidding for Saudi Arabia. The U.S., NATO
and other allies are engaged in a proxy war with Iran and Russia.
What about Assads war crimes?
Assad is no angel, but dont be fooled by the death toll attributed to him. Now
this is important. Remember the rst Gulf War? In the run up to Desert
Storm, a young woman testied before the Human Rights Caucus - she only
testied under her rst name, which was Nayirah. Remember that she
testied that Iraqi soldiers were taking infants from incubators in Kuwait,
leaving them to die? Her testimony was supposedly conrmed by Amnesty
International. Her testimony went viral, and every war hawk in the U.S.
government cited her testimony, saying we needed to right the wrongs, the
inhumanity. It was all one big lie!
After Desert Storm, it was revealed that Nayirahs last name was Al-Sabah,
and she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the United States.
Her testimony was part of a publicity campaign organized by Citizens for a
Free Kuwait, which was run by Hill & Knowlton, a PR rm out of New York.
People must learn the back story.
So we see a body count attributed to Assad. Whos doing the killing, Assads
people? Maybe at times, but the Free Syrian Army and other groups are
doing most of the slaughter. Its one huge false ag operation and the media
is selling it hard. And Americans are buying it, just like the testimony of the
girl from Kuwait.
3 of 4
11/30/2012 10:50 AM
Its one big lie being told by Obama, Clinton, Rice, and others. Many
Americans are buying the lie, and the media is selling the lie. The people
behind this are laughing at us. Dont you get it? Theyre laughing at us.
And do you want to know whats at stake? Four Americans were killed in
Benghazi. Forty thousand have been killed so far in Syria. Tens of thousands
of Syrian people have become refugees. Why? For what? To advance the
agenda of Saudi Arabia. For oil.
You know, the so-called right wing establishment were all up in arms about
Obamas submissive bow to the Saudi King. Where are they now? Wheres
the outrage that the body count will be much greater than Forty thousand? It
is anticipated that if the Obama plan succeeds, not only will America be
committed to yet another war, but the body count could be as high as FOUR
MILLION. Christians, among others, will be slaughtered. This could trigger a
third world war, its that serious.
What are Russia and Iran doing? Certainly, they must be fighting back.
Benghazi was a strike against us, the Obama-Clinton agenda. A visible strike,
and Ill explain more about this shortly, because there are events I will point
out that will put it all into perspective. But think of it this way. How did we
successfully collapse the Soviet Union? I mean, what was the last straw? We
attacked their currency - the Ruble. Theyre still stinging from that, and Putin
was in the KGB at the time. Do you think he forgot about that?
So, how do, or will Russia and Iran strike back if Obama and Clinton continue
this insanity? Militarily? Possibly in regional conicts, but to take us out, to
stop us, what is the one area where we are very vulnerable? Its our economy
- our dollar. Whats our dollar tied to? Not gold or silver anymore, and some
say its not tied to anything. Well, thats not quite correct. Its tied to OIL. The
free-ow of oil.
Oil transactions everywhere in the world, including Russia and China, are
made with U.S. dollars. We buy their oil with our dollars, and they return with
those same paper dollars and employ Americans by buying our goods and
services. As Michael Reagan wrote: [t]his system is also crucial to the
security of our diplomatic and legal infrastructure, which is ultimately backed
by our military. Its the core of our foreign policy. He also wrote that any
attack on the free ow of oil is an attack on the dollar. Any attack on the dollar
is an attack on our ability to project power and protect Western democracies,
economies, and ideals. God have mercy on us all if that attack is successful!
4 of 4
11/30/2012 10:50 AM
Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)
Obama does not want the American people to know the truth about what
is going on, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, AQIM

By Doug Hagmann Thursday, November 29, 2012
Weve heard dierent accounts and dierent timelines concerning

the attack at Benghazi. What exactly happened?
First, people must understand that the compound that was attacked was
situated in a somewhat rural area and was not a consulate, but a rented villa,
or a residential structure. The residence was the primary building, and what
has been referred to as the annex was located about 1800 feet away as the
crow flies, but just over a mile to travel by road. And again, visible security
was not present as the compound was the headquarters for a covert
operation. No one wanted to draw attention to what was taking place at this
location.
The first indications of problems there began at least twelve-(12) hours
before the first shot was even fired. One of the men at the compound
observed a policeman or Libyan security officer taking photographs outside
of the villa. Keep in mind that Ambassador Stevens, the point man in this
Obama-sanctioned weapons running operation, was hastily scheduled to
meet with the Turkish consul general at this location. The meeting was
deliberately planned for dinner time, toward evening, when the events that
happened next could be performed under the cover of darkness.
Its also important to consider the location of this meeting. Tripoli is the seat of
power in Libya, and a genuine diplomatic meeting could more safely have
been conducted there, at the embassy. Also, what most people dont know is
that Libya is split, much like East and West Germany before the wall. The
eastern part is more closely aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, the same
group that controls Egypt. The Turkish consul general had to meet there, not
just with Stevens but with other factions involved in this covert operation.
Now Ill digress for a moment. It is reasonable to ask whether the Turkish
consul general was setting Stevens up for a hit, like a classic mob-style hit.
First, there is no dispute that there was surveillance done at 6:30 a.m. and
intermittently throughout the day. Next, consider that three hours before the
rst shot was red, about 6:30 p.m. local time, some strange things were
observed taking place near the compound. Military type vehicles began
closing of the streets with trucks that had 50 caliber guns mounted on them.
Checkpoints on the streets and at intersections were being quietly closed o
around the compound. Nearby residents began going inside their homes.
Anyone walking in the area got o the streets, like a scene from a movie in the
Godfather series. It was obvious that the stage was being set for a strike
against the compound. This alone reveals preplanning and coordination.
1 of 6
11/30/2012 10:55 AM
Its also noteworthy to point out that the Turkish counsel general most likely
passed through one or more of these checkpoints, or at least would have
noticed that things were not right in the area. You must remember that just
as Stevens was previously CIA working under diplomatic cover, the Turkish
counsel general was his counterpart. Its typical spy versus spy stuff.
Also consider this. One of the men stationed at the compound, a British
national, left the compound at about 9:20 p.m., reportedly to get more phone
cards. Thats right, phone cards, like you would buy at Walmart. Why?
Because the men at the compound ran out of minutes. Just who do you think
they were talking to that day to burn through the minutes, and why do you
think they needed them at that exact time?
They were using the phones as a last and perhaps only line of
communications to provide assessments of the strange things going on
earlier. They knew that something was being planned and they were
conveying that information - their observations to those who could assist
them, in Tripoli and DC.
Based on these activities, it is clear that the men at the compound suspected
that they were in trouble long before the first shot was ever fired. They were
calling anyone who would listen, or who should have listened. We knew
trouble was brewing and no one responded in any meaningful way.
Could the man who left to buy more phone cards have known what
was about to take place?
Well, its possible, but there is no indication of that.
Was the Turkish counsel general in on this, to set Stevens up?
Well, what have we heard from our government? Has anyone even bothered
to interview him? What did he say? Dont forget, this administration decided
to handle this attack as a crime and not a terrorist attack. How long did it take
for the FBI to be able to access the crime scene after the attack? More
importantly, what was left at the crime scene to examine by the FBI due to
this delay? Do you think the delay was accidental?
Do you know what was discussed, or the reason for the meeting
between Stevens and the Turkish consul general?
Yes, I know some key points. First, keep in mind what this arms running
operation was all about. It was to topple Assad and replace him with a Muslim
Brotherhood leader. It was to destabilize Syria to advance the agenda of
Saudi Arabia. They were using U.S. and NATO forces to do exactly that.
However, Assad is no Gadda, and there is no comparison between Assads
army and the Libyan army. It would take much more than rebels inside Syria
to topple Assad. There is no way on earth that the Syrian rebels, or Free
Syrian Army, has the capability to accomplish this objective alone. It required
U.S. assistance, arms and training.
2 of 6
11/30/2012 10:55 AM
Now, Turkey is a NATO ally. They were assisting the Obama-Clinton-Saudi

plan to funnel weapons ultimately to Syria, but the primary staging areas for
these weapons were in Turkey near the Syrian border. Visual surveillance by
Russia, using satellites and other means amassed photographic
documentation of the U.S. assisting the anti-Assad rebels inside Turkey. They
developed evidence of the U.S. training these rebels and assisting them into
Syria to ght against Assad.
Think about this. What if surveillance images observed anti-Assad rebels
being trained to handle and mount chemical weapons - gas shells - onto
rockets? The process would be apparent and would obviously be detected by
a number of visual indicators. Obviously, Syria wanted this to stop. By
extension, so did Russia.
One aspect of the weapons plan was to set up a false ag operation to make it
appear that Assad used chemical weapons against his own people. Imagine
the outcry from the civilized world to the news that Assad gassed his own
people. That would be an invitation to NATO and the West to openly
intervene. Dont forget about the timing of all of this. Two months before the
elections, and time was running out. The job of taking out Assad was not yet
complete. Such an event would quickly advance this agenda. By this time,
however, being caught and placed in a rather unenviable position between
Russia and the U.S., the Turkish consul general was in a CYA, clean-up
mode, assuring that none of the chemical weapons that might have still been
in Libya were headed for Turkey.
It is also important to understand that the covert weapons running operation
was just about finished. An estimated 40 million pounds of weapons were
already shipped from Libya, and things were winding down.
There was another issue as well, a very important and telling one.
Seven members of the Iranian Red Crescent had been kidnapped or snatched
from the streets of Benghazi on or about July 31, 2012. Again you must
understand that virtually anyone walking on the streets of Benghazi not
indigenous to the area are spies. Covert operatives, operating under various
covers. From all nations.
Along with the message that the weapons running operation was
compromised, the Iranians had good reason to suspect that the Red Crescent
workers were snatched by the CIA or with their assistance. Iran wanted them
back. They were spies, and countries want their spies back! So part of the
meeting was to address this, as there was pressure by Russia against a
wavering Turkey to switch sides. Anyway, youll see how this ties in to the way
the actual attack was executed.
Please continue.
So at 9:30 pm local time, the compound began to take on small arms re.
Based on all reports Ive reviewed, there were three twelve-man attack
teams armed with small arms, RPGs, and other sophisticated military style
3 of 6
11/30/2012 10:55 AM
weapons. These were not run-of-the-mill street weapons, but military issued
type weapons. The types of weapons alone scream that this was a preplanned
attack.
Eyes on the area [authors note: satellites, surveillance drones] conrmed that
two of these teams surrounded the villa and the annex. The third team was
elsewhere, lying in wait. The two teams began their assault on the compound
where Stevens was inside about an hour after the Turkish counsel general
left. Remember, he had to pass the checkpoints after the meeting. Just keep
that in mind.
Anyway, we all know now that there was an intense firefight that lasted
nearly nine hours during which four Americans, Ambassador Chris Stevens,
Sean Smith, Glen Dougherty and Tyrone Woods were killed. And of course
that attack was not over a video and there were no protests before the attack.
Now there are questions that are not being asked. The two well-armed hit
teams had the capability to reduce the compound and annex to rubble
quickly. Why a protracted reght? There are a couple of reasons.
First, what was the makeup of the hit teams, or who were the attackers? We
have veried that the attackers were a combination of members of Ansar al
Sharia and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), but they were
operating under the flag of Ansar al Sharia. Who is Ansar al Sharia? Iranian
terrorists. They are a terrorist group that receives their training by and
funding from Iran. Now think about this. Carefully consider the implications
here. IRAN. Its the elephant in the room no one wants to mention or talk
about.
The attack on our ambassador and our people - Americans - was an attack by
Iran. It was an attack at a nation-state level.
AQIM also assisted. They are indigenous to Africa and are extremely
dangerous. AQIM is a very elite and extremely well-funded group, and very
limited in number. Our last assessment suggests that there are only 400 or so
members, but they are very inuential across Africa and into South and
Central America and Western Europe. Their importance and relevance will
become evident shortly.
The reason that they did not just take out the compound and everything and
everyone in it is that they were looking for their spies. Remember the Red
Crescent workers? The Iranian spies? They suspected that they might be held
at the annex. As such, they wanted to free them and did not want to risk
killing them.
Oh, and there were others missing as well. AQIM members. These were
terrorists involved in drug running operations from the Tri-border (TBA)
areas of South America through North Africa and into Western Europe. By
the way, this is the way they made their money. Drugs sell at higher prots in
Western Europe than elsewhere, so there is money to be made. The problem
is that some of them got caughtsnatched up in Benghazi and northeastern
4 of 6
11/30/2012 10:55 AM
Libya.
Now regarding AQIM, this has a direct connection not only to South America,
but also to Mexico and Mexican drug gangs. You think that whats going on
in Libya is just over there, and far away from the U.S. and has nothing to do
with our safety and security? Think again, but more on this in a bit.
Theres also another reason. The hit teams fully expected rescue teams from
the U.S. to be dispatched to the compound. Certainly, calls for help went out.
By waiting for the back-up or rescue forces, a surprise assault by the other
hit team team would have exposed our forces to possible causalities and
turned the event into a much bigger event where the actual nature of the
operation could be exposed to the world. Instead of being a cover-up for
which they have yet to be held accountable, it would have been an
international incident that would have exposed the entire aair.
So the Ansar al Sharia attack groups deliberately conducted a protracted
assault on the compound. Just imagine, our men and even the bad guys never
expected team Obama would leave our people twisting in the wind, fighting
for their lives. That alone should speak volumes to every American.
As daylight approached, they had to wrap things up so they could disappear
under the cover of darkness. Oh, and the crowds that are often cited by this
administration, did form in the area as the attack progressed, much like a
growing mob in riot. They provided the fog, or the cover, that permitted the
attackers to escape amid the crowd.
You mentioned the missing Iranian Red Crescent workers and
members of AQIM. Were they ever released or found?
Yes, and this is an extremely important part of this entire story. This reaches
into the highest levels of our government. This is so very important that it
must be addressed separately.
So the attack was first and the crowd came later. I noted that the
administration said that there were protests going on at the
Embassy in Cairo at the same time and they compared it to
Benghazi.
Yes, thats their cover story and they know that there is absolutely no
comparison. This is one huge lie that is easily addressed and put out of its
misery.
How soon did U.S. intelligence officials know who was responsible
for the attack?
Almost immediately, if not concurrent with the attack. Every part of that area
is under active aerial surveillance by the U.S. There was SIGINT or
communication intercepts at the time of the attack. Then, there was even an
admission by the attackers. Obama knew. Hillary knew. Clapper knew.
Everyone knew, expect the American people. And you know what? The
American media knew as well.
5 of 6
11/30/2012 10:55 AM
I heard a statement that they did not admit knowledge to avoid

alerting the perpetrators.
Yes, it was said that Rice and others did not want to alert the bad guys or tip
their hand or some such nonsense, but did that mean that Susan Rice, for
example, had to appear on national television and lie to every one of us, to the
country? In my opinion, Rice took on the temporary job of propaganda
minister for a day in exchange for a shot at Secretary of State in the future.
You are painting quite a dire picture.
It gets worse, much worse, and it involves real threats across the globe and
even to us here in the United States. But its all because of our actions, the
covert weapons running from Libya to Syria by way of Turkey at the direction
of Barack Obama and his Saudi handlers.
FORTY THOUSAND men, women and children are dead in Syria as a direct
result of this attempt at nation building, or tearing down Assad. There are
four dead Americans. We are arming some of the very people who are killing
our troops. Not only are we on the wrong side of this, we are actively pushing
the world to the precipice of World War III.
We are engaged in a real war here with Iran and Syria and by extension, with
Russia and China. And we are being lied to about it every step of the way.
And the lies are getting worse, but so are the attempts to stop the truth from
getting out.
What do you mean?
What do you think the recent directive issued by Obama, the one you wrote
about insider threats, is all about? Obama does not want the American
people to know the truth about what is going on. Hes doubled down to stop
leaks, like this. But you know what? He just might be too late, because were
not done here. Im not done talking, and theres much more that needs to be
exposed.
6 of 6
11/30/2012 10:55 AM
Advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in North

Africa, Middle East. We're doing their work, pitting ourselves against
Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia and China
Benghazi explained: Interview with an

Intelligence Insider (Part III)
By Doug Hagmann Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Events seem to be changing rapidly in Syria, and we know that the

operations in Benghazi played a very important role in Syria.
Please update the readers on the current situation, but first give a
brief recap for context.
Okay, but were running out of
time. The world is running out of time. Remember when we rst began this
lengthy interview process? It was in response to your report on September
15, 2012, just four days after the attack in Libya. You wrote that the fuse for
WW III has been lit. It is now burning rapidly down, although people are still
not understanding whats taking place right in front of them.
Ill give a brief, perhaps somewhat oversimplied recap going back to the
beginning, giving context for whats taking place at this very moment. I
suppose I cannot overstate this or say this enough. The so-called Arab
Spring is an initiative by Obama and his foreign policy advisers, Clinton, in
her capacity of Secretary of State, and others including some of the most
powerful people in the world. International bankers, the power brokers and
string pullers. It is a plan to reshape the Middle East and North Africa, and
change the geopolitical balance of power. Its not about some feel-good
mission to free the oppressed. Never was. Its about the U.S., through the CIA,
using groups ideologically aligned to al Qaeda aligned to overthrow various
Middle East nations to install regimes controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood.
Its a globalist agenda, using the blueprints and agenda created by Saudi
Arabia for the North African and Middle East portions of the globe, to shape
that area geopolitically. They are using the United States as their surrogate
and their military muscle, and the Obama led U.S. regime is all too willing to
comply.
With regard to Libya, it was in March of 2011 when the Clinton State
Department, under orders of Obama, appointed Ambassador Stevens as the
point man to the al Qaeda linked Libyan opposition forces to topple Qaddafi.
Remember, Osama bin Laden was reportedly killed two months later and al
Qaeda was supposedly out of existence, according to Obama. But think about
this. Under direct orders of Obama, Clinton appointed Stevens to work with
the very same people who reportedly killed 3000-plus Americans on
September 11, 2001 for the purposes of overthrowing Qaddafi. It worked,
and Qaddafi was deposed and murdered in October of 2011.
1 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
Look at what happened next. Clinton announced that the U.S. was throwing
$40 million into Libya to secure Qaddas weapon arsenals. Oh, really?
Thats what was being told to the public and to congress, but its not reality,
certainly not from the inside. As Ive already explained, that money and our
personnel were being used to collect the weapons to send them to Syria to
topple Assad. Before getting to Syria, they were placed in staging areas in
Turkey near the Syrian border, and other places, including Jordan. They were
being collected and sent through northern Libya, and the CIA operations
center was the headquarters for this operation. As Ive said many times, there
was no embassy or consulate in Benghazi. It was a covert CIA operations
center.
Wait, why do people continue to call it a consulate? Why is it
identified on Google maps as a consulate.
First, it continues to be called a consulate because this is part of the cover-up.
The government is STILL lying to the American people. The media is assisting
in the cover-up, and so are some in congress in both parties. For goodness
sakes, anyone looking at Google maps on September 10, 2012 will never find
the Benghazi location named a consulate. Its a LIE!
Sorry, please go on.
So every American understands, it is OUR tax money in part that was used to
arm Islamic groups ideologically aligned with al Qaeda. Imagine that. Eleven
years after 9/11, were funding and assisting the very same terrorists who
attacked our country to topple another country. And other countries are in
this up to their necks as well. The Brits for one. The very country or empire
that created some of the post-war borders, many knowingly unmanageable
from the outset, is now in part responsible for changing them.
Anyway, the weapons everyone in government said that were collected and
destroyed were pieces of junk that never worked. The working weapons,
including an estimated 10-15,000 shoulder red missiles were shipped out of
Libya. Stevens was the head of logistics, coordinating this operation. He was
working with the Turkish consul general as well, the guy who met with him
on the night of his death. We already went over this in detail.
The attack was perpetuated by Ansar al-Shariah, an Islamic terrorist group
backed by Iran. Also present were members of the terror group AQIM, or al
Qaeda in Northern Africa. It was a coordinated attack for a purpose, and
never, ever had anythig remotely to do with any internet video.
Please touch on the nature of the attack again for those just
catching up
As I explained before, I have information that three hit teams were
dispatched to Benghazi[iii]. Stevens was lured to the CIA compound to talk
about Russias knowledge of what the U.S. was doing - running weapons to be
used against Assad in Syria, which is Russias red line. They needed to talk
2 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
and not at the embassy, but at this out of the way location. The weapons
running operation, although it was winding down anyway, was compromised.
Over. Done. It is likely that the Turkish consul general told Sevens that the
Russians had evidence - proof, of weapons in Turkey, including chemical
weapons. Turkey, a NATO ally being squeezed by Russia, wanted the
weapons gone from their turf. We also had people up there training the
rebels on how to use the weapons as well. You heard about training
exercises in that area on or about September 11, 2012? Who do you think we
were training? Right after the Turkish counsel general left, the attack against
the CIA compound began.
What was the reason for the attack?
Remember the story of the Iranian Red Crescent workers being snatched
from the streets of Benghazi late on July 31 or the early morning of August 1,
2012? This happened at the same time the CIA compound wall was hit by a
mortar. These Red Crescent workers were spies. At the same time, some
members of the terror group AQIM were also picked up in Benghazi. It was a
mystery! Where did they go? Who had them?
The belief was that they were being held at the CIA compound. Iran wanted
them back. So, in addition to everything else, Ansar al Shariah was looking for
their people. AQIM were looking for their people too. This is the reason the
compound was not immediately leveled by the weapons they had on sight.
They were trying to find and free their people, who were not being held
there, but elsewhere. They were trying to smoke the people out of the
compound and rescue the hostages.
Plus, a message had to be sent to Obama, Clinton and others that the
weapons operation had to stop. The groups leading the attack, primarily
Ansar al Sharia with an AQIM presence as well, were tools of Iran, Syria and
of course, Russia.
So there were two reasons for the attack: get their spies back, and expose this
operation for what it was. Again, we went over this.
The snatched Red Crescent Workers play prominently into
exposing this operation.
Yes, and here is where it gets interesting. They were released exactly 65 days
after they were snatched. They were in good health and dropped o on the
streets of Tripoli. But why then? This is where it gets damning to Obama,
Clinton, and Valerie Jarrett.
What is not widely known to Americans is that Obama sent Iranian born
Valerie Jarrett to Qatar for high level talks with the Iranians about coming to
an agreement before the November elections. This, despite Jarrett not having
the capacity as official of the U.S. government. She had no business doing
what she was doing. That aside, the plan was that Jarrett would broker a deal,
and Obama would announce to the world that he had succeeded in
diplomatic negotiations with the Iranians where they would halt their nuclear
3 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
weapons ambitions and Obama would officially live up to his title as savior of
the world.
But before the talks kicked into high gear, the Iranians told Jarrett that the
Red Crescent workers had to be released before any talks could be done in
earnest. Jarrett relayed that to Obama and Clinton, and then, out of nowhere,
the missing workers were suddenly released.
If there were talks and the spies were released, then why was
there no agreement?
Because Jarrett, Obama and Clinton were being played by the Iranians. It was
to buy time, especially since the Obama agenda of arming the anti-Assad
rebels was continuing. The Iranians are not stupid. They understood that
Obama and Clinton were continuing to support the anti-Assad rebels, and
with bipartisan support, STILL ARE!
So now we are hearing reports of chemical weapons planned for
use by Assad. Whats the real story?
The world is being set up for a false ag operation. Obama, Clinton and every
supporter of the anti-Assad initiative are either lying to the American people
or are dupes. The objective remains taking out Assad and replacing him
with a Muslim Brotherhood-backed regime.
There have been reports out of the U.S. and the UK that Assad is preparing to
use chemical weapons against the rebels. Assad denies that he would ever
use them, and there is a reason we should believe him in this case. The
condemnation that would result is unnecessary and certainly unwarranted.
There reports are to condition people to immediately suspect Assad when a
chemical incident occurs. In this case, its the U.S., the UK and other Western
backed countries constantly asserting that Assad will launch a chemical
attack, and were getting ready just for that case.
But if you look at the evidence, its the anti-Assad, Western backed forces that
have taken possession of chemical storage areas. There was a recently
released video, very graphic in nature of anti-Assad rebels conducting the
test of a nerve agent on two rabbits. The video displayed chemicals bottles
with the name of a Turkish country on them. Im not going to give the name
or video channel, but people can find the video for themselves on YouTube.
Its a set-up to topple Assad and put a Muslim brotherhood leader in his
place.
I told you before, and you printed what I said, that a chemical weapon attack
would justify U.S. and NATO intervention, supported by the outcry of the
world against Assad. Its Iraq all over again, except Syria is a hundred times
more dangerous. Unlike Iraq, Afghanistan or even Libya, Syria will not
implode. It will EXPLODE, and we will be ghting Iranians as well. Russia has
advisers in Syria as well. Are the American people ready and willing to
square o against Iran AND Russia in a regional conict that will likely turn
into a global, full scale war?
4 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
Whats going on with Turkey, Syria and Russia now?

It was announced that Turkey will receive patriot Missiles to protect them
from the spillover. Actually, these missiles over the northern territory of Syria
will create a de-facto no fly zone that will allow the consolidation of anti-Assad
rebels to perhaps install a new Western-backed government in the northern
part of Syria[vii].
Well, Russia deployed Iskander missiles into Syria, rendering the Patriot
missiles ineffective. This move shows exactly how serious Russia is. They are
not backing down.
And you know what else? Sunburn missiles are at Irans disposal and can be
used in that theater. Regardless of what is written or talked about by talking
heads, these missiles poses a grave threat to our aircraft carriers. Want to see
how fast we can lose an aircraft carrier and the several thousand crew
members on board? This is what we face.
Russia is doubling down, Iran is doubling down. Assad is doubling down.
Meanwhile, Obama and the U.S. State Department continue to lie to the
American people. The lie continues, and the fuse to WW III is burning down
while the Obama regime is heading full steam ahead toward regional and
global war.
Why havent we heard any truth about Benghazi, even from
congressional investigators?
Because the lie continues, and we are still supporting the overthrow of Assad,
despite Putins warnings. Obama, Clinton, the global leaders and their
nanciers are continuing to lead us into World War III. The lies continue, and
to continue operations, the truth must be kept from the American public. We
are continuing our operations to overthrow Assad at full throttle right in front
of all Americans. And there will be fallout.
In addition to four dead Americans and over 40 thousand dead Syrians, the
consequences of our actions will cause the death of an estimated FOUR
MILLION in Syria alone, many Christians. When, not if the conict
escalates, well see many millions dead. And for what?
Okay, whats the objective here?
Behind the smoke and mirrors is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Its their
agenda. Were just providing the army, the training, performing the logistics
and doing the heavy lifting. Its the Saudi agenda, and its about power,
control and oil. Who do you think controls the Muslim brotherhood? Has
anyone asked why Obama, raised in a Muslim culture, is tied at the hip with
the Muslim Brotherhood?
Why arent Americans angry that we are using our assets, our men and
women to advance the agenda of Saudi Arabia under the orders of Barack
Hussein Obama?
5 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
Why are members of congress so quick to commit our forces to oust Assad
when it benefits Saudi Arabia, not the U.S?
The agenda of Obama is so overt, so in your face yet not one member of
congress, not one media outlet is calling him out on this. Some might call this
mere conspiracy theory. Theres a conspiracy alright, but it involves the
government and the media. They are laughing in our faces.
In addition to the obvious regional consequences, there will be blowback from
the Obama-Clinton agenda.
What type of blowback?
Well, lets rst look at whats happened already as this insane Obama agenda
has been going on for some time. Remember the plot to kill the Saudi
ambassador to the U.S? On October 11, 2011, the FBI announced that a plot,
identied by the FBI as Operation Red Coalition, was foiled to kill Saudi
ambassador Adel al-Jubeir in the United States. It was alleged that Iranian
nationals were working with a Mexican drug gang to kill al-Jubeir with a
bomb while he was dining at a DC restaurant. Do you think he would have
been the only one to die there if that plan succeeded? No, innocent men,
women and children would have died as well.
Many in the media and the talking heads were having trouble understanding
why Iran or Iranian nationals would want the Saudi Ambassador dead. Well,
in the context of what you know now, does this make a bit more sense? These
events do not happen in a vacuum.
But Im sure people will question why members of a Mexican drug cartel
would be enlisted to assist in this operation? This gets a bit complex, but it
goes back to AQIM. Remember them? Thats al Qaeda in Northern Africa.
They are an elite Muslim terror group of perhaps 400 or so members. They
carefully screen their members, and do a lot of subcontracting. Despite being
Muslim, they are running drugs from South America, specifically the
Tri-Border Area (TBA) into North Africa for ultimate distribution into Europe.
Why Europe instead of North America? Because the drugs are worth more
there, and the profit difference is worth it.
While drugs are being funneled from South America, terror groups are also
funneling al Qaeda terrorists or terrorists of similar ideology into South
America and into Mexico, where they are entering the United States. Think of
it as a two-lane highway. Some of these terrorists have been caught at the
southern border of the U.S., some with tattoos on their arms of mullahs and
Islamic phrases of jihad. Why? Because when the Syria-Iran situation goes
hot, there will be terrorists already inside the United States. But we created
them and gave them the reason to be here. A few AQIM members, running
the drugs east, were caught in Benghazi, which explains their presence and
getting picked up there as well.
So Ansar al Shariah and AQIM, both present at Benghazi, were looking for
6 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
their people.
But back to the blowback, or the consequences of the Obama foreign policy
agenda. There is more, and it much more serious.
Attacks in the U.S?
For all intents and purposes, the United States, Russia and China are at war.
Although the situation in Syria is being described as a civil war, it is the direct
result of U.S. involvement by Obama and Clinton at the behest of Saudi
Arabia. While real bullets are ying in Syria, an asymmetrical war exists
beyond the connes of Syrias borders.
Remember, Putin has drawn a hard line in the sand at Syria. The stability of
Syria is of extreme strategic economic and military importance to Russia as
well as China. Although no hot war exists between Russia, China and the U.S.
at the moment, that does not mean things are not taking place behind the
scenes in ways that are not readily apparent.
One of the biggest threats to the United States right now is an attack on the
U.S. Dollar. At this moment, the fate of the U.S. dollar hangs in the balance.
What is the U.S. dollar backed by? Gold? Silver? Neither. Some say the dollar
is not backed by anything, and although they might be technically accurate,
its not entirely true. At this moment, the dollar is backed by one important
thing, which is oil. The stability of the dollar rests on the free and unimpeded
flow of oil. Once that is interrupted or even threatened, there is a high degree
of risk that the dollar will collapse.
The string pullers are pulling us into a situation where our actions result in
the disruption or the threat of disruption of the free flow of oil. Given the
current state of our economy, how fast might this bring down the United
States without a shot having to be red?
Now I know Im stepping out into some areas that people might consider to be
fringe, but think about what is taking place in the U.S. and across the globe.
People talk about global governance, or a one order under a single currency.
Whats the quickest way to destroy a country from within? What was the
major reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union? Remember the Ruble? I
can tell you this, Putin does.
So at this point, whats an expeditious way to strike at the very heart of
America while also accomplishing other larger global objectives? Take out the
U.S. dollar.
We are in a period of heightened risk and maximum vulnerability, put here by
Obama, his foreign policy advisers, czars, and of course Hillary Clinton. What
are their objectives, and those of his closest advisers, especially in terms of the
fate of the U.S? Fundamental change in ways that can be hardly imagined.
Are you saying that the larger objective is to destroy America?
Im saying that we are advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia and the Muslim
7 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
Brotherhood in North Africa and the Middle East. Were doing their work,
pitting ourselves against Syria, Iran and ultimately Russia and China. Syria
and Iran are firewalls for Russia and China. Russia and China understand the
monster created and used by the United States, they understand the Muslim
Brotherhood backed terrorists. They will not stop at Syria. They will continue
to push into the Federation of Russian States, disrupt oil flow, overthrow
nations and threaten the security and sovereignty of Russia and threaten
China. Were playing with fire, and to expect no consequences is ridiculous.
The path that Obama continues to take, without any objection from congress
or others in the U.S., will lead us on a path to self destruction. Perhaps the
ultimate question is whether it is by incompetence or by design.
8 of 8
12/14/2012 03:44 PM
Benghazi explained: Behind the lies
Benghazi is a moving target of little lies that serve as cover for the big lie

By Doug Hagmann Sunday, December 2, 2012
Authors note: This is a special supplement of a multi-part interview with

a government insider intimately familiar with the events that took place in
Benghazi. It is important to note that the information contained in this series
was developed from interviews that spanned over 100 hours. My source
requested that the following information be written separately due to its
importance.
DH: You told me that you wanted to talk about the lies behind
Benghazi, said it is critical for everyone to understand the reason
for the lies. and asked that we do this separately. Go ahead.
II: Its about the lie, and once you
understand it, it becomes extremely revealing. Its about what the public has
been told from the very beginning. Do you realize that a lot of people,
especially Obamas associates and supporters do not believe that theyve been
lied to? Do you understand that much of the public does not believe that they
were lied to? Like a lot of us, youre in this thing so deep that we forget not
everyone even believes theyve been lied to. Theyre certainly not going to
hear about it in the media. To understand how deep this goes, how important
it is, and why it is so important, weve got to go back to the very beginning.
Think back to when we were first told that Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith,
Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods were killed in Benghazi. The media reported
that Stevens and the others were killed in an attack on the American
consulate in Benghazi. Every major media outlet identified the location of the
attack as an American consulate, much like this Reuters report and this from
The Washington Times. But there was no U.S. consulate in Benghazi, so
where did this information originate?
DH: Didnt the administration call it a consulate?
II: Exactly. Our embassies and consulate offices are directly under the control
of the U.S. State Department. They are areas of sovereign territory. Consulate
offices are like satellite offices to each embassy, and they are located in
convenient geographic locations in other countries to assist people with
routine or minor matters, saving them a trip to the actual embassy.
Consulates are easily identifiable and all have U.S. flags flying prominently for
easy identification. A listing of U.S. embassies and consulate offices in other
countries can be found on the State Department web site. Just about
everyone working at State knows the locations of the embassies and
consulates, as do most of our leaders in the executive branch.
So from the outset, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama certainly knew, without
1 of 3
12/02/2012 09:50 PM
any doubt, that there was no consulate or diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

None. In fact, on August 27, 2012, just 15 days before the attack in
Benghazi, Ambassador Chris Stevens ceremoniously opened the U.S.
Embassy in Tripoli with the U.S. State Department issuing press releases and
official statements. Tripoli was the only diplomatic mission in Libya - period.
And it was just established.
So one of the very first lies was to deliberate misidentify or improperly
characterize the compound in Benghazi as a consulate. Was there an
American flag flying outside of this compound? No. Was any diplomatic
legitimate business being conducted at this compound? No. But they called it
a consulate to draw attention away from the fact this was a CIA base of
operations.
It was located in a relatively rural area, and it consisted of a residence and a
separate annex located about 1800 feet away. By car, the annex was just
over a mile away. It was dicult to nd, too. People coming from Tripoli to
this compound often got turned around, even with the help of a GPS.
So the very rst thing everyone must understand is that the administration,
including Barack Obama and others in the executive branch, and the State
Department, including Hillary Clinton (her ocial statement identied the
compound as a mission, suggesting a diplomatic mission) knew that this
compound served no legitimate diplomatic purpose. Thats the rst lie.
DH: We now know that it was a CIA compound located in a
somewhat rural area and not identifiable as U.S. owned or
operated.
II: Correct. So think about this. The compound was unmarked, operationally
discreet, located in a rural area and difficult to find. How did a few hundred
protesters suddenly gather at this location on the evening of 9/11? How did
they know where to go, if this was not an embassy or consulate? More to the
point, how is it possible that anyone in any official capacity in this
administration could realistically describe the attack in terms of a protest
gone bad, even at the first reports of trouble? They could not. This was a
deliberate lie to the American people.
So how is it that U.S. Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice, five days after the
attack and after much of the initial dust settled, appeared on five national
news shows and still attributed the murders of Americans as a result of
protests? Who told her to do that? And, she continued to blame the murders
on an obscure internet video. Why?
DH: They have since publicly reclassified the description of the
location.
II: They had to because they could not continue to call the CIA operations
center an embassy or consulate. But they have yet to offer any reasonable
explanation for what happened there. Barack Obama has yet to look the
family members of Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith, or Glen Dougherty in the eyes
2 of 3
12/02/2012 09:50 PM
and tell the truth. He has yet to tell Americans the truth about the events of
9/11, and the reason for the lies, which continue through today. No one has
stepped up to tell the truth. We have only seen denials reinforced by
distractions. They continue to lie to this day. Who are they lying to and what is
the logical reason for the lies?
They are only lying to the American people. All other governments know
whats going on. And most importantly, the reason they are continuing to lie is
to cover up their plans as they are moving forward with their agenda.
Everyone must understand how important this is. The Obama plan
continues. No one is stopping them or this agenda. And in case you have any
questions about what this agenda is, let me explain it clearly and concisely.
Obama, Clinton, their foreign policy advisors and the people
involved in this agenda intend to start a war that will make
Afghanistan and Iraq look like a small police action by comparison.
They are going to start a war that will likely grow from a regional war to a
global war, or WW III. Afghanistan imploded when attacked, as did Iraq.
Syria will not, it will explode. Do the American people understand this?
Until now, everyone has been focused on the little lies. The security, the
misidentification of the CIA compound, the timeline, and on and on. They
want us to focus on the little lies so they can pull off the BIG LIE. The big lie
being told is that the U.S. is merely providing minimal support, including
humanitarian aid to the Syrians so they can defend themselves from Assad.
Thats the big lie that covers up what they are really doing in the region.
The CIA compound in Benghazi was a logistics hub for weapons, but not only
weapons from Libya. Weapons ordered by and destined for other countries,
like Saudi Arabia, the UAE and other countries, knowing the plan, were
allowing the weapons to be diverted, with Libya acting as the central
shipping hub. When Assad falls and U.S. troops are called in for ground
support, who will they be fighting? The Syrian army? No, they will be fighting
the Iranian army, the Russian army and the Chinese army. Why? Because
Iran, Russia and China all have a stake in the region. Putin called Syria his red
line in the sand, and stated that WW III will start in Syria, not Iran.
Benghazi is a moving target of little lies that serve as cover for the big lie. Are
Americans onboard?
3 of 3
12/02/2012 09:50 PM
Running down the clock on Benghazi
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article...
Yesterday's shameless hearings have done little to reveal the truth

Yesterday, Hillary Rodham Clinton provided unsworn testimony before the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee and the House Foreign Affairs Committee to answer questions about the
9/11 attack in Benghazi and the murders of four Americans. Conducted as fact-finding
hearings, many Americans were hopeful that the officials they elected to represent them were
finally going to get to the bottom of a deadly event that has been mired in deception since the
minute it began to unfold. Instead, Americans were sorely shortchanged by a combination of
inept questioning and lengthy monologues of professional praise, the latter which served as
an effective tactic to run down the game clock while limiting any errant exposure to the truth.
I suspect that the majority of congressmen and
senators will be sending their aides out today for a fresh supply of Chap Stick, while Clintons
aides will be busy applying soothing layers of a similar ointment to another part of her
anatomy as a result of that shameless and widely inappropriate public display of aection.
Every American with normal sensibilities should be outraged over the lack of accountability
that was celebrated instead of prosecuted, and the exploitation of the dead for political capital
rather than an honest quest for the truth.
It is telling that the elected ocials spent more time fawning over Hillary Rodham Clintons
alleged medical issues from which shes recovered, rather than attempting to learn the truth
behind the brutal, agonizing and possibly preventable deaths of four Americans. One result
from yesterdays hearings was immediately evident in the Progressive medias reports,
particularly by Lawrence ODonnell, who crowed that Hillary Clinton had put to rest
conspiracy theories associated with the attacks in Benghazi. Sadly, ODonnell and his ilk are
more concerned over the future political viability of their sacred cow instead of exposing the
truth behind an event that not only took American lives, but has hastened U.S. involvement
into a life-changing global conict.
Again, truth has been pushed behind a political
agenda that continues unabated in a situation that if exposed for what it was, would eclipse all
other political scandals to date in terms of scope and significance. It appears to be the nature
of Washington, the immorality of its denizens and power brokers, and the rampant
lawlessness that has evolved from decades of unchecked power allowed by a slumbering
populace and a complicit media.
A rip in the curtain
Once people understand that a full accounting of the events related to Benghazi would
provide a rare glimpse into the agenda and activities of a rogue government operation of
unfathomable consequence, it is easy to see why this regime is so intent on covering-up the
truth. To understand the role the special mission in Benghazi played in providing arms to
anti-Assad forces for the purposes of destabilizing Syria on behalf of Saudi Arabia and the
Muslim Brotherhood is to see the larger geo-political picture in this high-stakes game of
real-world Risk.
1 of 3
01/24/2013 10:43 PM
The attack in Benghazi ripped the curtain of secrecy, allowing the world to connect the dots
into the Obama-Saudi plan for restructuring the Middle East - a plan that is being allowed to
continue, compliments of an accommodating legislative branch of government and a fawning
and obedient media.
Much like the events in Benghazi provided those with eyes to see the larger agenda by this
unexpected rip in the veil of lies, there was one moment in the hearings that presented a
similar opportunity to see through the veil of the cover-up.
Out of hours of testimony and pages of written transcripts, the most telling moment came in
response to Senator Ron Johnsons rewording of a question relating to the motive and origin
of the attack. His persistence caused Clinton to raise her voice and irt with hysteria,
shouting:
With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a
protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided to go kill some
Americans? What dierence, at this point, does it make?
Her incomprehensible response offered a glimpse behind the curtain of deception, yet that
tear in the fabric of lies was left open but ignored as if following the line of questioning would
reveal too much.
The dierence, Madame Secretary, lies at the very core of why there are four dead
Americans. The question regarding what caused the attack is the foundation on which your
house of lies has been built. Behind your unbridled hubris and feigned outrage that such a
question should be asked exists the reason why the number of dead in Syria will not stop at
60,000, but will eventually rise into the millions. It is the very reason that Americans will, at
some point in the not-too-distant future, lament their involvement into yet another war
sparked by an American foreign policy designed by the Saudis and implemented by a dutiful
Barack Hussein Obama and your State Department.
Shameless exploitation of dead Americans
As I watched the hearings and poured through the transcripts, my thoughts turned to the
victims of the Benghazi attacks and their families. Having personally experienced the murder
of a family member that went unsolved for over five years, I know the feeling of being denied
the truth. I know the agony and heartache associated with unanswered questions. Although I
cannot speak for the families of the victims beyond my own personal experience, I certainly
suspect that your arrogance and overbearing pride as exhibited by your response has only
exacerbated their pain.
You shed a tear as you recounted how you and your boss met the arrival of the bodies of the
dead upon their return home, and how you stood next to the family members of the victims. In
one moment you expressed sorrow and promised justice, yet wasted no time erecting a
rewall against any meaningful disclosure that would allow for proper closure for the victims
families.
To deflect questions away from the motive is to divert people from learning the truth,
deliberately convoluting the facts and hiding the truth or from the victims families to every
thinking American.
2 of 3
01/24/2013 10:43 PM
It is difficult to fathom how you could stand with your boss, shoulder to shoulder with the
family members of the victims, while knowing the secrets you continue to keep hidden. It is
equally difficult to fathom how elected leaders have so easily acquiesced by failing to ask the
proper questions, and turned fact-finding sessions into de-facto canonization ceremonies
amid a moral, ethical and spiritual vacuum.
Yesterdays shameless hearings have done little to reveal the truth. To those paying attention,
however, it is becoming much clearer that the truth continues to be held hostage of the
current foreign policy constructed by the Saudis and implemented by the Obama military
muscle.
3 of 3
01/24/2013 10:43 PM
Flashing red lies of Benghazi
Murder, lies and videotape

By Doug Hagmann Wednesday, January 9, 2013
Late on Sunday, December 30, 2012, under the cover of the holiday
weekend, the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental
Aairs quietly released their investigative report of the attack in Benghazi
that killed four Americans. The 29-page investigative report titled Flashing
Red, additional to the State Departments own Accountability Review Boards
(ARB) report, was released by Committee Chairman Joseph Lieberman and
Ranking Committee member Susan Collins.
The report contains ten ndings,
eleven recommendations, 117 heavily redacted footnotes and even a
prominent mention of the dialogue between Barack Hussein Obama and Joy
Behar of The View. The conclusion reached by this report is a mere six
sentences long, ultimately determining that the Benghazi deaths are a tragic
reminder that the ght our country is engaged in with Islamist extremists and
terrorists is not over, and that the U.S. government failed to protect its public
servants in Benghazi.
As fully expected, the majority of the findings and subsequent
recommendations in this report directly relate to security of the physical
assets and personnel in Libya. These are deliberate deflections to divert
attention away from certain key elements, including but not limited to
identifying those who were behind the attacks and their motive. The most
critical aspect of this investigation that would provide the context necessary
to understand what took place in Benghazi on September 11, 2102, was
missing from this report: the reasons that Obama and certain members of his
administration deliberately withheld and even purposely misrepresented the
facts to the families of the slain victims and the American people collectively.
Contradictions and lies
Most Americans will recall that Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Susan Rice,
Jay Carney and others under the direct control of the Chief Executive
immediately identied a little-known video as the motive for the attack in
Benghazi, and the existence of a crowd of protestors motivated by
anti-American sentiment gathered outside of the embassy or consulate in
Benghazi due to this video. This is one of the most critically important aspects
to the ocial version of events in Benghazi as well as the events that followed
at the highest levels of our government.
The video is the metaphorical smoking gun in the intentional cover-up
implemented at the highest levels of our government. Its importance is
comparable to the Nixon tapes of the Watergate era, or the infamous blue
dress in the Clinton scandal. Despite its importance as the cornerstone of an
1 of 3
01/10/2013 09:14 AM
immense cover-up not seen since the Watergate era, this report not only
downplays its signicance, but allows obvious factual contradictions to exist
unimpeded. It is unconscionable that any investigative inquiry with a genuine
intent on uncovering the truth in the murders of four Americans would avoid
pursuing this issue as exhibited in this report.
The video was referenced four times within this report, with the most
important reference appearing on page four as follows (Washington timeline
of 9/11):
From 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. EST, Secretary Panetta met with senior DOD
ocials to discuss the Benghazi attack and other violence in the
region in reaction to the anti-Muslim video.
Having the benet of retrospect alone, it is unthinkable that this report fails to
question the truthfulness of this assertion which we now know cannot be
true. The veracity of this claim becomes even more absurd when its now
known with absolute certainty that the Benghazi compound was not an
embassy, consulate, or even an overtly obvious diplomatic mission. The facts
now prove that this compound was operating under the radar for
non-diplomatic purposes, a fact that was well known to Panetta, Clinton and
others.
Accordingly, there could not have been a protest of any kind at this location.
By deliberately and incorrectly calling the Benghazi compound an embassy
(initially) and later a consulate, the deception was further advanced to allow
for the possibility of a protest. This is not an act of omission by elected and
appointed officials, but one of commission. Yet the investigative report fails to
address this deception for what it is by outright dismissing this deliberate lie
with the concession that the attacks in Benghazi were, in fact, terrorist
attacks.
This absolute deceptions relative to the video, the alleged protest in Benghazi,
and the ultimate murders of four Americans were dismissed on page 23 of
this report by the following statement:
In short, regardless of questions about whether there had been a
demonstration or protest outside the Temporary Mission Facility in advance of
the attack, the extent to which the attacks were preplanned, or the role of an
anti-Islamic video which had sparked protests at the U.S. embassy in Cairo
and elsewhere earlier on September 11th, there was never any doubt among
key ocials, including ocials in the IC and the Department of State, that the
attack in Benghazi was an act of terrorism.
In one single run-on sentence, the report of investigation blatantly dismisses
the deception of the Obama administration relative to the video and nature of
the compound by merely admitting that the event in Benghazi was indeed a
terrorist attack. The report further gives passes to Obama, Clinton and Rice
as they knowingly misled the American people in multiple venues, from
Sunday morning panel shows to daytime shows such as The View and late
night talk shows such as The Late Show with David Letterman. It would
2 of 3
01/10/2013 09:14 AM
appear that the choice of venues is indicative of the utter contempt shown for
the victims, their families and every thinking American.
Murder, lies and videotape
It is often said that it is not always the crime, but the cover-up that creates the
most serious problems to those involved in criminal activity. So too will it be
with Benghazi. The evidence of a massive cover-up exists within reach,
waiting for the spotlight of truth to bring it into focus. The video that was
identified as being the spark that ignited the protests and ultimately, the
attack that resulted in the murder of four Americans plays an important and
very telling role, but not in the manner believed by many Americans.
The video holds certain clues in the activities of this administration, as do
those associated with it. Based on my own extensive research, investigation
and inquiries, it is my professional belief and opinion that it contains the
ngerprints of certain key individuals acting within and on behalf of this
administration, including, perhaps, one who is presently being considered to
head a large government agency.
Additionally, it appears that the video can be traced back to individuals and
groups who were involved in a case of political intrigue in 2008. A case that
when viewed in a certain manner, when focused in a certain way, might also
involve the unsolved murder of a young man who was caught in a situation
way over his head. Having no choice but to turn government informant, he
never got the chance to testify on record, as he was found with a bullet to his
head.
As we have seen with such cover-ups as Watergate and the Clinton sex
scandal, it is the hubris of those involved in the cover-up that leads to their
downfall. However, no one was murdered in either of those two scandals, and
the motives of both did not involve taking a country to the brink of a world
war.
The truth behind Benghazi, however, is the key to it all.
3 of 3
01/10/2013 09:14 AM
The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi report
Only if this report was written with the blood of the dead Americans could
it be more insulting to their memory, their families and to the intelligence
of the American public
The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi

report
By Doug Hagmann Thursday, December 20, 2012
Under the cover of the Newtown school shooting, an independent ve

member investigative panel quietly released an unclassied, 39-page report
Tuesday night, detailing their ndings of the attack that led to the murder of
four Americans in Benghazi on September 11, 2012. The report cites ve
main reasons for the loss of life, all primarily related to inadequate security for
U.S. personnel. However, the independent panel found that no U.S.
Government employee engaged in misconduct or willfully ignored his or her
responsibilities, and, therefore, did not nd reasonable cause to believe that
an individual breached his or her duty so as to be the subject of a
recommendation for disciplinary action. Stated another way, no one is to
blame nor will be held accountable for the murders of Americans Sean Smith,
Glen Dougherty, Tyrone Woods, and Ambassador Chris Stevens, so just
continue with your business.
The report was released in
advance of closed-door congressional testimony scheduled for today by two
senior panel members, retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering and former
Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Admiral Mike Mullen. Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton was also scheduled to testify this week, but has declined to do so as a
result of her recent fainting spell. Others are unavailable to testify or have not
been asked, which is a common tactic when the outcome of an investigation is
fixed from the beginning, and this, based on an extensive review of all
available evidence, most certainly was.
2012 Game show panel: To Tell The Truth
It is an interesting bit of trivia, perhaps, that the popular television game

show To Tell the Truth premiered exactly 56 years to the day that the
Benghazi report was released. The objective of the 2012 real world panel
appears to be the antithesis of former game show, as ferreting out the truth
did not appear to be the panels objective.
The panel report offers nothing more than obligatory eye candy in the form of
a stinging rebuke of State Department management and leadership failures
that led to the murder of four Americans. The panel deliberately convolutes
the pertinent issues with unrelated historical accounts of security issues in
Libya dating back to 1967, giving the reader a sense of thoroughness while
leaving the main issues untouched by design.
1 of 3
12/22/2012 06:30 PM
Ironically, the report opens with a 1905 quote from George Santayanna:
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. Included
perhaps to add legitimacy and a veneer of integrity to an investigative report
unworthy of such a denition, it is an insult to those aware of the actual
events leading up to the murderous attacks of 9/11.
To understand how the truth behind the murders and the events of the attack
is being buried amid familiar terms and talking points suitable for both
political parties and their spokespeople, it is vital to understand the origin and
makeup of the independent panel. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham
Clinton convened the Accountability Review Board (ARB) in the wake of the
attacks, quietly appointing retired Ambassador Thomas Pickering to chair
and direct the panel. His appointment unceremoniously appeared in the
October 4, 2012 edition of the Federal Register.
As noted in a previous report by this author, Thomas Pickering is an obvious
choice to direct an investigation that could have any negative implications to
Iran or this administrations associations with the Muslim Brotherhood.
Pickering is an advisory board member of the pro-Iranian organization known
as the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), and co-chairman of the
board of directors of the International Crisis Group (ICG), whose executive
committee includes the infamous George Soros. Pickering is also
vice-chairman of Hills & Co., global consultants founded in 1993 by CFR and
Trilateral Commission member Carla Anderson Hills.
The signicance of Pickerings appointment cannot be overstated or
underestimated considering that the trail of blood from four Americans leads
directly to Ansar al Sharia, a terrorist group funded by Iran. Who better to
redirect or cover up the operational conspiracy that exists between Barack
Hussein Obama, Hillary Rodham Clinton and that Muslim Brotherhood that
exists at the core of the 9/11 attack? Pickering is the obvious choice.
From the untouched to the absurd
Left untouched by the Pickering panel are the intrinsically sinister

machinations of Obama, Jarrett and Clinton, as they as are methodically
taking us to the brink of a new war in Syria through their weapons running
operations in Benghazi. The report intentionally oered only a very narrow
view of the events in Benghazi, limiting their scope to the already exposed
security deciencies that were secondary to the redened Benghazi
consulate. Using this tactic eectively diverts attention away from the real
issue and thus, the actual cause for the attack.
Beyond the narrow focus of the security issues and the subsequent
inconsequential wrist slap, the investigative panel descends further into the
abyss of absurdity and insult by incredibly asserting that everything possible
had been done to rescue and save our Ambassador and Sean Smith, and
further asserted that the interagency response was timely and
appropriate, but there was simply not enough time for armed U.S.
military assets to have made a dierence.
2 of 3
12/22/2012 06:30 PM
That finding alone should alarm every thinking American based on open
source intelligence and what is known, as well as what has yet to be disclosed.
Only if this report was written with the blood of the dead Americans could it
be more insulting to families of the dead and to the intelligence of the
American public.
Perhaps Pickering and his cadre of co-conspirators would like to disclose to
the American people the strange odyssey of a certain C-130 aircraft that left
Croatia for Libya to provide assistance to the Americans under siege at the
onset of the attack. The portal-to-portal ight time is about four
hours, yet it did not ocially appear on site for 23 hours. Perhaps
its time to address the fact that the lie is dierent at every level, and for
Pickering to stop being a rewall between his bosses and the truth owed to
every American, and particularly to the families of those who were murdered.
Its time to ask whether the crew of that C-130 was ever identied and
interviewed. Its time to locate and ask the personnel on board that aircraft
how long it was, after they changed from their military uniforms into their
street clothes to enact a rescue, were they forced to wait while the embattled
Americans endured the attack and met their deaths. Oh yes, there is
information known and crying out to be made public despite the contempt for
the truth and equally important, the contempt for the American people by
Barack Hussein Obama, Hillary Clinton and Valerie Jarrett.
Four Americans were murdered in Benghazi. Over forty thousand are dead
in Syria. Soon, it will be four million dead as a result of the hidden agenda of
our elected leaders, the complicity of a corrupt media, and the complacency
of a brainwashed public. Today we cry over the deaths in Newtown, but
tomorrow, our sobs will be for the masses.
Added for clarification: The C-130 referenced in this article departed
from Croatia but was officially reported to be present at Naval Air Station
Sigonella 23 hours later, despite an average flight time for that trip of
approximately four-(4) hours.
Additionally, it is reasonable to ask how the panel report could conclude that
there was simply not enough time for armed U.S. military assets to have
made a dierence, given what we know and the specic information that has
been ocially conrmed. The reght lasted approximately nine hours. Nine
hours. Also notice that the report is very specic in specifying armed U.S.
military assets. One must ask whether any other non-U.S. assets were in the
area that oered to assist, waiting for the call that never came. Anyone?
3 of 3
12/22/2012 06:30 PM

Doug Hagmann On Benghazi 2012-2013, PDF

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Judul Asli

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Doug Hagmann On Benghazi 2012-2013, PDF

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Administration is engaged in a massive cover-up

Benghazi explained: Interview with an

This is part one of a multi-part interview with a government insider intimately

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

Weve heard dierent accounts and dierent timelines concerning

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

Now, Turkey is a NATO ally. They were assisting the Obama-Clinton-Saudi

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

Benghazi: Behind the scenes (Part II)

I heard a statement that they did not admit knowledge to avoid

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Advancing the agenda of Saudi Arabia, the Muslim Brotherhood in North

Benghazi explained: Interview with an

Events seem to be changing rapidly in Syria, and we know that the

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Whats going on with Turkey, Syria and Russia now?

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Interview with an Intelligenc...

Benghazi explained: Behind the lies

Benghazi explained: Behind the lies

Authors note: This is a special supplement of a multi-part interview with

Benghazi explained: Behind the lies

any doubt, that there was no consulate or diplomatic mission in Benghazi.

Benghazi explained: Behind the lies

Running down the clock on Benghazi

Yesterday's shameless hearings have done little to reveal the truth

Running down the clock on Benghazi

Running down the clock on Benghazi

Running down the clock on Benghazi

Flashing red lies of Benghazi

Murder, lies and videotape

Flashing red lies of Benghazi

Flashing red lies of Benghazi

Flashing red lies of Benghazi

The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi report

The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi

Under the cover of the Newtown school shooting, an independent ve

It is an interesting bit of trivia, perhaps, that the popular television game

The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi report

Left untouched by the Pickering panel are the intrinsically sinister

The wretched absurdity of the Benghazi report

Anda mungkin juga menyukai