Geology
Golden plumes: Substantial gold enrichment of oceanic crust during
ridge-plume interaction
A.P. Webber, S. Roberts, R.N. Taylor and I.K. Pitcairn
Geology 2013;41;87-90
doi: 10.1130/G33301.1
Subscribe
Permission request
Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of
their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further
requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent
works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms
to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post
the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting
includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the
presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race,
citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect
official positions of the Society.
Notes
School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton
SO14 3ZH, UK
2
Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden
ABSTRACT
Mantle plume events are increasingly implicated as the source of gold (Au) in regions of
the Earth that show a high Au endowment. However, the process of enriching oceanic crust in
Au by plume activity is poorly understood and unconstrained. We present the first systematic
study of Au concentrations in oceanic basalts as a function of distance from a plume center. We
show that the influence of the Iceland plume on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge progressively enriches
the oceanic crust in Au along the Reykjanes Ridge by as much as 13 times normal levels, over a
distance of ~600 km, and that the enrichment can be attributed to specific plume components.
This Au enrichment by the Iceland plume implies a genetic relationship between deep mantle
upwelling and major gold mineralization.
INTRODUCTION
A crucial control on the formation of a hydrothermal mineral deposit is the concentration of
the metal of interest within the hydrothermal
fluid, which in turn is variably controlled by
temperature, salinity, pressure, oxygen fugacity
(O2), and the chemistry of the source and host
rocks (e.g., Keays, 1983, 1987). Consequently,
higher gold (Au) concentrations in the source
rock may provide an important control on the
size of any resulting Au deposit. Enrichment at
the source has been recognized as an important
factor in the production of several world-class
Au deposits and districts (Keays, 1983, 1987;
McInnes et al., 1999; Bierlein and Pisarevsky,
2008). This enrichment of Au could be supplied by a mantle plume carrying Au into the
upper mantle and, ultimately, into the mineralizing system (Oppliger et al., 1997; Kerrich et
al., 2000; Bierlein et al., 2006). Plumes, having
originated closer to the core than the upper mantle, may carry siderophile elements like Au into
the upper mantle where it can be incorporated
into oceanic crust (e.g., Brandon and Walker,
2005). In a subduction setting, Au enrichment
may involve the subduction of plume-enriched
oceanic crust, or by entraining plume material
into the mantle wedge, either through a slab
window or tear, or by entering the wedge from
behind the arc (Kerrich et al., 2000). All of these
models are predicated on a substantive enrichment of Au within the plume environment.
However, few data exist to support this assertion, in particular a lack of very low detectionlimit analyses and high-precision geochemical
analyses for Au.
Iceland presents an interesting test case.
There appears to be no significant gold mineralization in Iceland, yet volcanic and geothermal
systems are extensive, with geothermal fluid on
the Reykjanes Peninsula actively precipitating
metal-rich crusts on geothermal equipment, con-
Figure 1. Map of Reykjanes Ridge off Iceland (top right). Gray shades show bathymetry; darker shades correspond to greater
depths. Squares indicate sample locations.
Inset map shows wider area and sample locations (dots).
GEOLOGY, January 2013; v. 41; no. 1; p. 8790; Data Repository item 2013006
doi:10.1130/G33301.1
2012 Geological
Society
of America.
For permission to copy, contact Copyright Permissions, GSA, or editing@geosociety.org.
GEOLOGY
2013
| January
| www.gsapubs.org
87
0.7031
18.8
A
Pb/204 Pb
18.6
RRD1
18.4
RR3?
206
0.7029
0.7028
87
Sr / 86 Sr
RRE
0.7030
18.2
0.7027
RRD2
18.0
0.7026
0
Au (ppb)
Au (ppb)
8000
2.5
RRD2
RRE
2.0
6000
La /Au
La/ Sm
RESULTS
Gold concentrations ranged from 0.21 to
4.22 ppb (Table DR1 in the GSA Data Repository1). Samples analyzed from south of ~61N
show a range of Au values between 0.2 and 1.7
ppb, while samples from north of ~61N show
a range of 14.3 ppb, comparable to values
recorded from Iceland (Fig. 2). No correlations
are observed between Au and indices of basalt
magma evolution or mantle melting such as
Mg#, Fe[8], and Na[8]. Correlation of Au with
87
Sr/86Sr and 143Nd/144Nd, which are not affected
by magma evolution, suggests that variation in
the Au concentration is due to mantle source
mixing (Fig. 3A). Comparison of Au with Pb
isotope data shows that the RRE, RRD2, and
RRD1 end members described by Thirlwall
et al. (2004) can be identified (Fig. 3B). Plotting Au against an incompatible trace element
ratio, such as La/Sm, suggests at least three-endmember mixing, involving an enriched mantle
component and two components with depleted
trace element ratios, one with slightly higher
Au concentrations than the other (Fig. 3C). The
companion plot (Fig. 3D) confirms four-endmember mixing. The fourth end member does
not fit easily into established mixing models,
and may represent a suggested MORB (Taylor
et al., 1997) or RR3 component (Thirlwall et
al., 2004); we refer to this as RR3. The standard BIR-1, an extremely depleted sample from
Iceland, lies close to RR3 on the mixing line
1.5
RRD1
1.0
RRD1
4000
RRD2
2000
RR3
0.5
RRE
0
0.0
0
RR3
Au (ppb)
1/Au (ppb)
Au (ppb)
between RRD2 and RR3, with an Au concentration of 1.6 ppb (Constantin, 2009).
0
56
58
60
62
64
66
Latitude (N)
Figure 2. Gold (Au) in volcanic glasses versus latitude. We observe a trend from Atlantic mid-oceanic ridge basalt (MORB), shaded
histogram on y-axis (n = 22), to Icelandic lavas (x symbols). Closed circles have La/Sm
<1, open circles have La/Sm >1. Error bars
represent a conservative 5% error. MORB
data are from Keays and Scott (1976), Hertogen et al. (1980), Lapukhov et al. (1999), and
Tatsumi et al. (2000); Iceland data are from
Momme et al. (2003).
1
GSA Data Repository item 2013006, Table DR1, is
available online at www.geosociety.org/pubs/ft2013
.htm, or on request from editing@geosociety.org or
Documents Secretary, GSA, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder,
CO 80301, USA.
88
DISCUSSION
In the upper mantle, the distribution of Au
and other chalcophile elements is strongly controlled by the behavior of sulfur (e.g., Peach et
al., 1990; Keays, 1995). Sulfur-saturated silicate
melt will be depleted in chalcophile elements
that are sequestered by the sulfide-bearing
mantle residual, whereas sulfur-undersaturated
silicate melts will have the full complement of
chalcophile elements. MORB, for example, is
generally considered to be sulfur-saturated at the
time of extraction, and thus depleted in chalcophile elements (Peach et al., 1990). As the upper
mantle undergoes increased partial melting, a
greater fraction of the residual sulfide is consumed, and chalcophile elements are increasingly released to the melt. We observe elevated
Au concentrations compared to MORB in both
enriched and highly depleted lavas, and so proportion of partial melting cannot alone explain
the high Au concentrations in the Reykjanes
www.gsapubs.org
January 2013
GEOLOGY
Au in melt (ppb)
A
10
7 ppb
1
3 ppb
1 ppb
0.1
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
Proportion of melting
20
B
18
R/RA
16
14
12
MORB
10
8
6
0
Au (ppb)
Figure 4. A: Curves distinguish Au concentration in mantle source. Mantle source of
1 ppb does not generate high (>1 ppb) Au
concentrations until 23%25% partial melting, after which all sulfides have dissolved.
Raising the Au concentration of the mantle
source increases Au concentration of the
silicate melt across the entire range of partial melt fractions. Lines terminate at complete sulfide dissolution. Model parameters
are from Peach et al. (1990). B: Au versus R/
RA, where R/RA is the 3He/4He ratio of sample normalized to that of the atmosphere.
Samples lie between some high R/RA, high
Au end member (Iceland), and mid-oceanic
ridge basalt (MORB). Solid arrow is projected toward a theoretical maximum value
of 34 RA (MacPherson et al., 2005) and 7.5
ppb Au (Momme et al., 2003). MORB box is
given by the average R/RA of normal MORB
(Graham, 2002) and median average Au
content presented here. Indicated sample
(dashed arrow) had a particularly low He
concentration (Hilton et al., 2000), suggesting that it could have been significantly affected by radiogenic ingrowth of 4He. For
symbols, see Figure 2 caption.
GEOLOGY
January 2013
www.gsapubs.org
89
90
GEOLOGY