Find courtroom dramas in literature and try to filter out the common
elements in them.
Subject: English II
Submitted to: Dr. Prassananshu
Submitted by: Anwesha Choudhury
Roll no.: 15/2012
Year: 1st Year, 2nd Semester
Group: N
Topic No. 97
CONTENTS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Acknowledgement .. 2
Introduction . 3
Methodology .. 4
Observation Table 5
Analysis and Result 78
Discussion 79
Conclusion .. 81
References 82
ACKNOWLEDGEMNT
The topic I have chosen to research on is one of great interest to me, for my common love
towards both the law as well as book. I am, therefore, grateful to my professor, Dr.
Prassananshu, for making this topic a part of the syllabus, and, compelling me to work on it.
The project required me to look at various aspects of a trial scene from different perspectives
and draw conclusions. I am deeply indebted to Sir, for, his class room exercised gave me the
required skill to do the same.
Classes on literary pieces like Merchants of Venice, Benefit of Doubt arranged by Sir hav e
helped me a lot in applying a similar analysis to other works as well.
I am also thankful to my parents for providing me with resources I required to be able to
come up with the project.
And last but not the least, the University, for, the project would e a dream without the
facilities it has endowed its students with.
INTRODUCTION
Despite their apparent separation, law and literature have been closely linked fields
throughout history. Linguistic creativity is central to the law, with literary modes such as
narrative and metaphor infiltrating legal texts. Equally, legal norms of good and bad conduct,
of identity and human responsibility, are reflected or subverted in literature's engagement
with questions of law and justice (Kieran Dolin, A Critical Introduction to Law and
Literature). Law seeks to regulate creative expression, while literary texts critique and
sometimes openly resist the law. Law is literature but it also appears frequently in literature.
The trial itself has features in common with literature, and law and literature both require
interpretation. Literature may be constrained by the law and the law of defamation or
blasphemy. (Michael Freeman and Andrew Lewis, Law and Literature, Current Legal Issues
Volume 2).
Though the ways in which law is depicted in a book are be various, the researcher has
restricted the project to include only courtroom scenes and comment upon them.
The courtroom scene holds a natural fascination for writers of fiction. The obvious reason is
that fictional characters are often getting divorced and committing murders, all the while
suffering from a chronic case of bad luck just the sort one would expect to be regularly
hauled before a judge. But the underlying reason is that authors are in the same line of work
as jurors. The task of both begins with calling someone to account for his or her deeds(Thane
Rosenbum, Law Lit: From Atticus Finch to 'The Practice': A Collection of Great Writing
About the Law).
Through this project the researcher has not only attempted to go through a variety of trial
scenes but also to analyse them on the basis of the emphasis laid on each aspect of the same.
METHODOLOGY
The researcher went through a number of excerpts on trial scenes from various literary
pieces. A number of them like Merchant of Venice, Benefit of Doubt and Pro Archia
were a part of the syllabus itself.
Some others like Alice in Wonderland were known to the researcher well before.
But the major source for most of the excerpts was a book compiled and edited by Thane
Rosenbum, Law Lit: From Atticus Finch to 'The Practice': A Collection of Great Writing
About the Law.
After having gone through the excerpts the researcher put down the relevant parts in the
observation table, noted comments and came down with a first set of key words.
After having made the first set of key words the researcher clubbed the similar ones to a
second and much narrower set of key words, i.e.,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Lawyer
Judge
Society
Accused
Victim
Witness
Courtroom
These are the common elements in most of them. Then the researcher has tried to analyse
them on the basis of these elements. In the sense, the researcher has tried to find out what do
authors emphasise more on in their courtroom scenes; lawyers tactics, arguments and views,
or judges role in the scene, or how the witness is examined, or the accuseds reaction on
being convicted or exonerated, or what the victims feelings and views are throughout the
trial, or how the courtroom is set and the procedure followed or whether and to what extent
does society influence what happens within the walls of a courtroom.
OBSERVATION TABLE
SL.
SOU
OBSERVATION
YOUR
KEY
NO.
1.
RCE
COMMENTS
WORDS
To kill Gentlemen, I shall be brief, but I would Through
this dramatic
a
mocki
ng
bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
his
KEY WORDS 2
LAWYER
main
the
corners
to
enable them to
see through his
2.
point of view.
To kill Gentlemen, I shall be brief, but I would The speaker also appeal
a
mocki
ng
bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
to AUDIENCE
things
off
by
white.
that its not.
To kill The state has not produced one iota of This
excerpt prejudice
ACCUSED,
medical evidence that shows that the reflects the states against
SOCIETY
mocki
ng
took place. The state has relied solely mind against the
bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
state
of accused
system
4.
To
the
principle
of
presumption
of
innocence.
The state has not produced one iota of The speaker does witness
WITNESS
randomly analysis
Mocki crime Tom Robinson is charged with ever make his point or
5.
ng
took place. The state has relied solely give his opinion.
Bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
To
proper
and
SOCIETY
Kill a and conduct on the stand. They have here is prejudiced injustice
Mocki presented themselves in the cynical against the negros
ng
begin
Bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
with
is
with
societys
To
black.
I need not remind you of their appearance The trial here is social
Bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
injustice
SOCIETY
black.
To kill But a court is only as sound as its jury, Here
the lawyers
mocki
who
ng
bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
make
it
up. appeals
LAWYER
tactics
to
the
and
God,
gentlemen,
believe
Robinson.
8.
the
defendant.
To kill But a court is only as sound as its jury, The
lawyer judgea
and the jury is only as sound as the men knows that he is sycophancy
mocki
who
ng
bird,
Harpe
r Lee.
as
directly
of
make
God,
gentlemen,
it
believe
JUDGE
one.
he
Robinson.
indirectly pleads
with them to be
fair.
The
final
decision rests in
9.
The
their hands.
Stunned, distraught, unconscious of its Here the author audience
Trage
vividly expressions
the
AUDIENCE
Pudd
nhead
expressions
and
Wilso
movements
at
by
Mark
Twain
is an inevitable
part
of
any
courtroom scene
and makes even
the most dull of
trials
10.
dramatic
The
and entertaining.
Stunned, distraught, unconscious of its Disruptions are an audience
Trage
AUDIENCE
nhead
Wilso
n
by
Mark
11.
Twain
The
Trage
the sheriff. He was obeyed and the quiet definitely is one command
judges
dy of regained.
Pudd
even
nhead
would identify a
Wilso
courtroom.
JUDGE
layman
by
Mark
12
Twain
The
Trage
audience, audiences
dy of regained.
ebullient, is also
Pudd
obedient.
reaction
AUDIENCE
nhead
Wilso
n
by
Mark
13.
Twain
The
Trage
the answer.
again audiences
captures
dy of
audiences
Pudd
approbation.
AUDIENCE
the reaction
nhead
Wilso
n
by
Mark
14
Twain
The
Trage
the answer.
courtroom lawyers
dramas,
common mindset
Pudd
nhead
Wilso
Mark
Twain
is
successfully
applying
15.
a dramatics
dy of
by
LAWYER
that
The
tactic.
He moved to his place through a storm of In this scene, not order
Trage
applause-which the sheriff stopped and only the audience the court
in COURTROOM,
JUDGE
dy of made the people sit down, for they were but the judge, jury
Pudd
nhead
course.
Wilso
16.
Court,
jury,
sheriff,
and other
court
are
Mark
advocates
Twain
The
performance.
He moved to his place through a storm of A good speaker lawyers
9
LAWYER,
Trage
capture enrapturing
AUDIENCE
dy of made the people sit down, for they were everyones heart. audience
Pudd
nhead
course.
Wilso
17
Court,
jury,
sheriff,
and person
is
held
Mark
Twain
The
ACCUSED,
Trage
AUDIENCE
amongst
Pudd
audience. Such a
nhead
character adds to
Wilso
the
drama.
Theres
Mark
always
someone
Twain
in the courtroom
by
the
courtroom
who
18
hopes
The
Trage
of
getting accused
Pudd
apprentice
nhead
taken aback by
Wilso
the developments
made.
by
is
Mark
19
Twain
The
Trage
expression.
Pudd
Roxanna perhaps
nhead
is an accomplice
Wilso
or a supporter of
10
accused
by
Mark
shell-shocked by
Twain
the
negative
developments
20
in
The
the case.
Roxys pulses stood still. The whole The
audience audiences
Trage
reaction
participated in the
Pudd
developments
nhead
taking
Wilso
AUDIENCE
place
by
Mark
21
Twain
The
Trage
out of him.
guilty
is convicts
dy of
as he realises that
Pudd
nhead
long.
ACCUSED/CONVIC
T
Wilso
n
by
Mark
22
Twain
The
Tom was growing limp; the life oozing The book vividly convicts
ACCUSED/
Trage
out of him.
CONVICT
captures
dy of
physiological
Pudd
changes
nhead
place
Wilso
accused
guilt
by
Mark
23
the reaction
taking
in
the
as
is
his
being
established.
Twain
The
Tom turned his ashen face imploring The guilty finally convicts
Trage
which,
if
CONVICT
Pudd
nothing
more,
nhead
sort
Wilso
corroborates
guilt.
by
of
his
Mark
24
Twain
The
Trage
CONVICT
being reaction
sometimes
nhead
include
Wilso
problems as well.
health
by
Mark
25
Twain
The
Tom turned his ashen face imploring This can also be cunning
Trage
CONVICT
26
accused, to either
nhead
get
Wilso
sentence or to be
able
by
a
to
Mark
while
Twain
medical
mild
escape
getting
The
treatment.
Tom turned his ashen face imploring A
conviction convicts
Trage
CONVICT
shocked
dy of movements with his white lips and then destroys the life
Pudd
of an individual.
nhead
Wilso
have resulted in
by
Mark
27
Twain
Nativ
death.
Everybody rise, please
COURTROOM
by
stuck to.
Richa
rd
Wrigh
28
t.
Nativ
by
the decorum of t
Richa
the court.
AUDIENCE
rd
Wrigh
29
t.
Nativ
Immediately
Bigger
heard
of SOCIETY
e Son commotion. He turned his head and saw has also portrayed media
by
Richa
rd
newspaper men.
sensational cases.
Wrigh
30
t.
Nativ
Immediately
Bigger
heard
SOCIETY
e Son commotion. He turned his head and saw the case at hand is sensationali
by
sing
Richa
news
rd
newspaper men.
the
Wrigh
31
t.
Nativ
The
judge court
e Son
by
decorum of the
Richa
court
rd
maintained.
COURTROOM
be
Wrigh
32
t.
Nativ
JUDGE
e Son
by
well as fictional
Richa
courtroom scenes.
rd
Wrigh
33
t.
Nativ
by
public prosecutor
Richa
rd
attorney.
LAWYER
Wrigh
34
35
t.
Nativ
Such
rebuttals rebuttal-
LAWYER
by
Richa
most
interesting
rd
and
enjoyable
Wrigh
parts to read in
t.
any
Nativ
courtroom
fiction.
Your Honor, never in my life have I The
defending lawyers
LAWYER
e Son risen in court to make a plea with a firmer attorney starts of dramatics
by
speech
by
Richa
rd
Wrigh
his
trying to convince
t.
36
Nativ
out.
Your Honor, never in my life have I The case at hand moral
with
a appeal
by
Richa
rd
social judge
JUDGE,
to AUDIENCE
&
Wrigh
pronounce
t.
the
judgement
keeping
the
ramifications
37
Nativ
in
hindsight.
Your Honor, I have no desire to be The
attorney judge-
JUDGE
e Son disrespectful to the court but I must be plays with words. sycophancy
by
38
honest.
He apologises for
Richa
being
rd
disrespectful
Wrigh
before he is to
t.
create a positive
Nativ
impression.
Your Honor, I have no desire to be He is aware that judge-
honest.
views
JUDGE
are sycophancy
analogous to the
Richa
judges. hence, he
rd
is playing safe.
Wrigh
39
t.
Nativ
Richa
rd
Wrigh
t.
role
in
of
lawyers
Though he might
be losing out to
facts, the lawyer
here attempts the
win the second
15
dramatics LAWYER
round.
40
Nativ
moral
the
Richa
rd
Wrigh
t.
LAWYER,
AUDIENCE
moral
which
in
not
carry
Nativ
e Son
by
Richa
rd
Wrigh
t.
Again
"The hunt for Bigger Thomas served as
an excuse to terrorize the entire Negro
population,
to
Communists,
arrest
to
raid
hundreds
labor
of
union
the
played
role social
SOCIETY
by prejudice
societys
influence
has
been
re-
emphasised.
42
Nativ
e Son
by
Richa
rd
Wrigh
t.
to
arrest
to
raid
hundreds
labor
of
union
16
is
usually
discriminated
against, its crime
gets coupled with
the inherent crime
SOCIETY
that he belongs to
prosecution and the stimulated temper of
the people are of such nature as to
indicate that more than revenge is being
sought upon a man who has committed a
class
looked
crime.
43
Time
something
has
gotten
lost.
all
literary moral
LAWYER,
AUDIENCE
44
by
Akiva
Golds
man
A
Do you see? In all this legal manoeuvring The task of the lawyers
Time
something
has
gotten
lost.
That lawyer
is
LAWYER
to dramatics
Akiva
talk about the truth but actually seek it front of the judge.
Golds
man
time
vested
interests
supersede
the
is
principled
a
man
who is abiding by
45
his oath.
I want to tell you a story. I want you all to Here again
Time
close your eyes while I tell you this story. attorney brings in dramatics
yourselves.
element
drama.
Akiva
17
the lawyers
of
LAWYER
Golds
46
man
A
Time
lawyer audience
every enraptured
yourselves.
AUDIENCE
method
Akiva
heard out.
Golds
47
48
man
A
The
judge
is judge
Time
to Kill
by
by
Akiva
him
Golds
Honor.
man
A
referring
as
This
JUDGE
to
Your
is
the court
Time
conventional
to Kill
method
of
by
referring
to
Akiva
judges.
COURTROOM
mannerism
Golds
49
man
Merch DUKE I feel sorry for you. Youve come This
shows
an prejudice
ACCUSED,
SOCIETY
accused
by feelings of mercy.
Willia
m
Shake
50
speare
Merch DUKE I feel sorry for you. Youve come A very rare case biased
ant of to face a ruthless enemy, an inhuman where the judge judge
Venic
e
by feelings of mercy.
JUDGE
Willia
has begun.
Shake
51
speare
Merch BASSANIO
excerpt argument
cruel behaviour.
LAWYER
courtroom brawl.
Willia
BASSANIO
Shake
speare SHYLOCK
Does
anyone
hate
opposing argument
LAWYERS
cruel behaviour.
Willia
BASSANIO
Shake
speare SHYLOCK
common
This
is
to
all
anyone
hate
be sycophancy
Venic
the
adjudicating
by
case, is referred to
19
JUDGE
Willia
as the Lord.
m
Shake
54
speare
Merch SALERIO
of JUDGE
ant of waiting outside with letters from Bellario. being used here. judge
Venic
e
by
that
Willia
he
would
m
Shake
55
speare
Merch DUKE Welcome. Please have a seat. Are As in real life lawyers
ant of you familiar with the case currently cases, here too the role
Venic
e
LAWYER
and
Willia
m
Shake
56
speare
Merch PORTIA Yes, my lord.
ant of
acknowledged as sycophancy
Venic
My Lord.
JUDGE
by
Willia
m
Shake
57
speare
Merch PORTIA Yes, my lord.
ant of
Venic
judge as well.
by
Willia
m
Shake
20
COURTROOM
58
speare
Merch PORTIA No one shows mercy because Here comes the moral
AUDIENCE
ant of he has to. It just happens, the way gentle time to shed some appeal
Venic
e
on
mercy
Willia
Shake
AUDIENCE,
ant of he has to. It just happens, the way gentle some goodness in appeal
LAWYER
Venic
e
people
Willia
gives it and the one who receives it. Its as the parties.
Shake
21
LAWYER
ant of he has to. It just happens, the way gentle futile attempt by dramatics
Venic
e
lawyer
to
Willia
gives it and the one who receives it. Its mind and hence
Shake
LAWYER
ant of power in Venice that can change an that the lawyer is ethics
Venic
e
and
Willia
happen.
land.
Shake
62
speare
Merch PORTIA: That cant happen. Theres no This talks about social
ant of power in Venice that can change an policy
implication
Venic
SOCIETY
Willia
happen.
Shake
63
speare
Merch Whether the offending person lives or This excerpt re- judgeant of dies is up to the duketheres no one emphasises
Venic
that sycophancy
22
JUDGE
64
judges
Willia
Shake
have lawyers
65
in
LAWYER
The dramatics
Willia
wrong-doer
hence,
Shake
unfair
Benef
trial
it
the
Doubt
by
Jack
COURTROOM
of
any
arouses
and
can
even
the
vapid
of
was
so
voluminously
and
The
Benef
it
innocent unfair
Doubt
is trial
This audience
23
AUDIENCE
by
Jack
law
by
Londo four men. And of the two that testified, common citizens
n
one claimed to have been in the kitchen, a and how shellwitness to Watson's unprovoked assault shocked they are
on Patsy, while the other, remaining in when this trust in
the bar, had witnessed Watson's second shattered in the
and third rushes into the place as he courts of law.
attempted to annihilate the unoffending
Patsy. The vile language ascribed to
Watson
was
so
voluminously
and
The
Benef
it
denied
the unfair
is trial
a
fair
Doubt
by
previous
Jack
actions,"
bellowed
COURTROOM
68
The
"I was strolling casually along the street, The judge asks judges
Benef
it
JUDGE
Doubt
by
previous
Jack
actions,"
bellowed
69
The
prosecutor arguments
Benef
attorney asked.
his
it
plays
of
LAWYER
role
perfectly
by
Doubt
asking
crafty
by
questions to get
Jack
Londo
70
n
The
Benef
attorney asked.
it
71
shows
a Lawyers
LAWYER
of
adversarial
Doubt
system.
The
by
Jack
crafty
Londo
questions
n
The
LAWYER,
Benef
JUDGE
it
25
the
of
Doubt
by
Jack
to
the
is
also
with
practices.
The
Benef
it
judge judges
JUDGE
the orders
Doubt
by
Jack
73
The
"Men are unreasonable when they are The parties to the judge
Benef
it
Doubt
74
give
by
opinions.
Jack
Londo
judges wrath.
n
The
Benef
it
JUDGE
It
judges
Doubt
by
Jack
26
this
is
JUDGE
down
here
in
this
little
The
"I but answered your question, your The judges are judge-
Benef
it
JUDGE
Doubt
next blast. "And let me warn you, sir, let to feel belittled
by
Jack
any
76
down
here
in
this
little
The
Benef
it
the
the
judge
final
Doubt
Both
by
Jack
equal
and
the
doubt.
This
consistent
actual
JUDGE
up."
77
The
"The point is well taken," he decided. "I The judge here judges
Benef
it
JUDGE
Doubt
by
Jack
78
The
"The point is well taken," he decided. "I Here again there moral
Benef
it
lecture
Doubt
by
Jack
AUDIENCE
a
in
79
The
"Sit down,
Benef
it
sir!"
was
the
a decorum
position
Doubt
by
Jack
28
also
that
COURTROOM
80
consequences.
n
The
As
Benef
"It is a rule of law that the defendant shall judge gives the
it
always
the judgement
JUDGE
Doubt
by
Jack
81
Pro
Archi
a by
defending lawyers
well
here tactics
as
an opening
LAWYER
Inheri
t
Wind
one appeal
by
Jerom
Lawre most impartial judges, before such an the hearts and not
nce
and
Rober
minds
of
AUDIENCE
Inheri
t
attorney judge
JUDGE,
to
ATTORNEY
the sycophancy
Wind
by
Jerom
by
them.
he
is
nce
and
Rober
manner
for
that
Inheri
t
seeks judge
to sycophancy
Wind
by
Jerom
their
he
nce
and
Rober
JUDGE
Pro
archia
pleasant tactics
of
ACCUSED
the pleasant
before portrayal of
accused
with
Pro
AUDIENCE
Archi
of audience
and
in
of
the
Pro
Archi
and allowed me by you, I will soon cause praising his client portrayal of
ACCUSED
who
has
not
been
Pro
already.
There is a man present of the very highest The
Archi
author witness
WITNESS
to
his
Pro
himself.
There is a man present of the very highest The
Archi
lawyer witness
WITNESS
the analysis
he
has
not that he has heard of it, but that he saw called upon.
it; not even that he was present when it
was done, but that he actually did it
90
Pro
himself.
You must rely wholly on what arguments This is where the arguments
Archi
start.
counsel
35
his
LAWYER
Pro
study?
You must rely wholly on what arguments He is not only heated
Archi
LAWYER
his argument
sur-
by his friends. You ask us, O Gratius, his childish folly rebuttals
why we are so exceedingly attached to and looks down
this man. Because he supplies us with upon him with
food whereby our mind is refreshed after contempt.
this noise in the forum, and with rest for
our ears after they have been wearied
with bad language. Do you think it
possible that we could find a supply for
our daily speeches, when discussing such
a variety of matters, unless we were to
cultivate our minds by the study of
literature; or that our minds could bear
being kept so constantly on the stretch if
we did not relax them by that same
92
Pro
study?
You must rely wholly on what arguments The
Archi
you can find. For he will never be very well aware sycophancy
speaker
is judge-
JUDGE
literary
Pro
study?
You must rely wholly on what arguments This also forms a argument
Archi
of
LAWYER
the
Pro
study?
(for I will take advantage of your The attorney is judge-
Archi
inclination
towards him his
37
JUDGE
95
Pro
advantage.
(for I will take advantage of your He
constantly lawyers
Archi
96
LAWYERS
their predilection
to his advantage.
SECUTOR. Colonel, do you solemnly A
typical witness
Few
swear that testimony you will give in this courtroom scene analysis
Good
Men
by
strictly followed.
Aaron
A. Yes i do
Here, a witness
Sorki
99) Q. Would you state your name, rank, has been called
WITNESS
correct
is
air?
A.
Colonel
Nathan
R.
Jessep,
Few
swear that testimony you will give in this already aware of procedure
Good
Men
by
necessary
Aaron
A. Yes i do
prevent
Sorki
COURTROOM
air?
A.
Colonel
Nathan
R.
Jessep,
Few
Good
is that right?
Men
by
witness.
38
the examination
WITNESS
Aaron
Sorki
99
Q. Yes sir. Colonel, at the time of this The witness here uncooperat
Few
Good
is that right?
Men
by
Aaron
Sorki
WITNESS
holding
Few
with you.
part
Good
A. Yes.
courtroom scene
Men
by
Change of underwear?
witness is being
Aaron
asked
Sorki
of national security?
Judge:
Gentlemen.
in
where
a tactics
the
question
seem
baseless,
You
better
LAWYER
of
context
but
desired result.
Few
with you.
Good
A. Yes.
busy
Men
by
Change of underwear?
Aaron
Sorki
of national security?
Judge:
Gentlemen.
prosecutor witness
with
WITNESS
his
of
questions.
You
better
get
Crystal. Colonel, I have just one more The witness here lawyers
Few
question before I call Airman O'Malley falls into his own tactics
Good
Men
by
Aaron
Sorki
He
This
the
prosecutor closer
is
in
LAWYER
late that he is
immured.
Few
Good
Men
by
Aaron
Sorki
133) Q. But that's not what you said. You speak, especially
said he was being transferred because he if
they
are
fabricating
stuff
up they must be
prevent
trapped,
41
being
as
it
LAWYER
In frustration, a convicts
ACCUSED/
Few
cuss
CONVICT
Good
muttered.
Men
takes
by
closer to reality.
word
is reaction
This
fiction
Aaron
Sorki
105
n
A
Guilt
of
the convicts
Few
Good
proved. Now he is
Men
by
Aaron
ACCUSED/
CONVICT
Sorki
106
n
A
The
Few
Good
repeated
42
witness lawyers
LAWYERS
Men
questioning is a
by
key
to
getting
Aaron
your
Sorki
answer.
The
prosecutor
here
desired
certainly
sharp
107
has
lawyering
skills.
The lawyer
Few
Good
is very close to n
Men
is witness
by
he
Aaron
confidently
Sorki
commandingly.
He is determined
WITNESS
speaks
and
with
the
crime.
The
defending lawyers
ROSS
Few
Object. Your Honor, it's obvious that Lt. attorney tries to tiff
Good
Men
by
the
Aaron
Sorki
points
desperate
hope
with
that
the
the
mere prosecutor
jury. his
court
of
room
mannerisms.
ROSS
However
his
(continuing)
objection
is
with
the
Court's
deepest
apologies.
43
LAWYERS
honor--
RANDOLPH
109
Few
Object. Your Honor, it's obvious that Lt. such tactics just tactics
Good
Men
by
the
Aaron
Sorki
points
desperate
hope
with
that
the
the
mere track
jury.
n
ROSS
(continuing)
It's my recommendation, sir, that Lt.
Kaffee receive an official reprimand from
the bench, and that the witness be
excused
with
the
Court's
deepest
apologies.
RANDOLPH ponders this a moment.
RANDOLPH
(pause)
Overruled.
44
make
and
their
to
LAWYERS
ROSS
Your
honor--
RANDOLPH
110
ACCUSED/
Few
CONVICT
Good
Men
by
Kaffe.
takes on anyone
Aaron
he
considers
Sorki
responsible
his
for
situation.
Such
violent
attacks
mark
desperation to be
lat free, inability
to cope with the
fact
that
they
most
importantly, being
in a state of shock
that
111
112
they
are
actually caught
Guilt
of
the convicts
Few
Good
proved. Now he is
Men
by
Kaffe.
Aaron
Hence, unable to
Sorki
n
A
he plunges at him.
JESSEP: (continuing to Kaffe)Im gonna The
guilty convicts
45
ACCUSED
/CONVICT
ACCUSED
113
Few
Good
Men
curses reaction
/CONVICT
prosecutor.
Its a means to
by
Aaron
anger, desperation
Sorki
and frustration.
n
A
Few
tear your eyes right outta your head and colonel has been reaction
Good
Men
of
the convicts
ACCUSED
/CONVICT
by
Aaron
He is totally out
Sorki
hence indulges in
the use of such
foul language and
this condemnable
114
behaviour.
JESSEP: I saved lives. That boy there The guilty tries to convicts
ACCUSED
Few
was weak link. I saved lives, you hear justify his crime reaction
/CONVICT
Good
me.
by
coming
Men
with
as
by
excuses
Aaron
possible.
up
many
as
Sorki
115
n
A
ACCUSED
Few
was weak link. I saved lives, you hear loud to make his violent
/CONVICT
Good
me.
point.
Men
by
Aaron
Sorki
46
reaction
116
n
Inheri
t
Brady:
The
excerpt
is social
SOCIETY
the We must not abandon Faith! Faith is a from a trial which influence
Wind
more or less is a
by
Drummond:
duel
Jerom
between
and
and
Rober
117
Inheri
t
Brady:
the We must not abandon Faith! Faith is a the crowd jeers tactics
Wind
Brady
for
his
by
Drummond:
Jerom
lawyers
Lawre deny the one faculty of man that raises themselves in the
nce
and
Rober
What other merit have we? The Elephant role. At this point
important
be
slipping
LAWYER
with Drummond
Brady:
I dont know, Im a Man not a Sponge!
(Court laughs)
118
Inheri
t
the time:
stretching
his
arms
towards
ACCUSED
Wind
by
Jerom
wishes to think.
with
client.
Lawre
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
119
Lee
Inheri
t
the time:
stretching
his
arms
towards
LAWYER
Wind
by
Jerom
wishes to think.
courtroom.
Various
in
e
Lawre
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
120
Lee
Inheri
t
Wind
48
lawyers
techniques
used
to
are melodramat
prove ic appeal
LAWYER
by
of a tennis ball.
Jerom
courtroom.
description
of antics
Lawre
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
121
Lee
Inheri
t
The
author vivid
LAWYER
Wind
every action in
by
of a tennis ball.
the
courtroom.
Jerom
This
makes
Lawre
to imagine, very
nce
aptly, everything
and
that happens in
Rober
there.
it
t
Edwin
122
Lee
Inheri
t
doesnt lawyers
the fact, which the good Bishop carried at realise that he is tactics
Wind
mocked.
by
Jerom
has
9a.m.!
be stupid.
and
Rober
LAWYER
Lee
Inheri
t
out
lawyers
LAWYER
the tactics,
Wind
if taking
by
shots
Jerom
opposing
attorney
at
9a.m.!
and
Rober
Lee
Inheri
t
has catching
the things you could think about. Isnt it found a way to the
Wind
by
Jerom
five hours?
LAWYER
weak
him point
possible
and
Rober
t
Edwin
125
Lee
Inheri
t
is taking
the things you could think about. Isnt it very well aware shots at the
Wind
possible that the first day was 24 hours that Brady has no opposite
by
long? There was no way to measure it, no answers for the lawyer
Jerom
five hours?
asks. Hence he
50
LAWYER
possible
and
nervous.
Rober
t
Edwin
126
Lee
Inheri
t
Wind
here.
by
AUDIENCE
the
by
was
taking.
Jerom
ordered harmony
Lawre
is restored in the
nce
house.
and
Rober
t
Edwin
127
Lee
Inheri
t
JUDGE: (Shouting) I shall ask the bailiff The judge has the judges
Wind
here.
JUDGE
to order
maintain order in
by
the court.
Jerom
e
Lawre
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
128
Lee
Inheri
DRUMMOND:
so
you,
Matthew Drummond
51
lawyers
LAWYER
the Harrison
Brady,
through
oratory, dextrously
tactics
Wind
by
Jerom
is
and
Rober
painful to BRADY.
the
thrown
off-
track.
t
Edwin
129
Lee
Inheri
t
DRUMMOND:
the Harrison
so
Brady,
you,
through
Matthew Drummond
here ridiculing
LAWYER
Wind
with party
by
taking
Jerom
jibes
mockery
and
Rober
painful to BRADY.
t
Edwin
130
Lee
Inheri
t
attorney mockery
the Brady. God Speaks to Brady and Brady mocks the other.
Wind
by
Almighty!
Jerom
(DRUMMOND
crowd laughs).
tarnishes
bows
grandly.
The
nce
and
52
his
credibility in front
of others.
Lawre
certainly
LAWYER
Rober
t
Edwin
131
Lee
Inheri
t
AUDIENCE
ruthlessness reaction
Wind
by
Almighty!
Jerom
(DRUMMOND
crowd laughs).
grandly.
The
Lawre
even if it is at
nce
someone
and
expense.
elses
Rober
t
Edwin
132
Lee
Inheri
t
ruthlessness s
Wind
by
Almighty!
Jerom
(DRUMMOND
crowd laughs).
AUDIENCE
of
grandly.
The
Lawre
Even if it is at the
nce
cost of others.
and
Rober
t
Edwin
133
Lee
Inheri
t
Confidence is a lawyers
lawyers key to tactics
Wind
success.
by
jeered
53
Being
by
the
LAWYER
Jerom
Lawre
track is certainly
nce
too
and
Brady
Rober
Hence he begins
to flounder.
much
for
to
bear.
Edwin
134
Lee
Inheri
t
Wind
by
HonorMy
Jerom
Gentlemen
FollowersLadies
AUDIENCE
and
e
Lawre
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
135
Lee
Inheri
t
by
HonorMy
Jerom
Gentlemen
his reaction
and diffidence
very
evidently which is
improper
Lawre
good lawyer.
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
54
losing ATTORNEY
Wind
FollowersLadies
starts a
of
136
Lee
Inheri
t
excited
reaction
in
the
the
LAWYER
defending arguments
Wind
(There
attorney is being
by
Jerom
serious.
survive)
accusations make
of
is
Such
Lawre
the
courtroom
nce
and
more intriguing.
Rober
t
Edwin
137
Lee
Inheri
t
excited
reaction
in
active
Wind
(There
the
by
Jerom
survive)
AUDIENCE
and reaction
grasping.
It
is excitement
for
excitement.
Lawre
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
138
Lee
Inheri
t
excited
reaction
in
Wind
(There
the
by
Jerom
survive)
Lawre
55
is
his
primary
JUDGE
nce
and
Rober
t
Edwin
139
Lee
Alice
The King and Queen of Hearts were This describes the court
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
erland
by
Lewis
in
COURTROOM
the decorum
between
imaginary
140
Alice
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
erland
by
Lewis
aberration description
be
the
the arrangemen
of ts
COURTROOM
141
Alice
before, but she had read about them in is the first time dcor
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
erland
by
Lewis
she
is
very pleased to
the
Carrol he did it,) he did not look at all has read and what
l
witnessing
was
in
57
142
Alice
before, but she had read about them in point is made by familiarity
Adve
books, and she was quite pleased to find this excerpt. The with
ntures
in
Wond
erland
The judge, by the way, was the King; and However, she did
by
as he wore his crown over the wig, (look have a vague yet
Lewis
COURTROOM
the
all people.
Alice
indignant voice, but she stopped hastily, here too remain order
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
court.
erland
by
Lewis
Carrol
58
to
the
JUDGE
144
l
Alice
Adve
participatio
ntures
in
Wond
active audience
AUDIENCE
of reaction and
erland
by
Lewis
Carrol
145
l
Alice
Herald, read the accusation!' said the This shows how mannerism
King.
Adve
On this the White Rabbit blew three The king orders room
ntures
in
Wond
follows:--
erland
by
accusation and he
Lewis
Carrol
l
COURTROOM
146
Alice
King.
Adve
deal
ntures
in
in
Wond
follows:--
erland
by
Lewis
courtroom
involvement of a manners
of
this
also
All on a summer day:
the
accusation is read
59
COURTROOM
Carrol
l
manner.
And took them quite away!'
147
mannerisms
Such
are
Alice
obsolete now.
`Call the first witness,' said the King; and Here
too witness
Adve
WITNESS
are examination
ntures
to establish the
in
guilt.
Wond
erland
by
Lewis
Carrol
148
l
Alice
`Call the first witness,' said the King; and Presently, calling witness
Adve
WITNESS
simple procedure.
ntures
Theres
no
in
involvement
of
Wond
erland
of trumpets.
by
Lewis
Carrol
149
l
Alice
The first witness was the Hatter. He came As the judge is judge
in with a teacup in one hand and a piece the king himself, sycophancy
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
Your
of Your Honor.
erland
by
60
JUDGE
Lewis
Carrol
150
l
Alice
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
present
day courtroom
COURTROOM
the decorum
would
court.
erland
by
Lewis
Carrol
151
l
Alice
Here one of the guinea-pigs cheered, and This was done to courtroom
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
erland
by
COURTROOM
Lewis
Carrol
152
l
Alice
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
erland
by
Lewis
61
harsh judges
are order
in
JUDGE
Carrol
153
l
Alice
`I'm glad I've seen that done,' thought Alice, here, draws audiences
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
erland
this
by
AUDIENCE
how
is
court
of
wonderland.
Lewis
Carrol
154
l
Alice
Adve
ntures
in
Wond
erland
order
in JUDGE
by
Lewis
Carrol
155
l
Alice
Adve
Majesty
ntures
must
is
cross- lawyers
in
no witness
of examination
this
in
Wond
erland
witnesses.
by
Lewis
Carrol
62
WITNESS
156
l
Alice
The King looked anxiously at the White The king, who is judges
Rabbit, who said in a low voice, `Your the judge as well, role
Adve
Majesty
ntures
must
JUDGE
by
in
subordinate.
Wond
Reveals
erland
corruption
by
Lewis
Carrol
157
l
Alice
`Well, if I must, I must,' the King said, The king here is courtroom
Adve
ntures
in
sleepy
door
Wond
mouse
answers.
erland
This
by
`Collar
Lewis
that
Dormouse,'
the
COURTROOM
examining mannerism
cook.
being
But
158
Alice
Adve
his arms and frowning at the cook till his crime even in this
ntures
in
Wond
erland
by
`Collar
Lewis
that
Dormouse,'
the
Queen
63
heinous examination
wonderland.
of
WITNESS
159
Alice
Adve
ntures
in
too contempt of
Wond
court
erland
condemned
by
`Collar
Lewis
that
Dormouse,'
the
queen
is contempt
COURTROOM
annoyed of court
breaching
is
160
Alice
court audience
Adve
ntures
AUDIENCE
response
only
in
been
firmly
Wond
established.
erland
by
Lewis
Carrol
161
l
Lucky For some minutes the whole court was in Shows a lack of need
by
Alice
Sebol
d
162
in establish
court order
proceedings. It is
a
very
clumsy
trial.
Lucky I felt if I was going to win, I had to hate It is only normal victims
64
to COURTROOM
VICTIM
by
opposing take on a
Alice
Sebol
opponents
though
might
163
at
purely
professional.
Lucky I felt if I was going to win, I had to hate Its improper to victims
by
or
Alice
Sebol
VICTIM
hold view
against
opponents
after
and
whatever
conspires during
the trial is not
their attempt to
malign you but an
innocent attempt
to
164
Alice
Sebol
d
their
clients face.
While
Lucky
by
save
lawyers
questioning
the tactics
victim
the
LAWYER
attorney uses a
condemning tone
"Umm-hmm."
so as to affect her
165
psychologically.
lie.
desired answers.
The attorney was confusing
Lucky
"Miss Sebold, you said you were at 321
65
WITNESS
by
Alice
Sebol
d
"Umm-hmm."
166
an
answer
that
lie.
can
be
used
against her.
Lucky "How long had you been there on this The
attorneys confusing
by
evening?"
Alice
times is merely to
Sebol
there?"
of
WITNESS
the
random
founder at some
point.
"No."
"You didn't smoke that evening?"
"No."
"You had nothing to drink that evening?"
"No."
That tack not having worked, he moved
on to his next.
167
here, victim
by
evening?"
the
Alice
determined
Sebol
there?"
"I had nothing at all to drink."
"Did you have anything to smoke while
66
witness
is determinati
and on
VICTIM
Lucky
by
Alice
Sebol
d
license
required
me
to
wear
169
by
Alice
Sebol
d
license
required
me
to
well,
perplexed
is victims
when minds
questions
Lucky
wear
VICTIM
VICTIM
be judgemental of viewpoint
their
witnesses
170
create
of this person.
Lucky He jumped on this: "New prescription or The attorney felt lawyers
by
67
LAWYER
171
Alice
across
some
Sebol
valuable evidence
against
the
victim.
Lucky He jumped on this: "New prescription or He
by
jumps lawyers
LAWYER
Alice
that
he
Sebol
stumbled
has
across
evidence.
Lawyers
always
are on a lookout
172
Alice
Sebol
trap.
the
LAWYER
ploy
my veins.
Lucky Could he know that he was making his The
witness victims
by
Alice
Sebol
VICTIM
the determinati
on
my veins.
Lucky His tone, since questioning my vision, When all tactics lawyers
by
the
lawyer tactics
LAWYER
Alice
Sebol
he
witness
by
afraid.
attitude.
Lucky Could he know that he was making his Portrays
revictimisa
by
Alice
Sebol
VICTIM
of
my veins.
Lucky "Are you saying you were influenced by The
by
lawyer
is lawyers
LAWYER
Alice
Sebol
to
client.
defend
his
This
involves shifting
blame to even a
177
third party.
Lucky "Are you saying you were influenced by The lawyer
by
178
making
is client
random consideratio
Alice
deduction
Sebol
whatever
from n
the
d
witness is saying.
Lucky "Can you tell me briefly what you were Both attorneys are lawyers
by
Alice
Mr. Ryan stood and corrected the date. vigilant. After all while
Sebol
"May eighth."
"On
May
extremely
even
eighth,"
Mr.
Meggesto misstated
69
ACCUSED/ VICTIM
chemistry
fact arguing
can
LAWYER
179
correction
demanded.
Lucky "Can you tell me briefly what you were Both attorneys are determinat
by
Alice
Sebol
"May eighth."
"On
May
hell
bent
LAWYER/VICTIM/
on ion to save
their client
respective clients.
eighth,"
Mr.
Meggesto
181
182
wearing."
Lucky The judge's last words recorded in the The judge is the courtroom
by
in
Alice
Sebol
and
the mannerism
But
hence
demands a break.
Lucky The judge's last words recorded in the Reveals
social
by
Alice
hear the fatigue in them. His major that age to a rape social
Sebol
conditions
reflected in
The
courtroom
A clerk of the court announced that Their This shows the courtroom
in
SOCIETY
at stigma
Strang Honors were entering, and at the same beginning of the mannersims
er by moment two big electric fans started trial
COURTROOM
the
COURTROOM
183
COURTROOM
Honors were entering, and at the same the setting of the decorum
moment two big electric fans started court room.
buzzing overhead. Three judges, two in
black and the third in scarlet, with brief
cases under their arms, entered and
walked briskly to the bench which was
several feet above the level of the
courtroom floor. The man in scarlet took
the central, high-backed chair, placed his
cap of office on the table, ran a
handkerchief over his small bald crown,
and announced that the hearing would
184
The
now begin.
He said that the trial proper was about to The
importance order
in JUDGE,
maintaining the
COURTROOM
er by expected the public to refrain from any order in the court courtroom
Albert demonstration whatsoever. He explained is reemphasised.
Camu
185
cleared.
He said that the trial proper was about to This
paragraph judges
begin, and he need hardly say that he reminds that the roles
expected the public to refrain from any primary role of
demonstration whatsoever. He explained the judge is to
that he was there to supervise the impartially listen
proceedings, as a sort of umpire, and he to the case and
71
JUDGE
administer
The
cleared.
My examination began at once. The The trial is being fairness of JUDGE
accordance
Albert For the nth time I was asked to give with laid down
Camu
particulars of
procedures.
187
are
a courtroom
COURTROOOM
of procedures
seem
cumbersome and
are
to
slightest
chance
of a mistake as
the repercussions
of any mistake
will
188
The
be
life
changing.
The Prosecutor was then asked if he had The
accused, accused
whether
proven stereotyped
72
ACCUSED
of
mental
Camu
to
marked that I felt as I hadnt felt for ages. handle, the worst
I had a foolish desire to burst into tears. being that every
For the first time Id realized how all soul
these people loathed me.
in
vicinity
his
loathes
him.
The Prosecutor was then asked if he had The accused here accused
189
feels
abysmally point
ACCUSED
of
view
The
Strang movement, but for the first time in my and can be broken point
er by life I wanted to kiss a man.
Albert
of a courtroom.
Camu
given in favour of
ACCUSED
of
him by a person
develops
an
instant feeling of
love for this man
in his heart.
I didnt say anything, or make any The accused is accuseds
191
192
The
happiness
on
with happiness.
being
acquitted
Raymond was the next, and last, witness. It is of utmost courtroom
that mannersims
ACCUSED
COURTROOM
Camu
You are here to give evidence, not your Here the judge powers
views on the case, and you must confine performs his duty
yourself to answering the questions put by
you.
193
rebuking
witness
for
breaking
the
norms.
Raymond was the next, and last, witness. Cases are to be courtroom
He gave me a little wave of his hand and solved
on
the procedure
74
of
COURTROOM
ANALYSIS
60
50
40
30
20
10
RESULT
75
DISCUSSION
As evident from the bar graph above one can easily conclude that lawyers are the ones
who undoubtedly steal the limelight in legal fiction. Their tactics, how they place their
arguments, their re-buttals and sur-rebuttals, their trick in questioning the witnesses,
their acumen in play to sway the case in their favour, their determination to save their
clients face no-matter-what and most importantly their subtle sycophancy towards the
portrayed in literature.
A considerable share of attention is also taken by the audience. Every piece of
literature on trial scenes devotes a little to explain the nuances and reactions of the
audience to every high and low point of any case. In fact every development in the
case acts as a stimulus, and a never disappointing audience gives an apt reaction to
each. However, the audience is at times portrayed as being ruthless and sadistic: it
takes pleasure in the pain of others. All that it wants is an exciting case that satiates its
need for entertainment, no matter what the judgement is and its ramifications. Also
Lawyers of both sides are extremely vigilant when examination take splace to catch
time.
Victims description is also at times poignantly described. Focus mainly lies on how
he/she feels about the trial, the trauma of having to live every tormenting moment
again upon being questioned, their feeling of dislike towards the opposing attorney,
guilty.
77
CONCLUSION
Literature and Law are two intertwined entities. Literature very often ventures into legal
boundaries, especially if it is a fiction.
The obvious reason is that fictional characters are often getting divorced and committing
murders, all the while suffering from a chronic case of bad luck just the sort one would
expect to be regularly hauled before a judge. But the underlying reason is that authors are in
the same line of work as jurors. The task of both begins with calling someone to account for
his or her deeds. (Review, Law Lit: From Atticus Finch to The Practice: A Collection of
Great Writing About the Law)
However the distinctions between a real and fictitious trial scene are quite obvious, especially
for a law student. The best orations from defence lawyers always manage to convince us,
the readers, but never the juries.
This is because the aim of a book and a court are different. While the latter is determined
on ensuring dispensation of justice ( or so we presume ), the sole motto of an author is to
earn more readers. Hence their focus is more on making their protagonists suffer, their
judges being ruthless, and of coure, the attorneys being so impeccably awesome that the
readers would secretly wish to be real; for, justice delivered in a book would be just too
main stream.
This is evident from the discussion above that shows that lawyers undoubtedly steal the
show in any legal fiction, and accused, witnesses and victims are the ones who hardly
even matter.
Also, emotions matter more to the author than evidence.
Hence it may be concluded, law in literature will always be a world apart from that on
real life.
78
REFERENCES
Michael Freeman and Andrew Lewis, Law and Literature, Current Legal Issues
Volume 2. http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198298137.do#.UTCvcjBvB8g
Retrieved on 26-1-2013
Thane Rosenbum, Law Lit: From Atticus Finch to 'The Practice': A Collection of
Great Writing About the Law.
Law Lit: From Atticus Finch to The Practice: A Collection of Great Writing About the
Law
Edited by Thane Rosenbaum, The New Press, 2007,Review By Ronald Goldfarb.
79