APPRAISAL
ROLE OF HR
ROLE OF HR
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVES
DEVELOPING A PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL SYSTEM
ADMINISTERING A PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL SYSTEM
STEP 1
Announce when the performance appraisal
process will begin at least 30 days in advance.
STEP 2
Distribute a self-evaluation to employees at
the 30-day point.
ADMINISTERING A PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL SYSTEM
STEP 3
Require all managers to have their written
evaluation completed 7 days prior to the
employee evaluation meeting.
STEP 4
Review each manager's completed employee
evaluation to ensure that it does not violate
any company policies
ADMINISTERING A PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL SYSTEM
STEP 5
Analyze the completed appraisal after the
managers have their one-on-one meetings
with their employees and determine if the
managers' recommendations are appropriate.
METHODS OF
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
METHODS OF
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES
useful for measuring the performance of employees
in supervisory or managerial positions
Workers and managers work together to create a list
of SMART objectives for the worker to attain during
the review period.
performance is measured by how many of her goals
she accomplished within the designated time frame
METHODS OF
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
360-DEGREE EVALUATION
whoever conducts the appraisal interviews an
employees supervisor, peers and any direct reports
an appraiser receives in-depth feedback on the
employees behavior
Measuring areas of subjectivity, such as character
and leadership skills, allows an employer to manage
an employees development.
METHODS OF
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
FORCED RANKING
measures employees' achievements against those of
their peers, instead of comparing the employee's
current evaluation period against the employee's
own past performance
creates a very competitive work environment
HALO EFFECT
when an employee is rated the same across all
performance dimensions due to a positive or
negative rater impression.
typical when the rater either likes or dislikes the
employee and allows those feelings to influence their
performance rating of them
LENIENCY ERROR
tendency to evaluate all people as outstanding and to
give inflated ratings rather than true assessments of
performance
CENTRAL TENDENCY ERROR
tendency to evaluate every person as average
regardless of differences in performance
STRICTNESS
tendency to rate all people at the low end of the scale
and are overly critical of performance
CONTRAST EFFECT
tendency for a rater to evaluate a person relative to
other individuals rather than on-the-job
requirements
SIMILAR-TO-ME ERROR
tendency to more favorably judge those people
perceived as similar to the manager
REASONS EMPLOYEES
DISLIKE EVALUATION
RATING BIAS
REASONS EMPLOYEES
DISLIKE EVALUATION
LEGAL TERMINATION
PREPARATION
LEGAL TERMINATION
LEGAL TERMINATION
FRANCEMOPER
SALARIPAP
LOVENUATIA
TEARR RORER
GARTIN SABI
AGELL
AMINOTERINT