and authority set by previous court rulings, judicial decisions and administrative legal findings
or rulings. This is one of the main categories of law, with constitutional law, statutory
law and regulatory law.
Although statutory laws, created by legislative bodies in concurrence with constitutional law,
strive to provide overall direction, guidance and rules for society at large, it is impossible to deal
with all situations, legal issues and questions by this manner alone. Our judicial bodies are
tasked with interpreting law and in doing so, often set precedent where statutory, regulatory
and even constitutional law is vague, unclear or silent. All of these precedents make up case
law.
Stare decisis is the doctrine of precedent. It is the abbreviation of the full Latin phrase stare
decisis et non quieta mvere, of which the literal translation is to stand by decided matters and not
to disturb settled matters. This means that a court will rule according to a previously established
decision or finding. Although this does not always hold true, it is very difficult to obtain a ruling
against precedent, and generally involves appellate courts. Additionally, legislatively created
statutes may be enacted which overrule precedent. The decision cited for precedent must be
from a court higher than the one hearing the current case. And in fact, case law is most often
established by appellate courts.
Case law is generally very jurisdiction-specific. For example, a case in California would typically
not be overseen and decided using precedent set in Maine. Instead, previous California rulings
on the issue would be reviewed to determine interpretation of the law or issue, allowing a party
to cite binding precedent. If no such previous rulings exist, one may offer precedent from a
different jurisdiction, but rather than binding, this would merely be persuasive authority. T
here are also other factors in play which affect the binding authority of a specific case in
common law, such as how old the decision is and how closely the material facts match in both
cases.
Copyright HG.org
In Missouri v. McNeely, the United States Supreme Court decided that a blood draw is a
search which is protected under the Fourth Amendment.
The Supreme Courts Decision in Susan B Anthony List v Driehaus -a Victory for Civil
Rights Plaintiffs
Say that you need a permit to pursue your chosen occupation, but you believe that the costly
administrative procedure to acquire said permit is unconstitutional. You have been ticketed
for operating without a permit, and have every reason to believe that you will be ticketed
again, but you have yet to be arrested and thrown in jail. Can you bring a suit alleging the law
to be unconstitutional, or do you first have to be arrested or submit to the costly permit
procedure before you can sue?
Challenges for Cause: What You Don't Know Can Hurt You
Even attorneys experienced in voir dire have difficulty understanding how trial judges apply
the law concerning challenges for cause. This article will cover both the statutory and case law
on the subject as well as suggesting how to convince a prospective juror to admit bias.
Perhaps, more importantly, it will also suggest ways to convince the trial judge to sustain the
challenge.
Republican 2008 Presidential Election Tactics, Robo Calls and Negative Attack Ads
A discussion of some of the tactics being employed in the 2008 Presidential Election to sow
seeds of distrust and fear. The author asks whether the backlash against these tactics that are
generating anger and fear among voters at political rallies will yet cause John McCain, a decent
man with an honorable past, to repudiate the results of his own negative campaign ads and
strategies.
The Risks of Serving Alcohol to a Minor in Hotels, Restaurants, Nightclubs and Bars in
California
The author looks at the what can happen to a restaurant, hotel, nightclub or bar that serves
alcohol to a minor. Using the example of two restaurants in the Coachella Valley caught after
the fact having serving liquor to minors, the author discusses the facts of two cases to show
the deadly results that can follow from such actions.
Drug Charges and Their Defense
Drug offenses come in many varieties with one common factor, the penalties for a conviction
are severe and may result in lengthy prison sentences and fines. An aggressive defense is
necessary. Review this article related to drug charges and their defense.
All Government Law Articles
Articles written by attorneys and experts worldwide discussing legal aspects related to
Government including: administrative law, case law, election and political law, federal law,
government contracts, local, municipal and state law, military law, public law, regulatory law,
US federal courts.
Case Law - US
Court Opinion
]
Court opinions are the pronouncements of judges on the legal controversies that come
before them. In a common-law system, court opinions constitute the law by which all
controversies are settled. Attorneys analyze prior opinions on similar legal issues, attempting
to draw parallels between their case and favorable court opinions and to distinguish
unfavorable opinions. Judges study relevant opinions in rendering their decisions.
Judicial Precedent
A judgment of a court of law cited as an authority for deciding a similar set of facts; a case
which serves as authority for the legal principle embodied in its decision. The common law
has developed by broadening down from precedent to precedent. A judicial precedent is a
decision of the court used as a source for future decision making. This is known as stare
decisis (to stand upon decisions) and by which precedents are authoritative and binding and
must be followed. In giving judgment in a case, the judge will set out the facts of the case,
state the law applicable to the facts and then provide his or her decision. It is only the ratio
decidendi (the legal reasoning or ground for the judicial decision) which is binding on later
courts under the system of judicial precedent.
Fastcase
Fastcases libraries include primary law from all 50 states, as well as deep federal coverage
going back to 1 U.S. 1, 1 F.2d 1, 1 F.Supp. 1, and 1 B.R. 1. The Fastcase collection includes
cases, statutes, regulations, court rules, and constitutions. Fastcase also provides access to a
newspaper archive, legal forms, and a one-stop PACER search of federal filings through our
content partners.
The three branches of the federal government legislative, executive, and judicial operate
within a constitutional system known as "checks and balances." This means that although
each branch is formally separate from the other two, the Constitution often requires
cooperation among the branches. Federal laws, for example, are passed by Congress and
signed by the President. The judicial branch, in turn, has the authority to decide the
constitutionality of federal laws and resolve other disputes over them, but judges depend
upon the executive branch to enforce court decisions.