Anda di halaman 1dari 34

US007766041B2

(12) Ulllted States Patent

(10) Patent N0.:

Tackes et al.
(54)

(45) Date 0f Patent:


3,990,475 A *

11/1976 Myers ................... .. 137/6253

INCREMENTAL PRESSURE DROP

4,050,476 A
4,122,868 A

9/ 1977 Hayner etal.


10/1978 Holloway et al.

'

Not1ce:

5,351,717

Subject to any d1scla1mer, the term of th1s


patent is extended or adjusted under 35

son

Miller

6/1988 Henry e131. ......... .. 137/62538

9/1989 Cleasby
t

10/1994

saire

................... ..

137/62512

6/2002 Mickelson et al.

OTHER PUBLICATIONS
Herbert E. Merritt, Hydraulic Control Systems, 1967, pp. 40-43,

(21) APPL No" 11/5ooo35

100-109, John Wiley & sens.

D. Mcloy, H.R. Martin; The Control of Fluid Power, 1973, Sec

Flled

Aug' 81 2006
_

(65)

tions 4.3.1 & 43.2, Longman Group Ltd, London.


_

_T.F. Blackburn, J.L. Coakley, FD. Ezekiel, Fluid Power Control,

PrlOr PubllcatlOIl Data

US 2008/0035225 A1

(52)

6,397,890 B1

Usc. 154(b) by 560 days.

(51)

10/1983

4,862,920 A

(22)

4,750,511 A t

(Us)
.

JBntmm
4/1982 Hayner

4,411,189 A

Asslgooo' Dolto Power Company Rockford IL

:E

4,325,412 A

Jesse O. Arlas, Round Lake, 1L (US)

Aug. 3, 2010

FLOW FORCE REDUCTION BY

(75) Inventors: John N. Tackes, Rockford, 1L (US),


(73)

US 7,766,041 B2

[M_ CL
F161( 11/07

1960, section 10.321, Mir. Press.

Feb. 14, 2008

* Cited by examiner

Primary Examiner?lohn Fox


(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firrn?Foley & Lardner LLP

(2006,01)

U.S. Cl. ............................ .. 137/6253; 137/62535;

251/117

0f Classification Search .......

157/625'55 62558 62559 251/117 118


.

(57)

25 1/120

ABSTRACT
HOW Control device for improving, for example Valve

operation by reducing error forces occurring due to fluid


communication between ports of a valve having two or more

See apphcauon me for Complete Search hlstory'

ports. Incremental pressure drop passages bleed incremen

References Cited

tally the flow of fluid between rst an second ports as the

U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS

to decrease the pressure differential generated force exerted


on the spool whereby the energy required to be applied to the

(56)

valve spool is moving between the rst and second positions


1,859,876 A *

5/1932 Koplin

2,596,534 A *

5/1952

Crake .... ..

137/62539

2,836,198 A *

5/1958

McNeill .... ..

137/62539

2,964,023 A *

12/1960

3,912,222 A

10/1975 Hayner

.. 137/6253

spool for moving the spool between the rst and second
positions is decreased.

Meulendyk .......... .. 137/625.12

7 Claims, 22 Drawing Sheets

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 1 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

21

////=

23

20\
/7

26

.039"

Fig. 1A (PRIOR ART)

32a

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 2 0f 22

US 7,766,041 B2

>< /
2

Fi . 1C
Des-54B

Fig. 1B (PRIOR ART)

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 3 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

DG$4B Force vs Stroke

(.100 stroke is De-Energized, as shown)

EMA.

___..

O O5

Stroke [in]

Fig. 2

0.06

0.07

0,03

0.09

0.1

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 4 0f 22

US 7,766,041 B2

/ 10a
/

7a

33
35

32a
.052" -

36

_- _36

_ 38 _-_' 6b
3a

.038" -

.029" -

36a

@.096

48'

Fig. 3A

38

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 5 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

Nlodied DG-S4B Force vs Stroke

(.100 stroke is 13e-Energized, as shown)


--f' _4.3 Flow Forces (s GPM, 3000 psi) ?'

"

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

Stroke [in]

Fig. 3B

0.07

0.08

D D9

0.1

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 6 6f22

t.

aim-"

US 7,766,041 B2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 7 0f 22

Flg. 3Fl

Q1 Flg. 3F0

Q1
Q2

P in

)(Ao

A1 M

|_| Pout
CONVENTIONAL METERING
ORIFICE DIAGRAIVI

Fig. BF2
Q1

Q3

lp in Q4

US 7,766,041 B2

Q3

in

Q4

A2 ) <
P2

A4 > <
T P3

A3 > (

As ) <
lll P out

INCREMENTAL METERING
ORIFICE DIAGRAM

Q1 Flg. 3F3
P in

AEquv 4-5

AEquv 2-3

I_l pout
I__l_l Pour

INCREMENTAL METERING
REDUCED ORIFICE
DIAGRAIVI 1

INCREMENTAL METERING
REDUCED ORIFICE
DIAGRAM 2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 8 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

5o

//; /
68

56
58

57

55

51

74H

62

55

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 9 0f22

/A/

Fig. 4B

US 7,766,041 B2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

54

.Ilm
5

sheer 10 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 11 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

70

74
75

79
72

80a
8O
86
87
17

89
88

80D

Fig. 5A

83

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 12 0f 22

US 7,766,041 B2

/70

87

89

Fig. 5B

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 13 0f22

81/88

US 7,766,041 B2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

Sheet 14 0f 22

US 7,766,041 B2

/_ 100

ww

105

109
107

106b
106

1102#

115

112

117

113

116

110

\\ 106e
112D
111

Fig. 6A

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

DE-SZG
118

111

sheer 15 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 16 6f22

US 7,766,041 B2

122

/ 120

123

121

1288

136
127

1375
137
128
1396
139
130

138
126
129

134

140

130@

Fig. 7A

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 17 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

sheer 18 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

U.S. Patent

Aug. 3, 2010

180, 182

151
a

sheer 19 0f22

US 7,766,041 B2

Anda mungkin juga menyukai