diets with
impact on triiodothyronine,
balance1
content:
and nitrogen
Rosa
Hendler,
MD,
andAlfonsA
Bonde,
III, PhD
gesting
that
other
weightboss.
or more
complex
AmfClinNutr
KEY
WORDS
bolic
rate,
Obesity,
processes
l988;48:l239-47.
govern
weight-reducing
dietary-induced
thermogenesis,
diet,
endogenous
nitrogen
expenditure,
mete-
rate (RMR)
decreases
in proportion
to boss of
mass
(LBM)
or some similar
index of metabolic size (ie, surface
area, weight#{176}75, etc). However,
energy expenditure
decreases
during
weight
boss more than
Popular
use of very-low-calorie
diets (VLCDs)
for
treatment
of obesity
has raised
important
questions
about the factors
influencing
the safety and efficacy
of
various
diet regimens
available.
Since the rash of deaths
associated
with commercial
liquid-protein
weight-loss
products
(1), attention
has been focused
on the signifiof negative
weight
loss.
nitrogen
balance
generally
however,
the
precise
deficit
influence
Two
regimens
or the difference
is the result
between
total
weight
of the
1239-47.
Printed
in USA.
1988 American
RMR
and dietary-induced
together
account
for
the
boss nor
poto
thermogenup to 70-85%
of
(8, 9). DIT was shown to be an imporof the adaptive
response
to over- and
in small
animal
studies
(10),
where
1 From
the Department
of Internal
Medicine,
Yale
School ofMedicine,
New Haven, CT.
2 Supported
in part by grants from the National
Institutes
expen-
and intake.
This deficit and the weight
loss that
diminish
progressively
with continued
dieting betotal energy
expenditure
decreases.
Some of this
decreased
efficacy is readily understood,
for example,
totel meal-stimulated
thermogenesis
is decreased
in proportion
to the degree
of caloric
restriction
and resting
1988;48:
neither
it varies
proportionally
with food intake
to minimize
weight
change.
On this basis DIT was suggested
to be a component of an adaptive
response
to underfeeding
in man as
well (1 1). Attention
was also focused
on thyroid
and
sympathetic
nervous
system
responses
because
of their
diture
results
cause
Am J Clin Nuir
component
underfeeding
7) although
contribute
underfeeding
are
esis (DIT),
which
total expenditure
tant
calculations(6,
components
tentially
protein
during
by these
factors
responsible
the mechanisms
observed
ofdietary
on N balance
body
predicted
daily
energy
during
metabolic
lean
(RDA);
balance,
metabolism
triiodothyronine
Introduction
cance
during
protein
University
of Health
(RR-l25)
and the Cambridge
3 Address
reprint requests
Quest Foundation,
Pacific Grove, CA.
to R Hendler,
Yale University
School of
Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510.
Received August 13, 1987.
Accepted
for publication
January
5, 1988.
Society
for Clinical
Nutrition
1239
ABSTRACt
Optimal
composition
of reducing
diets
remains
controversial.
Seventeen
obese inpatients
received
440 kcal/d,
either 41% protein
plus 55% carbohydrate
(CD) or 95%
protein
(PP), for 3 wk. There were no significant
diet effects (all data CD vs PP) in weight loss
(8.88 1 .0 1 vs 8.74 0.79 kg), loss of lean mass (2. 10 0.35 vs 1 .6 1 0.39 kg), metabolic
rate reduction
(15.3 2.8 vs 13.0 5.2%),
or meal-stimulated
thermogenesis
(26.6-37.9
vs
29.0-26.
1 net kcal/3
h [time NS also]). Triiodothyronine
(T3) responses
differed (2.35 0.11
to 1.57 0.l4vs2.43
0.1 1 to 1.47 0.12 nmol/L,p
< 0.01)asdid
freeT3(3.4
0.2 to 2.6
0.2 vs 3.2 0.2 to 2.0 0.2 pmol/L,
(p < 0.01));
thyroxine
declined
similarly
in both groups.
Subjects
fed CD gained no advantage
over subjects
fed PP. Regression
analyses
revealed
no
relationship
between
thyroid
hormones,
energy deficit, or bean mass with nitrogen
losses,
sug-
HENDLER
1240
TABLE
1
characteristics
Physical
ET AL
of subjects
Percent
Diet
CD(n
9)
8)
PP(n
*
Age
Height
28.0 2.8
33.6 2.6
1.71 0.03
1.67 0.03
Body weight
IBW*
Body mass
index
Lean body
mass
kg
kg/mi
kg
137.2
125.5
14.2
10.2
141 5
133 4
well
ually
body
conventional
known
robes as regulators
of thermogenesis
and
protein
metabolism.
The objective
of the present
study was to determine
the influence
of diet composition
on metabolic
adaptation to weight loss, especially
changes
in energy expenditure and conservation
of LBM.
introduced
resting
obese
subjects
glucose
values
healthy
plasma
(75-g)
oral
renal function
417-mmol
liver, and
informed
were
in writing
and
consent
Investigation
Committee
Medicine
in accordance
dated in Tokyo,
Japan,
normal
All subjects
before
forms
studied.
response
to a
test (12).
Thyroid,
as serum
electrolytes
and
within
any medications.
consent
tab protocol
were
and a normal
glucose-tolerance
tests as well
electrocardiograms
were taking
the study.
were
limits.
No sub-
gave voluntary
The experimen-
by the Human
Yale University
School
of
Helsinki
Declaration
as up-
of the
with the
approved
1975.
Subjects
were admitted
to the Yale Adult General
Clinical
Research
Center (CRC) for
1 mo. During the month
before
admission,
all consumed
normal,
weight-maintaining,
mixed
diets. Throughout
the hospitalization
subjects
were weighed
each morning,
in a hospital
gown,
voiding.
Urine
measurements
was collected
of N, sodium,
daily
were initially
diets detailed
of
the CRC.
Diets
After admission
and
ate weight-maintaining
diets
the VLCD,
containing
50%
all
carbohy-
placed
below)
before
breakfast
and after
on a weight-maintenance
diet (all
measured
and
2 1st days
of the
intravenous
VLCD
period,
were obtained
for measurements
catheter
the
was
RMR
thermic
effect
weekly.
of food,
To examine
DIT
was
hormones,
of weight
standing
the study
were measured
measured
twice weekly;
uric acid, and complete
and electrocardiograms
After completion
to guard
boss. Blood
possible
evaluated
against
pressure
changes
at the
end
of
undesirable
conse-
to
serum electrolytes
were
plasma proteins,
liver function,
serum
blood counts
were measured
weekly;
were done weekly.
twice
daily;
of the VLCD
period,
VLCD
preparation
(donated
by
International,
Inc, Monterey,
CA), nominally
contaming
41% protein,
55% carbohydrate,
and 4% fat (by manufacturers
analysis).
The CD is based on nonfat
milk, soy proteins,
and fructose
and contains vitamin and mineral
supplements needed to meet the US RDA for adubts(4).
PP contained
95 1% protein,
2 1% carbohydrate,
mined from standard
tables (14). This
from
lean roasted
meats
K intakes
(chicken
and
or turkey),
with vitamins
3 1% fat as deter-
and minerals
for N-balance
calcubased on Kjebdahl
total N determinations
(15) peraliquots
ofeach
diet prepared
as served
to subjects.
intake (dietary and noncaboric,
noncaffeinated
bevat least 2.0 L/d throughout.
Na intake
was -90
each diet initially and was increased
individually
as
counteract
occasional
postural
hypotension.
Total
(15%
protein,
ice cream,
54%
banana,
carbohydrate,
respectively,
K gluconate
or K chloride)
known
normal
serum
K bevels (> 3.8
to meet the
N content
Dietary
including
supplements
(oral
to be required
to maintain
enate
entirely
or egg whites
and sugar
and
31%
350-mL
containing
fat;
from
homog6 1 8 kcal
standard
portions).
Measurements
the weight-maintenance
period and on the 21st day of the
VLCD period. All subjects were under close medical
supervision throughout
CD is a commercial
from an indwelling
of thyroid
(NS).
Cambridge
lations
formed
assigned
quences
subjects
were grad-
Energy
expenditure
assessments
for RMR and DIT were
made by indirect
calorimetry
with the ventilated-hood
technique with a Beckman
Metabolic Cart(SensorMedics
Corporation, Anaheim,
CA). Metabolic
rate was calculated
from measured oxygen consumption
with adjustments
for respiratory
quotient
(RQ) and urinary
N excretion
(16, 17). The ventibated-hood
method
was used because
it allows the prolonged
3h measurement
required
to evaluate
DIT with only minimal
subject
discomfort.
RMR
was measured
between
0700
and
0900 after an overnight
fast while subjects
lay quietly awake
in bed. Subjects
were allowed
to listen to the radio or watch
television
during the test but conversation
was not permitted.
Seventeen
mal fasting
in the
from
subjects
30% protein,
and 20% fat. During
this base-line
period
intake was adjusted
individually
to prevent
weight boss.
During the 2l-d VLCD period, the CD and PP subjects consumed an average of436
2 and 439 5 kcab/d, respectively
Subjects
posture
which
drate,
calorie
Methods
7th,
to a 1200-1500
foods,
after discharge
subjects
jects
60.9 4.8
52.5 3.7
weight (13).
bdeal body
jects
46.4 4.0
45.1 3.1
HIGHRMR
was calculated
from
45 mm
AND LOW-PROTEIN
of measurement
while
the
subjects
were in a stable, resting state.
To measure
DIT, subjects were removed
mediately
after RMR
determination
and
in six 30-mm
periods.
Although
5 h (18), these
hood
resting
longer.
metabolic
rate
became
response
mm.
the
and
concentrations
beast 30 mm
after
(19). Supine
placement
ofan
lay quietly;
2, 5, and
10 mm
ofstanding.
measured
concurrently
Analytical
techniques
increment
responses
were
were
eval-
intravenous
cath-
and
after
pulse
were
Radioimmunoassay
techniques
were
used
to
determine
Plasma
catechobamines
(epinephnne
and
norepineph-
The composition
ofweightbost
during the VLCD period was
estimated
from changes in weight and N balance. N balance
was the difference
between N intake and boss. N bosses were
calculated
from
measured
total
urinary
N plus
35.69
mmol/d
estimated
fecab N boss (28) and 0.357 mmob/kg.d
for unmeasured
integumentab
loss (29). All subjects
reported
decreased
paired
actions
analyses
variables
(31).
mass
ofvariance
to evaluate
inter-
Results
Weight
Weekly
nitrogen
losses
after 3 wk
0.79 kg,
balance
Subjects
Week
Week
Week
mol/wk
On CD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
iSEM
to posture
standing
indwelling
Blood
180
of concentration
samples
samples
in
by
TABLE
-4.95
-2.13
-4.43
-2.33
-1.90
-1.85
-3.44
-1.58
-2.77
-2.82
0.40
-2.42
-1.19
-1.70
-1.11
-1.06
-0.71
-2.01
-0.78
-0.25
1.24 0.23
I .03
-1.32
-1.10
-0.62
-0.48
-1.16
-2.15
+1.35
-0.26
-0.75
0.32
-
On PP
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
-3.12
1.47
-4.20
-1.49
-2.71
-3.01
-3.38
-2.32
iSEM
-2.71
respectively.
These
-0.54
-0.82
-2.28
-0.27
-2.31
-1.47
-1.68
-0.49
0.33
weight
-1.23
bosses
+0.10
-0.29
I .08
+0.69
-0.43
+0.81
-0.52
+2.83
+0.26 0.43
0.29
were
not
significantly
different
expressed
in absolute
terms or as percent
of mitial weight.
Table 2 contains
individual
weekly
N losses.
Both dietary regimens
resulted
in a similar pattern
ofnegative
N
balance,
highest
during
the first 2 wk then diminishing
in the third week. Note that we observed
substantial
subject-to-subject
variability
throughout
the 21-d VLCD period. Although
only one of nine CD subjects
vs four of
eight PP subjects
achieved
positive
N balance
in the third
week;
this was not a significant
difference.
Subjects
on
CD and PP lost 2. 10 0.35 and 1.6 1 0.39 kg (p = NS),
respectively,
ofLBM
3.4 and 3.0% oftheir
Fasting
hormones
during
initial
3 wk ofdieting,
(p = NS),
LBM
representing
respectively.
and substrates
mean
in units
multiplied
by minutes.
Sympathetic
nervous
system
responses
uated
weekly by comparing
supine and
chobamine
re-
were termi-
multiplying
and substrate
thermic
determinations
the
tests
1241
VLCDS
1242
HENDLER
TABLE
Thyroid
function
tests
Subjects
WeekO
On CD
14 (nmol/L)
94.0
TTBC(nmol/L)t
Weeki
5. 1
90. 1 6.43
36017
38021
EFT4(pmol/L4
T3(nmob/L)
181
2.37 0.11
211
1.67 0.11
FT3 (pmol/L)II
3.4 0.2
2.6 0.2
On PP
T4 (nmol/L)
84.9 6.4
39918
17 1
2.43 0.1 1
3.2 0.2
TTBC(nmol/L)t
EFT4(pmol/L4
T3(nmol/L).
Fr3 (pmol/L)II
S
ET AL
96.5
35826
21
1.83
2.5
Week2
Week3
83.7 6.4
33713
8 1 . 1 6.4
30513
211
9.0
1
0.17
0.2
221
1.55 0.08
2.5 0.2
1.57 0.14
2.6 0.2
96.5
83.7
34521
22
1.47
2.0
9.0
35826
22 1
1.60 0.12
2.3 0.2
5.2
1
0.12
0.2
Thyroxine.
t Total T4-binding
capacity.
II FreeT3.
represents
49 and 43% decreases,
CD and PP, respectiveby (diet effect NS). This decrease
in insulin
is consistent with the observed
15% reduction
in fasting plasma
glucose
concentration
observed
after the VLCD
period
(p < 0.02 with no group
effect).
These
changes
were accompanied
by the expected
increases
in circulating
free
fatty
acids
(p < 0.002)
and
/3-hydroxybutyrate
(p
<
0.003).
Although
ketone
responses
to
weight
loss
tended
to be greater
in the PP subjects,
consistent
with
our previous
report (32), this did not reach significance.
Supine plasma
norepinephrine
bevels declined
after dieting in both groups although
only the PP reached
statistical significance
(CD, 22%, p = 0.26; PP, 33%, p < 0.02;
no significant
group effect). Supine
plasma
epinephrine
concentrations
tended
to decline
with these diets although
this effect was only significant
when the groups
were combined
(p < 0.05).
Energy
expenditure
Table
for each
5 shows weekly
postabsorptive
metabolic
rate
subject.
The mean decreases
(both p < 0.002)
in
metabolic
rate were 15.3 2.8 and 13.0 5.2% in the
CD and PP groups,
respectively
(p = NS between
groups).
Figure
1 shows clearly
that the net thermogenic
reTABLE 4
Effects ofdieting
on fasting
plasma
substrate
and hormone
CD
Glucose(mmol/L)
Insulin (pmol/L)
Freefattyacids(zmol/L)
$-hydroxybutyrate
(mmol/L)
Norepinephrine
(nmol/L)
Epinephrine
(pmol/L)
sponse
to the standardized
test meal was undiminished
by weight loss with either VLCD treatment.
In fact, the
CD group response
seemed
to increase
(p = 0.07) after
weight boss.
Hormonal
Glucose,
and substrate
responses
to a meal
insulin,
and free fatty acid responses
to the
test meal are shown
in Figure 2. The glycemic
response
to the meal was similarly
affected
in both treatment
groups,
showing
peak responses
delayed
by 60 to 90 mm
and the net areas above the base line ofthese
curves tending to increase
(CD, 183 23 to 266 45 mmol.
mini
L, p = 0. 13 and PP, 156 20 to 355 63 mmol.
min/L,
p < 0.02) at the end of the diet period.
The net areas of
the insulin
response
curves
after the test meal
were
slightly
lower after the diets (CD, 76 100 8600
to
65 300 5000
pmol
min/L
and PP, 102 600 27 300
to 70 300 16 500 pmol.min/L,
bothp
=
NS), which
is
consistent
with the sluggish plasma glucose
response.
No
.
concentrations
before
CD after dieting
5.11 0.17
4.330.28
194 36
8605
0. 12 0.03
1 .23 0. 19
82 16
100
110070
1 .35
0.96
66
36
70
0. 1 3
I1
PP before
PP after dieting
5.11 0.17
15 1 3
68565
0. 10 0.02
1.38 0. 12
98 22
4.330.17
8622
105859
1 .7 1 0.38
0.93 0.11
7 1 11
t Estimated
free T4.
Triiodothyronine.
HIGHTABLE
AND
LOW-PROTEIN
VLCDS
individual
Subjects
Week
resting
metabolic
Week
rate
Week
Plasma
Week
3
-J
kca//min
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1 SEM
1.21
1.14
1.58
1.39
0.99
1.40
1.38
1.03
1.48
1.30 0.07
1.42
1.31
1.74
1.76
1 . 12
1.48
1.52
1.03
1.39
1.42 0.08
Glucose
7.0
7.0
6.5
6.5
6.0
6.0
5.5
/$
On CD
2
After
Before
Postabsorptive
1243
1.12
1.13
1.59
1.21
0.94
1.51
1.41
1.0 1
1.36
1.25 0.08
1.15
1.03
1.57
1.24
1.03
1.17
1.32
0.94
1.34
1.20 0.06
4.5
4.0
30
60
120
90
150
180
Plasma
1200
1000
1000
600
600
400
400
1.09
1.06
1.30
0.52
0.93
1.52
1.47
1.18
1.130.11
120
150
180
30
60
120
90
150
30
60
90
120
150
180
30
60
90
120
150
180
180
Plasma
1200
1200
1000
1000
600
600
800
0
E
E
400
200
200
C
30
60
90
120
150
180
Minutes
from
1 .29
1.39 0.29 to
0.09
to 2.06
groups).
Although
FIG 2. Plasma
standardized
glucose,
after
meal. Presented
0.50
response
significantly
affected
60
90
120
150
by weight
blood
maintenance
The decrease
After
fell from
changes
(CD:
between
test
meal
groups
90
120150
180
and
of the
was
was
not
Un-
Minutes
responses
declined
6%
to posture
from
weight-
standing
3 vs -7
1 1 4 mm Hg, p
nephrine
responses
weight
norepinephrine
pressures
12 1
after
-2
60
the
bevels (NS)
was similar
PP subjects
fell
mm Hg. Postural
slightly
after the
30
to the
boss.
and
Supine
180
Minutes
u0
acid responses
1.
Likewise,
after
different
Cardiovascular
30
free fatty
PP
1.0
and
as in Figure
0. 1 5 nmob/L).
norepinephrine
,J
insulin,
Before
Minutes
10 mm before
3 mm Hg,p
<
0.02).
to
Figure
standing
regimen
and
after
dieting
NS; PP: 0 2 vs
3 shows that norepi=
were
unchanged
by
used.
FIG I. Thermogenic
response
to a standardized
618 kcal meal before and after 3 wk ofVLCD.
Metabolic
rate (left) and the net thermogenic response
within 3 h after the meal (right) are shown for the CD
(closed circles and bars) and the PP regimens
(open circles and bars).
Values are :i SEM.
Discussion
can
1.10
1.06
1.35
0.71
0.95
1.50
1.56
1.03
1.160.10
90
200
-
1.21
1.09
1.43
0.75
1.08
1.71
1.56
1.06
1.240.11
60
800
800
0
On PP
1.26
1.10
1.57
0.86
1.20
1.68
1.65
1.06
1.300.11
30
Insulin
1200
200
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
iSEM
1244
HENDLER
Before
tal plasma
protein
content
was unaffected
by either
regimen,being65
1 and62
1 g/Lbeforevs65
2and6l
2 g/L after 3 wk ofCD
and PP, respectively.
Similarly,
albumin
values
did not change
during
either
therapy.
After
2.0
1.5
ET AL
aC
The
consequence
suggested
deficiency.
1.0
fall in TTBC
drate
Minutes
FIG 3. Changes
mm ofstanding.
After
in plasma
norepinephrine
levels after 2, 5, and 10
CD shown as shaded bars and PP as open bars SEM.
as a
in these
diets
(such
as CD)
is probably
insufficient
(CD)
or pure
protein
(PP).
Slightly
im-
groups
of subjects
undoubtabby
would.
that the small difference
in total K intake
plements)
between
the two groups
(CD
found
these N-balance
data also through
association
of K depletion
and excessive
>
Further,
(diet plus
note
sup-
PP) may
con-
the
well-known
N losses
during
weight
loss (35). Thus, although
none ofour
subjects
on
either
diet became
hypokalemic,
the ability
of our diets
(particularly
the PP diet) to conserve
N may have been
improved
ifK intake
had been somewhat
higher.
Like Yang
uab variability
17 subjects
termed,
subjects
week than
responses.
et al (34) we observed
considerable
in N balance.
By the third week,
were
close
an adaptive
N balance
to
individ5 of our
N equilibrium,
as Yang
et al
response.
On the other hand, in
was more
negative
in the third
in the second,
perhaps
reflecting
maladaptive
Our adaptive
subjects
appear to have achieved
N equilibrium
more
quickly
during
mum
adaptive
subjects.
overemphasized
However,
as it may
the
reported,
for even
third
week
than
this difference
should
not be
merely
be because
N intake
ance calculations
for these subjects
so near equilibrium.
It is important
to recognize
that total N balance
may
not reflect organ- or tissue-specific
N losses. Many investigators
have examined
plasma
proteins
as supplemental
indices
of visceral
or rapidly
exchanging
proteins.
Although
every subject lost N during
weight reduction,
to-
these
diets
(--
ment
only
includes
tissues.
to weight
boss on
14%) is similar
to previously
reported
data
(38-40). Unlike
RMR
the stimulation
ofmetabolism
by
the test meal (DIT)
was essentially
unaffected
by weight
boss or the diet used. This observation
that DIT is relatively
unresponsive
to weight
boss supports
the findings
of other
investigators
(41, 42). Note
that our measure-
postprandial
hours
and
it is well known
that meal effects actually
extend
well beyond this, perhaps
as much
as an additional
3-4 h (18).
ofa
meal,
weight
reduction
clearly
influences
the hormonal
and
substrate
profiles
of postprandial
blood.
Because
the
same
test meal was administered
throughout,
the sluggish postprandiab
response
of plasma
glucose
after dieting probably
reflects
some degree
ofdelayed
absorption.
Even though
boss actually
cose
drate
levels after
restriction
resulted
during
the glycemic
response
was delayed,
weight
increased
the area above basal plasma
gluthe DIT
because
in the greater
caloric
net insulin
the insulin
restriction,
secretory
response
increment
insulin
(p
<
carbohydiet (PP)
0.05). As expected
bevels
response
(indicated
curve above
basal)
decreased.
The
by area under
tended
to decrease
(NS unless
groups
combined,
then p < 0.05). Although
the PP group
response
fell somewhat
more than
did the CD (14 vs 3 1%), consistent
with the smaller glucose response,
this group difference
did not reach statistical significance
(p = 0.2 1). Fasting
norepinephrine
bevels
declined
with weight
loss on both diets. However,
the
plasma
concentration
responses
to a standardized
meal
was not affected by dieting.
In addition
to catechobamine
responses
to a meal, the
norepinephnne
and hemodynamic
responses
to standing changed
only slightly with weight loss on either diet.
This contrasts
sharply
with our previous
experience
when all subjects
on pure
protein
400 kcal/d diets deveboped postural
hypotension
(32). The difference
between
these two studies
is that Na intake
was increased
as required
in the present
study to counteract
any hypotensive responses
but intake was fixed in the previous
study
thus many subjects
experienced
substantial
negative
Na
balance.
nutrients
we (32)
be interpreted
undetected
protein
bosses from critical
The decrease
in RMR in response
Standing
proved
N balance
(NS) was seen with PP as LBM bosses
in the CD and PP subjects
accounted
for 24 and
18%
(NS) oftotal
weight
lost, respectively.
This LBM boss fobbowed the same pattern
found
by other
investigators
(4,
(34)
four
should
to raise thyroid-binding
capacities
above
levels seen with
carbohydrate-free
diets.
Our data confirm
this finding
because
the decrease
in TTBC
was similar
with both diet
treatments.
It must
be emphasized
that these
measures
are indirect
and cannot
totally
preclude
the existence
of
0.5
mixed
probably
of decreased
total
carbohydrate
intake
as
by Kelleher
et al (36), rather
than as protein
Hoffer
et al (37) suggested
that total carbohy-
HIGH-
AND
LOW-PROTEIN
1245
VLCDS
00
-1.5
C.)
C
-3.0-
#{149}
r=O.14
p = 0.6
C
C)
0
z
.----&----
>
-7.5
-.
0#{149}
0
I
-9.0
0
0.25
0.50
0.75
Change
FIG 4. Relationship
is
between changes
combined,
with CD
by dashed lines.
indicated
1 .00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
in Free T3 (pmoVL)
shown
limits
However,
plasma
norepinephrine
concentration,
and incremental
areas do not correlate
significantly with the thermogenic
response
after the test meal
or with the changes
in RMR
before or after dieting
in
either group.
Although
this seems to minimize
the involvement
of the sympathetic
nervous
system
(SNS) in
regulation
of these processes,
more-sensitive
measures,
such as norepinephrine
turnover,
could reveal relationships
not visible
in plasma-concentration
responses.
Such a dissociation
of plasma
concentration
and turnover responses
was reported
(46), leaving open the possibility ofa robe for the SNS in thermic
adaptive
responses
during weight boss.
From
a strong
correlation
of T3 and RMR
changes
during
high- and low-carbohydrate
VLCD
therapies,
we
(41) suggested
that changes
in T3 may mediate,
in part,
a change
in RMR during weight loss. Because
ofthis
experience,
we examined
the relationship
ofthese
variables
in the present
data set. Although
T3, FT, and RMR all
decreased
during the study, there was no relationship
between RMR and T3 or FT or between
their incremental
changes
during
weight
loss. However,
note that calorie
intake was substantially
higher in that study (800 kcal/d)
than in this present
work.
Thus,
it is possible
that the
relationship
was not detected
because
energy intake was
simply too bow.
Recent
reports (33, 45) suggested
links between
T3 and
RMR.
peaks,
-6.0
1246
HENDLER
sion
data
balance.
We thank Andrea Belous, Aida Groszmann,
Ralph Jacob, and Clara
Wong for their expert technical
assistance.
We are particularly
grateful
to the nurses ofthe General Clinical Research
Center for the care given
to our patients,
and to Dr Robert Gelfand
for reviewing
the manuscript
and want to acknowledge
Dr Robert S Sherwin
for his thoughtful
contributions to the design ofthe study.
References
1. Isner JM, Sours HE, Paris AL, Ferrans
VJ, Roberts
WC. Sudden,
unexpected
death in avid dieters using theliquid-protein
modifiedfast diet: observations
in 17 patients and the role ofthe prolonged
QT interval.
Circulation
1979;60:l401-b2.
2. Van Itallie TB, Yang MY. Cardiac dysfunction
in obese dieters: a
potentially
lethal complication
ofrapid
massive weight loss. Am J
Gin Nutr 1984; 39:695-702.
3. Sours HE, Frattali
VP, Brand CD, et al. Sudden
death associated
with very low calorie weight reduction
regimens.
Am J (in
Nutr
198 l;34:453-6
1.
4. Hoffer LI, Bistrian BR, Young VR, Blackburn
GL, Matthews DE.
Metabolic
effects ofvery low calorie weight reduction
diets. J Gin
Invest l984;73:750-8.
5. Committee
on Dietary
Allowances,
Food and Nutrition
Board,
National
Research
Council.
Recommended
dietary
allowances.
9th ed. Washington,
DC: National
Academy
Press, 1980.
6. Kbeiber M. The fire of life: an introduction
to animal energetics.
Huntington,
NY: Krieger RE, 1975.
7. Boer JO, van Es AJH, Rcovers
LCA, van Raaij JMA, Hautvest
JGAJ. Adaptation
of energy metabolism
of overweight
women to
low-energy
intake,
studied
with whole body calorimeters.
Am J
Gin Nutr 1986;44:585-95.
8. Horton
ES. Introduction:
an overview
ofthe assessment
and regulation of energy balance
in humans.
Am J Gin Nutr l983;38:
972-7.
9. Danforth
E Jr. Diet and obesity.
Am J Gin Nutr 1985;4l:l
13245.
10. Rothwell
NJ, Stock MJ. Regulation
ofenergy
balance.
Ann Rev
Nuts 1981; 1:235-56.
1 1. James WPT, Trayhurn
P. Thermogenesisand
obesity. Br Med Bull
l98l;37:43-8.
12. National
Diabetes
Data Group. Classification
and diagnosis
of diabetes mellitus and other categories
ofglucose
intolerance.
Diabetes
1979;28: 1039-57.
13. Metropolitan
Life Insurance
Company.
New weight standards
for
men and women.
Stat Bull Metropol
Life InsurCo
1959;40:l-4.
14. Watt BK, Mcml
AL. Composition
of foods. Washington,
DC:
United
States Department
of Agriculture,
1979. (USDA
handbook #8.)
15. Monro HN, Fleck A. Analysisoftissues
andbody
fluids for nitrogenous constituents.
In: Munro HN, ed. Mammalian
protein metabolism. New York: Academic
Press, Inc., 1969: Vol 3. 424-525.
16. Lister G, Hoffman
JIE, Rudolph
AM. Oxygen
uptake in infants
and children:
A single
method
for measurement.
Pediatrics
l974;53:656-62.
17. J#{233}quier
E. Long term measurement
ofenergy
expenditure
in man:
direct or indirect calorimetry.
In: Bjorntorp
R, Cairella M, Howard
AN, eds. Recent advances
in obesity research
III. London,
UK:
John Libbey,
1981:130-5.
18. Ebiner JR. Acheson
KJ, Doerner
A, et al. Comparison
of carbohydrate utilization
in man using indirect calorimetry
and mass spectrometry
after an oral load of 100 g naturally-labeled
3C glucose.
BrJ Nutr l979;41:4l9-29.
19. Cryer PE. Diseases
of the adrenal
medullae
and sympathetic
ncrvous system. In: Febig P, Baxter JD, Broadus
AE, eds. Endocrinology and metabolism.
1st ed. New York: McGraw-Hill,
1981:51150.
20.
Lazarow
A. Immunoassay
for insulin: two antibody
1963; 12:115-26.
Ekins RP, Ellis SM. The radioimmunoassay
of free thyroid
hormones in serum. In: Robbins
J, Braverman
LE, eds. Thyroid
research. Amsterdam:
Excerpts
Medics,
1976:597-600.
Morgan
CR,
system. Diabetes
21.
ET AL
HIGH22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
31.
32.
33.
34.
Selligson
H, Selligson
D. Measurements
ofthyroxine
by competitive protein binding.
Gin Chim Acta 1972; 38:199-205.
Passon PG, Peuler JD. A simplified
radiometric
assay for plasma
norepinephrine
and epinephrine.
Anal Biochem
1973;5b:6l8-31.
Miles J, Glassock
R, Aitkens
J, Gerich
J, Haymond
M. A microfluorometric
method
for the determination
offree fatty acids in
plasma. J Lipid Res l983;24:96-9.
Williamson
DH, Mellanby
J, Krebs HA. Enzymatic
determination
of D (-)-$-hydroxybutyric
acid and acetoacetate
in blood.
Biochem J 1972;82:90-6.
Tietz NW, Pruden
EL, Siggaard-Andersen
0. Electrolytes,
blood
gasses, and acid-base
balance.
In: Tietz NW, ed. Textbook
of cmical chemistry.
Philadelphia:
WB Saunders,
1986:1 172-3 16.
Willard HH, Merritt LL, Dean JA. Instrumental
methods
of analysis. Princeton:
D Van Nostrand,
1965:309-56.
Brown MR, Klish WJ, Hollander
J, Campbell
MA, Forbes GB. A
high protein,
low calorie liquid diet in the treatment
ofvery obese
adolescents:
long term effect on lean body mass. Am J Clin Nutr
l983;38:20-31.
Joint Food and Agriculture
Organization/World
Health Organization Expert
Committee.
Energy and protein
requirements.
Geneva: WHO,
1973. (WHO technical
report series #522.)
Forbes GB, Braining
GJ. Urinary
creatinine
excretion
and lean
body mass. Am J Gin Nutr l976;29:1359-66.
Snedecor
GW, Cochran WG. Statistical
methods.
Ames, IA: Iowa
State University
Press, 1980.
DeHaven
J, Sherwin
R, Hendler
R, Feig P. Nitrogen
and sodium
balance and sympathetic
nervous
system activity in obese subjects
treated
with a low-calorie
protein
or mixed diet. N EngI J Med
l980;302:477-82.
Yang MU, Van Itallie TB. Variability
in body protein
loss during
protracted,
severe caloric restrictions:
robe oftriiodothyronine
and
other possible determinants.
Am J Gin Nutr 1984;40:6l
1-22.
Yang MU, Barbosa-Saldinar
F, Pi-Sunyer
X, Van Itallie TB. Metabolic effects ofsubstituting
carbohydrate
for protein in a low cabrie diet: a prolonged
study in obese patients.
Int J Obes 1981;5:
231-6.
35. Sapir
control
1247
VLCDS
DO,
Chambers
of ammonium
NE, Ryan
JW. The
excretion
during
role of potassium
in the
starvation.
Metabolism
l976;25:2l 1-20.
36. Kelbeher
PC, Phinney
SD, Sims EAH, et al. Effects of carbohydrate-containing
and carbohydrate-restricted
hypocaloric
and eucaloric diets on serum concentrations
of retinol-binding
protein,
thyroxin-binding
prealbumin
and
transferrin.
Metabolism
l983;32:95-lOl.
37. Hoffer LI, Bistrian BR, Young VR, Blackburn
GL, Wannemacher
RW. Metabolic
effects ofcarbohydrate
in low-calorie
diets. Metabolism 1984; 33:820-5.
38. Bray GA. Effect of calorie
restriction
on energy expenditure
in
obese patients.
Lancet 1969;2:397-8.
39. Welle SL, Campbell
RG. Decrease
in resting metabolic
rate during
rapid weight loss is reversed
by low dose thyroid
hormone
treatment. Metabolism
l986;35:289-91.
40. Hendler
RG, Walesky
M, Sherwin
R. Sucrose substitution
in prevention
and reversal
of the fall in metabolic
rate accompanying
hypocaloric
diets. Am J Med 1986;8 I :280-4.
41. Bessard T, Schutz Y, J#{233}quier
E. Energy expenditure
and postprandial thermogenesis
in obese women
before and after weight loss.
Am J Gin Nutr 1983; 38:680-93.
42. Shetty PS, Jung RT, James WPT, Barrand
MA, Callingham
BA.
Postprandial
thermogenesis
in obesity. Gin Sci 198l;60:5l9-25.
43. Azizi F. Effect ofdietary
composition
on fasting induced
changes
in serum thyroid hormonesand
thyrotropin.
Metabolism
1978;27:
935-42.
44.
45.
46.
Spaulding
SW, Chopra
U, Sherwin
RS, Santokh
SL. Effect of caloric restriction
and dietary composition
on serum T3 and reverse T3
in man. J Gin Endocrinol
Metab l976;42:l97-200.
Kaptein
EM, Fisler JS, Duda MJ, NicoloffJT,
Drenick
EJ. Relationship
between the changes in serum thyroid hormone
levels and
protein
status during prolonged
protein
supplemented
odoric
deprivation.
Gin Endocrinol
1985;22:l-l5.
Schwartz
PS, Jaeger LF, Silverstein
5, Veith RC. Sympathetic
ncrvous system activity and the thermic
effect offeeding
in man. Int J
Obes
47.
Hegsted
1987;ll:141-9.
DM.
Balance
studies.
J Nutr
1976; 106:307-11.
30.
AND LOW-PROTEIN