Empowerment
Our young First Nation population understands the issues and with social media across the country they
are bringing the issues to the forefront.
-Chief Isadore Day, Serpent River First Nation (Jackson, 2012)
Claudia
E.
Marchessault
Student
ID:
87436144
University
of
British
Columbia,
MET
Program
Class:
ETEC
521
66A
Professor:
Michael
Marker
August
7,
2015
Introduction
In
December
2012,
Canadian
news
media
was
bombarded
with
images
of
Indigenous
people
and
their
allies
engaged
in
public
rallies,
flash
mobs,
hunger
strikes,
marches,
and
blockades
that
choked
highway
and
railroad
traffic
across
the
nation.
The
spike
in
media
exposure
and
public
interest
in
the
movement,
which
came
to
be
known
as
Idle
No
More,
emerged
in
large
part
out
of
a
ballooning
social
media
campaign
that
drew
millions
of
people
to
the
Idle
No
More
website,
twitter
account,
and
Facebook
page
every
day.
The
events
drew
media
coverage
and
international
attention
to
the
many
profound
issues
associated
with
the
status
and
living
conditions
of
Canadas
Indigenous
population,
inciting
parallel
rallies
and
protests
in
several
other
countries.
Although
the
movement
secured
little
more
than
a
commitment
from
Canadian
government
leaders
to
revisit
the
terms
of
historical
treaties,
the
rapid
and
wide-spread
publicity
and
support
received
by
the
movement
revealed
the
tremendous
power
of
social
media
to
unite
and
mobilize
collective
action.
Canadas
Indigenous
communities
are
one
among
the
many
groups
that
have
capitalized
on
social
medias
capacity
for
giving
voice
and
bringing
attention
to
the
people
and
matters
often
overlooked
by
popular
media,
and
for
gaining
the
traction
necessary
to
mobilize
collective
action.
By
examining
social
medias
impact
on
media
culture,
Indigenous
community
building,
as
well
as
its
potential
for
bolstering
civic
engagement
and
political
activism,
this
paper
contends
that
social
media
is
a
powerful
tool
which
can
foster
social
cohesion
and
empowerment
amongst
Canadas
Indigenous
people.
Media Culture
The
significance
of
social
media
cannot
be
appreciated
without
being
placed
within
the
context
of
media
culture
within
which
Canadian
indigenous
communities
have
historically
resided.
Over
several
decades,
Canadas
Indigenous
communities
have
experienced
numerous
cultural
assaults
from
epidemics
and
dislocation,
to
disenfranchisement
and
residential
schooling.
These
all
but
annihilated
Indigenous
communities:
dispersing
families,
fraying
cultural
bonds,
and
contributing
to
the
disintegration
of
the
indigenous
way
of
life.
Although,
from
the
earliest
examples
of
media
creation,
Indigenous
people
have
been
depicted
through
a
variety
of
unflattering
stereotypes,
it
was
in
the
aftermath
of
these
assaults
that
the
media
attention
became
particularly
negative
and
injurious.
Even
as
the
relationship
between
Indigenous
and
non-Indigenous
people
reached
a
critical
juncture,
and
Indigenous
groups
began
reclaiming
control
over
areas
such
as
reserve
finances
and
education,
a
new
stereotype
emerged:
that
of
dysfunctional
and
inept
Indigenous
communities
(Harding,
2005;
Bussidor
&
Bilgen-Reinart,
1997).
These
disparaging
depictions
cast
doubt
on
the
ability
of
Indigenous
people
to
successfully
manage
their
own
affairs,
stalling
gains
on
their
journey
towards
self-determination
(Harding,
2005).
Media
outlets
reported
on
the
trajectory
of
loss
that
characterized
the
Indigenous
experience,
and
promoted
discourse
about
the
continuing
conditions
of
poor
health,
impermanence,
and
self-destructive
behavior
(Brave
Heart&
DeBruyn,
1998).
While
some
communities
and
individuals
undeniably
succumbed
to
the
traumas
they
faced,
this
was
certainly
not
the
case
for
all.
Nevertheless,
negative
and
stereotypical
depictions
continued
to
dominate
representations
of
Indigenous
peoples
in
popular
media
coverage.
The
consequences
of
such
media
hegemony
present
significant
consequences
for
Indigenous
populations:
For
one,
damaging
media
representation
skews
public
opinion,
making
it
unlikely
that
the
public
at
large
will
be
sympathetic
to
Indigenous
issues,
and
equally
unlikely
that
they
will
lend
their
support
to
vital
initiatives
such
as
treaty
negotiations,
the
resolution
of
land
claims,
or
the
further
devolution
of
authority
to
Indigenous
people
in
education,
justice,
and
child
welfare.
Persistent
stereotypes
also
have
damaging
consequences
on
Indigenous
self-identity
insofar
as
they
contribute
to
the
shaping
of
negative
self-concepts
(Harding,
2005).
According
to
labelling
theory,
negative
stereotypes
have
potential
to
become
self-fulfilling
prophecies
for
those
individuals
and
groups
that
are
subject
to
them.
(Anthony,
2013)
A
large
part
of
this
skewed
portrayal
of
Indigenous
people
in
the
media
can
be
attributed
to
Indigenous
peoples
exclusion
from
positions
of
media
creation.
Historically,
avenues
for
communicating
with
and
presenting
information
to
the
masses
have
been
controlled
by
a
small
group
of
the
nations
elite
a
narrow
strata
of
wealthy,
white
men
(Artz
et
al.,
2003).
Although
Indigenous
peoples,
like
other
marginalized
groups,
have
often
be
the
focus
of
media
making,
they
have
largely
been
prevented
gaining
access
to
roles
in
which
they
are
able
to
negotiate
their
public
perception.
Systemic
oppression
hindered
their
ability
to
accumulate
the
skills,
expertise,
and
financial
resources
necessary
to
access
positions
that
would
enable
them
to
help
shape
their
portrayal
to
the
public
(Artz
et
al.,
2003).
As
a
result,
Indigenous
people
have
remained
tied
to
those
conceptualizations
and
projections
embedded
in
prevailing
media
stereotypes.
The
advent
of
social
media
has
helped
to
destabilize
hegemonic
power
relations
in
mass
media
and
communications.
Sites,
like
Twitter
and
Facebook,
which
allow
users
to
establish
connections
with
individuals
from
around
the
globe,
combined
with
sites
like
Instagram
and
YouTube,
which
enable
users
to
document
and
share
images,
sounds,
and
video,
have
had
major
consequences
for
mass
media,
with
some
crediting
social
media
with
democratizing
or
decentralizing
media
creation
(Guo
&
Saxton,
2014).
For
one,
the
requisites
for
engaging
in
social
media
production
are
minimal,
and
all
but
eliminate
those
skill-,
expertise-,
and
financial-related
barriers
that
have
historically
prohibited
marginalized
groups
from
participating
in
media
creation.
Secondly,
social
media
consumers
have
opportunities
to
curate
what
they
deem
to
be
matters
of
importance,
and
have
access
to
a
variety
of
perspectives
on
those
matters.
Whereas
before
social
medias
existence,
corporate-controlled
news
media
determined
what
issues
and
stories
were
news-worthy
enough
to
be
reported
on,
and
more
importantly,
how
those
issues
and
stories
were
to
be
framed
in
their
reporting,
media
consumers
now
play
a
critical
role
in
deciding
both
what
is
relevant
as
well
as
whose
opinions
are
taken
to
be
the
authority.
Insofar
as
social
media
decenters
the
expert
author,
placing
the
emphasis
instead
on
the
conversations
which
can
happen
through
comments,
blogs,
tweets
and
so
on(Petray,
2011,
p.924),
it
enhances
possibilities
for
people
around
the
globe
to
exercise
their
right
to
communicate(Petray,
2011).
Of
particular
note
for
Indigenous
groups,
social
media
offers
the
opportunity
to
communicate
in
their
own
language
(Petray,
2011).
For
groups
like
the
First
Nations,
social
media
has
a
compound
effect.
Not
only
does
social
media
provide
a
way
to
generate
traction
to
bring
issues
which
are
commonly
overlooked
or
ignored
by
mass
media
outlets
to
the
forefront,
but
in
giving
Indigenous
people
control
over
both
the
content
and
framing
of
the
issues
they
choose
to
present,
social
media
can
be
utilized
as
means
for
self-
representation.
By
giving
groups
the
power
to
present
themselves
and
their
concerns
in
the
manner
of
their
choosing,
social
media
offer
a
new
and
unique
opportunity
for
groups
to
negotiate
their
own
identity
and
influence
public
perceptions.
Ginsberg
suggests
that
this
power
enables
Indigenous
groups
to
reverse
processes
through
which
aspects
of
their
societies
have
been
objectified,
commodified,
and
appropriated
and
recuperate
their
histories,
land
rights,
and
knowledge
bases
as
their
own
cultural
property(2008,
p.
139).
For
First
Nation
and
Indigenous
peoples,
social
media
presents
an
opportunity
to
refute
prevailing
stereotypes
and
attitudes,
reshape
public
and
self-perceptions,
and
generate
greater
attention
and
support
for
critical
issues.
With
their
propensity
for
bypassing
the
traditional
gatekeeping
mechanisms
of
mass
media,
social
media
and
social
networking
sites
offer
First
Nation
and
Indigenous
communities
the
opportunity
to
wield
greater
influence
over
the
framing
and
representation
of
Indigenous
people
and
issues
to
the
public.
Building Community
With
its
massive
geographic
sprawl
and
harsh
climate,
Canada
has
a
population
density
among
the
lowest
in
the
world
(The
World
Bank,
2015).
The
hundreds
of
kilometers
which
separate
Canadians
from
one
another,
however,
shrinks
as
communication
networks
grow
and
evolve.
The
newspaper,
followed
by
the
radio
and
television,
transformed
how
quickly
and
broadly
local,
regional,
and
national
news
and
information
could
be
transmitted,
while
the
postal
service,
followed
by
the
telegraph,
telephone,
and
later
e-mail
accelerated
our
ability
to
correspond
with
one
another.
Social
media
merged
both
of
these
functions,
allowing
users
to
create
and
spread
information
and
ideas
to
an
expansive
and
intricately
linked
network
of
individuals
instantaneously.
For
groups
like
the
First
Nations,
whose
populations
are
largely
fragmented
and
broadly
dispersed
across
the
country,
social
media
helps
to
bridge
geographic
distance
and
join
together
individuals
with
shared
identities,
shared
interests,
and
shared
experiences.
Although,
Aboriginal
elders
and
leaders
have
long
been
concerned
about
the
potential
for
such
new
circulatory
regimes
to
undermine
Aboriginal
languages
and
culture,
as
Faye
Ginsburg
reports
in
her
article,
Rethinking
the
Digital
Age,
Indigenous
groups
are
coopting
social
media
and
other
digital
technologies
as
a
means
for
generating
broader
understandings
of
their
histories
and
cultures,
for
wider
audience,
but
most
importantly,
for
their
own
cultural
futures
(2008,
p.
134).
A
cursory
examination
of
Indigenous
websites
and
Facebook
groups
suggest
that
these
communications
technologies
are
being
used
in
the
fight
to
preserve
Indigenous
culture,
language
and
identity
(Taylor,
2011,
p.
9).
An
assistant
professor
of
museum
studies
at
University
of
Toronto
notes
that
younger
members
of
the
Haida
Nation
use
Facebook
to
socialize,
to
promote
community
news
and
events,
to
share
images
of
Indigenous
arts
and
crafts,
and
through
the
use
of
family
photographs,
to
record
family
and
community
history.
Similarly,
she
notes
a
growing
trend
of
people
using
Facebook
as
a
means
of
communicating
cultural
knowledge
--
i.e.
using
their
status
to
inform
people
of
what
you
should
do
when
someone
dies
to
show
respect
or
using
posts
to
elicit
and
discuss
Haida
vocabulary.
There
are
young
people
making
a
very
concerted
effort
to
learn
the
Haida
language
while
mother-tongue
speakers
are
still
alive
these
students
use
Facebook
as
a
practice
space
(Taylor,
2011,
p.
15)
As
her
comments
reveal,
social
media
are
also
being
used
to
revive
Indigenous
languages
and
cultural
practices.
As
Ginsbert
asserts,
social
media,
like
other
digital
technologies,
are
being
taken
up
by
Indigenous
communities
on
their
own
terms,
furthering
the
development
of
political
networks
and
the
capacity
to
extend
their
traditional
cultural
worlds
into
new
domains
(2008,
p.
133).
Indigenous
people
from
all
social
strata
have
embraced
social
media
as
a
means
to
connect
with
family
and
friends,
to
revitalize
dying
languages
and
practices,
to
advocate
for
environmental
conservation,
to
showcase
Indigenous
cultural
identity
and
promote
political
activism
(Taylor,
2011).
As
such,
Indigenous
participation
in
social
media
have
helped
to
create
and
contest
social,
visual,
narrative,
and
political
spaces
for
local
communities
and
in
the
creation
of
national
and
other
kinds
of
dominant
cultural
imaginaries
that,
until
recently,
have
excluded
vital
representations
by
First
Nations
peoples
(Ginsburg,
2008,
p.
140).
This
highlights
social
medias
ability
not
only
to
forge
connections
across
Canadas
vast
geography,
but
also
its
capacity
for
promoting
collective
identity,
and
fostering
cultural
revival
and
revitalization.
Faye
Ginsberg
uses
the
term
cultural
activism
to
describe
the
trend
observed
whereby
Indigenous
groups
use
the
production
of
media
as
cultural
forms
which
serve
as
a
means
for
revivifying
relationships
to
their
lands,
local
languages,
traditions,
and
histories,
and
of
articulating
community
concerns
(2008,
p.
139).
In
providing
a
public
space
where
individuals
can
congregate
to
share
knowledge,
opinions,
values,
traditions,
and
experiences
social
media
provides
an
arena
for
reifying
ones
self-identity,
for
promoting
discourse
on
critical
issues,
and
for
solidifying
bonds
and
affiliations
among
group
members.
Whether
on
isolated
reserve
lands,
or
scattered
throughout
Canadas
cities
and
towns,
social
media
has
helped
to
strengthen
First
Nation
and
Indigenous
communities
through
its
ability
forge
connections
across
vast
geographic
distance,
unite
fragmented
groups,
and
foster
collective
consciousness.
and
data
speaks
volumes
of
their
relevance
in
contemporary
political
mobilization.
Social
medias
capacity
for
strengthening
social
bonds,
raising
awareness
of
pressing
societal
concerns,
and
reinvigorating
faith
in
the
underdog
make
it
a
powerful
force
for
generating
support
and
mobilizing
collective
action.
Conclusion
The
advent
of
social
media
has
transformed
the
way
we
connect
and
engage
with
the
world
around
us.
From
keeping
in
touch
with
home
communities,
to
preserving
cultural
identity,
and
supporting
political
advocacy,
social
media
is
being
harnessed
by
Canadas
Indigenous
people
for
uses
far
more
complex
than
simply
making
communication
easier.
Through
participation
in
media
creation,
Indigenous
groups
are
challenging
the
misrepresentations
of
Aboriginal
people
posed
by
non-Aboriginal
media
makers,
helping
them
to
overcome
prejudices,
and
secure
greater
domain
over
self-representation
and
self-
determination.
Social
media
presents
itself
as
a
powerful
tool
which
Indigenous
people
can
coopt
as
a
means
of
furthering
social
and
political
transformation
by
inserting
their
own
stories
into
national
narratives
as
part
of
ongoing
struggles
for
Aboriginal
recognition
and
self-determination(Ginsburg,
2008,
p.
139).
As
was
observed
in
the
Idle
No
More
campaign,
social
media
has
proven
itself
as
a
major
asset
in
the
promotion
of
social
and
political
unity.
Its
interactive,
decentralized
nature
enables
groups
to
foster
a
dialogue
with
a
global
audience,
draw
attention
to
issues
which
might
otherwise
be
overlooked
by
popular
media,
and
most
importantly,
mobilize
members
and
supporters.
Though
there
are
well-founded
misgivings
among
Aboriginal
peoples
regarding
the
potential
negative
impact
of
social
media
on
their
cultures
and
languages,
it
is
clear
that
many
are
using
these
technologies
in
the
fight
to
preserve
Aboriginal
cultures,
language,
and
identity.
By
connecting
Indigenous
people
from
the
around
the
world
and
by
making
their
shared
concerns
more
visible,
social
media
has
the
capacity
empower
Indigenous
groups
and
exact
meaningful
political
change.
R E F E R E N C E S :
Anthony,
T.
(2013).
Indigenous
people,
crime
and
punishment.
Abingdon,
Oxon:
Routledge.
Artz,
L.,
Kamalipour,
Y.
R.,
Ebrary
Academic
Complete
(Canada)
Subscription
Collection,
&
Project
Muse
University
Press
Archival
eBooks.
(2003).
The
globalization
of
corporate
media
hegemony.
Albany:
State
University
of
New
York
Press.
Brave
Heart,
M.
Y.
H.,
&
DeBruyn,
L.
M.
(1998).
The
american
indian
holocaust:
Healing
historical
unresolved
grief.
American
Indian
and
Alaska
Native
Mental
Health
Research,
8(2),
56-78.
Bussidor,
I.,
&
Bilgen-Reinart,
U.
(1997;
2000).
Night
spirits:
The
story
of
the
relocation
of
the
sayisi
dene.
Winnipeg:
University
of
Manitoba
Press.
Castells,
M.
(2010)
Conclusion:
The
Network
Society,
in
The
Rise
of
the
Network
Society:
With
a
New
Preface.
Volume
I,
Second
edition
with
a
new
preface,
Wiley-Blackwell,
Oxford,
UK.
Gainous,
J.,
Wagner,
K.
M.,
&
Oxford
Scholarship
Online.
(2014;
2013).
Tweeting
to
power:
The
social
media
revolution
in
american
politics.
New
York:
Oxford
University
Press.
Ginsburg,
F.
(2008).
Rethinking
the
digital
age.
The
media
and
social
theory.
New
York:
Routledge,
127-144.
Guo,
C.,
&
Saxton,
G.
D.
(2014;
2013).
Tweeting
social
change:
How
social
media
are
changing
nonprofit
advocacy.
Nonprofit
and
Voluntary
Sector
Quarterly,
43(1),
57-79.
doi:10.1177/0899764012471585
Haas,
R.
(2011).
Reflections
on
the
revolutions
in
Egypt.
The
New
Arab
Revolt.
New
York:
The
Council
on
Foreign
Relations
Harding,
R.
(2005).
The
media,
aboriginal
people
and
common
sense.
Canadian
Journal
of
Native
Studies,
25(1),
311.
Jackson,
K.
(2012,
December
5).
Social
media
draws
First
Nation
issues
to
forefront.
Retrieved
August
5,
2015,
from
http://aptn.ca/news/2012/12/05/social-media-draws-first-nation-
issues-to-forefront/
Petray,
T.
L.
(2011).
Protest
2.0:
Online
interactions
and
aboriginal
activists.
Media,
Culture
&
Society,
33(6),
923-940.
Prins,
H.
E.
L.
(2001).
Envisioning
power:
Ideologies
of
dominance
and
crisis.
American
Anthropologist,
103(1),
263-264
Rosaldo,
R.
(1981).
The
cultural
impact
of
the
printed
word
A
review
article.
Comparative
Studies
in
Society
and
History,
23(3),
508-513.
Retrieved
from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/178487
Silver,
J.,
Hay,
J.,
Gorzen,
P.,
&
Canadian
Public
Policy
Collection.
(2004).
Aboriginal
involvement
in
community
development
the
case
of
winnipeg's
spence
neighborhood
Canadian
Centre
for
Policy
Alternatives.
Taylor,
A.
(2011)
Social
Media
as
a
Tool
for
Inclusion.
Resources
and
Skills
Development
Canada.
Stiles
Associates
Inc.
Retrieved
from
http://www.homelesshub.ca/resource/social-
media-tool-inclusion
The
World
Bank.
(2015)
Population
Density
(people
per
Sq.
Km
of
Land
Area).
Retrieved
from
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.POP.DNST