Tesol 10
whether they need to improve or not. Therefore, students can identify their
own strengths and weaknesses in writing, and make their text more readerfriendly (Tsui, & Ng, 2000, p.168).
References
Abdel Rahman Adalla Salih. (2013). Peer response to L2 student
writing: Pattern and Expectations, 42 -50
doi:10.5539/elt.v6n3p42
Amy B.M. Tsui and Maria NG. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefits
from peer comments?
Journal of second language writing, 9 (2), 147-170
Hansen and Jun Liu. (2003). Guiding principles for effective peer
response, 31-38
Pham. V. P. Ho & Usaha, S. (2009). Blog-based peer response for EFL
writing: A case study in Vietnam. Aisa call online journal (ISSN
1936-9859) Vol. 4 No.1 October 2009
Pham Vu Phi Ho (2015). Phng php t chc lp hc vit bi lun theo
nhm. Nh xut bn kinh t TP. H Ch Minh
Sandra Lam Tsui Eu. A qualitative study of second language writers
response to and use of teacher and peer feedback a proposal,
116-123
Eu, S. L. (n.d.). A qualitative study of second language writers' rseponse to and use
of teache and peer feedback - a proposal. 116-123.
Junliu, H. &. (2003). Guiding principle for effective peer response. 31-38.
Pham, H. V. P(2015). Phng php t chc lp hc vit bi lun theo nhm.
Pham. V. P. Ho & Usaha, S. (2009). Blog-based peer response for EFL writing: A case
study in Vietnam. Asia call online journal (ISSN 1936-9859) Vol. 4 No. 1
October, 2009.
Salih, A. R. (2013). Peer response to L2 student writing: Patterns and Expectations.
doi:10.5539/elt.v6n3p42, 42-50.
Tsui & Ng. (2000). Do sencondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of
second language writing, 9 (2), 147-170.