The Holy Quran states, "Say thou how would those who know would be equal to those who do not
know?" This sound principle exalts the place of knowledge as the ultimate tool for enlightenment and
exhorts all human beings to gain knowledge. The Prophet also said, "The most righteous of people is the
one who brings the greater good to the community." Because of this, the most beneficial of all deeds is
one that continues to bear fruit for generations to come. Waqf (endowment) has been an essential
component in the building of Islamic civilization. Wishing to rekindle and spread the great and noble
virtue of learning that has marked the Arab and Muslim worlds in earlier times, I am establishing King
Abdullah University of Science and Technology on the Red Sea in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. As a
new "House of Wisdom," the University shall be a beacon for peace, hope, and reconciliation and shall
serve the people of the Kingdom and benefit all the peoples of the world in keeping with the teachings of
the Holy Quran, which explains that God created mankind in order for us to come to know each other. It
is my desire that this new University become one of the world's great institutions of research; that it
educate and train future generations of scientists, engineers and technologists; and that it foster, on the
basis of merit and excellence, collaboration and cooperation with other great research universities and the
private sector. The University shall have all the resources that it needs to pursue these goals. A perpetual
waqf (endowment) is being established and shall be managed for its benefit by an independent Board of
Trustees. The Board of Trustees shall embody wise and responsible governance in support of the spirit of
creativity that the University represents. The coastal locale of the University is an area of great natural
beauty and cultural significance. In its design, construction and operations the University will conserve
natural resources and demonstrate by precept and example the value of responsible environmental
stewardship. Since universities striving for excellence depend on an atmosphere of exploration and
initiative, nurturing and protecting freedom of research, thought and discourse related to scholarly work
will be among the primary objectives of King Abdullah University of Science and Technology. Our
intention is to create an enduring model for advanced education and scientific research. A complete
residential and academic compound will permit the faculty, staff, students, associates and their families to
enjoy a rich and broad range of educational programs and social amenities. In providing a strong
foundation for all aspects of life and work in the University, we aim to ensure its success in promoting
the economic development and social prosperity of the people of the Kingdom and of the world.The
Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud
Joe Nahhas reply to His Majesty. For 38 years I tried to reach you and failed
because there are at least 1002 doors to your chair and a peasant like me carrying
1003 new physics formulas all derived from 10th century Arabs treasure of real time
physics making me the Carrier of “house of wisdom” and here is a part of it “Arabs
real time Astronomy”. I am smart enough to be the greatest physicist in the
Galaxy. I am brave enough to challenge to tell a King and say “buildings do not
make a University” and “walls do not a house of wisdom” and “Western stupidity is
not science” and confident enough to attempt to take on humanity and change
physics and history daring all to stop me. My work is spreading and I am foolish
enough to tell you that KAUST is anything but a “house of wisdom”. What makes a
house of wisdom is a genuine desire to serve humanity with open mind and a kind
heart like your open mind and kind heart but that’s your wish and the faculty and
academia you chose has a collective value that can be proven as nothing but
garbage educated and garbage producers and this book is my proof and I challenge
all humans including KAUST to prove me wrong. I am Joe Nahhas and I am the
greatest and have 1003 physics formulas that are being openly published to delete
all physics and make it an Arab style house of wisdom physics and I bet my neck
on my 1003 discoveries.
By all means I have no intentions of any insult or disrespect to your Majesty but I
have absolutely no respect for KAUST faculty people and its program. My problem
is that I can prove modern physics is stupidity itself and stupidity taught at KAUST
respect is not what Arabs do. My problem is that I can prove that Nobel Prize
winner physics and physicists are idiots to say the least and criminals to be exact
and it is the subject of this book.
Arabs real time Astronomy
Arabs real time Universe
(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0
Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics
Quantum = classical + relativistic
joenahhas1958@yahoo.com
My name is Professor Joe Nahhas Re- founder of Arabs real time physics July 4th 1973
There is one and only one physics Arabs real time physics
This is me in October 2009 flashing my 1979 picture stapled to my thermo book congratulating
myself on 1001 new Arabs real time physics formulas to change physics and history
Page 1
Chapter one: What is Arabs real time astronomy?
Car size at distance 4
R1 R2 O2
Car size at distance 2
D D D
R1 O1 d
Page 3
Let us do R1 real time analysis
R2 = R2
R2 = R1 + (R2 – R1)
Dividing by R1
(R2/R1) = (R1/R1) + (R2 – R1)/ R1
Visual measurement scale
(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]
Distance R1 when measured using light source and not a measuring tape is not the same
as R1 but is measured as R2. R2 is the visual distance of R1. Using an eye as an instrument
visual distance R2 is smaller than actual distance R1. The percentage of visual distance R2 to
actual distance R1 is equal to (R2/R1).
(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] = 1 + [(R2/ R1) – 1]
Percentage = 1 + [percentage – 1]
Multiplying by R1
(R2/R1) R1 = R1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] R1
Visual = actual + (Visual – actual)
In clear words when we try to measure the distance R1 using light source reflected from
the car we see a percentage of R1 which is (R2/R1) R1 and that percentage times R1 is the
visual we measure R2
Real time distance = event time distance + delay time distance
Visual distance = distance + visual effect
Visual measurement scale using distance
Real time astronomy scale using distance
(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]
Visual measurement scale using Velocity
Real time astronomy scale using Velcoity
(V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]
Visual measurement scale using angle
Real time astronomy scale using angle
(θ 2/ θ 1) = 1 + [(θ 2 – θ 1)/ θ 1]
Visual measurement scale using angular velocity
Real time astronomy scale using angular velocity
(θ’ 2/ θ’ 1) = 1 + [(θ’ 2 – θ’ 1)/ θ’ 1]
Visual measurement scale using time
Real time astronomy scale using time
(t 2/ t 1) = 1 + [(t 2 – t 1)/ t 1]
Page 4
Arabs real time astronomy application
(I/O) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(I – O)/O] θ’0
Real time physics = event time physics + time delay physics
In old terms
Quantum = classical + relativistic
(R2/R1) = 1 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1]
(R2/R1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(R2 – R1)/ R1] θ’0
This is Arabs real time astronomy distance scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0
(V2/V1) = 1 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1]
(V2/V1) θ’0 = θ’0 + [(V2 – V1)/ V1] θ’0
This is Arabs real time astronomy Velocity Scale to measure the angular velocity θ’0
Planet Mercury angular velocity accumulation in arc second per hundred years
When astronomers measure the angular velocity from two different distances
they make the following error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43
When astronomers measure Planet mercury angular speed around the Sun
from Earth r0 and not from the sun r m they make the following error
Error: [(r m - r0)/r0] δ θ’ m = 43
Page 6
Chapter Two
The confrontation between Arabs real time Astronomy and
Western Nobel prize winner modern space time astronomy
Arabs astronomers:
0
M Mercury S Sun
That:
1- All object classified as planets Suns Moons has a real time circular motion
As: r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
And not
1 – Kepler - Newton’s ellipse r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)]
Or Einstein’s rotating ellipse: r= a (1 - ε²)/ [1 + ε cosine (θ - Ψ)]
2- The difference between two real time circular motions is a visual rotating ellipse
Or, the difference between r1 = r 10 e í [θ (1) + ω (1) t] and r2 = r 20 e í [θ (2) + ω (2) t]
Is Arabs real time ellipse: r= [a (1 - ε²)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)] e í [θ + ω t]
500 years ago Europeans took 10th century Arabs real time Astronomy and changed it to Space- time
astronomy and in the process physics was changed from an Arabic science to European – western stupidity
globalized through planet of the Apes Institution and best known as Alfred Nobel Prize winner Institution
Page 7
Alfred Nobel: The Man behind the Nobel Prize; Joe Nahhas: The Man after Alfred Nobel Institution head
Since 1901, the Nobel Prize has been honoring men and women from all corners of the globe for
outstanding achievements in physics. The foundations for the prize were laid in 1895 when Alfred Nobel
wrote his last will, leaving much of his wealth to the establishment of the Nobel Prize. But who was
Alfred Nobel? Meet Alfred Nobel - scientist, inventor, entrepreneur, author and pacifist. What is modern
physics? Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity
waves? Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and found dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone
have a proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does
anyone figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners claim that the universe is made
up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one
grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a
Carpenter by inheritance but I never knew what a dumb ass really is till I met my science teacher! What
did Alfred Nobel honor? The difference between an Alfred Nobel Prize winner physicists and fortune
tellers is a flip of a coin. Space - Time is not physics but Alfred Nobel physicists’ flip of a coin between a
crime and stupidity. Alfred Nobel Institution honored criminals in Alfred Nobel suit for all of past
century. Modern space – time physics changed physics from science to stupidity and physicists from
researchers to criminals. In writing: Yes I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head on my plate and I
accept nothing less. Space – time physics is stupidity itself. Ending Nobel Prize for stupidity from
classrooms and scientific calculations is the only Nobel thing left to do. Alfred Nobel Prize became 1001
times more worth in cash value. Big Institutions backed wrong physics and physicists for all of past
century for a prize and a billion dollars jack pot and garbage for physics. I am Joe Nahhas and I am
unknown to the world of physics but I have 1001 new physics formulas to cut Alfred Nobel Institution
head and delete Alfred Nobel Prize winner physics and physicists without loss of subject. This book is
just the beginning and it is prime time and it is Arabs real time astronomy
Page 8
Arabs in 950 AD said that light going vertical (blue) to the eye it will go through the eye to
be seen. The Arabs added that light coming oblique (pink) to the line of sight (blue line) we
would see the part of light (pink) that is equal to the amount of light of horizontal amount
(blue) or its vertical projection. What the Arabs concluded is that human eye and machines
are unidirectional that can only recognize the amount of light along the line of sight or line
of measurements. The Arabs mean that any point on the oblique pink line will be measured
as its vertical projection as the blue line. The Arabs added that the horizontal projection of
the pink line is the amount that would be measured as Zero or not seen at all. A point
location on the pink line would be measured as equal to its vertical projection on the blue
line and that part would be seen detected and measured by the eyes and instruments and
its horizontal projection would not be detected or measured by the eyes or instruments and
would be completely missed.
r0 sine ω t
r0
ωt
r0
cosine ω t
The angle between the pink line and the blue line is called light aberration angle. The
aberration angle between the line where an object is (pink) and an object projection is
with the eye as center. Light aberrations angle equals to: ω t = arc tan (v/c) where v
= relative velocity of the moving object and c is light velocity. The light coming from a
distant object is seen along the line of sight and that meant we do not measure actual
distance of an object r0 (pink line) but we measure its image or vertical projection
which is r0 cosine ω t (blue line) and we escape measuring the horizontal projection
r0 sine ω t which is perpendicular to the line of sight (black line).
Page 9
The Arabs said that we do not see or measure light reflected from objects but we
measure light speed projections as constant or light speed projections is
measured as constant.
c
c
c
The Arabs claim that we do not see objects position r0 but we see their visual position r.
What humans see is r0 measured along the line of sight and miss r0 perpendicular to the
line of sight. In other words an object at a distance r0 humans are not aware that they do
í ω (r) t
not see r0 but they see a visual of r0 which is r = r0 e and projection of r0 along
the line of sight that humans eye see and instruments measure is r0 cosine ω t and the
projection of r0 perpendicular to the line of sight is r0 cosine ω t. The Arabs added that
when accounted for, the difference between an object image or visual position r (quantum
mechanics) and object location or position r0 (classical mechanics) is equal to a time delay
effect (relativistic mechanics)
Page 10
This is the basis of correct measurements. The entire western civilization 500
years of physics and the world 500,000 “modern” western civilization educated
physicists made/make this mistake and globalize their stupidity and to correct
this mistake is to delete western civilization physicists without loss of subject.
There is nothing in “modern” physics that can be considered as correct
because modern physics is based on wrong measurements. Modern physics is
“wrong time physics” that can be deleted without loss of subject. Arabs real
time physics is the past present and future of all of physics and it is the subject
of this book.
Page 11
Arabs real time astronomy: The Arabs Astronomers and Physicists said that:
We can not see or/and detect or/and measure something in space that did not
exist; we can not see or/and detect or/and measure something that had not
happened. We can only see or/and detect or/and measure things and events in
space that had happened. What we see or/and detect or/and measure is not
necessarily what there is and not necessarily what happened. We see or/and detect
or/and measure traces and images of objects of past event. We see or/and detect
or/and measure in present time of images of object and events that happened in
past time. That is we measure images and record data of objects of past events in
present time. An event changes in time and when an event is measured it is
measured after it happened.
Present time = real time; past time = event time; (present time – past time) =
time delay, or, Real time = event time + time delay
Page 12
There are objects at locationr0 (actual or classical distance) and when measured in
í ω (r) t
real time they appear as at a location r (quantum distance) = r 0 e
That is the distance in the Universe is a classical distance but when a distance measured in
real time it appears as quantum distance and the difference between classical distance and
quantum distance is relativistic distance
í ω (r) t
We see detect and measure quantum distance r = r0 e of an actual or
íωt
classical distance r0 and the difference between quantum distance r = r0 e
and actual or classical distance r0 is relativistic distance
í ω (r) t
Take r = r0 e
í ω (t) t
Or, t = t0 e of an actual or classical time t0 ------------------ Eq - 3
í ω (t) t
And the difference between Arabs t = t0 e and actual or classical time t0 is
relativistic time
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location is all of astronomy needed Equation -1
That is if mass of objects in space is known and if the location of object in space is
know then the state S = m r = mass x location of any object in space can be
known and that is all needed to be known to describe space motion of any object
and that is what is called astronomy
That is mass m location r and time t = Astronomy and from this we can conclude:
Page 13
Chapter four
The size of the car object is the same but the size of the car image is dependent on car
distance and transmitted signal. Meaning we see detect and measure an image of size I
in real time (present time) of an object O seen detected and measured in event (past
time). That is when images of cars are seen these images of the cars are seen in real
time. And when these car objects move the car see itself the same size. That is we
measure images of object in real time and not objects. The difference between images
and objects are visual illusions Arabs knew about and described in 10th century Ad.
Conclusion:
Is that humans see detect and measure images of objects in real time
Modern physics is all wrong because Modern physics is wrong time physics based on
wrong physics measurements that misses by a factor of [(I – O)/O] q and this
quantity [(I – O)/O] q is taken as real experimental result and not as a relativistic
illusion correction. In other words:
Correct Physics is: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
Modern Physics is wrong because
(I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
What we measure = what there is + visual effects
Quantum = classical + relativistic
Quantum = we see in real time = observer dependent = time dependent measurements
Classical = object independent of observer = time independent measurements
Relativity = illusions
In mathematical terms:
Relativity = time dependent measurements – time independent measurements
Real time scale
Real time = event time + (real time – event time)
Real time = event time + time delay; time delay = (real time – event time)
With real time = Γ; event time = t; time delay = (Γ – t)
Γ = t + (Γ – t) = t + ∆ Γ; ∆ Γ = (Γ – t)
Γ/t = t/t + (Γ – t)/t
Γ/t = 1 + (Γ – t)/t
To measure orbital speed using time, then multiply by orbital speed to
get the following equation: (Γ/t) θ’0= θ’0 + [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0
And θ’0 = orbital speed
The quantity θ’0 measurement is independent of time
The quantity (Γ/t) θ’0 measurement is time dependent
The difference = [(Γ – t)/t] θ’0 = relativistic = Illusions
Page 16
Let us demonstrate the power of Arabs real time Physics and astronomy and see
how Arabs real time astronomy works but first let us do some definitions.
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Planet
r
Su
n
The Grand moron said planets travel in time around the Sun rotating the elliptical orbit
21
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
I am not saying Einstein is a moron but what I am saying is all western physicists
are morns to say the least and can be deleted without loss of subject to be exact.
Practicing again
If 1= 1
2=2
3=3
Then we can write anything that is equal to itself as equal to itself like:
Visual = Visual
Actual = actual
- Actual = - actual
----------------------- Add
Visual = Actual + (Visual – actual)
Divide by actual
Visual/actual = Actual/actual + (Visual – actual)/actual
Or
Visual/actual = 1 + (Visual – actual)/actual
Image/object = 1 + (Image – object)/object
I/O = 1+ (I – O)/O
We do not see object O but we see Image I. If we to look at planet Mercury from
Earth and not from the Sun, then we are not looking at θ’ m= 2 π /T m = (v m /r0) but
we are looking:
At θ’0 I/O = 1 θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0
Or θ’0 I/O = θ’0+ [(I – O)/O] θ’0
The visual illusion and Modern Physicists confusion is: [(I – O)/O] θ’0
Where I is Mercury – Sun distance = 58,200,000 kilometers = r m
And O is Earth – Sun distance = 149,600,000 kilometers = r e
The Visual Illusions and modern Physicists confusion of Planet Mercury is:
[(I – O)/O] θ’0 = [(r m – r e)/ r e] θ’0
Page 23
Multiplying by (t/t) = 1
Next
Is Galileo
Page 24
With r m = v m T m; r e = v e T e
Page 25
Tyco Brahe Velocity Illusion: [(r m – r e)/ r e] = [(r m /t) – (r e/ t)]/ (r e /t) = (v m – v e)/ v e
Page 26
(I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
This is on the house
(v m /r m) [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = (70.75)
M r Lippershey you can even read the telescope and you are deleted
(70.75)( v e – v* e /v m) = 70.75 [(29.8 – 0.465)/47.9] = 43
Hans Lippershey the person who attempted to get a patent for the telescope in 1609
Modern Physics is wrong because Hans and the entire Western civilization still
have no clue how to read the telescope
Page 27
Rene Descartes Cartesian failures
t = t0 e í ω (t) t
í ω (t) t
Γ = te
Along the line of sight
Γ x = t cosine ω t
Γ x = t + (Γ x – t) = t + ∆ Γ x; ∆ Γ x = (Γ x – t)
Γ x /t = t/t + (Γ x – t)/t
Γ x /t = 1 + (Γ x – t)/t
Page 28
Chapter 3: Arabs real time light motion
Visual objects seen through emitted or reflected light follow this law
Light measurement of visual motion of objects law: (I/O) q = q + [(I – O)/O] q
The proof:
Page 29
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a
location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
Page 30
From Eq-2: d (r²θ')/d t = 0
Then r²θ' = h = constant
Differentiate with respect to time
Then 2rr'θ' + r²θ" = 0
Divide by r²θ'
Then 2(r'/r) + θ"/θ' = 0
And 2(r'/r) = - θ"/θ' = 2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)]
Also, r = r0 (θ, 0) e [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
And θ' = θ' 0 (θ, 0) e -2[λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
For a fixed orbit: λ r = 0
Also, r = r 0 (θ, 0) e ỉ ω t
Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t
Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
í ω (r) t
Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics r = r0 e
Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light
in motion and at best they can take a snap shot.
In mathematical language
Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0
And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t
And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t]
And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t
And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]
31
Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)
= r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1]
Page 33
When Newton came with F = - GmM/r²
Physicists calculated: θ' c m = v /r;cm
And v cm = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a]
And v s = √ (GM/a)
Page 34
W " (calculated) = [- π m/MT] (180/π degrees) (3600 seconds) (36526 century); T
= days; with m = 0.32 x1024 kg; and M = 2.0 x1030 kg; T = 88 days
Page 35
Hooke’s for law F = - ω²x; 3 – Newton’s law F = - GmM/x²
If Hooke’s law is taken the F = - k r in one dimension
Then r’’ +ω²r = 0; then r (θ, 0) = r0 e ỉ ω t
Then r = r0 e ỉ ω t; and r = r0 [1- 2 sine² ω t/2]
And (r - r0)/ r0 = - 2 sine² ω t/2
The distance visual effect Error is: [(r m – re)/re] δ θ’ m
Page 36
Chapter Five: The all time wrong Astronomer
Then Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier came
The angular velocity of Mercury around the Sun is: θ m' = v m /r m
And δ θ’0 = (v m /r m) (180/π) (3600) (26526/Tm); Tm = 88 days
M
S
Page 38
Chapter six
Newton equation is a solved wrong for 350 years
Newton’s unprecedented stupidity
Planet
r
Su
n
The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
Location = r = r r (1)
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r
F = F1 + F2
Page 40
The solution is not
And r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+εcosθ)]
But this solution
[λ +ỉω ]t
Real time solution is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) (r)
Page 41
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
And the motion of a planet m around the Sun M measured in real time is a rotating ellipse
θ
ψ
Tyco Brahe Logged observational Data of Planets P motion around the Sun S and
then Kepler stated the areal velocity law: If Planet p observed from the sun then the
trajectory of planet p will cut equal areas in equal times.
Page 42
P
A A
A
A A
A A
P
T T
T
T T
T T
Page 43
When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets
orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also.
Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = --
= location² x [angular speed] = constant
= Areal velocity
If r² θ' = h
Then differentiating with respect to time
Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t
And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0
Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)
The r = r0 e íωt
With r = r0 e íωt
Page 45
Chapter seven
Inverse Cube equations F = m γ = - k/r³ r (1), then in polar coordinates
With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - k /r³ Inverse Cube Gravitational law (1)
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)
(2): d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
Then m²r²θ' = constant; if m is taken as constant then r²θ' = h
And (1): d² r/dt² - r θ'² = [-GmM/r²] e k/r
Let m r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u²
= - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ
= (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ
= - h d u/d θ
And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ²
= - hu² [d²u/dθ²]
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = [-GmM/r²] e k/r
Nuclear Gravity (1)
48
And [1 – GMk/h²] = (GM/h²) a (1-ε²)
And h² - GM k = G M a (1- ε²)
(m α/ M r)
Nuclear Gravity (-GmM/r²) e
Let m r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ
And d² r/dt² = -hθ'd²u/dθ² = - hu² [d²u/dθ²]
-hu² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = -G M u² [1 – (α m /M) u]; α m /M r << 1
Or (d²u/ dθ²) + (1 – Gmα/h²) u = GM/h²
And u = [GM/ h²]/[1 – Gmα/h²] + A cosine {√ [1 - Gmα/h²]}θ
Page 49
And φ = 43.03426909''/century
φ = 2 π m/2(m + M) = π m/ (m + M)
Page 50
Chapter Nine
Frequency Games
What is the accumulated value of 2 π f per century for planet mercury seen from
Earth?
The angular frequency is ω = 2 π f
How I would see ω of planet mercury turning around the sun from earth?
The answer is there will be a frequency change of
W = 2 π f [v* m - v*e]/v* e; radians per second
Where v*e = Earth orbital velocity around the Sun = 29.8 km/sec
And vº e = Earth spin speed = 0.465 km/sec
And v* m = Mercury orbital velocity around the Sun = 47.9 km/sec
With f = 1/T; f = frequency; T = Period = 88 days
If W is wanted in degrees multiply by: 180/π
If W is wanted in degree per century multiply by (180/π) x (36526 days/ T)
If W is wanted in arc second per century multiply by
(180/π) x (36526 days/ T) x 3600
W = [2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x (180/π) x [36526 days/ (T days)] x 3600
With f = 1/T (seconds)
W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
W = [360 x 3600 x (36526/T (days)] [1/ 24 x 3600 x T (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
W = 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
[(I – O)/O] δ θ’0 =15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
For Mercury
W = 15 x [36526/ (88)²] [(47.9 – 29.8)/29.8] = 43.0 arc second per century
The conclusion is
With ω = 2 π f = 2 π /T angular frequency in event time
And ω (real time) = ω (event time) + Δ ω
Δ ω = ω (real time) - ω (event time)
= 2 π f [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
= 2 π f Z; Z = [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
= red shift
And Δ ω = 2 π f (1 + Z)
The Advance of Planet Mercury Perihelion is 2 π f Z = 2 π Z/ T
Δ ω = (2 π/T) [(v* m - v*e)/v* e]
In arc seconds per century: Multiply by: (180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600)
And Δ ω = [2 π / T (seconds)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x
(180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600);
T (seconds) = T days x 24x 3600
Δ ω = [2 π / T days x 24x 3600] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] x
(180/π) [36526/T (days)] (3600)
Δ ω = [15 x 36526 / T² (days)] [(v* m - v*e)/v* e] = 43
Page 51
Chapter Ten: Space – time unlimited stupidity
Visual force: F = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³
With m [d² r/dt² - θ'²r] = - Gm M/r² - Gm Mk/r³ Visual Gravitational law (1)
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's Areal Velocity Equation (2)
Or, r 1 v 1= r 2 v2
This is the angular time delay and will be seen as angular visual Illusion
The angular speed is θ' = v/r
For Mercury: θ' = v/r = (47.9km/sec)/58,200,000 km = 0.000000843 radians/sec
If you want the accumulation value in arc sec /century W", then
And W" = (v/r) (180/π) (3600) (26526/T) = angular velocity in arc sec per century.
What is the angular visual Illusion for planet Mercury that would be seen when
measured from Earth with Earth location r (1) = Earth = 149.6 x 106
And r (2) = Mercury = 58.2 x 106
Page 53
No Force solution
Newton said there is gravity Force F = -GmM/r² whose solution is this
Planet
r
Su
n
With r = r0 e íωt
Page 55
Abstract: light measurements are done along the line of sight and we measure light
projections to our eye. Meaning, that we do not measure distance r but we measure r
cosine arc tan (v/c) when light is used and as a consequence instead of measuring time
T we measure T cosine arc tan (v/c) and here is the experimental proof of it.
Your eyes
A000 0
0000 0
0000 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 θ (2) 0 0 0
0 θ (1) 0 0 θ (3) 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
B------------------------- 0 --------------- 0 ------------- 0
1 2 3
The projections of light is what we measure and the projection of 1
and 2 and 3 is AB
If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (1)
If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (2)
If the angle between ray 1 and AB is θ (3)
Then C (1) cosine θ (1) = C (2) cosine θ (2) = C (3) cosine θ (3) = c = AB
Page 56
A Light V E L O C I T Y B2
O O O O O O O O O O
O θ C O
O O
O O
O V O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
B1
2/3
= 15 x (36526/T² (days)] [(Tm/ Te) – 1] = 43
1/2
= {[GM/r³]} [(v m – v e)/ v e] [(180/ π) (3600) (36526/ T m) = 43
1/2 2/3
= {[GM/r³]} [(Tm/ Te) – 1] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m)] = 43
1/2
= {[GM/r³]} [(v m T m – v e T e)/ v e T e] [(180/π) (3600) (26526/T m) = 43
Page 58
Chapter Eleven
Arabs real time physics in outer Space
The problems Einstein and all others can not solve
Apparent Apsidal motion of binary (two) stars
This is the solution to the 150 years apsidal motion puzzle that is not solvable by
space-time physics or any said or published physics including 500 years of Modern
physics and 500,000 modern physicists. Binary stars apsidal motion or "Apparent"
rate of orbital axial rotation is a visual effect along the line of sight of moving
objects applied to the angular velocity at Apses. From the thousands of close binary
stars astronomers picked a dozen sets of binary stars systems that would be a
good test of relativity theory and modern physics collected data for all of past
century and relativity theory failed every one of them. This rate of "apparent" axial
rotation is given by this new equation
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} (v* + v°/c) ²
degrees/100 years
T = period; ε = eccentricity; v° = spin velocity effect; v*= orbital velocity effects
The simplest problem in physics that all 500 years modern physics and
500,000 modern physicists could not solve by any physics:
1 – As Camelopardalis
2 – DI Herculis
3 – V1143 Cygni
4 – V 541 Cygni
5 - AI Hydra
6 - V 731 Cephei
7 - SW Canis Majoris
8 - NV Canis Majoris
9 - GG Orion
10- CM Draconis
11- VV PYX
12 – EW Oriomis
13- V1147 Sagittari
14 – PSR 1913 + 16
12 – PSR 0737 – 3039
Solution: Location r = r r (1) ; Velocity v = r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Acceleration γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
S = m r; State = mass x distance
P = d S/ d t = d (m r)/d t = m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) r
Velocity = v = (d r/d t); mass rate change = m' = (d m/d t)
P = m v + m' r; Momentum = change of state = change in location or change in
mass
F = d P/d t = d² S/d t² = d [m (d r/d t) + (d m/d t)]/d t
= m d² r/d t² + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r
Page 59
F = m d² r/d t² + 2 (d m/d t) (d r/d t) + (d² m/d t) ² r
Force = Change of momentum
F = m a + 2 m ' v + m" r
F = - GmM/r²
Or, Newton's Kepler's equation: F = - GmM/r²
Then
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)
With m = constant, then m can be taken out from both equations (1) and (2)
With d² r/d t² - r θ'² = - GM/r² Newton's Gravitational Equation (1)
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Kepler's force law (2)
From 2: With m = constant; then d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
And m² d (r²θ')/d t = 0
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0
And r²θ' = h
With (1): d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = -GmM/r²
With m = constant
Then m [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - Gm M/ r²
And [d² r/ d t² - r θ'²] = - G M/ r²
Let r =1/u
Then d r/d t = -u'/u² = - (1/u²) (θ') d u/d θ = (- θ'/u²) d u/d θ = - h d u/d θ
And d² r /d t² = - h θ'd²u/dθ² = - h u² [d²u/dθ²]
And - h u² [d²u/dθ²] - (1/u) (hu²)² = - G Mu²
Or, [d²u/ dθ²] + u = G M/ h ²
u = G M/ h² + A cosine θ
And r = 1/u = 1/ [G M / h² + A cosine θ]
= (h²/ G M)/ [1 + (Ah²/ GM) cosine θ]
= (h²/GM)/ (1 + ε cosine θ)
This is Newton's Classical Equation solution of two body problem. We solved this
equation and we got the motion equation:
Is: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] which is the equation of an ellipse with
eccentricity ε and semi - major axis a, and a semi- minor axis whose value is b = a
√ [1 - ε²] and two foci one equals to c = ε a, and the other foci location equals to -
c = - ε a. Or the motion of one ball around the other ball should be an ellipse with
the other ball at one of the foci +/- ε a, of the ellipse with semi major axes (- a, a)
on x-axis and semi minor axes (-b, b) on y- axis and foci (- c, c) on x- axis again
with angle of rotation θ. If this law to work on two planets instead of two balls like
planetary motion around the sun, then Astronomers should see this motion of a
planet moving around the sun in an ellipse with the sun at one of its foci.
Page 60
m
What astronomers saw was not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse like the ellipse
below wth rotating angle ψ
θ
ψ
Page 61
When the areas size A are sliced equally it was found that the times spent by planets
orbiting around the Sun and making areas A each are equal also.
Or, r² (0) θ' (0) = r² (1) θ' (1) = r² (2) θ' (2) = r² (3) θ' (3) = --
= location² x [angular speed] = constant
= Areal velocity
If r² θ' = h
Then differentiating with respect to time
Then d (r² θ')/ d t = d h/ d t
And 2 r r’ θ’ + r² θ’’ = 0
Or 2 (r’ /r) = - (θ’’/θ’)
The r = r0 e íωt
With r = r0 e íωt
Δ W ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees
And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days
Page 62
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x
sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} degrees/100 years
Astronomy re - written
Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples AS CAM
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples AS CAM
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples AS CAM
Spin: v° = 40 + 30=70km/sec
And v* (e) = v* Earth = 29.8 km/sec
And vº (e) = 0.465 km/sec
Then v* + v °= v* (m) + v* (M) + v* (e) + vº (m) + v° (M) + vº (e)
= 110.178 + 145.435 + 70 + 29.8 – 0.465 = 355 m/sec
[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ² = 1.43; T = 3.431days
Page 64
Calculations
1- ε = 0.5118; (1-ε²/4) = 0.94; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 3.33181; 1 + ε = 1.4882;
G=6.673x10-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x109m
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 99.88 km/sec
V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 113.8km/sec
Page 65
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan
114.85/300,000]
= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (114.85/300,000)²
= 1.22° degrees/ century
Observed: 1.24° degree/century +/- 0.05°
References:
1-Geminez and Margrave, 1985
[0.00071°/cycle] = [1 century = 36526days/7.641days] = 3.393987698°/century
Page 67
And a = [R (m)/r (m)] R (0) = (1.88/0.0440)0.696x10^9m = 29.73818182x10^9m
Then a (1-ε²/4) = 28.03x10^9m
And v (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 75.5883km/sec; v° (m) =24
And v (M) = √ [Gm²/a (m + M) (1-ε²/4)] = 75.883km/sec; v° (M) =24
With v°=24 + 24= 44km/sec
And v* = 151.1766km/sec
With v* + v°= 151.1766 - 48 = 103.1766km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (103.1766/300,000)²
W° (ob) = 0.65°
Notice: [v° (m), v° (M)] = [24 ± 2, 24 ± 2]
If v° (m) = v° (M) = 24 + 2 = 26
Then v* + v°= 151.1766 - 52 = 99.1766km/sec
And W° (ob) = (- 720 x 365226/15.3379) (3.2339) (99.1766/300,000)²
W° (ob) = 0.60°/century
Observed is W°= 0.60° +/ -0.1/century Lacy = [0.5°; 0.7°]
Relativity: W° = 0.97°/century
Calculations
1-ε = 0.77; (1-ε²/4) = 0.986775; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.6414
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Then a = [R (m) / r (m)] = 19.24062059 x 10 ^ 9 m
Page 68
With v* = v (m) + v (M) = 81.11439578km/sec + 88.11km/sec =
169.2243958km/sec
And v° = v° (m) + v° (M) = 28 + 27 = 55 km/sec
Then (v* + v°) = 224.2243958 km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan
224.2243958/300,000]
= (-720x36526/8.29) (1.6414) (224.2243958/300,000)²
= 2.90°/ century
W° (observed) = 2.90°/century as measured
Observed is 2.90°/century
Space-Time Relativity theory 6.8° / century
Now let us calculate v* (cm) = ∑m v/∑m
= 2.15 x 81.11439578 + 1.98 x88.11= 84.46822 km/sec
With v* = 2 v*(cm) = 168.936411 km/sec; And v° = 55 km/sec
Then v* + v° = 223.9364411 km/sec and
W° (observed) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² [Inverse tan 223. 936/300,000]
= (-720x36526/10.55) (3.33181) (223.9364411/300,000)²
W° (observed) = 2.9°0/century
With σ = √ {∑ [v* - v* (cm)] ²/2}
= √ {[88.11 -84.46822]²/2 + [81.11439578 - 84.46822]²/2}
= √ {[3.64178]²/2 + [3.35382422]²/2} = 3.5 km/sec
Then W° (ob) = 2.9°0/century; observed is W° = 2.9°/per century
And Einstein's 100,000 space-timers 6.8° / century
References: Go to Smithsonian/NASA website SAO/NASA and type:
1- Apsidal motion of AI Hydra Popper 1985
2- KH. F. Khaliulullin and V.S Kozyreva 1988
3- Petrova - Ovlav Apsidal motion catalogue 1999
6 - V731Cehpei Apsidal Motion Solution
Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑] [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
[↑,↑]=orbit
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples V731Cephei
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples V731Cephei
Next the same equation will be used to find the advance of Periastron or "apparent"
apsidal motion of V731 binary stars system.
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/T) x
{[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v°+ v*)/c] ² degrees/100 years
Calculations
M + m = 2.738; 1-ε=0.9835 1-ε²/4=0.9999 R (0) = .696x10^9m
Page 70
W° (obo) = (-720x36526/T) x {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} {[v* + v°]/c} ²
W°/century= (-720x36526/6.068567) (1.033694356)
(259.7856266 /300,000)²=2.91°/century
W°/century = 3.35914177°/century = 0.0335914177°/year
U = 360°/0.2048333818°/year;
U = 1757. 5 years
Page 71
Relativity theory coffin nail # 8 SW Canis Majoris
W° (cal) = (-720x36526/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²]} [(v° + v*)/c] ² degrees/100
years
Page 72
SW CMa apsidal motion solution:
Data: T=10.09 days; r (m) = 0.0942; m = 2.22 M (0); R (m) = 3.01R (0); ε = 0.3179
And r (M) = N/A M = 2.03 M (0) R (M) =2.46 R (0); m + M = 4.25 M (0)
And [v° (m), v° (M)] = [30+/-2, 27+/-3]
K (1) = 80.5; K (2) = 87.8
Calculations
And, v* + v° = 218.7574713km/sec
73
9 - GG Orion Apsidal motion puzzle solution
Primary → v°(p) ↑ v* (p)↑ v° (p) ↑v* (p)↓ v° (p) ↓ v* (p) ↑ v° (p) ↓V* (p) ↓
Secondary ↓
v°(s) ↑ v* (s)↑ Spin=[↑,↑][↑,↑]=orbit [↑,↑][↓,↑] [↓,↑][↑,↑] [↓,↑][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) - v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v* (p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples GG Orion
v° (s) ↑v* (s)↓ [↑,↑][↑,↓] [↑,↑][↓,↓] [↓,↑][↑,↓] [↓,↑][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) + v°(s) v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s) -v°(p) + v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples
v° (p) ↓ v*(s) ↑ [↑,↓][↑,↑] [↑,↓][↓,↑] [↓,↓][↑,↑] [↓,↓][↓,↑]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) + v*(s) -v*(p) + v*(s) v*(p) + v*(s) -v* (p) + v* (s)
Examples
v° (s) ↓V*(s) ↓ [↑,↓][↑,↓] [↑,↓][↓,↓] [↓,↓][↑,↓] [↓,↓][↓,↓]
Spin results v°(p) - v°(s) v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s) -v°(p) - v°(s)
Orbit results v*(p) - v*(s) -v*(p) - v*(s) v*(p) - v*(s) -v* (p) - v* (s)
Examples GG Orion
Data: T=6.6314948; m = 2.342 M (0); M = 0.2338 M (0); R (1) = 1.852 R (0); R (2) =1.830
ε = 0.2218; 1 - ε = 0.7782; r (1) = 0.0746; r (2) =.988 r (1); m + M = 4.68 M (0)
And [v° (p); v° (s)] = [16 +/- 1; 16 +/- 1]; [v° (p); v° (s)] = [25 +/- 3; 24 +/- 3];
U = 10700 +/- 4500 years
Calculations
(1-ε²/4) = 0.9877; [√ (1-ε²)] / (1-ε) ² = 1.57
G=6.673x10^-11; M (0) = 1.98892x19^30kg; R (0) = 0.696x10^9m
Calculations
With v* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.6 km/sec
And v* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 95.735 km/sec
And v° (p) = 16 km/sec; v° (s) = 16 km/sec
Then v* (p) + v* (s) + v° (p) + v° (s) = 223.335 km/sec
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/6.6314948) (1.57) [223.335/300,000] ² degrees/100
years
W° (ob) = 3.45°/century = 0.0345°/year
U [years] = 360/[0.0345°/year]
U = 10,432 years Nahhas
U (observed) = 10700+/-4500years
Page 75
Apsidal motion is given by this formula:
U [years] = 360/[0.06731598944°/year]
U (observed) = 5400+/-3200years
Einstein's and space-timers U = 360/ [0.00191x365.26] = 516 years
Can it get any better?
It is not just about dumping relativity it is dumping relativity and Alfred Nobel
institution with it.
11 - V 1147 Sagittari
V 1147 Sagittari: Data: U = 592.5 +/- 6 years
With K (p) = 117.4 km/sec; K(s) = 130.8 km/sec
Giving v* (p) = 117.4 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 146.735 km/sec
And v* (s) = 130.8 + 29.8 – 0.465 =160.135 km/sec
Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec
And vº (p) = 80 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 109.335 km/sec
And vº(s) =75 + 29.88 – 0.465 km/sec = 104.335 km/sec
Then v* + vº = 146.735 + 160.135 + 109.335 + 104.335 = 520.54km/sec
[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 2.62
W (cal) = (-720x36526/3.28) x (2.62) (520.541/300,000)²= 63º/century
U = [63/100]-1x 360 = 570 years.
Observed values; 592.5
References
Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries V 1147Sagittari
J. Anderson, A. Gimenez 1985
Page 76
12- EW Orionis
EW Orionis: Data: U =16300 +/- 3900
With K (p) = 73.18km/sec; K(s) = 75.46 km/sec
Giving v* (p) = 73.18 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec
And v* (s) = 75.46 + 29.8 – 0.465 =104.795 km/sec
And vº (p) = 9 + 29.8 - 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec
And vº (s) = 73.18 - 29.8 + 0.465 = 102.515 km/sec
Orbital speed of earth = 29.8 km/sec; spin speed of earth is 0.465 km/sec
And vº (p) = 9km/sec; vº(s) =8.8km/sec
Then v* + vº = 102.515 + 104.795 +9.0 + 8.8 =225.11km/sec
[√ (1- ε²)] (1-ε) ² = 1.167
Calculations
Page 77
With v* (m) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a (1-ε²/4)] = 103.70 km/sec
References
Absolute dimensions of solar-type eclipsing binaries EW Orionis
J.V. Clausen, H. Bruntt, E.H. Olsen, B.E. Helt, and A. Claret 2009
Page 78
Chapter 13: Alfred Nobel prize winner for less than a $
1993 Nobel Prize Winner Dr Joseph H. Taylor
Binary Pulsar 1913 + 16
For PSR 1913 + 16
Data: Joseph Taylor and Joel M. Weisberg 2004
With a =2.3417725 R (0); R (0) = 0.696 x 10 9meters
And ε = 0.6171338
T = 0.322997448930
And θ' = 4.226595 °/year
With mass m = 1.4414 M (0) and M = 1.3867 M (0); M (0) = 2 x 1030 kg
V* (p) = √ [GM²/ (m + M) a] = 235.9574664 km/sec
V* (s) = √ [Gm²/ (m + M) a] = 245.2640841km/sec
W° (cal) = (-720x365.26/Tdays) x
sine² [Inverse tan (v/c)] degrees/100 years
= (-720x365.26/0.329974489) x sine² [Inverse tan (481.22/300, 00)] deg/100
years
W = 4.2°/year
References
The Double pulsar PSR J0737 - 3039
Burgay, M; D’Amico,N.; A.Manchester,R.N; Lyne, A.G.; Kramer, M; Mclaughlin, M.A; Lorimer, D.R;
Carmilo, F.; Stairs, I.H: Freire, P.C.C; Joshi,
Page 79
Chapter 14
B- Arabs Real time GPS or Real time Global positioning systems
Abstract: The Global Positioning System or GPS 45 micro seconds per day time
delays have nothing to do with Einstein's relativity theory time travels confusions of
physics and they are a consequence of Satellite orbital speed and Earth rotational
speed given by this formula below. Even if Einstein's formulas were correct for all
practical purposes they are insignificant to the performance to the GPS system.
Earth - Satellite distance is a variable that Engineers account for and the tiny
"relativistic" effect has no significance whatsoever because distance adjustment is
far more than any relativistic adjustment. For the president of the United States
President to ask for Innovations like that in an AAAS meeting is a sign of a
bankrupt scientific community and for those who knew the facts must have laughed
to their teeth at the president.
NASA's and AAAS laughing at the president requires a reply with laugh at AAAS and
NASA and all other including the person who wrote the speech for the president
GPS time delays of 45 micro seconds per day have nothing to do with relativity
theory or Einstein or AAAS or NASA or silly time travel physics or any theory. This
time delay is due to Earth rotation and satellite orbital speed that Scientists turn
their heads away from because without Einstein's silly magic sock of time travel
physics, Physicists will have less tricks that allows them to say anything publish
anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel Prizes and silly physics.
10 - Arabs Global Positioning System Circular Satellite Orbits time delays in seconds/day
U (seconds/day) = [-720x 3600/15] (v/c) ² sec/day
Page 81
Chapter 15
Arabs Real time Interplanetary Telecommunications systems
Abstract: Interplanetary time delays around the moving sun derived from three
dimensional time-dependent Newton - Kepler's equations solution gives a solar
round trip time delay rate of:
ΔΓ= 16πGM/c³ [1 + (v°/v)] ² = ΔΓ0 [1 + (v°/v)] ²
ΔΓ0 = 16πGM/c³= 247.597μs
G = Gravitational constant; M=Sun mass; a=mean distance from Sun. And
eccentricity; c = light speed; a = mean distance
And v = Planet speed; v°= Sum/Difference in spin between Earth and planets.
When applied to actual data it gives extremely accurate results better than
Shapiro's Space-time-delay analysis and without space-time fictional forces or
space-time fiction.
Page 82
W° (ob) = (-720x36526/Tdays) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} x [(v° + v*)/c] ²
degrees/100 years
ΔΓ = 250μs Mars-Earth.
These data compared to Shapiro's time delay from NASA 1977 Vikings 6, 7 Earth -
Mars Telecommunications mission are more accurate because the actual value is
250μs and the value published by Doctor Irwin Shapiro of Harvard is 247.597μs
Although this formula works the correct formula is
Δ θ = -4π [(v° + v*)/c] ² Sun-Photon; and with v° ≠ 0
v = √ [GM/a] = 24.1 km/sec; vº = 0.46511 – 0.241 = 0.224 km/sec
ΔΓ = 2 arc length/c = 2[Δ θ] d/c
= 16πGM/c³ [1 + (vº/v)] ² = 247.597 x [1 + 0.224/24.1)]²
Δ Γ = 250 µs For Mars; 0.4651 = Earth rotation; 0.241 = mars rotation; v = mars
speed
Harvard physics department is where physics changed from science to stupidity
Page 84
If we took a look at the most famous physics fundamental constant G from Newton's
350 years old Equation F = - GmM/r², or, Coulomb electric force equation F = - Qq/4π
ε 0, one can see that, for example, G’s value has unit dimension of [G] = [1/ρ T²]; ρ is
density and T is time rotational period. If we can show that the gravitational constant G
= G (ρ, T) is a variable air density and Earth rotational period dependent then we can
say what Earth is saying that the most famous physics fundamental constants are not
so universal constants because all three fundamental constant are air density and Earth
spin dependent.
Proof: G = G (ρ, T) = 1/ [(2/5) (4 π/3) ρT²] = √ (2π)/ (4 π/3) ρT²
Nothing that: 8 π /15 = (2/5) (4π/3); 4π/3 and 2/5 come from spherical aspect
Where: ρ = air density; T = Earth rotation period
The 2/5 is the ratio for radius of gyration of a sphere
Taking T = 24 hours and ρ = 1.2045 kg/m³
G = 1/ (8 π/15) ρT² = 6.674 x 10 - 11
And ε 0 = 1/4πρT² = 8.85 x 10 -12
And μ = 4πρT²/c²
0
When Newton’s equation F = - mM/r² was solved it produced the angular velocity r’
= r’0 e í ω t
Divide by c
And r’/c = (r’0/c) e íωt
T = T0 e íωt
And f = f0 e - í ω t
And f = f x + f y = f 0[cosine ω t - í sine ω t]
And f x = f 0 cosine ω t
And f x - f 0 = f 0 [1 – 2 sine² (ω t/2)] - f 0
And δ f = f x - f 0 = – 2 f 0 sine² (ω t/2)
And δ f/f 0 = - 2 sine² (ω t/2) Up
And δ f/f 0 = 2 sine² (ω t/2) Down
And δ f/f 0 (total) = [2 sine² (ω t/2) Down] – [- 2 sine² (ω t/2)]
And δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² (ω t/2)
With ω t = arc tan (v/c)
With v = δ f/f 0 (total) = 4 sine² [(arc tan √2gh) /2]
With v << c
Page 86
Set up this round rotating table in 1887 with a lamb, two mirrors beam splitter,
telescope
Page 87
In Modern times an animation of the experiment would look like
Their reasoning was that if they rotate the table 90 degrees they would see the
interference pattern should change looking through the telescope.
When the interference pattern did not change they claim that physical quantities
data would not change when rotated 90 degrees or 1 = 1 +i
A. Michelson and E. Morley
Handymen in white ropes confusions of an Experiment
In General
V = v = Velocity of Earth assuming that emitter - receiver line-up with earth line
travel at start and during this whole experiment. That would be the x-x line
X' ------Earth moving in this direction with velocity v -----------X
And C = c at start
What is turning is the table that has the lamb and the mirrors and the telescope on
top of it.
Page 88
1-Assume θ = 0° Arm A
Then: V = v; C = c; d = d
Forward is C-V = c - v
Backward C+V = c + v
And t = d/ (c-v) + d/ (c + v)
2- Assume θ = 90° then e î 90 = î Arm B
Then V = v; C = c î; d = d î
Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)
V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î means along the y-y
axis
Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)
And comes to this is Position I
Position 1: Right-Upper
Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]
Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 +
v²/c²)]
Now Position II
3-Assume θ = 90° Arm A
Then: V = v; C = ỉ c; d = d
Forward is C-V = -v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²) MMX mistake √ (c² -
v²)
Backward C+V = v + c î; and its measure is = √ (c² + v²)
And t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]
4- Assume θ = 90° + 90° =180 then e î 180 = -î Arm B
Then V = v; C = -c; d = d
Forward is C-V = -c - v; V is along the x-x and has no component on y-y axis and î
means along the y-y axis
Backward C+V = -c + v
Then t = d/-c+ v forward and in absolute value t = d/ (c - v)
And t = d/-c -v backward and in absolute value t = d/ (c + v)
And t' (2) = d/ (c - v) + d/ (c + v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]
With t' (1) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²) = (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]
Conclusions is turning the table 90° has no effect what so ever on time length
difference
In General
If we twist the table by an angle θ then V = v; C = c e î θ; d = d e î θ; e î θ = cosine
θ + î sine θ
Now position I
V = v; C = c cosine θ + î c sine θ; d = d cosine θ + î d sine θ
Forward: C - V = c cosine θ -v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ -v) ²
+ c² sine ² θ]
Backward: C + V = c cosine θ +v + î c sine θ and its measure is √ [(c cosine θ +
v) ² + c² sine ² θ]
Page 89
Right: t (1) = d/ (c -v) +d/ (c +v) = 2dc/ (c² - v²) = (2d/c) [1/ (1- v²/c²)]
Upper: t (2) = d/√ (c² + v²) + d√ (c² + v²) = 2d/ √ (c² + v²)
= (2d/c) [1/√ (1 + v²/c²)]
If θ = 30° then,
And t (1) = d / c √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + d / c √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4]
And t (2) = d / c √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + d / c √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2)
²]
We can take (d/c) Then Multiply that at the end
If θ = 0 then,
Right: t (1)/ (d/c) = 2 / (1- v²/c²)] = 2.00000002
Upper: t (2)/ (d/c) =2/√ (1 + v²/c²)] = 1.99999999
Then δ t = 3 x 10-8 (d/c) = 3 x 10-8 (d/300,000,000) = 10 -16 d
Then δ t = 10 -16 d
If θ = 30° then,
And t (1)/ (d / c) = √ [(√ 3/2 -v/c) ² + 1 /4] + √ [(√ 3/2 + v/c) ² + 1 /4] =
0.99999134 + 1.00000866 = 2
And t (2)/ (d / c)
= √ [(1/2 -v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²] + √ [(1 /2 + v/c) ² + (√ 3/2) ²]
= 0.999995 + 1.000005 = 2
Then δ t' = 0
So the difference is
ΔΓ = δ t - δ t' = 10 -16 d
With fringe shift = c ΔΓ/ δ r = 3x10-8d/λ; λ = 5.9 x 10^-5 c m; d = 11m =1100c m
With (d/λ) = 1100/ (5.9x 10-5)
Then fringe shift = (3300x10-8)/ (5.9x 10-5) = .559322034
Well if fringe shift does not happen at angle 90° and fringe shift happens at 30°
why no shift seen?
The initial problem was and is the lineup of apparatus with earth velocity which is
impossible because of the infinite numbers of possibilities of earth motion in space
and if it happened it will be momentarily.
MMX will never work and all similar experiments will not work unless it is designed
as a 3-dimensional set-up and not a one-dimensional wish washy set-up
An ideal setup is a spherical set-up but a more realistic setup will be discussed
below how to find earth path in space
Page 91
Page 92
Chapter 17 Earth Path in real space in real time
Earth path in space is possible and Einstein can keep his relativistic
trash to himself: Self – referenced motion
There is a serious problem in all of physics and that is timing of
experiments and physics experiments theory.
Earth absolute motion is a circle that is going to tie spin to orbit motion and waiting
experimental verifications
Finding new sources of energy requires the elimination of bad physics and bad
physics is E = mc² because it is based on space - time physics and space time
physics is wrong because I can prove it wrong as follows.
What is wrong with space - time is that it is a wrong idea and it is without proofs.
Time is a human made scale and making it a dimension is scientifically stupid and
the reasoning behind accepting time as a dimension and not as a scale is the
assumption that it matches experiment. Time as a dimension allowing the
exchange of time for space or squeezing space to expand time is not acceptable to
me regardless what all Nobel prize winners have said about it and regardless what
the 100, 000 living physicists are saying about it and regardless what all 100, 000
dead physicists had said about it because it is wrong and proving it wrong is what I
can do and did the first time I read what started it and that would be the original
dumb idea and experiment in Cleveland Ohio in 1887 by Michelson and Morley.
What dumb Michelson and Morley experiment did is it started stupidity as accepted
science.
The stupidity of Michelson and Morley experiment is the following.
We can not measure something that did not happen. We can only measure
something that had happened. We can measure something in present time that
had happened in past time.
Michelson and Morley experiment is stupid because two handymen in white robes
tried to measure something in real time and wondered why they did not see it in
past time.
What we measure = what happened + what changed till things are measured.
Real time physics = event time physics + time delays physics
What we see or measure is relativistic = Absolute event + relativistic time delays
What happened is absolute = real time relativistic event - real time relativistic
effects
Page 93
Real time = event time [this is the wrong idea that started space - time stupidity]
What are missing are time delays
[Known as quantum theory and relativity theory]
This formula is my 1973 discovery that not only Nobel Prize winners are wrong but
all of physics and physicists are wrong because physics solution is based on the
idea that:
In one dimension:
The problem is very simple, I would send a signal to 2 signals to two equidistant
repeaters that send back the signal to me and the signal that comes first indicate a
motion in opposite direction. Installing a multi opposite directional repeaters
system and one signal and for each tow opposite direction have on timer will
produce Earth path in absolute space and may produce the greatest formula in all
of Physics and that would be mass motion and spin and better than that it will
erase stupidity from classrooms know as space - time.
Abstract: Finding new sources of energy require the elimination of bad physics
and bad physics is Einstein's space-time (x, y, z, ict) confusion of physics that lead
to energy fraud symbol E = mc² because energy spent is based on distance
traveled and not relative distance and distance traveled is self referenced distance
or absolute motion and finding this motion is waiting on funding for discovery since
the beginning of time and experimentally is possible. Discovering Earth absolute
motion in space could be one of the greatest discoveries in physics of all time
because it will answer the trillion dollar question if mass m spin s and absolute
motion r are related by a mathematical formula that expresses a physical law and if
this law is to be found can it explains the structural design of the solar system and
if so what applications of such a law is useful inside the nucleus to produce new
sources of energy?
Page 94
The experimental set - up
Timer T x
And d
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d
Sensor y' Emitter E y Lead Sensor y
E
Timer T y
And d
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d
Sensor z' Emitter E z Lead Sensor z
E
Timer T z
1-Assume there is a pulse emitter E shooting pulses in six different directions of the
Euclidean system of axes per unit time τ; x'-x and y'-y and z'-z axes at six
equidistant receivers of distance d and has three wire leads Ex, E y, E z connected
to three Timers Named T x , T y, and T z.
3- Three timers are named timer T x with three wires one to receiver x' and one
wire to receiver x and one wire to emitter wire lead E x and timer T y with three
wires one to receiver y' and one wire to receiver y and one wire to emitter wire
lead E y and timer T z with three wires one to receiver z' and one wire to receiver z
and one wire to emitter wire lead E z are used
4- These six pulses has their directions grouped in three sets of pairs x'-x, y'-y, z'-
z.
5- Three timers T x; T y, and T z are associated with the three axes respectively
a - Timer T x takes measurements from Emitter lead E x; receiver x' and receiver x
b - Timer T y takes measurements from Emitter lead E y; receiver y' and receiver y
c - Timer T z takes measurements from Emitter lead E z; receiver z' and receiver z
Page 95
Now
d <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<E>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> d
Sensor x' E x Lead Sensor x
Emitter
E
t x' Timer T x tx
1- Timer T x receives 3 signals
a- From lead E x a signal departures from emitter E to T x register E [T x, n = 1, 2, 3,]
b - From receiver x' a signal departures to timer T x [t x', n =1, 2, 3,]
c - From receiver x a signal departures to timer T x [t x, n =1, 2, 3,]
If t x' - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x'
And t x - T x is the travel time from emitter E to receiver x
Conclusion:
The idea of this experiment is to find distance travel segments r (1); r (2); r (3); r
(4); ...ETC; then join them together.
With [r (1); τ]
O -------------- O [r (4); τ]
- - O ------------------
[r (2); τ] - -
- - [r (3); τ]
- O
r (1) = X1 + Y1 + Z1
r (2) = X2 + Y2 + Z2
r (1) = X3 + Y3 + Z3
r (4) = X4 + Y4 + Z4
The smaller the signal time interval or period τ then the more accurate the
experiment. Such a set-up is not only capable of finding absolute motion but it will
give clues to finding the relation between mass m spin s and its orbit r of planet
Earth. If mass m motion r and spin s are found to be related it will the greatest
formulas of all time because all there is in the Universe is mass m space r and spin
s. Earth mass m and spin s are know but mass r is Earth absolute motion that had
been waiting on funding for discovery since the beginning of time.
Page 97
Chapter 18
Johann Georg Von Soldner 1801 light bending historical mistake
Proof:
With (2): d (r²θ')/d t = 0
Then r²θ' = constant = h
Differentiate with respect to time
θ ς
Real time orbit: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ [λ (r) + ỉ ω (r)] t
This equation is real time Universal mechanics solution
[λ + ỉ ω (r)] t
This: r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] ℮ (r) --------------------------------- I
It is the math formula that matches a physical experiment
If time is frozen that is t = 0
Then r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] we get the classical or event time solution ----------- II
Relativistic is the difference between I and II
Or, θ” (θ, t) = - 2 ì ω (r) [h/ r² (θ, 0)] [cosine 2 ω (r) t + ί sine 2 ω (r) t]
Page 100
Or ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² radians
Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) degrees
Or, ψ ≈ 4 (v/c) ² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds
With v² = GM/R
Then ψ ≈ 4 GM/R c² x (180/π) x 3600 seconds
Einstein with the help of others rigged eternity to come up with 4 (v/c) ² and not 2 (v/c)
² to justify experimental illusions or 2[2(v/c) ²]
Ψ = 7200 [arc tan (437.89 / 300,000)] sine 2 [arc tan (437.89/300,000)]
= 1.757855865 arc second
MR Eddington: keep the trash to England Royals
101
Real time Physics: We can only measure past events. We can not measure
something that did not happen. We can only measure things that had happened.
What we measure is not what happened. We measure in present time an event
that happened in past time.
If an event happens on Planet Mercury and the event is seen from the Sun at event
time t, then this same event would be seen from Earth in real time as time Γ = t +
ΔΓ
Γ = t + (Γ - t)
Real time = Event time + time delays
Γ = t + Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y) = t + Δ Γ
Δ Γ = Δ Γ (x) + ỉ Γ (y)
Δ Γ (x) is along the line of sight time delays
Δ Γ (y) is perpendicular to the line of sight time delays
Γ = t (Γ/t)
ỉωt ỉωt
Γ=te ; Γ/t = e
ίωt
Γ=te
ίωt ίωt
Multiplying by c, then r = c Γ = c t e = r0 e ; ω T = arc tan (v/c)
ίωt
Or r = r0 e
Page 103
Case I
Constant velocity of light principle: v 0 = ω r 0 = c
Then
Ex = (m/2) [(c² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c² sine 2ω t]
Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² sine 2ω t]
Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t
A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)
Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t
Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (v 0/c)]
Ex = - m c² sine 2 [arc tan (c/c)]
Ex = - m c²
B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]
Ex = - m c² sine 2ω t
Ex = - m c² sine 2[π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]
Case II
Rest Energy Principle: v 0 = 0; ω r 0 = c
Then
Ex = (m/2) [(0² - c²) cosine 2ω t - 2 c (0) sine 2ω t]
Ex = (m/2) [- 2 c² cosine 2ω t]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t
A – Light aberration ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)
Ex = - m c² cosine ω T= arc tan (v 0/c)
Ex = - m c² cosine 2 [arc tan (0/c)]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2 (0)
Ex = - m c²
B – Michelson and Morley ω T = [π/2 + arc tan (v 0/c)]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2ω t
Ex = - m c² cosine 2[π/2 + arc tan (0/c)]
Ex = - m c² cosine 2(π/2)
Ex = - m c² cosine π
Ex = - m c² (-1)
Ex = m c²
Page 104
Michelson Morley
This 1907 Nobel Prize winner Dude along with this Dude put a Lamp two mirrors
and a telescope on a round rotating table.
This was the set –up.
Page 105
Michelson and Morley looked at the virtual image from the two mirrors of
light reflections through the telescope. They claim that if they to rotate the
table then the image should change. When Michelson and Morley rotated
the table in 1887 and the image did not change they claim that you can
rotate data without change in results!
Then conclusion of this wacky claim that won a Nobel Prize is that
The number 1 can be replaced by 1 + i; i is the complex number
Page 106
i
The crooks of “University” are using visual effects to claim Dark energy or an
expansion of 500 years of western stupidity and fraud in physics
Page 107
Chapter 20: special relativity stupidity
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a
location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)
With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc
tan (v/c)
In absolute value S = r
Along the line of measurement: S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] ≈ r √ [1-(v/c) ²];
v/c << 1
This the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories
But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent and not real
These are time dilatation equations given by Einstein’s special relativity theory.
Two observers observing the same thing the time dilations are
Then, t x = t √ [1-(v/c) ²]; t = {1/√ [1-(v/c) ²]} t x absolute math; Lab purposes
And, t x' = t √ [1-(v'/c) ²]; t' = {1/√ [1-(v'/c) ²]} t x' absolute math; Lab
purposes
5- Energy
E = m (0) c²; v = 0
Page 111
Chapter 21
Quantum mechanics Copenhagen Cyclic Interpretation
Ape Man Modern Physicist Nobel Prize Ape Ass.
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
S = m r; State = mass x location:
P = d S/d t = m (d r/d t) + (dm/d t) r = Total moment
= change of location + change of mass
= m v + m' r; v = velocity = d r/d t; m' = mass change rate
F = d P/d t = d²S/dt² = Total force
= m (d²r/dt²) +2(dm/d t) (d r/d t) + (d²m/dt²) r
= m γ + 2m'v +m" r; γ = acceleration; m'' = mass acceleration rate
In polar coordinates system
r = r r (1) ;v = r' r(1) + r θ' θ(1) ; γ = (r" - rθ'²)r(1) + (2r'θ' + r θ")θ(1)
r = location; v = velocity; γ = acceleration
F = m γ + 2m'v +m" r
F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/mr) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-GmM/r²] r (1) ---------------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law
Page 112
Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Page 113
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And - h² u² (d² u/ d θ ²) – (1/u) (h u²) ² = 0
Then (d² u/ d θ ²) + u = 0
Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t
Or, r = r 0 e í (θ + ω t)
í ω (r) t
Arabs real time astronomy is actually quantum mechanics r = r0 e
Light is emitted and not an emitter and humans have no means of measuring light
in motion and at best they can take a snap shot.
In mathematical language
Then r (θ, 0) = r 0 e í θ at t = 0
And r (θ, t) = r 0 e í (θ + ω t) = r 0 e í θ e í ω t = r (θ, 0) e í ω t
And r (θ, t) = r (θ, 0) [cosine ω t + í sine ω t]
And r x (θ, t) = r x (θ, 0) cosine ω t
And ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]
Then ∆ r = r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)
= r x (θ, 0) [(cosine ω t) – 1]
And [r x (θ, t) - r x (θ, 0)]/ r x (θ, 0)
= [(1 - 2 sine² ω t/2) – 1]
= - 2 sine ² ω t/2; ω t = cosine-1 [r x (θ, t) / r x (θ, 0)]
rabs real time astronomy:
Image = Image = I
Object = Object = O
- Object = - Object = - O
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
Figure - 1
Newton and Hooke reiterated the same thing as Kepler and wrote: r/ t2 = k/r2
Astronomers found that the motion is not an ellipse but a rotating ellipse
Einstein wrote another acceleration law r/t2 = k/ r2 + k1/r4 to describe a rotating ellipse
7 billion people were told by Alfred Nobel prize winner physicists that Planets rotate
around the Sun in a rotating ellipse
I am Joe Nahhas
And I am better than good and I am after Alfred Nobel Institution head
Page 117
Mercur
y
θ
ψ
Sun
It is a fact that Astronomers see this axis tilt and Einstein got a formula for it: ψ = {6 π G
M/a c² (1 - ε²)} [180/ π] [36526/T (days)][3600]
G = 6.673 x 10-11= gravitational acceleration constant
M =2x1030kg = mass of the Sun
Page 118
Page 119
I am not saying that Alfred Nobel physicists are idiots to say the
least but what I am saying is that Alfred Nobel prize winner
physics is stupidity itself and Alfred Nobel prize winner
physicists are crooks to be exact. Time is not a structure like
space to allow Alfred Nobel Institution to dictate stupidity in
classrooms on the rest of us and Alfred Nobel Physicists can
keep stupidity to themselves. Alfred Nobel prize is worth 1001
times in money. Alfred Nobel prize is a 1 billion dollar business
each. Big Institutions with massive funding needs backed bad
physics and idiots for physicists for 1 billion dollars prize and
the world stuck with garbage for physics.
What is modern physics?
Did anyone hear the big bang? Did anyone saw a black hole? Did anyone find Einstein’s gravity waves?
Did anyone hook up a hose to the sky and funnel dark energy to verify E = mc2? Does anyone have a
proof of Newton’s action at a distance? Does anyone have a proof of Einstein time travel? Does anyone
figure out why humans have to accept Alfred Nobel prize winners nuclear claims that the universe is
made up of particles that dies and rebirth billion billion times a second? Hey dude I am a redneck one
grandfather was a damn farmer and my other grandfather was a damn Carpenter and my father was a
much damn redneck I sometimes feel reluctant to claim him but I never knew what a dumb ass really is
till I met my science teacher talking about the greatest idiots of physics starting With the seven idiots in
order Copernicus Galileo Newton and Einstein!
Page 120
All there is in the Universe is objects of mass m moving in space (x, y, z) at a location
r = r (x, y, z). The state of any object in the Universe can be expressed as the
product
F = m [(r"-rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)] + 2m'[r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] + (m" r) r
(1)
= [d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'²] r (1) + (1/m r) [d (m²r²θ')/d t] θ (1)
= [-G m M/r²] r (1) -------------------- Newton's Gravitational Law
Page 121
Proof:
First r = r [cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ] = r r (1)
Define r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Define v = d r/d t = r' r (1) + r d[r (1)]/d t
= r' r (1) + r θ'[- sine θ î + cosine θĴ]
= r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)
Define θ (1) = -sine θ î +cosine θ Ĵ;
And with r (1) = cosine θ î + sine θ Ĵ
Then d [θ (1)]/d t= θ' [- cosine θ î - sine θ Ĵ= - θ' r (1)
And d [r (1)]/d t = θ' [-sine θ î + cosine θ Ĵ] = θ' θ (1)
Define γ = d [r' r (1) + r θ' θ (1)] /d t
= r" r (1) + r'd [r (1)]/d t + r' θ' r (1) + r θ" r (1) +r θ'd [θ (1)]/d t
γ = (r" - rθ'²) r (1) + (2r'θ' + r θ") θ (1)
With d² (m r)/dt² - (m r) θ'² = F (r)
And d (m²r²θ')/d t = 0
With m = constant, then
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = F (r) Eq-1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
With d² r/dt² - r θ'² = 0 Eq–1
And d (r²θ')/d t = 0 Eq-2
Page 122
Then u = A e - í θ
Then r 0 (θ, 0) = (1/A) e í θ
And r 0 (θ, 0) = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ
And r = r 0 (0, 0) e í θ e ỉ ω t
í (θ + ω t)
Or, r = r 0 e
What I am saying Dear Pope is this is the equation of motion of
any planet!
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
Sun r
r s Mercury
r1 r0 r m
X1 r2
X2
Earth
Page 123
In mathematical form: r1 = x1 + r s
And r2 = x2 + r m
Then r2 - r1 = x2 - x1 + r m – r s
Or, r = r0 + (r m – r s)
To find the extreme values of r,
Then: d r/d t = d r0/d t+ (d r m/d t – d r s/ d t) = 0
And d r m/d t = d r s/ d t
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
Now Planet Mercury motion is r m = r m 0 e
The Sun Motion is r s = r s 0 e í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
í [θ (m) + ω (m) t]
And d r m/d t = r m 0 [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] e
í [θ (s) + ω (s) t]
And d r s/ d t = r s 0 [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] e
And [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] = [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)]
Is: [θ’ (s) + ω (s)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r s 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
Page 124
Is: [θ’ (e) + ω (e)] - [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600)
= [(r m 0/ r e 0) -1] [θ’ (m) + ω (m)] x (180/π) x (36526/88) x (3600) = 43
r m 0
r s 0
M M Mercury S Sun
r m0 r 0
Page 125
Mercury
r
θ
Sun
Figure - 1
Page 126
Page 127
Mercury
θ
Ψ
Sun
Ψ ° = (-720/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} sine² {Inverse tan [(v* + v°)/c]} Degrees
And multiplication by 1 century = 36526 days and using T in days