ChemComm
FEATURE ARTICLE
1. Introduction
The uorescence technique has been widely used in diverse
elds ranging from optical materials, analytical chemistry,
protein conformation studies to biological assays by taking
advantage of its exquisite sensitivity (even at the single molecule
level) and selectivity, cost-eectiveness, facile operation, and
superb spatial and temporal resolutions.16 In addition, it
enables the design of a new generation of uorescent chemosensors and biosensors via the facile modulation of relevant
photophysical properties of uorophores when combined with
proton-, energy- and electron-transfer processes, heavy-atom
eects, changes of electronic density, and destabilization of a
non-emissive np* excited state.68 Recently, uorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) has been utilized for designing
chemosensors and biosensors to achieve quantitative ratiometric
sensing, which can eectively eliminate background interferences
and the uctuation of detection conditions through the selfcalibration of two emissive bands.9 Moreover, it has also been
introduced to the eld of studying protein binding/interactions
and exchanging dynamics of guest molecules encapsulated
within polymeric assemblies and those occurred between unimer
chains and polymeric micelles.1012 In addition, uorescent lifetimes can oer extra information. One of the limitations of
CAS Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Chemistry, Department of
Polymer Science and Engineering, Hefei National Laboratory for
Physical Sciences at the Microscale, University of Science and
Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China.
E-mail: sliu@ustc.edu.cn
3262
View Online
Changhua Li
This journal is
3263
View Online
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration for the fabrication responsive DHBCbased highly selective and sensitive uorescence turn-on probes for
uoride ions working in purely aqueous media by exploiting uoride
ions-induced cyclization reaction of non-uorescent moieties to induce
the formation of uorescent coumarin moieties within the thermoresponsive block. Reproduced with permission from ref. 59. Copyright
2011 American Chemical Society.
Scheme 1 Three main types of strategies employed in designing
uorescent polymeric assemblies and NPs with external stimuliresponsive emission characteristics: lighting up uorescence, tuning
uorescence emission, and modulating FRET processes.
View Online
Fig. 2 Synthesis of spiropyran (SP)-embedded polymeric NPs via emulsion polymerization and the proposed SPMC transition upon
UV irradiation. Reproduced with permission from ref. 64 (Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society).
can be covalently coupled together to aord a highly uorescent product (Fig. 3).72 Original examples of uorogenic
click reaction were based on coumarin derivatives and were
independently reported by the Wang72 and Fahrni73 research
groups. Wooley et al.74 utilized the uorogenic click reaction
to evaluate the availability of alkynyl functionalities within the
core of shell cross-linked (SCL) block copolymer micelles on
the basis of azide-functionalized coumarin, 3-azidocoumarin.
They synthesized amphiphilic block copolymers with alkynyl
moieties covalently attached to the hydrophobic block via
RAFT polymerization. The self-assembly of these amphiphilic
block copolymers in aqueous media followed by shell crosslinking aorded SCL micelles bearing alkyl groups within the
core domain. The reactivity and availability of alkynyl functionalities were successfully evaluated via uorogenic click
reaction with 3-azidocoumarin. Based on the same principle,
uorogenic click reaction was also employed to evaluate the
reactivity of alkynyl or azide moieties on the surface of
polymeric NPs75,76 and to monitor the completeness of the
proteinpolymer conjugation process.77
Since Cu(I) is an indispensible catalyst during the click
reaction, OReilly et al.78 recently utilized the uorogenic
click reaction to investigate the catalytic activity of a
Cu(I)/terpyridine complex within SCL polymeric micelles.
They synthesized amphiphilic block copolymers bearing
terpyridine moieties in the hydrophobic block via NMP. The
amphiphilic copolymers self-assembled into spherical micelles
and were cross-linked in the shell layer to aord SCL micelles
with terpyridine moieties located in the hydrophobic core.
After forming the Cu(I)terpyridine complex within SCL micelles,
the uorogenic click reaction between non-uorescent phenylethynyl and 3-azidocoumarin was then conducted in the
presence of SCL micelles. The availability and catalytic
activity of terpyridine moieties, after complexation with
Cu(I), can then be quantied on the basis of the uorescence
emission intensities.
Fig. 3 Schematic representation of a typical uorogenic click reaction. Reproduced with permission from ref. 72. Copyright 2010 The Royal
Society of Chemistry.
This journal is
3265
View Online
2.2.
Fig. 4 (A) Schematic illustration of the MMP-specic polymeric nanoparticle based optical nanosensor (NS). When MMPs meet the NS at the
site of disease, cleavage of the uorogenic peptide occurs owing to specic substrate recognition by the MMPs, aording pronounced NIR
uorescence signal recovery due to dequenching of the dye (Cy5.5). (B) MMP-specic NS. After cleavage of the peptide substrate by MMPs, NIR
uorescence dyes are released from NPs and uoresce brightly. (C) Chemical structures of polymeric NPs and MMP-sensitive uorogenic peptide.
Reproduced with permission from ref. 80. Copyright 2010 The American Chemical Society.
3266
This journal is
View Online
Fig. 5 Construction of uorogenic sensors via the integration of negatively charged AIE-active uorogens (TPECOOH4) with water-soluble
amine-caged charge-generation polymers (CGPs) exhibiting selective and specic analyte-triggered switching from the initially uncharged state to
cationic polyelectrolytes. Reproduced with permission from ref. 87. Copyright 2011 Wiley-VCH.
This journal is
3267
View Online
View Online
Fig. 7 Thermo-responsive P(DMAPAM-co-NTBAM-co-DBDAE) copolymer in aqueous solution serves as a uorescent molecular thermometer.
(A) Fluorescence intensity changes upon heating and cooling cycles. Inset: uorescence emission spectra. (B) Visual and uorescent images recorded
at temperatures below and above the LCST. Reproduced with permission from ref. 95. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society.
3269
View Online
Fig. 9 (a) Schematic design of pH-switchable micellar uorescent nanoprobes. (b) Structures of PEO-b-(PR-r-TMR) diblock copolymers (dialkyl
and cyclic series). Reproduced with permission from ref. 113. Copyright
2011 Wiley-VCH.
View Online
Fig. 10 The utilization of PNIPAM nanogels covalently labeled with NPTUA moieties as a ratiometric uorescent sensor for Hg2+ ions with
thermo-enhanced detection sensitivity due to thermo-induced collapse of thermo-responsive nanogels. Reproduced with permission from ref. 116.
Copyright 2010 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
3271
View Online
View Online
Fig. 12 (a) Synthetic schemes employed for the preparation of thermo- and photo-responsive P(NIPAM-DMNA-NBDAE-RhBEA) microgels
via emulsion polymerization. (b) A schematic illustration of tuning the eciency of FRET processes within P(NIPAM-DMNA-NBDAE-RhBEA)
microgels by temperature, UV irradiation, or a combination of them. Reproduced with permission from ref. 131. Copyright 2011 The Royal
Society of Chemistry.
3273
View Online
View Online
Fig. 15 Schematic illustration of the construction of polymeric micelles-based reversible three-state switchable multicolor luminescent system
fabricated from amphiphilic and thermo-responsive diblock copolymer, P(St-co-NBDAE-co-SPMA)-b-P(NIPAM-co-RhBAM), bearing NBDAE
and photo-switchable SPMA uorophores in the hydrophobic PS block and pH-switchable RhBAM dyes in the thermo-responsive PNIPAM
block. Also shown are macroscopic images recorded under UV light. Reproduced with permission from ref. 140. Copyright 2010 Wiley-VCH.
The FRET donor (NBDAE) and two types of acceptors, pHswitchable RhBAM and photoswitchable SPMA, were all
covalently attached to diblock copolymer chains (Fig. 15).140
On/o uorescence switching of the latter two types of acceptor
dyes can be controlled by pH changes and light, respectively.
RhBAM moieties are non-uorescent at pH > 6 and highly
emissive at pH o 6. Thus, this novel type of dye combination
facilely leads to the construction of three-state switchable multicolor luminescent systems: (a) NBDAE emission at pH 7 under
visible light; (b) NBDAE/RhBAM (open form) FRET system
below pH 6 under visible light; (c) NBDAE/MCMA FRET
system at pH 7 upon UV irradiation. Moreover, the eciency
of the FRET process between NBDAE and ring-opened
This journal is
5. Conclusions
Fluorescent chemosensors and biosensors render in vitro and
in vivo biological assays and in situ process monitoring much
more facile with exquisite sensitivity and selectivity. Nanosized
uorescent polymeric assemblies and NPs have now become a
fascinating new tool in this eld by taking advantage of their
photostability, stimuli-responsiveness, aqueous dispersibility,
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 32623278
3275
View Online
Acknowledgements
The nancial support from National Natural Scientic Foundation
of China (NNSFC) Project (51033005, 20874092, and 91027026)
and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1 A. P. Demchenko, Introduction to Fluorescence Sensing, Springer,
Berlin/Heidelberg, 2008.
2 R. Mart nez-Manez and F. Sancenon, Chem. Rev., 2003, 103,
44194476.
3 K. Rurack and U. Resch-Genger, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2002, 31,
116127.
4 W. S. Han, H. Y. Lee, S. H. Jung, S. J. Lee and J. H. Jung,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 19041915.
5 F. Mancin, E. Rampazzo, P. Tecilla and U. Tonellato, Chem.Eur. J.,
2006, 12, 18441854.
6 L. Prodi, New J. Chem., 2005, 29, 2031.
7 L. Prodi, F. Bolletta, M. Montalti and N. Zaccheroni, Coord.
Chem. Rev., 2000, 205, 5983.
8 A. P. de Silva, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, T. Gunnlaugsson, A. J. M.
Huxley, C. P. McCoy, J. T. Rademacher and T. E. Rice, Chem. Rev.,
1997, 97, 15151566.
9 K. E. Sapsford, L. Berti and I. L. Medintz, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 45624588.
10 S. F. Martin, M. H. Tatham, R. T. Hay and I. D. W. Samuel,
Protein Sci., 2008, 17, 777784.
11 S. Jiwpanich, J. H. Ryu, S. Bickerton and S. Thayumanavan,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 1068310685.
12 S. W. A. Reulen and M. Merkx, Bioconjugate Chem., 2010, 21,
860866.
13 C. Pietsch, U. S. Schubert and R. Hoogenboom, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 87508765.
14 J. M. Hu and S. Y. Liu, Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 83158330.
15 H. N. Kim, Z. Guo, W. Zhu, J. Yoon and H. Tian, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2011, 40, 7993.
16 L. Bau, P. Tecilla and F. Mancin, Nanoscale, 2011, 3, 121133.
17 Y. Shiraishi, R. Miyamoto, X. Zhang and T. Hirai, Org. Lett.,
2007, 9, 39213924.
18 Y. Shiraishi, T. Inoue and T. Hirai, Langmuir, 2010, 26,
1750517512.
19 Y. Shiraishi, R. Miyarnoto and T. Hirai, Langmuir, 2008, 24,
42734279.
20 D. P. Wang, R. Miyamoto, Y. Shiraishi and T. Hirai, Langmuir,
2009, 25, 1317613182.
21 Q. Yan, J. Y. Yuan, W. Z. Yuan, M. Zhou, Y. W. Yin and
C. Y. Pan, Chem. Commun., 2008, 61886190.
22 V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 25962599.
23 K. B. Sharpless, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 20242032.
24 B. S. Sumerlin and A. P. Vogt, Macromolecules, 2009, 43, 113.
25 M. F. Cunningham, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2002, 27, 10391067.
26 W. A. Braunecker and K. Matyjaszewski, Prog. Polym. Sci.,
2007, 32, 93146.
27 C. J. Hawker, A. W. Bosman and E. Harth, Chem. Rev., 2001,
101, 36613688.
28 V. Coessens, T. Pintauer and K. Matyjaszewski, Prog. Polym.
Sci., 2001, 26, 337377.
29 M. Ouchi, T. Terashima and M. Sawamoto, Chem. Rev., 2009,
109, 49635050.
30 J. Chiefari, Y. K. Chong, F. Ercole, J. Krstina, J. Jeery, T. P. T. Le,
R. T. A. Mayadunne, G. F. Meijs, C. L. Moad, G. Moad,
E. Rizzardo and S. H. Thang, Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 55595562.
31 A. E. Smith, X. Xu and C. L. McCormick, Prog. Polym. Sci.,
2010, 35, 4593.
32 A. B. Lowe and C. L. McCormick, Prog. Polym. Sci., 2007, 32,
283351.
33 M. Beija, M.-T. Charreyre and J. M. G. Martinho, Prog. Polym.
Sci., 2011, 36, 568602.
34 I. Lee, Y. Yoo, Z. Cheng and H. K. Jeong, Adv. Funct. Mater.,
2008, 18, 40144021.
This journal is
View Online
35 S. H. Bae, S. Il Yoo, W. K. Bae, S. Lee, J. K. Lee and B. H. Sohn,
Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 41854187.
36 J. Peng, M. Chen, F. Qiu, Y. Yang, B. H. Sohn and D. H. Kim,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 2008, 93, 183303.
37 S. I. Yoo, S. H. Bae, K. S. Kim and B. H. Sohn, Soft Matter,
2009, 5, 29902996.
38 S. I. Yoo, J.-H. Lee, B.-H. Sohn, I. Eom, T. Joo, S. J. An and
G.-C. Yi, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2008, 18, 29842989.
39 H. G. Schild, Prog. Polym. Sci., 1992, 17, 163249.
40 R. Pelton, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2000, 85, 133.
41 S. Dai, P. Ravi and K. C. Tam, Soft Matter, 2009, 5, 25132533.
42 S. Dai, P. Ravi and K. C. Tam, Soft Matter, 2008, 4, 435449.
43 C. D. H. Alarcon, S. Pennadam and C. Alexander, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2005, 34, 276285.
44 D. Roy, J. N. Cambre and B. S. Sumerlin, Prog. Polym. Sci.,
2010, 35, 278301.
45 C. Weber, R. Hoogenboom and U. S. Schubert, Prog. Polym.
Sci., 2012, DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.10.002.
46 J. V. M. Weaver, S. P. Armes and S. Y. Liu, Macromolecules,
2003, 36, 99949998.
47 D. Wang, J. Yin, Z. Y. Zhu, Z. S. Ge, H. W. Liu, S. P. Armes and
S. Y. Liu, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 73787385.
48 J. Xu, J. Ye and S. Y. Liu, Macromolecules, 2007, 40, 91039110.
49 Y. M. Zhou, K. Q. Jiang, Q. L. Song and S. Y. Liu, Langmuir,
2007, 23, 1307613084.
50 H. X. Xu, J. Xu, Z. Y. Zhu, H. W. Liu and S. Y. Liu,
Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 84518455.
51 Z. S. Ge, J. M. Hu, F. H. Huang and S. Y. Liu, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 17981802.
52 Y. K. Yang, K. J. Yook and J. Tae, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
1676016761.
53 X. L. Zhang, Y. Xiao and X. H. Qian, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2008, 47, 80258029.
54 Y. Xiang and A. J. Tong, Org. Lett., 2006, 8, 15491552.
55 J. M. Hu, C. H. Li and S. Y. Liu, Langmuir, 2010, 26, 724729.
56 J. M. Hu, L. Dai and S. Y. Liu, Macromolecules, 2011, 44,
46994710.
57 X. J. Wan and S. Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 1032110329.
58 T. Liu and S. Y. Liu, Anal. Chem., 2011, 83, 27752785.
59 Y. Y. Jiang, X. L. Hu, J. M. Hu, H. Liu, H. Zhong and S. Y. Liu,
Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 87808790.
60 R. Guglielmetti, Photochromism: Molecules and Systems, Elsevier,
Amsterdam, revised edn, 2003.
61 M. Irie, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 16851716.
62 G. Berkovic, V. Krongauz and V. Weiss, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100,
17411754.
63 M. Irie, T. Fukaminato, T. Sasaki, N. Tamai and T. Kawai,
Nature, 2002, 420, 759760.
64 M. Q. Zhu, L. Y. Zhu, J. J. Han, W. W. Wu, J. K. Hurst and
A. D. Q. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 43034309.
65 M. Q. Zhu, G. F. Zhang, C. Li, M. P. Aldred, E. Chang, R. A.
Drezek and A. D. Q. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 365372.
66 V. I. Minkin, Chem. Rev., 2004, 104, 27512776.
67 J. D. Luo, Z. L. Xie, J. W. Y. Lam, L. Cheng, H. Y. Chen,
C. F. Qiu, H. S. Kwok, X. W. Zhan, Y. Q. Liu, D. B. Zhu and
B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2001, 17401741.
68 B.-K. An, S.-K. Kwon, S.-D. Jung and S. Y. Park, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 1441014415.
69 Y. N. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun.,
2009, 43324353.
70 Y. N. Hong, J. W. Y. Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011,
40, 53615388.
71 C. Le Droumaguet, C. Wang and Q. Wang, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2010, 39, 12331239.
72 K. Sivakumar, F. Xie, B. M. Cash, S. Long, H. N. Barnhill and
Q. Wang, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 46034606.
73 Z. Zhou and C. J. Fahrni, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
88628863.
74 R. K. OReilly, M. J. Joralemon, C. J. Hawker and K. L. Wooley,
Chem.Eur. J., 2006, 12, 67766786.
75 D. R. Breed, R. Thibault, F. Xie, Q. Wang, C. J. Hawker and
D. J. Pine, Langmuir, 2009, 25, 43704376.
76 C. E. Evans and P. A. Lovell, Chem. Commun., 2009, 23052307.
77 A. J. Dirks, J. J. L. M. Cornelissen and R. J. M. Nolte,
Bioconjugate Chem., 2009, 20, 11291138.
This journal is
3277
View Online
113 K. J. Zhou, Y. G. Wang, X. N. Huang, K. Luby-Phelps,
B. D. Sumer and J. M. Gao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50,
61096114.
114 W. T. Wu, T. Zhou, M. Aiello and S. Q. Zhou, Chem. Mater.,
2009, 21, 49054913.
115 Y. Y. Li, H. Cheng, J. L. Zhu, L. Yuan, Y. Dai, S. X. Cheng,
X. Z. Zhang and R. X. Zhuo, Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 24022406.
116 C. H. Li and S. Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 1071610723.
117 T. Liu, J. M. Hu, J. Yin, Y. F. Zhang, C. H. Li and S. Y. Liu,
Chem. Mater., 2009, 21, 34393446.
118 X. J. Wan, T. Liu and S. Y. Liu, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 40824090.
119 L. Y. Zhu, W. W. Wu, M. Q. Zhu, J. J. Han, J. K. Hurst and
A. D. Q. Li, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 35243526.
120 J. Chen, F. Zeng and S. Z. Wu, ChemPhysChem, 2010, 11,
10361043.
121 J. Chen, F. Zeng, S. Z. Wu, Q. M. Chen and Z. Tong, Chem.Eur. J.,
2008, 14, 48514860.
122 J. Chen, F. Zeng, S. Z. Wu, J. Q. Zhao, Q. M. Chen and Z. Tong,
Chem. Commun., 2008, 55805582.
123 J. A. Chen, P. S. Zhang, G. Fang, P. G. Yi, X. Y. Yu, X. F. Li,
F. Zeng and S. Z. Wu, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2011, 115, 33543362.
124 I. Yildiz, S. Impellizzeri, E. Deniz, B. McCaughan, J. F. Callan
and F. M. Raymo, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 871879.
125 B. L. Ma, S. Z. Wu, F. Zeng, Y. L. Luo, J. Q. Zhao and Z. Tong,
Nanotechnology, 2010, 21, 195501195509.
126 J. Chen, F. Zeng, S. Z. Wu, J. H. Su, J. Q. Zhao and Z. Tong,
Nanotechnology, 2009, 20, 365502365508.
3278
This journal is