INTRODUCTION
Mobile wireless industry has started its technology
creation, revolution and evolution since early 1970. From
Mid 1990s the cellular communication industry has
witnessed explosive growth. Wireless communication
networks have become much more pervasive than anyone
could have imagined when the cellular concept was first
deployed in 1960s and 1970s. Mobile cellular subscribers
are increasing 40% per year, and by the end of 2010 there
will be 4 times more mobile cellular subscription than fixed
telephone lines.
The rapid world wide growth in cellular telephone
subscribers has demonstrated conclusively that wireless
communications is a robust, viable voice and data transport
mechanism. The wide spread success of cellular has led to
the development of newer wireless system and standards
for many other types of telecommunication traffic besides
mobile voice telephone calls.
Why we use wireless communication
Wireless technology are differentiated on the basis of their
range. Some offer connectivity within few feets viz.
Bluetooth and other cover medium sized office space. The
mobile phone covers whole continents.
Wireless technology offer e-commerce more flexible and
in-expensive ways to send and receive data.
The four key benefits of wireless technology are as under:-
www.ijcsit.com
1.
2.
3.
4.
Increased
efficiency:High
technology
communication systems lead to faster transfer of
information within business and between customers.
Rarely out of touch:- No need to carry cables or
adapters in order to access office Networks.
Greater flexibility for users:- Wireless workers in
the office can be networked without sitting at
dedicated PCs.
Reduced Cost:- Wireless networks are mostly
cheaper to install and maintain than wired networks.
2545
Mohammad Meraj ud in Mir et al, / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 6 (3) , 2015, 2545-2551
1.
2.
www.ijcsit.com
2546
Mohammad Meraj ud in Mir et al, / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 6 (3) , 2015, 2545-2551
www.ijcsit.com
2547
Mohammad Meraj ud in Mir et al, / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 6 (3) , 2015, 2545-2551
Video-conferencing support.
www.ijcsit.com
Mohammad Meraj ud in Mir et al, / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 6 (3) , 2015, 2545-2551
Generation
1G
2G
14.4 Kbps
Technology
AMPS,NMT,
TACS
Time period
1970 1980
TDMA,CDMA
171.2 Kbps
20-40 Kbps
GPRS
2001-2004
CDMA 200
(1xRTT, EVDO)
UMTS, EDGE
2004-2005
14.4 Mbps
1-3 Mbps
HSPA
2006 2010
4G
100-300 Mbps.
3-5 Mbps
100 Mbps (WiFi)
WiMax
LTE
Wi-Fi
5G
Probably
gigabits
Not Yet
Soon (probably
2020)
2.5G
3G
3.5G
Speed
www.ijcsit.com
1990 to 2000
Features
During 1G Wireless phones are used for voice
only.
2G capabilities are achieved by allowing multiple
users on a single channel via multiplexing. During
2G Cellular phones are used for data also along
with voice.
2.5G the internet becomes popular and data
becomes more relevant.2.5G Multimedia services
and streaming starts to show growth. Phones start
supporting web browsing though limited and very
few phones have that.
3G has Multimedia services support along with
streaming are more popular. In 3G, Universal
access and portability across different device
types are made possible. (Telephones, PDAs,
etc.)
3.5G supports higher throughput and speeds to
support higher data needs of the consumers
Speeds for 4G are further increased to keep up
with data access demand used by various services.
High definition streaming is now supported in 4G.
New phones with HD capabilities surface. It gets
pretty cool. In 4G, Portability is increased further.
World-wide roaming is not a distant dream.
Currently there is no 5G technology deployed.
When this becomes available it will provide very
high speeds to the consumers. It would also
provide efficient use of available bandwidth
2549
Mohammad Meraj ud in Mir et al, / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 6 (3) , 2015, 2545-2551
KEY CHALLENGES
Integration of various standards: Each engineering
practice has their own standard (F.eks Telecom has 3GPP,
3GPP2, ITU, IETF, etc). To integrate these various
standards, requires systematic and time consuming
approach.
Common Platform: There is no common architecture for
interconnecting various engineering practices. One
common governing body is required, which creates a
common platform for all engineering practices to regularize
the interconnectivity issues as well as knowledge sharing.
Super core concept
Existing telecom networks are fashioned in hierarchical
way, where subscriber traffic is aggregated at aggregation
point(BSC/RNC) and then routed to gateways. Flat IP
architecture will lessen burden on aggregation point and
traffic will directly move from Base station to Media
gateways. When transition from legacy (TDM, ATM)
platforms to IP will be concluded (Flat Network concept,
described in previous section) a common ALL IP platform
will be emerged. Vision of Super Core is based on IP
platform. All network operators ( GSM,CDMA, Wimax,
Wireline) can be connected to one Super core with massive
capacity. This is realization of single network
infrastructure. The concept of super core will eliminate all
interconnecting charges and complexities, which is right
now network operator is facing. It will also reduce number
of network entities in end to end connection, thus reducing
latency considerably.
High redundancy requirement:
Under Super core concept, all network operators will be
moving to single core infrastructure, high redundancy and
security among core network entities is required. A failure
of single node will impact huge number of subscribers
across various network operators.
Transparency among network operators, regarding
Subscriber data, churn management, etc. Government
regulatory framework for Super core.
Flatter IP concept
At regular interval, semiconductor manufacturers advance
to a new generation with smaller feature sizes. This allows
them to incorporate more functions into a given area of
silicon and, hence, more features or new capabilities into
electronic devices like cell phones. As advancement semiconductor industry, 22nM CMOS will be reality and this
will increase the processing capacity of digital devices
significantly. Increased processing capacity will be allow
Mobile devices (cellphones, PDAs, etc) to do more tasks
(instructions per minute) then before. This will lead to even
the Flatter IP network. As Flat IP has shifted some of the
BSC/RNCs radio resource functions to Base station,
Flatter IP will shift some of the RR functions, to Mobile
devices from Base station. Finally your cell phone will not
be just access device but, it will also perform some of the
Radio
Resource
Management
functions.
Evolution of network infra sharing
Network operators, worldwide are opting for infrastructure
sharing. Currently trend is for passive infra sharing as
Active infra sharing has certain limitation. But at invention
and deployment of Cognitive Radios (Software based
www.ijcsit.com
2550
Mohammad Meraj ud in Mir et al, / (IJCSIT) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Vol. 6 (3) , 2015, 2545-2551
www.ijcsit.com
5
6
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
16
17
18
REFERENCES
ITU (2009). Measuring the Information Society; The ICT
Development Index, [Online] Available: http://www.itu.Int/ITU
D/ict/publications/idi/2009/material/IDI2009_w5.pdf
Mishra, Ajay K. Fundamentals of Cellular Network Planning and
Optimization, 2G/2.5G/3GEvolution of 4G, John Wiley and
Sons, 2004.
Chen, Yue (2003). Soft Handover Issues in Radio Resource
Management for 3G WCDMA Networks, Queen Mary, University
of
London,
[Online]
Available:
www.elec.qmul.ac.uk/research/thesis/YueChen2003.pdf
ITU-R PDNR WP8F. Vision, Framework and Overall Objectives of
the Future Development of IMT-2000 and Systems beyond IMT2000, 2002.
Toh, C. K. Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless Networks: Protocols and
Systems, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, 2002.
Pereira, Vasco & Sousa, Tiago. Evolution of Mobile
Communications: from 1G to 4G, Department of Informatics
Engineering of the University of Coimbra, Portugal 2004.
ITU (2010). Measuring the Information Society, 2010.[Online]
Available:
http://www.itu.int/ITUD/ict/statistics/material/graphs/2010/Global_ICT_Dev_00-10.jpg
UMTS World (2009). UMTS / 3G History and Future Milestones,
[Online] Available: http://www.umtsworld.com/umts/history.htm
Kamarularifin Abd Jalil, Mohd Hanafi Abd. Latif, Mohamad
Noorman Masrek, Looking Into The 4G Features, MASAUM
Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences Vol.1,No. 2 September 2009
3gamericas (2010). Transition to 4G: 3GPP Broadband Evolution to
IMT-Advanced, Rysavy Research/3G Americas. [Online]
Available: ww.rysavy.com/PR/3GA_PR_2010_09.pdf
Fumiyuki Adachi, Wireless past and Future: Evolving Mobile
Communication Systems. IEICE Trans. Findamental, Vol.E84-A,
No.1, January 2001.
ITU (2010). ITU Paves the Way for Next-Generation 4G Mobile
Broadband
Technologies.
[Online].Available:http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/press_releases/
2010/40.
Andrea Goldsmith, Wireless Communications, Standford University
Arogayaswami Paulraj, Rohit Nabar, Dhananjay Gore, Introduction
To Space Time Wireless Communications, Prentice Hall of India
A. V. Geramita and J. Seberry, Orthogonal Designs, Quadratic
Forms and Hadamard Matrices, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied
Mathematics, vol. 43. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, 1979.
A. Wittneben, Base station modulation diversity for digital
SIMULCAST, in Proc. IEEE VTC, May 1991.
B. Hassibi and B. Hochwald, high-rate codes that are linear in space
and time, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, April 2001.
J. Winters, J. Salz, and R. D. Gitlin, The impact of antenna diversity
on the capacity of wireless communication systems, IEEE Trans.
Communication.
L. Stuber, Principles of Mobile Communication. Boston,
M.A:Kluwer
2551