KeyWords
Column liquid chromatography
Optimization
Validation
Gramicidin
Summary
A simple, selective method is described for separation of more than 10 gramicidin components on Spherisorb ODS B, 5 I~m, 250 x 4.6 mm I. D. column, maintained at 50 ~ The mobile phase comprised methanol-water (71:29) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min 1. Detection was by
UVat 282 nm. Vahne gramicidins A, B and C were very well separated from the isoleucine gramicidins A, B and C. Four new gramicidin components were also resolved and their structures
determined by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry The names 10-methionine valine
gramicidin C 4-methionine valine gramicidin A, vahne gramicidin A hydroxypropyl and isoleucine gramicidin A hydroxypropyl were proposed. Robustnessof the liquid chromatography
method was evaluated by performing a full factorial design experiment. The method also
showed good repeatabihly, linearilyand sensitivily.
Introduction
Gramicidin, a peptide antibiotic, was first
isolated from Bacillus brevis in 1939 as a
crude complex together with a second
peptide antibiotic known as tyrocidin.
The complex containing on the average a
mixture of 20% gramicidin and 80% tyrocidin is called tyrothricin [1]. Gramicidin
is the most active component of tyrothricin [2]. It is active against gram-positive
organisms except gram-positive bacilli,
and against certain gram-negative organisms, such as the Neisseria. Gramicidin is
mainly used topically, either alone or in
Original
0009-5893/00/02
17- 05
$ 03.00/0
17
1
HCO - - W - -
4
Gly--L-Ala -- X --
10
-- D - L e u - - Z - - Y - - L - T r p - -
L-Ala - -
D-Val--
D-Val - - ]
L-Val
Gramicidin
Val A
Ile A
Val B
Ile B
Val C
Ile C
4-Met Val A*
10-Met Val*
Val A hydroxypropyl*
Ile A hydroxypropyl*
L-Val
L-Ile
L-Val
L-Ile
L-Val
L-Ile
L-Val
L-Val
L-Val
L-Ile
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
Met
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
D-Leu
Met
D-Leu
D-Leu
L-Trp
L-Trp
L-Phe
L-Phe
L-Tyr
L-Tyr
L-Trp
L-Trp
L-Trp
L-Trp
NH(CH2)2OH
NH(CH2)2OH
NH(CH2)zOH
NH(CH2)zOH
NH(CH2)zOH
NH(CH2)zOH
NH(CH2)zOH
NH(CH2)zOH
NH(CH2)3OH
NH(CH2)3OH
new
Figure 1. Structures of known and new gramicidins. Ala, alanine; Gly, glycine;Ile, isoleucine;Leu,
leucine;Met, methionine; Phe, phenylalanine;Trp, tryptophan; Tyr, tyrosine; Val, valine.
Chromatography
in their antibacterial activity [8] and therefore reliable microbiological assay can not
be performed if the sample and the standard preparations have different component ratios. Liquid chromatography (LC)
methods are capable of determining these
antibiotics rapidly, selectively and accurately.
Few LC methods for gramicidins appeared in literature. Gramicidins A, B and
C were separated on Zorbax ODS, 5 ixm,
250 2.1 mm I. D. at 60 ~ with a mobile
phase of methanol-0.005M ammonium
sulphate (74:26) at a flow rate of
1 mL min 1 with monitoring at 220 nm.
The elution order was, with increasing lipophilicity, Val C < Ile C < Val A < Ile
A < Val B < Ile B, with a typical lot containing 78% A, 8% B and 14% C [8]. Gradient elution with increasing acetonitrile
concentration, on LiChrosorb RP-8, 5 ixm
column was described for the analysis of
commercial gramicidin samples [11].
ixBondapak Phenyl, 10 ixm, 300 3.9 mm
I.D. was used to separate gramicidins
with a mobile phase of methanol-water
(75:25) at a flow rate of 1.2mLmin 1
with monitoring at 254 nm. Elution sequence is C < A < B. For preparative
chromatography, a larger column was
used [6]. Gramicidin content was determined using Hypersil ODS, 5 ixm, 250
4.2mm I. D. column with a mobile phase
of methanol-tetrahydrofuran-0.1M sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate pH 4.5
(180:20: 50) and 280nm detection [12].
Val C, Val A, Val B, Ile A and Ile B, in
that order, were resolved on poly(styrene18
Experimental
Reagentsand Samples
Methanol was from BDH Laboratory
Supplies (Poole, England). Water was distilled twice from glass apparatus. Commercial gramicidin bulk samples were
from Lundbeck (Copenhagen, Denmark),
Gist-Brocades (Delft, The Netherlands)
and Apothekernes Laboratories (Oslo,
Norway).
LCApparatus
and OperatingConditions
The isocratic LC system consisted of an
L-6200 intelligent pump (Merck-Hitachi,
Darmstadt, Germany), a Merck Hitachi
model 655A-40 autosampler set to inject
101xl, an electronic integrator HP 3396
Chromatographia 2001, 53, January (No. 1/2)
Resultsand Discussion
Optimization
of ChromatographicMethod
An LC method for gramicidin earlier developed in this laboratory utilized PSDVB
stationary phase [13]. Though this method
was an improvement on the existing LC
methods described in literature for gramicidin [6, 8, 11, 12], some minor gramicidin
components were still not resolved.
In an effort to further improve the analysis method for gramicidin we examined
the procedures described in literature [6,
8]. Isocratic systems containing methanol0.005M ammonium sulphate (74:26) [8]
or methanol-water (75:25) [6] were evaluated. It was found that the addition of the
salt did not improve chromatography.
Various organic modifiers were examined.
Original
M e t h a n o l was f o u n d to be superior in
terms of selectivity over isopropanol, acetonitrile a n d t e t r a h y d r o f u r a n . A mobile
phase of m e t h a n o l / w a t e r was used for
further work. In order to optimize the sep a r a t i o n conditions, studies were carried
out using various silica-based stationary
phases. R e s o l u t i o n of the m a j o r gramicidin c o m p o n e n t s , valine a n d isoleucine
gramicidins A, B a n d C was o b t a i n e d with
all the columns examined. However, the
best selectivity was o b t a i n e d with Inertsil
O D S 2 a n d Spherisorb O D S B stationary
phases (Table I). Baseline resolution of
valine a n d isoleucine variants was obtained on these two stationary phases. I n
addition, other m i n o r impurities were also
separated. Spherisorb O D S B c o l u m n was
retained for further use because it gave the
best selectivity a n d c o l u m n efficiency.
The c o n c e n t r a t i o n of the organic modifier in the mobile phase a n d c o l u m n temperature were optimized using D r y L a b
software (LC Resources, W a l n u t Creek,
CA, USA). LC conditions finally chosen
comprised Spherisorb O D S B m a i n t a i n e d
at 50 ~ C with a mobile phase of m e t h a n o l water (71:29) at a flow rate of 1 m L m i n 1.
The L C profile of gramicidin c o m p o n e n t s
u n d e r the optimized conditions is s h o w n
in Figure 2. The assignment of the peaks is
according to the elution order reported in
literature [8, 12]. The identity of the peaks
was confirmed by L C / M S analysis.
Robustness
%
Symmetry a
CH3OH
X-Terra RP18
Supelcosil ABZ+Plus
Supelcosil LC ABZ
YMC-Pack ODS-AQ
YMC-Pack Pro C-18
Hypersil ODS
Hypersil BDS
Inertsil ODS-2
Spherisorb ODS B
74
73
72
79
79
75
73
76
72
0.8
0.8
1.2
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.1
0.9
0.9
Original
Cb
Ao
Bd
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.8
2.0
2.0
1.0
1.9
1.6
1.9
1.7
1.9
2.3
2.5
2.8
1.5
2.1
1.8
2.9
2.3
2.4
2.6
2.6
3.6
Theoretical k 'f
platese
660
2030
1710
1860
1290
1790
2810
3510
4250
5.0
5.0
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.4
5.2
5.2
a Calculated for Val A. b Resolution between Val C and Ile C. ~ Resolution between Val A and Ile A.
d Resolution between Val B and Ile B. e Calculated for Val A. f Capacity factor calculated for Val A.
20-
10
12
~_~1
13
0
-r
10
20
30
Time (min)
40
50
Resolution
Chromatographic variable
1, 0 and + 1 levels.
Low level
1)
Methanol (%)
Column temperature (~
70
45
Central level
High level
(o)
(+ 1)
71
50
72
55
C h r o m a t o g r a p h i a 2001,
19
Figure 4. Estimated response surface plots for (a) Val C (lower plane) and
Ile C (upper plane); (b) Val A (lower plane) and Ile A (upper plane); (c)
Val B (lower plane) and Ile B (upper plane); constructed with the capacity
factors as a function of concentration of methanol in the mobile phase
and column temperature.
TaMe III. Monoisotopic mass of gramicidin components determined by mass spectrometry (MS) in
both the positive (+ve) and negative ( v e ) ion mode.
Gramicidin
Molecular
formula
Monoisotopic
mass
MS
+ve mode*
MS
~ e mode
Val A
IleA
Val B
Ile B
Val C
Ile C
4-Met Val A
10-Met Val C
Val A hydroxypropyl
Ile A hydroxypropyl
C99H140N20017
C100H142N20017
C97H139N19017
C98H141N19017
C97H139N19018
C98H141N19018
C9sH 138N20017S
C96H137N19018S
ClooH142N20017
ClolH144N20017
1881
1895
1842
1856
1858
1872
1899
1876
1895
1909
1904
1918
1865
1879
1881
1895
1922
1899
1918
1932
1880
1894
1841
1855
1857
1871
1898
1875
1894
1808
The difference in mass between the positive and the negative modes of the gramicidin components
is due to sodium adduct formation noticed in the positive ion mode.
20
Liquid Chromatography/Mass
Spectrometry(LC/MS)Analysis
The liquid chromatographic system described above was adapted for L C / M S
using a 250 2 m m I. D. column (instead
of 4.6 m m I. D.). Mass spectrometric analysis was performed with a LCQ ion trap
mass spectrometer (Finnigan M A T , San
Jose, CA, U S A ) equipped with an electrospray interface operated in the positive
Chromatographia 2001, 53, January (No. 1/2)
and the negative ion mode. The acquisition and interpretation of the mass spectrometry data are described in more detail
elsewhere [7]. The structures of gramicidin
components were elucidated by comparison of the fragmentation patterns of the
unknown minor components with the
fragmentation patterns of the known gramicidin components. The monoisotopic
mass obtained from L C / M S analysis of
the examined gramicidin components is
presented in Table III. The structures of 4
new minor components in gramicidin
commercial sample were elucidated from
the results of L C / M S analysis. The names,
4-methionine valine gramicidin A (4-Met
Val A), 10-methionine valine gramicidin
C (10-Met Val C), N-deshydroxyethyl-N(3-hydroxypropyl)-Val A (Val A hydroxypropyl) and N-deshydroxyethyl-N-(3-hydroxypropyl)-Ile A (Ile A hydroxypropyl)
were proposed. The numbering is from
the amino acid moiety located at the end
of the chain having a formyl group (Figure 1). 4-Met Val A has the same composition as Val A except that the D-leucine at
position 4 is replaced by methionine. 10Met Val C has the same composition as
Val C except that the D-leucine at position
10 is replaced by methionine. The configuration of the methionine moiety was not
elucidated. Val A hydroxypropyl and Ile
A hydroxypropyl each has a propanolamine moiety at the C-terminus instead of
ethanolamine in Val A and Ile A respectively.
Original
Acknowledgement
10-Met Val C
Val C
4-MetValA
IleC
ValA
Val A hydroxypropyl
IleA
Ile A hydroxypropyl*
ValB
IleB
Total unknown
Total gramicidins
0.3
9.8
0.8
4.1
65.7
1.0
13.2
< 0.09
3.8
0.6
0.7
100
0.5
12.0
0.9
4.4
63.7
1.2
12.2
< 0.09
3.0
0.4
0.7
99
0.5
11.6
1.0
4.3
58.1
1.4
12.7
< 0.09
2.7
0.4
2.3
95
0.5
16.5
<0.09*
2.0
58.6
0.8
7.4
< 0.09
7.1
0.8
0.3
94
0.4
21.9
<0.09*
2.8
49.8
1.0
6.1
< 0.09
6.1
0.6
0.3
89
0.3
13.3
<0.09*
3.2
52.4
0.9
10.0
< 0.09
5.7
0.9
0.3
87
SampleComposition
The composition of different commercial
gramicidin samples was compared. The
sample with the highest total area was taken as corresponding to 100% total gramicidins. The total gramicidins content of
the other samples was calculated against
this sample on the basis of total area ratio.
The composition of the samples was calculated by normalization. The result of each
peak was then multiplied by a factor corresponding to the total gramicidin content
divided by 100. Composition of the samples examined is presented in Table IV.
The composition of the major component,
Val A ranged from 50 to 66% of total gramicidins. The Ph. Eur. m o n o g r a p h for
gramicidin does not refer to gramicidin
impurities, only the identification is performed by T L C resulting in two spots or
two groups of spots for tyrothricin, which
is used as the reference substance [9]. These
Original
Conclusion
The isocratic LC method described here
allowed the separation of more than 10
gramicidin components. The structure of
6 components was described previously.
The LC method, coupled to MS, allowed
to elucidate the structures of 4 of the minor components. It was noted that the
choice of the column played an important
role in the quality of the separation. This
simple and robust method shows good selectivity, repeatability and linearity.
References
[1] Brewer, G.A. in: Florey, K. (Editor), Anal
Profiles of Drug Substances, Vol. 8, Academic Press, New York, 1979, p. 179.
[2] Martin, A.R. Antibacterial Antibiotics, in:
Delgado, J.N.; Remers, W.A. (Editors),
Wilson and Gisvold's Textbook of Organic Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, 10 th edition, Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, 1998, p. 253.
[3] Drucker, D.B. (Editor), Microbiological
application of high-perjbrmance liquid
chromatography, Cambridge University
Press, London, 1987, p. 123.
[4] Gregory, J.D.; Craig, L.C.J. Biol. Chem.
1948,172,839.
[5] Okamoto, K.; Yonezawa, H.; Izumiya, N.
J. Chromatogr. 1974, 92, 147.
[6] Koeppe II, R.E.; Weiss, L.B.J. Chromatogr. 1981, 208, 414.
[7] Govaerts, C.; Orwa, J.A.; Van Schepdael,
A.; Roets, E.; Hoogmartens, J. Rapid
Commun. Mass Spectrom., submitted.
[8] Axelsen, K.S.; Vogelsang, S.H.J. Chromatogr. 1977, 140, 174.
[9] European Pharmacopoeia, 3rd edition,
Council of Europe, Strasbourg, France,
1997.
21