prepared by the
Social Sector Policy
Analysis Project
Operated by the
Academy for Educational Development
for the
Agency for International Development
PPC/PCPR/SP
IN BANGLADESH:
Full Report:
August 1991
The evaluation of this project was supported by the Social Sector Policy Analysis Project (SSPA) operated by the
Academy for Educational Development (AED), contract no. PDC-0082-C-O0-9080-00, for the Bureau for Program
and Policy Coordination, Office of Policy Development and Program Reviev (PPC/PuiPR) of the U. S. Agency for
International Development (AID). Funding for the preliminary analysis of the Weaning Intervention was provided by
PPC/PDPR of AID under contract no PDC-0032-0-00-8118-00. The field project itself was funded by the Asia and
Near East Bureau r! 'ID (ANE/TR) through the U.S. Office of International Health (OIH) under the rublic Health
Service Contract NO. 282-86-0011.2
IHealth.
..............................................
Give Me Food...
I tell you,
I'll give up all other demands of mine....
If you can't satisfy this demand of mine,
things will go very wrong in your kingdom.
The hungry one does not know
what is right or wrong,
what is good or bad,
he does not know rules or statutes...
This
simpletohunger
for encompass
food,
if allowed
grow and
everything,
can surely bring about a disastrous end...
G;ve me food...
prodctio.
Be
Hlen rmsrong
Table of Contents
Glossary of Terms
Policy Recommendations
10
Conclusions
15
Glossary of Terms
Anthropometric measurements:
measures of body size, used here to
indicate weight and arm
circumference,
BRAC:
Bangladesh Rural Advancement
Committee
Chop Chop:
energy-rich complementary food
Complementary foods:
(complement) breastmilk.
Daily wage:
Energy adequacy:
(e.g., lactating).
FAO/WHO/UNU:
Nations University.
standards.
Severe malnutrition:
sex.
Tubewell:
surface.
Weight adequacy:
WHO:
/t
................... ................
...............
...
...
....
..........
MOTIVATIONAL
happy.
intron
much breastmilk.
4.
CORRCT BEASTEEDNG
TCIINQUEassessment
6. When baby feeds or! both breasts, he drinks
feeding.
Bangla version.
socioeconomic indicators,
anthropometric measurements,
dietary information (based on 24
hour recall), and child morbidity
data (based on 30-day recall).
Comparison of treatment and
control groups permitted
nutritional requirements.
...............................................................................................................
Intervention
..........................................................................................................
3.
4.
your baby.
..................................................................................................................
Fig 3. ENERGY ADEQUACY OF
LACTATING MOTHERS'DIETS
Before and After Nutrition Education
100%
68..
60%
55%
4%
40%
20%
0%1I
I
Before Education
May-July
*Oct-Nov
Fcb-March
-
62%.,.
..
Treatment (n=39)
Control (n=28)
*Change from Feb-Mar to Oct-Nov significantly
for treatment than control (adjusted
for other significant factors)
90%
8 5%
_
75%_"_--____....
70%
Before Education
Oct-Nov*
My-July
Treatment (n=62)
...Control (n-55)
Average child age May-July 8 mos, Oct-N, 13 mos,
100% children breastifeeding
..........................................
Fig 5. SEVERE MALNUTRITION
0
L
X:
30%
21%
20%
16%
.........
........
1%io
o%-_.,._"______.________
Before Educaion
May-July
Treatment (n=62)
*Oct-Nov
....
Control (n=55)
for treatment.
o e nly
86 p etre t mt
e cntrolp
group, were consuming
romplee y fods.
is
.............................................................
00
25%
FAO/WHO/UNU).
20%
15%
10%
27%
18% .......
*........
17%
5%
0%
Before Education
*Oct-Nov
"-July
-
Treatment (n=62)
- Control (n=55)
Breastmilk estimates not included
*Change in adequacy (adjusted) significantly
better for treatment than control
Ave age: Before-8 mos, Oct/Nov-13 mos
25
25
20
[
0 15._
U
121
.
5
4.3
3.4
2.6
0
4-7 mo
Food Gap
-C h i t d Food Consumed
.............................................................................................................................
.
.
z
4o9 ..
31%
20%
A.
,,
,"
0%
'"
.
Vegrrut
R4'VEgg/Meat
Treatment (n=62)
Control (n=55)
Feedingcomplementary foods.
,Y
................
o%
Oi
10
Policy Recommendations
From the experience of this
1. Incorporate natrition
education for improving
women's diets into programs
that make these
iml 'rovements a!fordable,
Cofdlthof rn Buglades
prcjects, agricultural
production, hcme gardens, or
subsidized or donatted food
programs.
children.
12
.........................................
Fig 9. DAILY COST OF PROVIDING INFANT
FORMULA, COW MILK#, OR BREASTMILK*
Compared with Daily Wage in Bangladesh
30
25
25
20.5
0
U
15
'
____,__--__,______
::."N:
10
,
:
O .;'.
0D,
.,
..,, .: +,l
. ,
.... .
''
l -;;'.'+ ,.-I .
m,,
'
C,
breastmilk substitute.
*Breastmilk based on additional food
costs to improve lactating mother's diet
Costs computed for child 0-6 months.
,.
-+,:I
Milk.
__._,
7."
_---_,"_
inc nfoote
n a mels.
They confronted the self-sacrificing
cultural taboos ingrained in the
5.3
' .,"
l..c ,,-
..
. '
B-.,'mr,
Bastmiko
13
memorable.
What a man brings home from the market determines the family diet.
v.A
14
education.
,
.
iN
women.
..
15
Conclusions
An evaluation of two nutrition
education interventions in rural
Bangladesh confirms that culturally
appropriate nutrition messages can
change infant feeding practices and
improve the nutritional status of
children. These changes can be
affordable, even to poor families.
However, the evaluation raises
concerns about the effectiveness of
nutrition education in improving
women's diets unless financial
barriers are also addressed. For
both women and children, existing
patterns of nutrition are intricately
connected to cultural beliefs and
practices. Thus, designing effective
programs requires attention to both
cultural and economic realities.
Pf