Anda di halaman 1dari 14

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS


In accordance with International Building Code 2012
Tedds calculation version 2.6.08

Retaining wall details


Stem type;

Cantilever

Stem height;

hstem = 14.667 ft

Stem thickness;

tstem = 8 in

Angle to rear face of stem;

= 90 deg

Stem density;

stem = 150 pcf

Toe length;

ltoe = 2.667 ft

Heel length;

lheel = 2.667 ft

Base thickness;

tbase = 18 in

Base density;

base = 150 pcf

Height of retained soil;

hret = 6 ft

Angle of soil surface;

= 0 deg

Depth of cover;

dcover = 1.667 ft

Depth of excavation;

dexc = 0.667 ft

Retained soil properties


Soil type;

Medium dense well graded sand

Moist density;

mr = 135 pcf

Saturated density;

sr = 145 pcf

Effective angle of internal resistance;

r = 30 deg

Effective wall friction angle;

r = 0 deg

Base soil properties


Soil type;

Medium dense well graded sand

Soil density;

b = 115 pcf

Cohesion;

cb = 0 psf

Effective angle of internal resistance;

b = 30 deg

Effective wall friction angle;

b = 15 deg

Effective base friction angle;

bb = 30 deg

Allowable bearing pressure;

Pbearing = 3000 psf

Seismic details
Horizontal seismic acceleration factor;

Kh = 0.2

Vertical seismic acceleration factor;

Kv = 0

Seismic acceleration angle;

= atan(Kh / (1 - Kv)) = 11.31 deg

Loading details
Live surcharge load;

SurchargeL = 200 psf

Horizontal line load at 10.833 ft;

PL1 = 140 plf

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

8"

7'

2' 8"

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

2' 8"

P1

14' 8"

200 psf

8"

1' 6"

1' 8"

9' 2"

10' 10"

6'

67 psf

479 psf

2070 psf

137 psf

6'

General arrangement

Calculate retaining wall geometry


Base length;

lbase = ltoe + tstem + lheel = 6 ft

Moist soil height;

hmoist = hsoil = 7.667 ft

- Distance to horizontal seismic component;

xseismic_h = 0.6 (hsoil + hbase) = 5.5 ft

Length of surcharge load;

lsur = lheel = 2.667 ft

- Distance to vertical component;

xsur_v = lbase - lheel / 2 = 4.667 ft

Effective height of wall;

heff = hbase + dcover + hret = 9.167 ft

- Distance to horizontal component;

xsur_h = heff / 2 = 4.583 ft

Area of wall stem;

Astem = hstem tstem = 9.778 ft2

- Distance to vertical component;

xstem = ltoe + tstem / 2 = 3 ft

Area of wall base;

Abase = lbase tbase = 9 ft2

- Distance to vertical component;

xbase = lbase / 2 = 3 ft

Area of moist soil;

Amoist = hmoist lheel = 20.444 ft2

- Distance to vertical component;

xmoist_v = lbase - (hmoist lheel2 / 2) / Amoist = 4.667 ft

- Distance to horizontal component;

xmoist_h = heff / 3 = 3.056 ft

Area of base soil;

Apass = dcover ltoe = 4.444 ft2

- Distance to vertical component;

xpass_v = lbase - (dcover ltoe (lbase - ltoe / 2)) / Apass = 1.333 ft

- Distance to horizontal component;

xpass_h = (dcover + hbase) / 3 = 1.056 ft

Area of excavated base soil;

Aexc = hpass ltoe = 2.667 ft2

- Distance to vertical component;

xexc_v = lbase - (hpass ltoe (lbase - ltoe / 2)) / Aexc = 1.333 ft

Date

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

- Distance to horizontal component;

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

xexc_h = (hpass + hbase) / 3 = 0.833 ft

Using Coulomb theory


Active pressure coefficient;

KA = sin( + r)2 / (sin()2 sin( - r) [1 + [sin(r + r) sin(r - ) /


(sin( - r) sin( + ))]]2) = 0.333

Passive pressure coefficient;

KP = sin(90 - b)2 / (sin(90 + b) [1 - [sin(b + b) sin(b) / (sin(90 +


b))]]2) = 4.977

Using Mononobe-Okabe theory


Active dynamic pressure coefficient;

KAE = sin( + - r)2 / (cos() sin()2 sin( + + r) [1 + (max((sin(r


+ r) sin(r - - ) / (sin( + r + ) sin( - ))), 0))]2) = 0.473

Passive dynamic pressure coefficient;

KPE = sin(90 - + b)2 / (cos() sin(90 + + b) [1 + (max(sin(b + b)


sin(b - ) / (sin(90 + b + )), 0))]2) = 0.452

From IBC 2012 cl.1807.2.3 Safety factor


Load combination 1;

1.0 Dead + 1.0 Live + 1.0 Lateral earth

Sliding check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem;

Fstem = Astem stem = 1467 plf

Wall base;

Fbase = Abase base = 1350 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_v = Amoist mr = 2760 plf

Base soil;

Fexc_v = Aexc b = 307 plf

Total;

Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 5883 plf

Horizontal forces on wall


Surcharge load;

Fsur_h = KA SurchargeL heff = 611 plf

Line loads;

FP_h = PL1 = 140 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_h = KA mr heff2 / 2 = 1891 plf

Total;

Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fsur_h + FP_h = 2642 plf

Check stability against sliding


Base soil resistance;

Fexc_h = KP cos(b) b (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = 1727 plf

Base friction;

Ffriction = Ftotal_v tan(bb) = 3397 plf

Resistance to sliding;

Frest = Fexc_h + Ffriction = 5124 plf

Factor of safety;

FoSsl = Frest / Ftotal_h = 1.94; > 1.5


PASS - Factor of safety against sliding is adequate

Overturning check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem;

Fstem = Astem stem = 1467 plf

Wall base;

Fbase = Abase base = 1350 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_v = Amoist mr = 2760 plf

Base soil;

Fexc_v = Aexc b = 307 plf

Total;

Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 5883 plf

Horizontal forces on wall


Surcharge load;

Fsur_h = KA SurchargeL heff = 611 plf

Line loads;

FP_h = PL1 = 140 plf

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_h = KA mr heff2 / 2 = 1891 plf

Base soil;

Fexc_h = -KP cos(b) b (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = -1727 plf

Total;

Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fexc_h + Fsur_h + FP_h = 914 plf

Date

Overturning moments on wall


Surcharge load;

Msur_OT = Fsur_h xsur_h = 2801 lb_ft/ft

Line loads;

MP_OT = abs(PL1) (p1 + tbase) = 1727 lb_ft/ft

Moist retained soil;

Mmoist_OT = Fmoist_h xmoist_h = 5777 lb_ft/ft

Total;

Mtotal_OT = Mmoist_OT + Msur_OT + MP_OT = 10305 lb_ft/ft

Restoring moments on wall


Wall stem;

Mstem_R = Fstem xstem = 4400 lb_ft/ft

Wall base;

Mbase_R = Fbase xbase = 4050 lb_ft/ft

Moist retained soil;

Mmoist_R = Fmoist_v xmoist_v = 12880 lb_ft/ft

Base soil;

Mexc_R = Fexc_v xexc_v - Fexc_h xexc_h = 1848 lb_ft/ft

Total;

Mtotal_R = Mstem_R + Mbase_R + Mmoist_R + Mexc_R = 23179 lb_ft/ft

Check stability against overturning


Factor of safety;

FoSot = Mtotal_R / Mtotal_OT = 2.249; > 1.5


PASS - Factor of safety against overturning is adequate

Bearing pressure check


Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem;

Fstem = Astem stem = 1467 plf

Wall base;

Fbase = Abase base = 1350 plf

Surcharge load;

Fsur_v = SurchargeL lheel = 533 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_v = Amoist mr = 2760 plf

Base soil;

Fpass_v = Apass b = 511 plf

Total;

Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fpass_v + Fsur_v = 6621 plf

Horizontal forces on wall


Surcharge load;

Fsur_h = KA SurchargeL heff = 611 plf

Line loads;

FP_h = PL1 = 140 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_h = KA mr heff2 / 2 = 1891 plf

Base soil;

Fpass_h = max(-KP cos(b) b (dcover + hbase)2 / 2, -(Fmoist_h + Fsur_h +


FP_h)) = -2642 plf

Total;

Ftotal_h = max(Fmoist_h + Fpass_h + Fsur_h + FP_h - Ftotal_v tan(bb), 0 plf) = 0 plf

Moments on wall
Wall stem;

Mstem = Fstem xstem = 4400 lb_ft/ft

Wall base;

Mbase = Fbase xbase = 4050 lb_ft/ft

Surcharge load;

Msur = Fsur_v xsur_v - Fsur_h xsur_h = -312 lb_ft/ft

Line loads;

MP = -(PL1 (p1 + tbase)) = -1727 lb_ft/ft

Moist retained soil;

Mmoist = Fmoist_v xmoist_v - Fmoist_h xmoist_h = 7103 lb_ft/ft

Base soil;

Mpass = Fpass_v xpass_v - Fpass_h xpass_h = 3470 lb_ft/ft

Total;

Mtotal = Mstem + Mbase + Mmoist + Mpass + Msur + MP = 16984 lb_ft/ft

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

Check bearing pressure


Distance to reaction;

x = Mtotal / Ftotal_v = 2.565 ft

Eccentricity of reaction;

e = x - lbase / 2 = -0.435 ft

Loaded length of base;

lload = lbase = 6 ft

Bearing pressure at toe;

qtoe = Ftotal_v / lbase (1 - 6 e / lbase) = 1583 psf

Bearing pressure at heel;

qheel = Ftotal_v / lbase (1 + 6 e / lbase) = 624 psf

Factor of safety;

FoSbp = Pbearing / max(qtoe, qheel) = 1.895;


PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure

From IBC 2012 cl.1807.2.3 Safety factor


Load combination 2;

1.0 Dead + 1.0 Live + 0.7 Earthquake + 1.0 Lateral earth

Sliding check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem;

Fstem = Astem stem = 1467 plf

Wall base;

Fbase = Abase base = 1350 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_v = Amoist mr = 2760 plf

Base soil;

Fexc_v = Aexc b = 307 plf

Total;

Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 5883 plf

Horizontal forces on wall


Surcharge load;

Fsur_h = KA SurchargeL heff = 611 plf

Line loads;

FP_h = PL1 = 140 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_h = KA mr heff2 / 2 = 1891 plf

Seismic;

Fseismic_h = 0.7 (KAE - KA) mr (hsoil + hbase)2 / 2 = 556 plf

Total;

Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fseismic_h + Fsur_h + FP_h = 3197 plf

Check stability against sliding


Base soil resistance;

Fexc_h = KPE cos(b) b (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = 157 plf

Base friction;

Ffriction = Ftotal_v tan(bb) = 3397 plf

Resistance to sliding;

Frest = Fexc_h + Ffriction = 3554 plf

Factor of safety;

FoSsl = Frest / Ftotal_h = 1.111; > 1.1


PASS - Factor of safety against sliding is adequate

Overturning check
Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem;

Fstem = Astem stem = 1467 plf

Wall base;

Fbase = Abase base = 1350 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_v = Amoist mr = 2760 plf

Base soil;

Fexc_v = Aexc b = 307 plf

Total;

Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fexc_v = 5883 plf

Horizontal forces on wall


Surcharge load;

Fsur_h = KA SurchargeL heff = 611 plf

Line loads;

FP_h = PL1 = 140 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_h = KA mr heff2 / 2 = 1891 plf

Base soil;

Fexc_h = -KPE cos(b) b (hpass + hbase)2 / 2 = -157 plf

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Seismic;

Fseismic_h = 0.7 (KAE - KA) mr (hsoil + hbase)2 / 2 = 556 plf

Total;

Ftotal_h = Fmoist_h + Fexc_h + Fseismic_h + Fsur_h + FP_h = 3040 plf

Date

Overturning moments on wall


Surcharge load;

Msur_OT = Fsur_h xsur_h = 2801 lb_ft/ft

Line loads;

MP_OT = abs(PL1) (p1 + tbase) = 1727 lb_ft/ft

Moist retained soil;

Mmoist_OT = Fmoist_h xmoist_h = 5777 lb_ft/ft

Seismic;

Mseismic_OT = Fseismic_h xseismic_h = 3056 lb_ft/ft

Total;

Mtotal_OT = Mmoist_OT + Mseismic_OT + Msur_OT + MP_OT = 13360 lb_ft/ft

Restoring moments on wall


Wall stem;

Mstem_R = Fstem xstem = 4400 lb_ft/ft

Wall base;

Mbase_R = Fbase xbase = 4050 lb_ft/ft

Moist retained soil;

Mmoist_R = Fmoist_v xmoist_v = 12880 lb_ft/ft

Base soil;

Mexc_R = Fexc_v xexc_v - Fexc_h xexc_h = 540 lb_ft/ft

Total;

Mtotal_R = Mstem_R + Mbase_R + Mmoist_R + Mexc_R = 21870 lb_ft/ft

Check stability against overturning


Factor of safety;

FoSot = Mtotal_R / Mtotal_OT = 1.637; > 1.1


PASS - Factor of safety against overturning is adequate

Bearing pressure check


Vertical forces on wall
Wall stem;

Fstem = Astem stem = 1467 plf

Wall base;

Fbase = Abase base = 1350 plf

Surcharge load;

Fsur_v = SurchargeL lheel = 533 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_v = Amoist mr = 2760 plf

Base soil;

Fpass_v = Apass b = 511 plf

Total;

Ftotal_v = Fstem + Fbase + Fmoist_v + Fpass_v + Fsur_v = 6621 plf

Horizontal forces on wall


Surcharge load;

Fsur_h = KA SurchargeL heff = 611 plf

Line loads;

FP_h = PL1 = 140 plf

Moist retained soil;

Fmoist_h = KA mr heff2 / 2 = 1891 plf

Base soil;

Fpass_h = -KP cos(b) b (dcover + hbase)2 / 2 = -2772 plf

Seismic;

Fseismic_h = 0.7 (KAE - KA) mr (hsoil + hbase)2 / 2 = 556 plf

Total;

Ftotal_h = max(Fmoist_h + Fpass_h + Fseismic_h + Fsur_h + FP_h - Ftotal_v tan(bb), 0


plf) = 0 plf

Moments on wall
Wall stem;

Mstem = Fstem xstem = 4400 lb_ft/ft

Wall base;

Mbase = Fbase xbase = 4050 lb_ft/ft

Surcharge load;

Msur = Fsur_v xsur_v - Fsur_h xsur_h = -312 lb_ft/ft

Line loads;

MP = -(PL1 (p1 + tbase)) = -1727 lb_ft/ft

Moist retained soil;

Mmoist = Fmoist_v xmoist_v - Fmoist_h xmoist_h = 7103 lb_ft/ft

Base soil;

Mpass = Fpass_v xpass_v - Fpass_h xpass_h = 3607 lb_ft/ft

Seismic;

Mseismic = -Fseismic_h xseismic_h = -3056 lb_ft/ft

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Total;

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

Mtotal = Mstem + Mbase + Mmoist + Mseismic + Mpass + Msur + MP = 14066 lb_ft/ft

Check bearing pressure


Distance to reaction;

x = Mtotal / Ftotal_v = 2.124 ft

Eccentricity of reaction;

e = x - lbase / 2 = -0.876 ft

Loaded length of base;

lload = lbase = 6 ft

Bearing pressure at toe;

qtoe = Ftotal_v / lbase (1 - 6 e / lbase) = 2070 psf

Bearing pressure at heel;

qheel = Ftotal_v / lbase (1 + 6 e / lbase) = 137 psf

Factor of safety;

FoSbp = Pbearing / max(qtoe, qheel) = 1.449;


PASS - Allowable bearing pressure exceeds maximum applied bearing pressure

RETAINING WALL DESIGN


In accordance with ACI 318-11 and MSJC-11 using the strength design method
Tedds calculation version 2.6.08

Concrete details
Compressive strength of concrete;
Concrete type;

f'c = 4000 psi


Normal weight

Reinforcement details
Yield strength of reinforcement;

fy = 60000 psi

Modulus of elasticity or reinforcement;

Es = 29000000 psi

Cover to reinforcement
Top face of base;

cbt = 2 in

Bottom face of base;

cbb = 3 in

Masonry details
8" CMU in running bond, fully bedded with PCL class M mortar, fully grouted
Compressive strength of unit;

fcu = 2800 psi

Net compressive strength - Table 2;

f'm = 2000 psi

Net modulus of elasticity - cl.1.8.2.2.1;

Em = 900 f'm = 1800000 psi


fr = 163 psi
tb = 7.625 in

Length of unit;

lb = 15.625 in

Height of unit;

hb = 7.625 in

Thickness of joint;

tj = 0.375 in

Face shell thickness;

twf = 1.25 in

End shell thickness;

twe = 1.25 in

Internal web thickness;

twi = 1.25 in

Depth of cavity;

tc = tb - 2 twf = 5.125 in

Length of cavity;

lc = (lb - twi - 2 twe) / 2 = 5.937 in


0.375"

7.625"

3.813"

15.625"

1.25"
5.125"

Modulus of rupture - Table 3.1.8.2;


Thickness of unit;

5.937"

1.25"

5.937"

1.25"

1.25"

1.25"

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

From IBC 2012 cl.1605.2.1 Basic load combinations


Load combination no.1;

1.4 Dead

Load combination no.2;

1.2 Dead + 1.6 Live + 1.6 Lateral earth

Load combination no.3;

1.2 Dead + 1.0 Earthquake + 1.0 Live + 1.6 Lateral earth

Load combination no.4;

0.9 Dead + 1.0 Earthquake + 1.6 Lateral earth


Loading details - Combination No.1 - kips/ft2

Shear force - Combination No.1 - kips/ft

Bending moment - Combination No.1 - kips_ft/ft

Stem

Toe

0.32
1.45

0.27
0.32
0.32
1.45

Heel

2.3

1.32
1.52

0.55 0.27
0.32

0.9

-0.5
0.8
1

Loading details - Combination No.3 - kips/ft2

Shear force - Combination No.3 - kips/ft

Bending moment - Combination No.3 - kips_ft/ft

Stem

0.14

0.07
0.14

3.8

Toe

0.27
0.2
1.24

1.34 0.23
0.27
0.73 0.2
0.27
1.24

0.27
0.23

5.5
4.3
0.07
0.05
0.55

-6
-3.5

Heel

Check stem design at base of stem


Depth of section;

12.1
8.8

t = 8 in

Masonry section properties


Gross cross-sectional area;

A = tb = 91.5 in2/ft

Gross moment of inertia;

I = tb3 / 12 = 443.3 in4/ft

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Gross section modulus;

S = 2 I / tb = 116.3 in3/ft

Gross radius of gyration;

r = (I / A) = 2.2 in

Date

App'd by

Date

Reinforced masonry - Section 3.3


Design bending moment combination 3;

M = 145242 lb_in/ft

Axial load;

P = 1.2 stem hstem A = 1678 lb/ft

Effective height;

h = 2 hstem = 29.333 ft

Slenderness ratio;

h / r = 159.917

Nominal axial strength - exp.3-19;

Pn = 0.8 (0.8 (A - Asr.prov) f'm) (70 r / h)2 = 22328 lb/ft

Strength reduction factor - cl.3.1.4;

= 0.9

Design axial strength;

Pn = Pn = 20095 lb/ft
P / Pn = 0.083
PASS - Nominal axial strength exceeds axial load

Reinforcement provided;

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c

Area of reinforcement provided;

Asr.prov = sr2 / (4 ssr) = 0.46 in2/ft

Depth of reinforcement;
d = 3.813 in
Maximum usable compressive strain of masonry - cl.3.3.2
mu = 0.0025
Tensile strain in reinforcement at balance point;

s = fy / Es = 0.002069

Tension reinforcement strain factor;

s = 1.5

Maximum area of reinforcement;

Asr.max = 0.64 f'm d [mu / (mu + s s)] / fy = 0.435 in2/ft


FAIL - Area of stem reinforcement provided exceeds maximum allowable

Distance from fiber of maximum compressive strain to neutral axis


c = d mu / (mu + s) = 2.086 in
Tb = Asr.prov fy = 27612 lb/ft

Tensile force at balance point;

1 = 0.8
Compressive force at balance point;

Cb = 0.8 f'm 1 c = 32042 lb/ft

Design axial force at balance point;

Pb = (Cb - Tb) = 3988 lb/ft

Design moment at balance point;

Mb = (Tb (d - tb / 2) + Cb (tb / 2 - 1 c / 2)) = 85882 lb_in/ft

Strength interaction diagram


c/d

c (in)

C (lb/ft)

T (lb/ft)

fs (psi)

M (lb_in/ft)

P (lb/ft)

0.01

0.038

586

27612

60000

2001

-24323

0.1

0.381

5856

27612

60000

19290

-19580

0.2

0.763

11712

27612

60000

36972

-14310

0.3

1.144

17568

27612

60000

53047

-9039

0.4

1.525

23424

27612

60000

67514

-3769

0.5

1.906

29280

27612

60000

80374

1502

0.547

2.086

32042

27612

60000

85882

3988

0.6

2.288

35136

22243

48333

91626

11604

0.7

2.669

40992

14299

31071

98220

20095

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

10

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

25000
98220 lb_in/ft, 20095 lb/ft

20000
15000
10000
5000

85882 lb_in/ft, 3988 lb/ft


145242 lb_in/ft, 1678 lb/ft

105000

90000

75000

60000

45000

30000

15000

-5000

Design axial load Pn - lb/ft

Design moment M n - lb_in/ft

From strength interaction diagram...


Maximum moment;
Limiting moment under applied axial load;

Mmax = 101271 lb_in/ft


Mlimit = 80570 lb_in/ft
M / Mlimit = 1.803
FAIL - Design flexural strength is less than factored bending moment

Design shear force;

V = 3496 lb/ft

Nominal shear strength - cl.3.3.4.1.2;

Vn = min((4 - 1.75 min(M / (V tb), 1)) A (f'm 1 psi) + 0.25 P, 4


A (f'm 1 psi)) = 9626 lb/ft

Strength reduction factor - cl.3.1.4;

v = 0.8

Design shear strength;

Vn = v Vn = 7701 lb/ft
V / Vn = 0.454
PASS - Design shear strength exceeds applied shear force

Check stem design at 1.333 ft


Depth of section;

t = 8 in

Masonry section properties


Gross cross-sectional area;

A = tb = 91.5 in2/ft

Gross moment of inertia;

I = tb3 / 12 = 443.3 in4/ft

Gross section modulus;

S = 2 I / tb = 116.3 in3/ft

Gross radius of gyration;

r = (I / A) = 2.2 in

Reinforced masonry - Section 3.3


Design bending moment combination 3;

M = 96168 lb_in/ft

Axial load;

P = 1.2 stem hstem A = 1678 lb/ft

Effective height;

h = 2 hstem = 29.333 ft

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

11

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

Slenderness ratio;

h / r = 159.917

Nominal axial strength - exp.3-19;

Pn = 0.8 (0.8 (A - Asr1.prov) f'm) (70 r / h)2 = 22328 lb/ft

Strength reduction factor - cl.3.1.4;

= 0.9

Design axial strength;

Pn = Pn = 20095 lb/ft
P / Pn = 0.083
PASS - Nominal axial strength exceeds axial load

Reinforcement provided;

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c

Area of reinforcement provided;

Asr1.prov = sr12 / (4 ssr1) = 0.46 in2/ft

Depth of reinforcement;
d = 3.813 in
Maximum usable compressive strain of masonry - cl.3.3.2
mu = 0.0025
Tensile strain in reinforcement at balance point;

s = fy / Es = 0.002069

Tension reinforcement strain factor;

s = 1.5

Maximum area of reinforcement;

Asr.max = 0.64 f'm d [mu / (mu + s s)] / fy = 0.435 in2/ft


FAIL - Area of stem reinforcement provided exceeds maximum allowable

Distance from fiber of maximum compressive strain to neutral axis


c = d mu / (mu + s) = 2.086 in
Tb = Asr1.prov fy = 27612 lb/ft

Tensile force at balance point;

1 = 0.8
Compressive force at balance point;

Cb = 0.8 f'm 1 c = 32042 lb/ft

Design axial force at balance point;

Pb = (Cb - Tb) = 3988 lb/ft

Design moment at balance point;

Mb = (Tb (d - tb / 2) + Cb (tb / 2 - 1 c / 2)) = 85882 lb_in/ft

Strength interaction diagram


c/d

c (in)

C (lb/ft)

T (lb/ft)

fs (psi)

M (lb_in/ft)

P (lb/ft)

0.01

0.038

586

27612

60000

2001

-24323

0.1

0.381

5856

27612

60000

19290

-19580

0.2

0.763

11712

27612

60000

36972

-14310

0.3

1.144

17568

27612

60000

53047

-9039

0.4

1.525

23424

27612

60000

67514

-3769

0.5

1.906

29280

27612

60000

80374

1502

0.547

2.086

32042

27612

60000

85882

3988

0.6

2.288

35136

22243

48333

91626

11604

0.7

2.669

40992

14299

31071

98220

20095

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

12

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

25000
98220 lb_in/ft, 20095 lb/ft

20000
15000
10000
5000

85882 lb_in/ft, 3988 lb/ft


96168 lb_in/ft, 1678 lb/ft

105000

90000

75000

60000

45000

30000

15000

-5000

Design axial load Pn - lb/ft

Design moment M n - lb_in/ft

From strength interaction diagram...


Maximum moment;
Limiting moment under applied axial load;

Mmax = 101271 lb_in/ft


Mlimit = 80570 lb_in/ft
M / Mlimit = 1.194
FAIL - Design flexural strength is less than factored bending moment

Design shear force;


Nominal shear strength - cl.3.3.4.1.2;

V = 2656 lb/ft
Vn = min((4 - 1.75 min(M / (V tb), 1)) A (f'm 1 psi) + 0.25 P, 4
A (f'm 1 psi)) = 9626 lb/ft

Strength reduction factor - cl.3.1.4;

v = 0.8

Design shear strength;

Vn = v Vn = 7701 lb/ft
V / Vn = 0.345
PASS - Design shear strength exceeds applied shear force

Check base design at toe


Depth of section;

h = 18 in

Rectangular section in flexure - Chapter 10


Design bending moment combination 3;

M = 8832 lb_ft/ft

Depth of tension reinforcement;

d = h - cbb - bb / 2 = 14.688 in

Compression reinforcement provided;

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c

Area of compression reinforcement provided;

Abt.prov = bt2 / (4 sbt) = 0.46 in2/ft

Tension reinforcement provided;

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c

Area of tension reinforcement provided;

Abb.prov = bb2 / (4 sbb) = 0.46 in2/ft

Maximum reinforcement spacing - cl.10.5.4;

smax = min(18 in, 3 h) = 18 in


PASS - Reinforcement is adequately spaced

Depth of compression block;

a = Abb.prov fy / (0.85 f'c) = 0.677 in

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

13

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

Neutral axis factor - cl.10.2.7.3;

1 = min(max(0.85 - 0.05 (f'c - 4 ksi) / 1 ksi, 0.65), 0.85) = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis;

c = a / 1 = 0.796 in

Strain in reinforcement;

t = 0.003 (d - c) / c = 0.052342
Section is in the tension controlled zone

Strength reduction factor;

f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002) (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.9

Nominal flexural strength;

Mn = Abb.prov fy (d - a / 2) = 33017 lb_ft/ft

Design flexural strength;

Mn = f Mn = 29715 lb_ft/ft
M / Mn = 0.297
PASS - Design flexural strength exceeds factored bending moment

By iteration, reinforcement required by analysis;

Abb.des = 0.135 in2/ft

Minimum area of reinforcement - cl.7.12.2.1;

Abb.min = 0.0018 h = 0.389 in2/ft

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than minimum area of reinforcement required
Rectangular section in shear - Chapter 11
Design shear force;

V = 5529 lb/ft

Concrete modification factor - cl.8.6.1;

=1

Nominal concrete shear strength - exp.11-3;

Vc = 2 (f'c 1 psi) d = 22294 lb/ft

Strength reduction factor;

s = 0.75

Design concrete shear strength - cl.11.4.6.1;

Vc = s Vc = 16721 lb/ft
V / Vc = 0.331
PASS - No shear reinforcement is required

Check base design at heel


Depth of section;

h = 18 in

Rectangular section in flexure - Chapter 10


Design bending moment combination 3;

M = 6012 lb_ft/ft

Depth of tension reinforcement;

d = h - cbt - bt / 2 = 15.687 in

Compression reinforcement provided;

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c

Area of compression reinforcement provided;

Abb.prov = bb2 / (4 sbb) = 0.46 in2/ft

Tension reinforcement provided;

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c

Area of tension reinforcement provided;

Abt.prov = bt2 / (4 sbt) = 0.46 in2/ft

Maximum reinforcement spacing - cl.10.5.4;

smax = min(18 in, 3 h) = 18 in


PASS - Reinforcement is adequately spaced

Depth of compression block;

a = Abt.prov fy / (0.85 f'c) = 0.677 in

Neutral axis factor - cl.10.2.7.3;

1 = min(max(0.85 - 0.05 (f'c - 4 ksi) / 1 ksi, 0.65), 0.85) = 0.85

Depth to neutral axis;

c = a / 1 = 0.796 in

Strain in reinforcement;

t = 0.003 (d - c) / c = 0.05611

Strength reduction factor;

f = min(max(0.65 + (t - 0.002) (250 / 3), 0.65), 0.9) = 0.9

Nominal flexural strength;

Mn = Abt.prov fy (d - a / 2) = 35318 lb_ft/ft

Section is in the tension controlled zone

Design flexural strength;

Mn = f Mn = 31786 lb_ft/ft
M / Mn = 0.189
PASS - Design flexural strength exceeds factored bending moment

By iteration, reinforcement required by analysis;

Abt.des = 0.086 in2/ft

Minimum area of reinforcement - cl.7.12.2.1;

Abt.min = 0.0018 h = 0.389 in2/ft

303 Second Street, Suite 300 South

Project

Job Ref.

Section

Sheet no./rev.

14

San Francisco, CA 94017


Calc. by

Date

11/10/2016

Chk'd by

Date

App'd by

Date

PASS - Area of reinforcement provided is greater than minimum area of reinforcement required
Rectangular section in shear - Chapter 11
Design shear force;

V = 4279 lb/ft

Concrete modification factor - cl.8.6.1;

=1

Nominal concrete shear strength - exp.11-3;

Vc = 2 (f'c 1 psi) d = 23812 lb/ft

Strength reduction factor;

s = 0.75

Design concrete shear strength - cl.11.4.6.1;

Vc = s Vc = 17859 lb/ft
V / Vc = 0.240
PASS - No shear reinforcement is required

Transverse reinforcement parallel to base


Minimum area of reinforcement - cl.7.12.2.1;

Abx.req = 0.0018 tbase = 0.389 in2/ft

Transverse reinforcement provided;

No.3 bars @ 8" c/c each face

Area of transverse reinforcement provided;

Abx.prov = 2 bx2 / (4 sbx) = 0.331 in2/ft

FAIL - Area of reinforcement provided is less than area of reinforcement required

3.812"

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c


No.5 bars @ 8" c/c
No.5 bars @ 8" c/c

No.5 bars @ 8" c/c


No.3 bars @ 8" c/c
transverse reinforcement
in base

Reinforcement details

2"

3"

Anda mungkin juga menyukai