1995
Larsen PB, Brendstrup L, Skov L, Flachs H. Aminophylline versus caffeine citrate for apnea and
bradycardia prophylaxis in premature neonates. Acta Paediatr 1995;84:360-4. Stockholm. ISSN
0803-5253
We investigated the efficacy and adverse effects of aminophylline and caffeine citrate in 180 premature
neonates for 10 days and nights. Aminophylline (n = 98) and caffeine citrate (n = 82) were equally
effectivein preventing apnea and bradycardia. The caffeine citrate group had a lower median heart rate
on day 3, fewer neonates with tachycardia and a smaller amount of gastric aspirate on day 7. The need
for mononasal continuous positive airway pressure and respirator therapy was similar in both groups.
We conclude that caffeine citrate is the drug of choice for apnea and bradycardia prophylaxis in
premature neonates with a gestational age 5 3 3 full weeks. Aminophyylline, apnea, bradycardia,
caffeine citrate, neonate, premature
PB Larsen, Skyttevangen 30, D K 3450 Allered, Denmark
The objective of this study was to determine if aminophylline was more effective than caffeine citrate in
preventing apnea and bradycardia in premature neonates and if there were any differences in adverse effects.
At the Department of Neonatology, Rigshospitalet,
aminophylline is used for apnea and bradycardia
prophylaxis in all premature neonates with a gestational age 5 3 3 full weeks. The drug is administered
orally, iv or rectally, with a loading dose of 6.0mg/kg
followed by a maintenance dose of 2.0mg/kg twice a
day. At other neonatal departments, both aminophylline and caffeine (a metabolic product of aminophylline
in premature neonates) are used for apnea and bradycardia prophylaxis in premature neonates. Both treatments are equally accepted, but only a few studies
comparing the two drugs exist, and they do not show
any difference in efficacy in preventing apnea and
bradycardia (1 -4). These studies, with the same statistical conditions as in our study, have a 75% risk of
committing an error of the second type, because of the
small number of patients (18-45 neonates).
Theoretically, caffeine citrate should be a better
drug than aminophylline, as the therapeutic index is
more favorable (5, 6). The literature describes no
adverse effects for caffeine citrate near the upper
limit of the alleged therapeutic interval, whereas a
variety of adverse effects of aminophylline are
reported at just above its alleged therapeutic interval.
These include failure to gain weight, sleeplessness,
irritability, tachycardia, hyperglycemia, dehydration,
hyperreflexia, tremor, seizures, hypertension and
cardiac arrhythmia (5, 6). Tachycardia is the most
frequent side effect of aminophylline. Furthermore, it
Patients
This investigation included all premature neonates
with a gestational age 533 full weeks admitted to the
neonatal department from April 1, 1990 to June 1,
1992, and for whom parental informed consent was
obtained. The investigation was approved by the local
Ethics Committee and the Danish National Health
Service. As both aminophylline and caffeine citrate
have a well documented effect on apnea and bradycardia in neonates, it was considered unethical to include
a placebo group in the investigation. Neonates were
excluded if they were receiving respirator therapy for
more than 96h. The design of the investigation was
prospective and double-blind, and the neonates were
randomized to receive treatment with either aminophylline or caffeine citrate. All premature neonates
with a gestational age 533 full weeks in the neonatal
department are routinely treated with mononasal
continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for
apnea and bradycardi prophylaxis.
The aminophylline group received an iv loading
dose of 6.2mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of
3.1 mg/kg iv or by a gastric baby feeding tube twice a
day for 10 days. The caffeine group received an iv
loading dose of caffeine citrate 20.2 mg/kg followed
by a maintenance dose of 2.5mgIkg iv or by a gastric
baby feeding tube twice a day for 10 days. The loading
and maintenance doses used were those recommended
by Roberts (5) (20mg of caffeine citrate is equivalent
to 10 mg of active caffeine base, and 6.2 mg of aminophylline is equivalent to 5mg of active theophylline
base (5)). Treatment efficacy was measured as the need
for NCPAP and ventilator therapy, and by the number
of episodes of apnea and- bradycardia in 24 h for 10
days. Apnea was defined as cessation of breathing for
more than 15s, which might be accompanied by
cyanosis and/or bradycardia (pulse less than 100
beatslmin). The neonates were observed in unstable
phases with a respiratory-cardiac monitor and in
more stable phases with ECG. Adverse effects were
36 1
Results
Included in the study were 214 patients out of a possible
total of 359 premature neonates in this period. We
planned to include 216 patients, but two of the
medicine packages were defective and were not used.
Of the remaining 214 neonates, 34 were excluded for
reasons listed in Table 1. Of the remaining 180 neonates,
only 131 completed all 10 days of the study, but all 180
neonates were included in the calculations, while
breathing spontaneously, with as many data as
possible. Patient characteristics for the 180 neonates
are listed in Table 2. No differences were found between
the groups regarding sex, birth weight, gestational age,
Respirator therapy
>96 h
~
Aminophylline group
Caffeine group
I
15
Parental
request
Death
Treatment
failure
Medication
error
Insufficient
case record
362
P B Larsen et al.
Median
(2.5%-97.5%)
Sex
(MF)
Birth weight
Gestation age
(weeks)
NCPAP
(days)
Intubdted
(days)
Aminophylline group
98
59/39
82
0.3702
F
43/39
180
102178
1300
(619-2378)
0.6152
MW
1275
(670-2450)
1290
(653-2450)
29
(26-33)
0.7475
MW
29
(25- 33)
29
(26-33)
7
(0- 10)
0.9751
MW
6.5
(0- 10)
7
0
(0-4)
0.6653
MW
0
(0-4)
0
(0-4)
P=
Test type
Caffeine group
Both groups
(0-10)
~~
F = Fishers exact test, MW = Mann-Whitneys U-test. NCPAP = Mononasal continuous positive airway pressure.
numbers of days with NCPAP or numbers of days of scaled baby syndrome and one neonate was intubated
intubated. No differences were found between the two because of hydrops fetalis.
groups regarding the number of neonates who needed
The 22 neonates who were excluded because of
respirator therapy (28 in the aminophylline group and respirator therapy for more than 96h did not differ
34 in the caffeine group F; p = 0.3533). No differences from the group of patients who completed the investiwere found in the number of episodes of apnea or gation regarding birth weight (MW: p = 0.1 163) or
bradycardia between the two groups (Table 3).
umbilical cord pH (MW: p = 0.9494). But they were
The caffeine citrate group proved to have a lower pretreated with Celestone less often (F: p = 0.0420),
median heart rate on day 3 and a smaller amount of were born 1 week earlier (median 28 versus 29 gestagastric aspirate on day 7 (Table 4). Furthermore, the tional weeks (MW: p = 0.0020)) and had a lower
caffeine citrate group had fewer premature neonates median Apgar score (4.5 at 1 min and 8.5 at 5min
with tachycardia (heart rate >160 beats/min) than the versus 8 at 1 min and 10 at 5min (MW: p = 0.0001))
aminophylline group (38 of 92 neonates versus 12 of 67 than those neonates who were not excluded.
neonates; p = 0.003).
In both the aminophylline and caffeine citrate groups,
Among the 62 neonates who were intubated and the central 95% of all neonates had a plasma theophylventilated, 22 neonates had to be excluded because of line or plasma caffeine concentration within the alleged
respirator therapy for more than 96h (7 from the therapeutic interval (Table 5). There were no differences
aminophylline group and 15 from the caffeine group) in the frequency of RDS (F: p = 0.1155) or necrotizing
(F: 2a = p = 0.0938, /3 = 0.4259). Seventeen of these enterocolitis (F: p = 0.7469) between the two groups.
neonates were intubated because of severe respiratory
All the above calculations were made on the basis of
distress syndrome (RDS) with chest X-ray anomalies data from all 180 neonates in the study. Using the data
and a median arterial/alveolar (a/A)-P02 ratio (9, 10) from the 131 neonates who completed all 10 days of the
of 0.16 and an interquartile range of 0.11-0.18 (a/A study yielded similar results.
) (PaC02/0.8))).
PO2-ratio = Pa02/((Fi02 ~ 0 . 9 5 Of the 17 neonates with RDS, 4 neonates were transferred intubated to the department. Of the remaining
five excluded neonates, two neonates were intubated Discussion
because of septicemia, one neonate was intubated in One of the more serious clinical problems in the neothe delivery room, one neonate was intubated because natal intensive care unit is apnea and bradycardia in the
Table 3. Observations of apnea and bradycardia.
Median
(2.5Yo-97.5 Yo)
Aminophylline group
98
P=
Test type
Caffeine group
Both groups
82
180
Apnea in 10 days
(no.)
Apnea/24 h
(mean no.)
BC in 10 days
(no.)
BC/24 h
(mean no.)
2.0
(0-67)
0.2762
MW
2.5
(0-70)
2.0
(0-66)
0.2
(0-7)
0.2396
MW
0.3
(0-8)
0.3
(0-7)
4.5
(0-78)
0.1481
MW
5.0
(0-72)
5.0
(0-73)
0.6
(0-9)
0.1 143
MW
0.8
(0-10)
0.7
(0-9)
-
MW = Mann-Whitneys U-test, BC = bradycardia. Numbers apnea/BC in 10 days = total amount in 10 days and nights. Mean apnea/24 h
or BC/24 h is based on numbers of valid days each neonate contributed to the investigation while breathing spontaneously.
363
Day 7
~~
Median
(2 5%-97 5%)
Aminophylline group
P=
Test type
Caffeine group
Both groups
Per 0s
total amount
(mu
Per 0s
(YOof 100%
fluid req )
Aspirate
(total amount
in ml)
Aspirate
(YOof by mouth
admin )
(YOof 100%
158
(1 33- 176)
<0.00005
MW
149
(123- 168)
155
(127-174)
83
(0-316)
0.5095
MW
114
(0-323)
88
(0-3 18)
35
(0-87)
0.4039
MW
49
(0--91)
41
(0-87)
2.0
(0-33)
0.0074
MW
0.0
(0-1 1)
2.0
(0-117)
0.0137
MW
0.0
(0-79)
0.7
(0-92)
0.7
(0-9)
0.0087
MW
0.0
(0-6)
0.4
(0-8)
premature neonate. Prevention of apnea and bradycardia in neonates is brought about by treating
concurrent disorders such as infection, hypoxemia,
hypoglycemia and hypothermia, and avoiding apnea
and bradycardia provoking stimulations. In addition,
the incidence and severity of neonatal apnea and
bradycardia can be decreased by treatment with
methylxanthines.
The frequency of apnea and bradycardia was
registered by monitoring the neonates with a respiratory-cardiac monitor, ECG and an apnea mattress,
and the nursing staffs clinical observations. Some
episodes of apnea or bradycardia may have been
overlooked, but this source of error may be assumed
to be identical in both groups. This investigation
revealed that aminophylline and caffeine citrate
decrease the incidence of neonatal apnea and bradycardia to the same extent. With regard to adverse
effects, we exposed a significant difference between
the two drugs. The caffeine group had a lower heart
rate on day 3 and less gastric aspirate on day 7 than
the aminophylline group.
Other studies have shown that aminophylline reduces
cerebral blood flow (CBF) in stable preterm neonates,
without affecting the visual evoked potential (1 l),
whereas caffeine injection was not associated with significant changes in CBF (12). In a parallel study we have
demonstrated that aminophylline reduces CBF, without
any associated changes in cardiac output, whereas
Table 5. Measured plasma (P) theophylline and caffeine concentrations on day 3.
Median
(2.5%-97.5%)
Aspirate
Heart rate
Day 3
(beatsimin)
Therapeutic
interval
Aminophylline
group
Caffeine
group
P theophylline (mg/l)
5-15
P caffeine (mg/l)
5-25
10.3
(4.8-16.8)
4.0
(1.4-6.2)
0.5
(0.0-3.0)
16.0
(9.6-23.8)
(0-20)
fluid req )
= administered
References
1. Sims ME, Rangasamy R, Lee S , Chung H, Cohen J, Walther FJ.
Comparative evaluation of caffeine and theophylline for weaning
premature infants from the ventilator. Am J Perinatol 1989;6:
72-5.
364
PB Larsen et al.