Career Anna
Leadership Theories
The Great Man theory evolved around the mid 19th century. Even though no one was able to
identify with any scientific certainty, which human characteristic or combination of, were
responsible for identifying great leaders. Everyone recognized that just as the name suggests;
only a man could have the characteristic (s) of a great leader.
The Great Man theory assumes that the traits of leadership are intrinsic. That simply means that
great leaders are born Heroes. This theory sees great leaders as those who are destined by birth
to become a leader. Furthermore, the belief was that great leaders will rise when confronted with
ran out of steam in their search for traits, they turned to what leaders did, how they behaved and
came with behavioural theory of leadership. This became the dominant way of approaching
leadership within organizations in the 1950s and early 1960s but this theory too had its own
limitations. Behavioural Theory of Leadership proposes leadership styles but a specific
leadership style may not be best in all circumstances. When researchers really got to work on
this it didnt seem to validate their assumptions. While behavioural theories may help managers
develop particular leadership behaviours but they provide little guidance as to what constitutes
effective leadership in different situations.
There were lots of differences and inconsistencies between studies. It was difficult to say which
style of leadership was significant in enabling one group to work better than another. The styles
that leaders can adopt are far more affected by those they are working with, and the environment
they are operating within, than had been originally thought. Most researchers today conclude
that no one leadership style is right for every manager under all circumstances.
Contingency Theory of Leadership
Contingency theories are a class of behavioural theory that contend that there is no one best
way of leading and that a leadership style that is effective in some situations may not be
successful in others.
An effect of this is that leaders who are very effective at one place and time may become
unsuccessful either when transplanted to another situation or when the factors around them
change.
This helps to explain how some leaders who seem for a while to have the 'Midas touch' suddenly
appear to go off the boil and make very unsuccessful decisions.
Transactional Leadership Theory
Transactional theories, also known as exchange theories of leadership, are characterized by a
transaction made between the leader and the followers. In fact, the theory values a positive and
mutually beneficial relationship.
For the transactional theories to be effective and as a result have motivational value, the leader
must find a means to align to adequately reward (or punish) his follower, for performing leaderassigned task. In other words, transactional leaders are most efficient when they develop a
mutual reinforcing environment, for which the individual and the organizational goals are in sync.
The transactional theorists state that humans in general are seeking to maximize pleasurable
experiences and to diminish un-pleasurable experiences. Thus, we are more likely to associate
ourselves with individuals that add to our strengths.
Transformational Leadership Theory
The Transformational Leadership theory states that this process is by which a person interacts
with others and is able to create a solid relationship that results in a high percentage of trust, that
will later result in an increase of motivation, both intrinsic and extrinsic, in both leaders and
followers.
The essence of transformational theories is that leaders transform their followers through their
inspirational nature and charismatic personalities. Rules and regulations are flexible, guided by
group norms. These attributes provide a sense of belonging for the followers as they can easily
identify with the leader and its purpose.
Con's
Burns Transformational Leadership Theory is idealistic and may not be applicable to
populations not wanting or able to go beyond just living as they do and maintaining their
own status quo. In this case, Burns Transformational Leadership Theory must be
coupled with a motivational theory, as well as preparing them emotionally and
intellectually.
Burns Transformational Leadership Theory may not work in emergency situations or
situations in which tasks are enormously complex and beyond the skill level of the
average group member.
A major issue with Burns Transformational Leadership Theory, is how a transformational
leader is to deal with other leaders not so enlightened.
Pro's
Con's
This theory assumes that the group members do not know what is good for them. It is
inherently undemocratic.
If the leader has flaws the whole method stands a good chance of failure.
Leaders are not always rational, and a course of action might be based on delusion, thus
jeopardizing group members.
The leader-led-task system could collapse, if there is too much dependence on the
leader and where either something happens to the leader or he simply cannot carry out
his leadership functions.
Successful Leadership
Success of a leader depends upon:
(i) How the individual or the group behaves.
(ii) Position power.
(iii) Close Supervision.
Effective Leadership
Effectiveness of leadership depends upon:
(i) Internal shape or predisposition of an individual or a group and thus, it is attitudinal in nature.
(ii) Personal power.
(iii) General Supervision.
v.
vi.
Career Planning
Career planning is an ongoing process that can help you manage your learning and
development.
You can use the four step planning process whether you are:
still at school;
a school leaver;
an adult adding on skills; or
an adult changing your job or career.
Career planning is the continuous process of:
thinking about your interests, values, skills and preferences;
exploring the life, work and learning options available to you;
ensuring that your work fits with your personal circumstances; and
continuously fine-tuning your work and learning plans to help you manage the changes in
your life and the world of work.
EMPLOYEE REWARDS
There are a number of ways to classify rewards. Three of the more typical dichotomies are:
Intrinsic versus extrinsic rewards, financial versus non financial rewards, and performance-based
versus membership based rewards. These categories are far from being mutually exclusive.
Reward
1. Intrinsic versus extrinsic rewards: The satisfactions one gets from the job itself are its
intrinsic rewards. These satisfactions are self initiated rewards, such as having pride in ones
work, having a feeling of accomplishment, or being part of a team. The techniques of flex time,
job enrichment, shorter work weeks, and job rotation, can offer intrinsic rewards by providing
interesting and challenging jobs and allowing the employee greater freedom.
On the other hand extrinsic rewards include money, promotions, and fringe benefits. Their
common thread is that extrinsic rewards are external to the job and come from an outside
source, mainly, management.
Thus, if an employee experiences feelings of achievement or personal growth from a job, we
would label such rewards as intrinsic. If the employee receives a salary increase or a write up in
the company magazine, we would label those rewards as extrinsic.
While we have stressed the role of extrinsic rewards in motivation, we should point out that
intrinsic and extrinsic rewards may be closely linked.
2. Financial versus Non financial rewards: Rewards may or may not enhance the employees
financial well being. If they do they can do this directly through wages, bonuses, profit sharing,
and the like, or indirectly through supportive benefits such as pension plans, paid vacations, paid
sick leaves and purchase discounts.
Non financial rewards are potentially at the disposal of the organization. They do not increase
the employees financial position, instead of making the employees life better off the job, non
financial rewards emphasize making life on the job more attractive.
The old saying one mans food is another mans poison applies to the entire subject of rewards,
but specifically to the area of non financial rewards. What one employee views as something Ive
always wanted, another finds superfluous. Therefore care must be taken in providing the right
non financial reward for each person, yet where selection has been done assiduously, the
benefits to the organization should be impressive.
Some workers are very status conscious. An attractive office, a carpeted floor, a large executive
desk, or a private bathroom may be just the office furnishing that stimulates an employee
towered top impressive job title, their own business cards, their own secretary, or a well located
parking space with their name clearly painted underneath the Reserved sign.
3. Performance based versus membership based rewards: The rewards that the
organization allocates can be said to be based on either performance criteria or membership
criteria. While the managers in most organizations will vigorously argue that their reward system
pays off for performance, you should recognize that this is almost invariably not the case. Few
organizations actually rewards employees based on performance. However, without question,
the dominant basis for reward allocations in organization is membership.
Performance based rewards are exemplified by the use of commission, piecework pay plans,
incentive systems, group bonuses, or other forms of merit pay plans. On the other hand,
membership based rewards include cost of living increases, profit sharing, benefits, and salary
increases attributable to labour market conditions, seniority or time in rank, credentials (such as
a college degree or a graduate diploma), or future potential (the recent M.B.A. from a prestigious
university). The demarcation between the two is not always obvious.
Theories of Motivation
At a simple level, it seems obvious that people do things, such as go to work, in order to get stuff
they want and to avoid stuff they don't want.
Why exactly they want what they do and don't want what they don't is still something a mystery.
It's a black box and it hasn't been fully penetrated.
Overall, the basic perspective on motivation looks something like this:
Classifying Needs
People seem to have different wants. This is fortunate, because in markets this creates the very
desirable situation where, because you value stuff that I have but you don't, and I value stuff that
you have that I don't, we can trade in such a way that we are both happier as a result.
But it also means we need to try to get a handle on the whole variety of needs and who has them
in order to begin to understand how to design organizations that maximize productivity.
Part of what a theory of motivation tries to do is explain and predict who has which wants. This
turns out to be exceedingly difficult.
Many theories posit a hierarchy of needs, in which the needs at the bottom are the most urgent
and need to be satisfied before attention can be paid to the others.
Maslow
Maslow's hierarchy of need categories is the most famous example:
self-actualization
esteem
belongingness
safety
physiological
Specific examples of these types are given below, in both the work and home context. (Some of
the instances, like "education" are actually satisfiers of the need.)
Need
Home
Job
selfactualization
training,
creativity
esteem
recognition,
responsibilities
belongingness
advancement,
high
growth,
status,
safety
physiological
According to Maslow, lower needs take priority. They must be fulfilled before the others are
activated. There is some basic common sense here -- it's pointless to worry about whether a
given color looks good on you when you are dying of starvation, or being threatened with your
life. There are some basic things that take precedence over all else.
Alderfer's ERG theory
Alderfer classifies needs into three categories, also ordered hierarchically:
growth needs (development of competence and realization of potential)
relatedness needs (satisfactory relations with others)
existence needs (physical well-being)
This is very similar to Maslow -- can be seen as just collapsing into three tiers. But maybe a bit
more rational. For example, in Alderfer's model, sex does not need to be in the bottom category
as it is in Maslow's model, since it is not crucial to (the individual's) existence. (Remember, this
about individual motivation, not species' survival.) So by moving sex, this theory does not predict
that people have to have sex before they can think about going to school, like Maslow's theory
does.
Alderfer believed that as you start satisfying higher needs, they become more intense (e.g., the
power you get the more you want power), like an addiction.
Do any of these theories have anything useful to say for managing businesses? Well, if true,
they suggest that
Not everyone is motivated by the same things. It depends where you are in the hierarchy
(think of it as a kind of personal development scale)
The needs hierarchy probably mirrors the organizational hierarchy to a certain extent: top
managers are more likely to motivated by self-actualization/growth needs than existence
needs. (but try telling Bill Clinton that top executives are not motivated by sex and
cheeseburgers...)
Acquired Needs Theory (mcclellan)
Some needs are acquired as a result of life experiences
need for achievement, accomplish something difficult. as kids encouraged to do things for
themselves.
need for affiliation, form close personal relationships. as kids rewarded for making friends.
need for power, control others. as kids, able to get what they want through controlling others.
These needs can be measured using the TAT (thematic apperception test), which is a projectionstyle test based on interpreting stories that people tell about a set of pictures.
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
This theory suggests that there are actually two motivation systems: intrinsic and extrinsic that
correspond to two kinds of motivators:
intrinsic motivators: Achievement, responsibility and competence. motivators that come from
the actual performance of the task or job -- the intrinsic interest of the work.
extrinsic: pay, promotion, feedback, working conditions -- things that come from a person's
environment, controlled by others.
One or the other of these may be a more powerful motivator for a given individual.
Intrinsically motivated individuals perform for their own achievement and satisfaction. If they
come to believe that they are doing some job because of the pay or the working conditions or
some other extrinsic reason, they begin to lose motivation.
The belief is that the presence of powerful extrinsic motivators can actually reduce a person's
intrinsic motivation, particularly if the extrinsic motivators are perceived by the person to be
controlled by people. In other words, a boss who is always dangling this reward or that stick will
turn off the intrinsically motivated people.
Note that the intrinsic motivators tend to be higher on the Maslow hierarchy.
Two Factor theory (Herzberg)
According to Herzberg, two kinds of factors affect motivation, and they do it in different ways:
hygiene factors. These are factors whose absence motivates, but whose presence has no
perceived effect. They are things that when you take them away, people become dissatisfied
and act to get them back. A very good example is heroin to a heroin addict. Long term addicts
do not shoot up to get high; they shoot up to stop being sick -- to get normal. Other examples
include decent working conditions, security, pay, benefits (like health insurance), company
policies, interpersonal relationships. In general, these are extrinsic items low in the
Maslow/Alderfer hierarchy.
motivators. These are factors whose presence motivates. Their absence does not cause any
particular dissatisfaction, it just fails to motivate. Examples are all the things at the top of the
Maslow hierarchy, and the intrinsic motivators.
So hygiene factors determine dissatisfaction, and motivators determine satisfaction. The two
scales are independent, and you can be high on both.
Equity Theory
Suppose employee A gets a 20% raise and employee B gets a 10% raise. Will both be motivated
as a result? Will A be twice as motivated? Will be B be negatively motivated?
Equity theory says that it is not the actual reward that motivates, but the perception, and the
perception is based not on the reward in isolation, but in comparison with the efforts that went
into getting it, and the rewards and efforts of others. If everyone got a 5% raise, B is likely to feel
quite pleased with her raise, even if she worked harder than everyone else. But if A got an even
higher raise, B perceives that she worked just as hard as A, she will be unhappy.
In other words, people's motivation results from a ratio of ratios: a person compares the ratio of
reward to effort with the comparable ratio of reward to effort that they think others are getting.
Of course, in terms of actually predicting how a person will react to a given motivator, this will get
pretty complicated:
1. People do not have complete information about how others are rewarded. So they are going
on perceptions, rumors, inferences.
2. Some people are more sensitive to equity issues than others
3. Some people are willing to ignore short-term inequities as long as they expect things to work
out in the long-term.
Reinforcement Theory
Withhold
Reward
positive
reinforcement
(raise above
baseline)
negative
reinforcement
(raise up to
baseline)
Stressor
punishment
(bring down
below
baseline)
extinction
(stay
baseline)
at
Reinforcement schedules
The traditional reinforcement schedule is called a continuous reinforcement schedule. Each
time the correct behavior is performed it gets reinforced.
Then there is what we call an intermittent reinforcement schedule. There are fixed and
variable categories.
The Fixed Interval Schedule is where reinforcement is only given after a certain amount of time
has elapsed. So, if you decided on a 5 second interval then each reinforcement would occur at
the fixed time of every 5 seconds.
The Fixed Ratio Schedule is where the reinforcement is given only after a predetermined
number of responses. This is often seen in behavior chains where a number of behaviors have
to occur for reinforcement to occur.
The Variable Interval Schedule is where the reinforcement is given after varying amounts of
time between each reinforcement.
The Variable Ratio Schedule is where the reinforcement is given after a varying number of
correct responses.
the person's assessment of the degree to which effort actually correlates with performance.
I (instrumentality) = The person's perception that performance will be rewarded/punished. I.e.,
the person's assessment of how well the amount of reward correlates with the quality of
performance. (Note here that the model is phrased in terms of extrinsic motivation, in that it asks
'what are the chances I'm going to get rewarded if I do good job?'. But for intrinsic situations, we
can think of this as asking 'how good will I feel if I can pull this off?').
V(valence) = The perceived strength of the reward or punishment that will result from the
performance. If the reward is small, the motivation will be small, even if expectancy and
instrumentality are both perfect (high).
Employee Morale: Nature, Significant and Measures to Improve Morale!
Employee morale is the relationship that a particular employee or a group of employees have
with their work and the organization they work for. High employee morale means that employees
are happy, and this is reflective in the kind of work they produce. On the other hand, low
employee morale results in less productivity and pessimism among employees. It is important for
every organization to continually keep employee morale high.
According to Dalton E. McFarland, morale is basically a group phenomenon. It is a concept that
describes the level of favourable or unfavourable attitude of employees collectively to all aspects
of their workthe job, the company, their tasks, working conditions, fellow workers, superiors
and so on.
Nature of Employee Morale:
Morale represents a composite of feelings, attitudes, and sentiments that contribute to general
feelings of satisfactions. It is a state of mind and spirit affecting willingness to work, which, in
turn, affects organizational and individual objectives. It describes the overall group satisfaction.
1. High morale and low morale:
If the enthusiasm and willingness to work of a group is high, we can say morale is high and vice
versa. Just as good health is essential for an individual, high morale is necessary for an
organization. High morale represents an attitude of satisfaction with desire to continue and
willingness to strive for the goals of the group. Under conditions of high morale, workers have
few grievances, frustrations, and complaints. They are clear about the goalsindividual and
organizationaland are satisfied with human relations in the organization.
2. Morale versus motivation:
Morale should be distinguished from motivation. Although both are cognitive concepts, they are
quite different. Morale is a composite of feelings, attitudes and sentiments that contribute to
general feeling of satisfaction at the workplace. But motivation is something that moves a person
to action.
It is a process of stimulating individuals to action to accomplish the desired goal. It is a function
of drives and needs. Motivation is concerned with mobilization of energy, whereas morale is
concerned with mobilization of sentiments.
3. Morale affects productivity:
Morale has a direct effect on productivity. High morale leads to high productivity and low morale
leads to low productivity.
4. Measurement of morale:
It is hard to measure morale directly as it is an intangible state of mind of the workers.
There are four methods which can be used for measuring the morale of the employee
indirectly:
a. Observation:
The managers can measure the morale of the employees by keenly observing and studying their
activities and behaviour. Since the manager is close to the scene of action, they can always find
out unusual behaviours and report promptly. Observation is not a very reliable way of measuring
morale.
b. Attitude or morale survey:
Survey helps to know the opinion of the employees either by direct interview or by
questionnaires. Efforts are made to find out the view of employees about their job, co-workers,
supervisors, and the organization.
c. Morale indicators:
Employee morale can be measured by examining company records regarding absenteeism,
labour turnover, fluctuations in output, quality records, excessive waste and scrap, training
records, accident rate, and the number of grievances filed.
d. Suggestion boxes:
Employees can be asked to put in their complaints, protests, and suggestions in suggestion
boxes even without disclosing their identity. Morale generates long-term benefits such as
improving the goodwill and increasing the productivity for the organization, and a satisfied
employee is an asset to the organization.
Significance/Importance/Benefits of Morale:
Morale is an important part of organizational climate. It is a vital ingredient of organization
success because it reflects the attitudes and sentiments of organizational members towards the
organization, its objectives, and policies. Morale is the total satisfaction that employees derive
from their job, their work group, their boss, their organization and their environment.
Benefits of High Morale:
Morale of employees must be kept high to achieve the following benefits:
1. Willing cooperation towards objectives of the organization.
2. Loyalty to the organization and its leadership or management
3. Good disciplinevoluntary conformity to rules and regulations
4. High degrees of employees interest in their jobs and organization
5. Pride in the organization
6. Reduction of rates of absenteeism and labour turnover
7. Happy employees are productive employees
Indicators of Low Morale:
Low morale indicates the presence of mental unrest. Such a situation will have the following
adverse consequences;
1. High rates of absenteeism and labour turnover
2. Excessive complaints and grievances
3. Frustration among the workers
4. Friction among the workers and their groups
5. Antagonism towards leadership of the organization
6. Lack of discipline
Measures to Improve Morale:
Morale building is a continuous process which cannot be stopped even for a moment. Morale
cannot be maintained at a high level forever. It is dynamic. Morale building may be done either
on individual basis or on ground basis. Morale building on group basis is always preferable.
Group morale can be increased by understanding the group dynamics. It will automatically
Communication Process
Communication process consists of some interrelated steps or parts through which messages
are sent form sender to receiver. The process of communication begins when the sender wants
to transmit a fact, idea, opinion or other information to the receiver and ends with receivers
feedback to the sender. The main components of communication process are sender, message,
channel, receiver and feedback.
it is clear that communication process is the set of some sequential steps involved in
transferring message as well as feedback. The process requires a sender who transmits
message through a channel to the receiver. Then the receiver decodes the message and sends
back some type of signal or feedback.
Steps or elements of communication process
The communication process refers to the steps through which communication takes place
between the sender and the receiver. This process starts with conceptualizing an idea or
message by the sender and ends with the feedback from the receiver. In details, communication
process consists of the following eight steps:
1. Developing idea by the sender: In the first step, the communicator develops or
conceptualizes an idea to be sent. It is also known as the planning stage since in this stage
the communicator plans the subject matter of communication.
2. Encoding: Encoding means converting or translation the idea into a perceivable form that
can be communicated to others.
3. Developing the message: After encoding the sender gets a message that can be transmitted
to the receiver. The message can be oral, written, symbolic or nonverbal. For example, when
people talk, speech is the message; when people write a letter, the words and sentences are
the message; when people cries, the crying is the message.
4. Selecting the medium: Medium is the channel or means of transmitting the message to the
receiver. Once the sender has encoded his into a message, the next step is to select a
suitable medium for transmitting it to the receiver. The medium of communication can be
speaking, writing, signalling, gesturing etc.
5. Transmission of message: In this step, the sender actually transmits the message through
chosen medium. In the communication cycle, the tasks of the sender end with the
transmission of the message.
6. Receiving the message by receiver: This stage simply involves the reception of senders
message by the receiver. The message can be received in the form of hearing, seeing,
feeling and so on.
7. Decoding: Decoding is the receivers interpretation of the senders message. Here the
receiver converts the message into thoughts and tries to analyze and understand it. Effective
communication can occur only when both the sender and the receiver assign the same or
similar meanings to the message.
8. Feedback: The final step of communication process is feedback. Feedback means receivers
response to senders message. It increases the effectiveness of communication. It ensures
that the receiver has correctly understood the message. Feedback is the essence of two-way
communication.
Communication Channels
In order for employers to maximize their messaging strategy, they need to understand which
communication
channels
are
most
effective
at
reaching
their
employees
.
The chart on the right shows a list of strategies that employers indicated were most or least
effective, with the most effective on the top.
No matter which channel an employer uses, its important to put together a targeted strategy that
includes multiple channels. In general, people who receive information in a variety of ways will
have a better chance of actually paying attention to the information and taking action. Results of
a study by Guardian showed.
Employers are getting more creative in how they communicate to their covered population. Some
are using videos and training materials on employee portals, pre-enrollment campaigns and
social media.
Emerging Trends
Social media (e.g. texts, tweets, blogs, web sites such as Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn) has
been an emergent trend as a channel for benefits communications. While employers may still be
testing the waters, social media is widely used by health plans and vendors in the benefits
space. Before a company embarks on this type of strategy it is important to understand their
populations level of interest in wanting to use it.
Best Communication Channels to Use
In the following 5-Step Method to Effective Employee Benefits Communication, employers can
determine which communication channels work best with their approach. Determining what
channel to use when is very important to the success of an overall strategy.
1. Analyze employers available HR data/feedback including EOS (Employee Opinion Survey)
2. Identify key areas for improving employee perceptions, knowledge and understanding
3. Design communication program and implementation time line that includes:
Development of an overall image for benefits communication program
Initial communications focusing on the realities and business reasons for changes in
Corporate Governance
The system of rules, practices and processes by which a company is directed and
controlled. Corporate governance essentially involves balancing the interests of the many
stakeholders in a company - these include its shareholders, management, customers, suppliers,
financiers, government and the community.
Internal Mechanism
The foremost sets of controls for a corporation come from its internal mechanisms. These
controls monitor the progress and activities of the organization and take corrective actions when
the business goes off track. Maintaining the corporation's larger internal control fabric, they serve
the internal objectives of the corporation and its internal stakeholders, including employees,
managers and owners. These objectives include smooth operations, clearly defined reporting
lines and performance measurement systems. Internal mechanisms include oversight of
management, independent internal audits, structure of the board of directors into levels of
responsibility, segregation of control and policy development.
External Mechanism
External control mechanisms are controlled by those outside an organization and serve the
objectives of entities such as regulators, governments, trade unions and financial institutions.
These objectives include adequate debt management and legal compliance. External
mechanisms are often imposed on organizations by external stakeholders in the forms of union
contracts or regulatory guidelines. External organizations, such as industry associations, may
suggest guidelines for best practices, and businesses can choose to follow these guidelines or
ignore them. Typically, companies report the status and compliance of external corporate
governance mechanisms to external stakeholders.
Independent Audit
An independent external audit of a corporations financial statements is part of the overall
corporate governance structure. An audit of the company's financial statements serves internal
and external stakeholders at the same time. An audited financial statement and the
accompanying auditors report helps investors, employees, shareholders and regulators
determine the financial performance of the corporation. This exercise gives a broad, but limited,
view of the organizations internal working mechanisms and future outlook.
Small Business Relevance
Corporate governance has relevance in the small business world as well. Internal mechanisms
of corporate governance may not be implemented on a noticeable scale by a small business, but
the functions can be applied to many small businesses nevertheless. Business owners make
strategic decisions about how workers will do their duties, and they monitor their performance;
this is an internal control mechanism -- part of business governance. Likewise, if a business
requests a loan from a bank, it must respond to that banks demands to comply with liens and
agreement terms -- an external control mechanism. If the business is a partnership, a partner
might demand an audit to place reliance on the profit figures provided -- another form of external
control.
expand the guidance on the role of the board of directors in overseeing the implementation of
effective risk management systems;
emphasise the importance of the board's collective competence as well as the obligation of
individual board members to dedicate sufficient time to their mandates and to keep abreast of
developments in banking;
strengthen the guidance on risk governance, including the risk management roles played by
business units, risk management teams, and internal audit and control functions (the three
lines of defence), as well as underline the importance of a sound risk culture to drive risk
management within a bank;
provide guidance for bank supervisors in evaluating the processes used by banks to select
board members and senior management; and
recognise that compensation systems form a key component of the governance and incentive
structure through which the board and senior management of a bank convey acceptable risktaking behaviour and reinforce the bank's operating and risk culture.