Histamine in Fish
J. P. GOUYGOU,
of
ABSTRACT
Histamine was determined by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid
chromatography in trichloroacetic acid extracts after derivatization with
o-phthaladehyde. Fluorescence was monitored at 350 nm excitation
and 450 nm emission wavelength after elution with water containing
40% acetonitrile. The advantage of the described method is a rapid
analysis in an automated system, where no selective extraction procedure is necessary and interfering substances are easily separated
from the histamine fluorophore.
INTRODUCTION
THE FLUORIMETRIC METHOD for determining histamine
is based on the reaction of o-phtalaldehyde, at highly alkaline
pH, which forms a fluorescent product after converting into a
more fluorescent and stable product by acidification (Shore et
al., 1959). During the last few years, the sensitivity and specificity of this method have been greatly improved. The sensitivity can now be measuredin nanogram amounts of histamine,
but the lack of specificity requires large and laborious purification of most tissue extracts prior to assay.
Many methods have been used to avoid interferences with
other naturally occurring substances,mainly histidine and spermidine (Green and Erickson, 1964; Kremzner and Pfeiffer,
1966; Michaelson, 1967) by specific purification techniques
such as ion-exchange chromatography (Ronnberg et al., 1984)
or selective extraction into alcohol (Anton and Sayre, 1969)
prior to the chemical derivatization with o-phtalaldialdehyde.
Fluorescencedetection coupled with high-pressureliquid chromatography offers possibilities to improve the specificity.
Many studies dealing with the determination of histamine in
fish by high-pressure liquid chromatography have been published (Mietz and Karmas, 1977; Volk and Gemmer, 1982;
Walters, 1984).
Histamine is generally present in fresh fish at levels less
than 50 mg/kg (Staruszkiewicz et al., 1977). Larger amounts
of histamine and other biogenic amines are formed during the
decomposition process by the action of decarboxylating bacteria on the corresponding free amino acids. A maximum allowable level of 100 mg histamine/kg fish seemsto be adequate
in order to prevent fish poisoning (Luten, 1983).
The purpose of this study was to develop a sensitive, simple,
and selective method to analyze histamine in fish after condensation with o-phthaldialdehyde, using HPLC under isocratic elution conditions.
MATERIALS
Determination
All other reagents were of analytical grade (E. Merck). All solvents
were degassed prior to use.
The HPLC system consisted of a LC Pump 414 and MS1 660 autosampler (KONTRON), and a Rheodyne injection valve with a loop
capacity of 20 pl. The detector used was a KONTRON SFM 25
fluorometer, equipped with a Xenon-High pressure Lamp. Fluorescence was monitored at 350 nm excitation and 450 nm emission wavelengths.
The KONTRON RP 18 column (4.6 x 220 mm) packed with a
particle size of 5 pm was used for reversed-phase liquid chromatography. The isocratic mobile phase consisted of 40% acetonitrile in
water with monosodium phosphate (50 mmoles/L) at a flow-rate of
0.7 mL/min. Chromatogram recordings and all calculations were performed on a ANACOMP 220 computer.
Derivatization was done by a modification of the method of Rice
et al., 1975. The OPA reagent was prepared by dissolving 10 mg
OPA in 1 ml methanol. Standard solutions of histamine ranging be-l
0 bos
061
0015
CONCENTRATION
Fig. l-Linearity
of fluorescence
intensity
centrations
of histamine
in TCA (100%).
for
k&rn~
increasing
con-
& METHODS
The authors
are with the lnstitut
Francais
de Recherche
Pour
LExploitation
de la Mer, Rue de llle dYeu - BP 1049 44037
Nantes
Cedex 01, France.
Fig. 2-Stability
measured
over
Volume
52,
No.
of fluorescent
a 24-hr period
4, 1987-JOURNAL
OPA-histamine
derivative
at 4C and 23C (ambient).
OF
FOOD
SCIENCE-925
was
IN FISH. . .
Histamine
.
.3
I
n
Retention
time
4
v)
"
(min)
Fig. 3-HPLC
separation
of OPA-TCA
fish extract
using
reversed-phase
column
with
monosodium
phosphate
mmolesll)
in the acetonitrile-water
(40.60) solvent.
RP 18
(50
tween 0.001 and 0.02 mg/mL in 10% TCA were filtered (0.45 urn)
and stored at 4C.
The histamine-OPA fluorophore was prepared by mixing 135 )LI
stock solution with 1.86 mL deionized water and 0.4 mL N sodium
hydroxide solution, and leaving it for 1 min in a tube protected from
light with aluminium foil. OPA reagent (0. 1mL) was added, the
solution mixed, and left 4 min before addition of 0.2 mL 3N HCI.
For a histamine solution containing 0.01 mg/mL in 10% TCA the
20 )LL injection volume corresponded to a quantity of 10 ng histamine.
The sample was prepared by blending 5Og fish with 100 mL 10%
TCA solution, centrifuging and filtering the clear extract through a
0.45 pm filter. The filtrate was stored at 4C.
CHO
HI
CH2
yCH2
OF FOOD SCIENCE-Volume
Retention
I
0
time-(min)
Fig. AHPLC
separation
of histidine
standard
(5 mglmL)
using
RP 18 reversed-phase
column
with monosodium
phosphate
(50
mmoleslL)
in the acetonitrile-water
(40:6OJ solvent.
Table I-Range
and average
(parts per millionJ.
Samples of
canned tuna
N II 2
G II 1
values of histamine
Number of
analvsis
8
8
found in canned
Histamine
Ranae
17.5-18.2
5s
6.1
content
tuna
(ppm)
Averaae
17.9
5.9
. .From
REFERENCES
rocedure for
Anton, A.H. and Sayre, D.F. 1969. A modified fluorometric
tissue histamine and its distribution
in various animals. s: Pharmacol.
Exp. Ther. 166: 285.
Green, H. and Erickson, R.W. 1964. Effect of some drugs upon rat brain
histamine content. Int. J. Neuropharmacol.
3: 315.
Kremsner, L.T. and Pfeiffer, C.C. 1966. Identification
of substances interfering with the fluorometric determination
of brain histamine. Biochem
Pharmacol. 15: 197.
Luten, J.B. 1983. Analysis, toxicity and formation of histamine. Paper
presented at 13th Annual Meeting of Western European Fish Technologists Association, Iimuiden,, the Netherlands.
Michaelson, I.A. 1967. Spernudine: A contaminant
in the n-butanol extraction of brain in the fluorometric
assay of histamine. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1: 378.
Miets, J.L. and Karmas, E. 1977. Chemical quality index of canned tuna
as
J. Food Sci. 42:
.-- determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography.
103.
page 921
REFERENCES
AOAC. 1960. Official Methods of Analysis, 9th ed. Association of Official
A icultural Chemists, Washington, DC.
Bal 8,rati, G., Guidi, G., Piraszoli, P., and Porreta, A. 1977. Tecnologia di
Trasformasione
delle acciughe. II. Influenza della pressatura sulla ma$rIrfzione delle acciughe sotto sale. Industria Conserve. Parma 52(3):
Boeri, R.L., Davidovich, L.A., and Lupin, H.M. 1978. Comparacion de metodos para la determinacidn
de humedad en productos pesqueros. La
Alimentacion
Latinoamericana.
111: 44.
Filsinger, B.E., Barassi, C.A., Lupin, H.M.,, and Trucco, R.E. 1982. An
objective index for the evaluation of the ripening of salted anchovy. J.
Food Technol. 17: 193.
Himmelblau,
D.M. 1970. Process Analysis by Statistical Methods, p. 116.
John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.
COMPOSlTlON
Lupin, H.M., Boeri, R.L., and Moschiar, S.M. 1981. Water activity and salt
content relationship
in moist salted fish products. J. Food Technol. 16:
31.
Manaelsdorf, P. 1959. Convenient plot for exponential functions with unkn&n
asymptotes. J. Appl. Phys. 30: 442. _
Swinbourne, ES. 1960. Method for obtaining the rate coefficient and final
concentration of a first-order reaction. J. Chem. Sot. 82: 2371.
Zugarramurdi,
A. and Lupin, H.M. 1977. Studies on anchovy salting. 2.
Dynamics of the process. Lat. Am. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. Chem. 7: 25.
MS reveived 4/l/85; revised l/16/87; accepted 1116187.
The author
thanks
La Campagnola
Iribarren
for
The authors sincerely thank R. Benson, G. Bon&l, G. Browne, S. Cave, N. Cheeseman, A. Downey, J. Johnson, J. Lauder, W. Saint, H. Stagg, J. Summers and P. Wheeler
for their technical assistance.
The assistance of J. Rice and D. Stansbury
in analyzing
the data is greatly appreciated.
The authors are grateful to the commercial
fishermen
at Bonavista,
NF, for the
excellent co-operation that was received.
OF FOOD SCIENCE-927
1