Jfs 173 Report Final

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center
2004 Thesis
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Allentown, Pennsylvania
Owner/Occupant: The Lehigh County Historical Society

Architect: RCG Inc., Architects
Engineer (Civil, Structural, MEP): Barry Isett and Associates, Inc.
Construction Management: Alvin H. Butz, Inc.
Architectural Features:
~ 32,000 ft2, Two Story Plus
Basement Museum Building
~ Masonry Faade Containing Brick,
Bluestone and Concrete
~ 24 x 28 x 13.5 Insulated Glass,
Pyramidal Skylight
~ Zinc Cornice on Roof, Concealing
the Equipment Well
Project Information:
> Estimated Project Cost of $5.7 Million, With A
New Estimate Forming As The Project is Being Bid
Upon
> Proposed Fast Track Delivery Method
> Only Bidding (Invitation Only) For Site,
Foundation And The Steel Package Has Taken
Place
Mechanical Features:
*Two RTUs & Three AHUs for 33,800 CFM
*19 VAV Boxes (Heating Only)
*Two 238 MBH Steam Generators
*Two 2000 MBH Boilers for the Hot Water Piping
Serving Two Duct Coils, VAV Boxes, Tube and
Panel Radiators, Fan Coil Unit, and the AHUs
*One 60 ton chiller
Structural Features:
^ Standard Steel Framing with
Reinforced Masonry Shear Walls\
^ Steel Stud Backing Behind Masonry
Walls
^ Concrete Floor Slabs on Metal
Decking Containing Support Draped
Mesh with Chairs
Electrical Features:
- 42 KA AIC Main Breaker, 1000/3 N-Frame With
160 KA TVSS Which Feeds Both RTUs, And The
Elevator
- Dimmable Track Lighting Located In The
Galleries And Conference Room
- Integrated Video Surveillance/ Door Intercom
System And Card Access System For Security
Purposes
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option
www.arche.psu.edu/thesis/2004/jfs73

Table Of Contents
Executive Summary
Introduction
Background / Site.
Existing Conditions
Architecture...
Structural...
Electrical/Lighting
Mechanical.
3
5
6
7
Depth Study
DOAS System ... 9
Breadth Study
Structural
Analysis of mechanical equipment on roof.
Construction Management
EPS formwork...
Smart Windows.
Cooling Tower Study
17
19
23
Summary and Conclusions
25
References.
26
Credits/Acknowledgements..........
Appendices
Appendix A: Mechanical
Appendix B: Structural
27
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option
13
The Pennsylvania State University

Architectural Engineering

Executive Summary
The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center is being constructed in Allentown,

Pennsylvania. The 32,000 ft2 museum will contain a mixture of spaces with many uses.
Some spaces include an orientation room, a library, two art galleries, a large open lobby
and a school program room. A redesign of the mechanical system has been conducted for
the depth study and numerous energy analysis simulations have been performed to
determine if a dedicated outdoor air system with parallel fan coil units will save on energy
consumption as well as provide each space with the correct ventilation air requirements
established by ASHRAE Std. 62-2001. A new ventilation air unit with energy recovery
replaced the existing roof top units and air handling units. New equipment has been
selected for the chiller, boilers, steam generators and VAV boxes. A cost analysis has
been made with the 2003 RS Means Mechanical Cost Data to determine an equipment cost
savings of $72,500.
A structural breadth was performed for a small area located on the roof. The steel
framing of the equipment well on the roof that houses the new outdoor air energy recovery
unit and condensing unit has been resized and a cost savings estimate of approximately
$1,290 has been calculated based on the reduction of the beam and girder sizes.
Feasibility studies have been made on EPS concrete insulating forms for the
basement walls, electrochromic windows for electrical cost reductions through reduced
artificial lighting, and the evaluation of replacing the air cooled chiller with a cooling
tower. None of the studies have shown any favor to any of these items to the Heritage
Center, but the electrochromic windows will be a large item on the automated building
controls scheme in the future and will hopefully reduce electricity consumption from
artificial lighting.
1
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Introduction To:

Background / site
The Lehigh County Historical Society has been collecting artifacts of the Lehigh
Valley since times as early as 1904. Since then over 30,000 historic artifacts have been
obtained, including items such as tools, clothes, pictures, artwork, books, products, family
documents, newspapers, maps, records of social event and buildings. The Lehigh County
Historical Society provides exhibits, literature and educational programs to inform visitors
about the history and development of the Lehigh Valley.
The Lehigh County Historical Society is based in Allentown, Pennsylvania. The
Old Courthouse, located on Hamilton and 5th Street, contains the offices of the Lehigh
Valley Historical Society. Other historical sites that the Lehigh Valley Historical Society
has helped maintain are the George Taylor House, Trout Hall, Troxell-Steckel House and
Farm Museum, Haines Mill Museum, Claussville School, Lock Ridge Furnace Museum
and the Saylor Park Cement Kilns. Another building that contains a large archive of the
Lehigh Valleys heritage is the Scott Andrew Trexler II Memorial Library.
The Lehigh County Historical Society decided to build a new building to house more
artifacts and offices. The new building, named The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center, will be
constructed on an existing plot where Trout Hall is located, on Walnut and South Penn
Streets. The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center will be a 32,000 ft2 multi-space building.
This two story, plus basement structure will contain offices, a conference room, a school
program room, an orientation room, galleries, storage space, a museum shop, library, and
a large, open lobby at the entrance. The building will not only serve as a visitors center,
to welcome and inform guests visiting the Lehigh Valley, but also as a research and
learning center to residents of the Lehigh Valley.
Although the Lehigh Valley Heritage Center wont be a historic building anytime
soon, the historic information contained inside the building will take people through time,
from the inhabitance of the Lenni Lenape Native American tribe to the arrival of the settlers to
the industrial revolution era and finally, to the modern day Lehigh Valley.
2
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Existing Conditions:

Architecture
The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center will serve as a collector for artifacts of the
Lehigh Valley. The 32,000 ft2 building is currently being constructed at the corner of
Walnut and South Penn Streets. The building will be two stories tall with a basement. A
portion of the basement wall will be exposed on the south and west faade of the building.
The building materials of the faade will be poured in place concrete for the basement, face
brick, ground face CMU block and bluestone for the first and second floor walls and a zinc
cornice around the roof. The northeast corner of the building will serve as the main
entrance and is designed as a large, open lobby with plenty of windows spanning the walls
as well as a pyramidal skylight above.
The spaces inside the Heritage Center are of mixed purposes, as the building is
designed to hold more than just artifacts. The building footprint is 12,310 ft2 yet the
basement is only 8,345 ft2. The northern area of the building containing the reading room
and workroom areas is slab on grade construction. The basement contains three storage
rooms, two mechanical rooms and corridor space. The loading dock/receiving area is
located off of the sidewalk level on the south faade, which is between the basement and
first floor. A south entrance to the building is also located off of the sidewalk elevation.
This entrance leads to a small vestibule where the elevator and a set of stairs are located.
The first floor contains an orientation room where presentations will be given
through various media, an archive storage room, a reading room/library (in conjunction
with the archive storage), a workroom for preparing artifacts, a museum shop, restrooms
and the lobby.
Figure 1. Walnut Street (North) Elevation, courtesy of The Lehigh

County Historical Society
The second floor contains twelve offices (including the directors office), a volunteer
room, work stations, two galleries, a school program room (for children visiting on field
trips), restrooms, a copy room, a processing room, a conference room and a balcony above
the lobby. The area containing the two galleries and lobby has a higher roof structure
than does the rest of the building. The galleries have an open ceiling, exposing the open
3
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


web steel trusses and supporting girders, instead of the standard suspended acoustical tile
located throughout the rest of the building. The difference in height of the two roofs is
eight feet. This multi-functional building contains a variety of spaces, as discussed, which
provides a challenge for engineering the building.
Figure 2. Hickory Street (South) Elevation, courtesy of the

Lehigh County Historical Society
A cornice wraps around the lower ceiling height and is made of copper. A cornice
also wraps around the upper roof, but is made of zinc. A large glass pyramid is located on
the upper roof, above the lobby. The pyramid is approximately 28 wide by 32 long and is
17 above the upper roof elevation. Elevations of the building from the north, south and
west are given below in Figures 1, 2 and 3.
Figure 3. Penn Street (West) Elevation, courtesy of The

Lehigh County Historical Society
4
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Structural
The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center contains a steel skeleton. The steel framed
building sits on piers, connected to the footings in the foundation walls of the basement.
The basement walls are 16 thick around the perimeter of the building to withstand a
5,000 psf soil bearing pressure. Pilasters are located around the perimeter, which contain
steel columns supported on the piers. The basement walls are 17 tall. The northern
and eastern walls are underground, while the western and southern walls are partially
exposed. Depth of the footings varies around the building, as because of the excavated and
unexcavated areas of the basement. The footings are stepped as they approach the
excavated area of the basement, lowering them as much as 11.
The walls of the faade of the building are reinforced, shear masonry walls. The
walls will consist of face brick, crushed face CMU block, and concrete. The floor to floor
height from the first to second floor is 16, while the floor to roof height of the second floor
varies between 12-4 and 20-4. Behind the exterior walls are steel studs on which
gypsum board is attached.
The basement flooring will consist of 6 poured concrete containing 44 W4.0 x W4.0
welded wire fabric. The first and second floors will consist of 5 poured concrete,
containing 66 W2.9 x W2.9 welded wire fabric, on a 22 gauge composite galvanized metal
deck. In the museum shop and restrooms on the first floor, the slab is 7 thick. The roof
framing is made of girders, beams and open web steel trusses. Metal decking with board
insulation and built up roofing will sit on the structural members. A cornice wraps around
the perimeter of the building on both the lower and upper roof.
Some mechanical equipment is contained on the roof, in equipment well. The
equipment well is located on the south western area of the roof, butting up against the
higher roof structure of the main gallery. These units sit on dunnage, which is a support
system that sits above the roof elevation. The dunnage transfers the weight of the units
from its support system to the columns supporting the roof structure. The roof structure
consisting of the metal decking and built up roofing have negligible structural integrity.
The walls of the well are composed of rectangular hollow structural steel, mainly HSS 6 x
8 . The faade consists of a zinc cornice, open at the bottom 4 of the western wall.
5
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Electrical/lighting
The Heritage Center contains many types of lighting, inside the building and
outside. Outside fixtures include bollard metal halide, in-wall light, wall sconce metal
halide, in-ground well light, architectural wall light and area cutoff for the parking area.
The majority of the lighting is concentrated on the concrete terrace, located on the eastern
side of the building, outside the lobby. Lights also span the southern faade of the
building to illuminate the sidewalk and parking area.
Interior lighting fixtures are mainly fluorescent fixtures, recessed in the suspended
ceiling. Downlights are found in the corridor surrounding the lobby, the orientation room,
stairwells, bathrooms, conference room and in the galleries. Tracks are placed in the
galleries, but no fixtures are assigned to them, a note on the drawings indicates the owner
decides the type of lighting that will go on the track the positions that they will face.
Dimmable lights are specified in the galleries as well as the conference room. The lighting
can be remotely controlled by radio signals or by touch panels located on the walls. Lutron
is the specified company that will provide the controls for dimming capabilities.
Electricity to the building is supplied by PP&L Co. A transformer is located in
vault located on the southwest corner of the building. The secondary feeders from the
transformer are routed in mechanical room 006 in the basement where they are attached
to a switch gear. The switch gear contains a 42KA AIC Main Breaker. Several wires are
run from the switch gear to the roof top units, the elevator, power panels, lighting panels
and mechanical panels. These wires carry 277/480V 3 phase power. Another transformer
(150 KVA 480delta stepdown) is located after the switch gear and distributes 208Y/120V
to the rest of the power and light panels. The entire building contains 11 panel boards,
including the main distribution panel.
The building fire alarm and detection system is also served by the power
distribution equipment. The system contains smoke detectors, heat detectors, duct
detectors, pull stations and strobe lights, with and without horns, which are all connected
to a fire alarm control panel and the building control system. The building also contains
an integrated security system with cameras, card access readers, door contact sensors,
motion detectors and break glass sensors.
6
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Mechanical
Because the building has different spaces located within it, there isnt just one
mechanical system. The basement contains two mechanical rooms, mechanical room 006,
located on the southern area of the basement, and mechanical room 003, located adjacent
to and north of mechanical room 006. Mechanical room 006 contains a 60 ton air cooled
chiller, two 149 gpm circulating pumps for the chiller, a 3,055 cfm air handling unit (AHU3, containing HW and CHW coils) and a 4,200 cfm relief air fan connected to a motorized
louver (30x72x6).
Mechanical room 003 contains two 238 MBH steam generators (gas fired), a 11,993
cfm air handling unit (AHU-1), a 4,214 cfm air handling unit (AHU-2) and two 2,000 MBH
gas fired boilers. The boilers are located in an enclosed room within mechanical room 003
because of code dealing with explosion containment and egress from the space. The room
also contains several pumps for the boilers (two 135 gpm boiler pumps, one 125 gpm
primary loop pump, one 35 gpm pump for VAV boxes, one 8 gpm pump for panel radiators
located in the lobby and stairwell 001 and one 4 gpm pump for the baseboard units located
in the loading dock, reading room, directors office and south vestibule). The basement also
contains two outdoor air intake fans for the steam generators and boilers (combustion air),
one 1,668 cfm fan for the boilers and one 208 cfm fan for the steam generators.
The steam generators and boilers are direct vent equipment. The vents travel up
the mechanical shaft to the roof, which is approximately 53 ft above the basement floor.
The steam generators serve air handling units one and two, located in the same room.
This is because of the humidity control in the storage and gallery spaces that must be
maintained. The owner specified that the spaces be within 5%+/- of a 45% relative
humidity design condition. The Archival Storage, Museum Collections Storage and
Negative Storage rooms all require a climate consisting of forty-five percent relative
humidity (+/- five percent) at sixty five degrees Fahrenheit (+/- five degrees) dry bulb
temperature. The Galleries, Reading Room, Archival Processing and Collections
Processing rooms all require a climate of forty-five percent relative humidity (+/- five
percent) at seventy to seventy-five degrees Fahrenheit dry bulb temperature.
AHU-1 is located in the basement mechanical room, with its outdoor air being
supplied by a fan and corresponding ductwork from the roof. AHU-1 serves the basement
as well as spaces on the first floor such as the reading room, archive storage and the
archivists office and workroom. AHU-2 serves the two galleries on the second floor.
AHU-3 serves the orientation room, museum shop and restrooms on the first floor. AHU-1
and AHU-3 both supply air to VAV boxes (HW heating) located in each of their
corresponding zones.
VAV boxes are located throughout the building each one serving a zone within the
building. The VAV boxes are used as primary heating elements for the air supplied to
7
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


each zone. Hot water coils are used in the boxes to heat the air. The VAV boxes are not
fan powered, but do have a small transformer on them to step down the voltage to
modulate the damper. There are a total of nineteen VAV boxes, all with hot water coils.
Located in the lobby, an electric unit heater serves the vestibule at the entrance.
A fan coil unit is located in the loading dock to condition the air. No outdoor air is
supplied to the space, because an assumption was made that when people were located in
that space, the overhead door would be open when loading/unloading artifacts. The fan
coil unit is a four pipe unit. Exhaust fans are located in bathrooms and are on a switch
control, which prevents the fans from operating all day.
Located on the roof are two 30 ton condensing units, one 8,280 cfm packaged DX
roof top unit (RTU-1), one 6,209 cfm packaged DX roof top unit (RTU-2) and one 5,253 cfm
outdoor air intake fan. The condensing units each have four fans to cool the refrigerant
being pumped from the chiller located in the basement. Because the roof top units are
packaged DX units, they only have cooling capacities. One hot water duct coil located in
the supply ductwork directly below each unit heats the air as it enters the building. The
larger duct coil, corresponding to RTU-1, has a capacity of 330 MBH while duct coil 2,
corresponding to RTU-2, has a capacity of 126 MBH. The condensing units and both roof
top units are located within the equipment well. The outdoor air intake fan is located on
the higher roof located 24 east of the mechanical shaft because of the exhaust flues from
the boilers and steam generators as well as the exhaust fan located above the mechanical
shaft, adjacent to the flues.
8
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Depth Study:

Doas Design
DOAS stands for dedicated outdoor air systems. This type of system addresses the
issue of supplying the correct ventilation air requirements to each space in a
building/zone. DOAS contains two parallel working systems. One system handles the
distribution of ventilation air to the spaces as well as the total latent loads in the spaces,
which also satisfies some of the sensible loads in the spaces. The parallel system only
needs to satisfy the remaining sensible loads in the spaces. The separate conditioning of
the sensible and latent loads is called decoupling. The parallel system may be a parallel
all air VAV system, packaged unitary water source heat pumps, fan coil units, packaged
unitary equipment or radiant ceiling panels.
Table 2 of ASHRAE Std. 62-2001 contains outdoor air ventilation requirements for
a variety of rooms in different facilities. Table 2 contains an estimated maximum
occupancy for spaces, outdoor air ventilation requirements (based on occupancy or area)
and exhaust rates for bathrooms and other special processes. The ventilation rates are
based on human comfort. Humans generate carbon dioxide, which unless ventilated, can
cause discomfort to humans due to odors. The standard is based on keeping carbon
dioxide levels less than 700 ppm above outdoor air conditions.
ASHRAE Std. 90.1-2001 also affects DOAS. ASHRAE Std. 90.1-2001 requires that
Individual fan systems that have both a design supply air capacity of 5,000 cfm or greater
and have a minimum outside air supply of 70% or greater of the design supply air quantity
shall have an energy recovery system with at least 50% recovery effectiveness. This
means that any DOAS above 5,000 cfm will be required to have an energy recovery device
(enthalpy wheel). The standard also addresses the requirement that reheat is not allowed
because of the humidity control incorporated with the unit to satisfy the latent load.
Because of this requirement, a sensible wheel can be used for free heating.
The reason for choosing a DOAS for the Lehigh Valley Heritage Center was because
of the VAV boxes located throughout the building. VAV boxes are poor humidity
controllers and outdoor air distributors. Recirculated air mixes with outdoor air to be
supplied to the spaces. This means a certain fraction of that supply air is outdoor air.
When the boxes throttle down to the minimum setting, a small amount of air is
distributed to the room. This small amount of air has the same percentage of outdoor air
mixed in with it when it was traveling down the main duct, but because its volume was
reduced entering the space so was the amount of outdoor air mixed with it. This makes it
very hard for engineers to ensure the proper amount of outdoor air for a space. ASHRAE
Std. 62-2001 contains the multiple spaces equation, which calculates the amount of air
needed to be supplied to the critical space to ensure proper ventilation requirements. The
volume of air is usually increased which means that all other spaces are receiving more air
than needed, adding to the coiling coil load on the main air handling unit. The same
principle relates to the humidity control in the spaces. As the boxes throttle down,
9
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


humidity control is lost due to the inadequacy of the lower volume supply air. Because the
building will contain artwork and artifacts, humidity control is an important factor in
preserving the materials being stored within the building.
To simulate The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center with a DOAS system, the Carrier
HAP v4.2 energy and building simulation program was used. The existing file from last
semesters evaluation was imported and refined with new utility rates for both gas and
electric. The electric utility rate is based on a GS-3 service from PP&L Co. This service
includes demand charges and step functions for the electric rate. The gas is supplied by
UGI and that rate changed as well. An overhang was added to the exterior of the lobby
that was missed in the first calculation. The total operating cost of the building was
$33,401, which came out to be $1.39/ft2.
Heritage Center
($)
4,717
Component
Air System Fans
Cooling
2,477
Heating
4,638
Pumps
1,404
Cooling Tower Fans
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
13,236
12,429
Electric Equipment
695
Misc. Electric
7,042
Misc. Fuel Use
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
20,166
Grand Total
33,401
Table 1. Existing Condition Operating Cost
In order to simulate a DOAS in HAP, all air handling units were turned into
ventilation units. The terminal (parallel) units were chosen to be four pipe fan coil units
since both hot and chilled water were existent in the building. A common ventilation
system was chosen on the general tab of the air distribution systems.
Under the ventilation system components tab, a constant airflow for the ventilation
air was chosen because the ventilation system only needs to supply the outdoor air
requirement for the spaces. The ventilation sizing method was chosen to be the sum of the
space outdoor air flows, which will provide the cfm necessary for the ventilation unit.
Ventilation reclaim simulates the enthalpy wheel on the ventilation unit. The enthalpy
wheel does both sensible and latent heat transfer. Its efficiency was guessed at 80% as
well was the power input at 0.8 kW. The coiling coil was arbitrarily chosen at 45 degrees
F, which will be modulated to determine the most feasible operating point. The coil
bypass factor was left set at 0.1. Chilled water will be providing the cooling through the
coils. The heating coil was checked, even though ASHRAE Std. 90.1 does not allow it; it
10
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


will be used as a sensible heating wheel. The fuel input for the coil was chosen to be
propane, only because no other equipment in the building used propane, so the energy
charge could be set to zero to simulate free heating. The temperature was set at 55
degrees F and would be modulated with the cooling coil to find an optimum operating
point. Humidification was chosen to be a minimum of 40% and would be supplied by a
steam generator. The cooling coil would be dehumidifying and the maximum set point
was chosen as 50% from the building owners requirements for the spaces containing
artifacts and artwork. The ventilation units that would be chosen were from Semco and
would have ventilation and an exhaust fan. Both fans were arbitrarily chosen as forward
curve at 2.0 in w.g. with an efficiency of 54%. The duct system would have a return air
plenum with 5% heat gain from the walls, 68% heat gain from the ceiling and 27% from
the lighting equipment.
Under the zone components tab all spaces were made into their own zone during the
testing of the systems and equipment. The thermostat was kept as the same used in the
original design last semester. Common data was left alone at the hot water and chilled
water temperatures. Terminal units were set on fan coil, but no data was placed in for the
fan hp or minimum airflow.
The sizing data and equipment tab were not adjusted in any way. The hot water,
chilled water and steam generator plant were all kept the same as the original design.
Systems were analyzed to determine if the loading in the building could be decoupled and
at what condition(s) it occurred. After varying the temperatures and input conditions for
each system, the zoning needed to be finalized. . All roof top units and air handling units
were converted into one ventilation unit while the number of zones was reduced to
eighteen. After the zones had been reconfigured a test was conducted to see at which
temperature would the lowest operating cost would be. All plant equipment was the same
as the existing data and simulations were run at (cc temp/ hc temp) 45/55, 55/55, 60/60,
65/65, and 70/70.
The 70/70 system was the most cost effective system so that was chosen to be the
operating conditions of the DOAS. Next, corresponding equipment could be sized for the
zones as well as the main air handling unit. York four pipe fan coil units were chosen for
the different zones. The YHBC models were chosen for the majority of the spaces and four
11
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


LVHC DOAS 45
55
($)
3,944
LVHC DOAS 55
55
($)
3,993
LVHC DOAS 60
60
($)
4,003
LVHC DOAS 65
65
($)
4,012
LVHC DOAS 70
70
($)
3,988
Cooling
8,562
6,062
5,567
5,189
4,956
Heating
4,567
3,915
3,053
2,276
1,661
401
407
402
394
329
Component
Air System Fans
Pumps
Cooling Tower Fans
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
Electric Equipment
Misc. Electric
Misc. Fuel Use
17,474
14,377
13,025
11,871
10,934
13,800
13,982
13,983
13,974
13,855
715
724
725
724
718
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
14,515
14,707
14,708
14,698
14,573
Grand Total
31,989
29,084
27,733
26,569
25,506
Table 2. Annual Costs for test temperatures of DOAS
YHYB models were chosen for the high use spaces, the lobby being one of them. All fan
coil units fit in the plenum spaces below the steel joists. A Semco Energy Recovery Unit
was chosen for the ventilation system. An EPD-18 model was chosen to satisfy the 41.5
ton load on the cooling coil.
Although the design intentions were to make the fan coil units a sensible only
system, the fan coil units will condense and must be equipped with drain pans and
condensate piping.
The entire mechanical system was able to be reduced. A new boiler rated at 750
MBH was selected from Bryan Boilers, the chiller was downsized to a 41.5 ton unit and,
accordingly, the air cooled condenser unit on the roof was downsized. A smaller steam
generator was selected, 140 MBH max input, while the roof top units, air handling units,
VAV boxes, an O/A intake fan, duct heaters and a louver were all able to be removed. The
approximate savings of the new system over the old system came out around $72,500.
This only accounts for the equipment in Appendix A. Ductwork and piping costs were not
included, which would lower the savings.
The new operating cost of the building comes out to be $1.17/ft2, which corresponds
to a savings of $0.22/ft which is $5,280. As well as saving money, mechanical room 006
contains no more equipment, since the new chiller and boiler moved to mechanical room
003. Mechanical room six is 890ft2, which can be utilized as storage for the museum.
12
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Breadth Study:

Structural
Analysis of the new mechanical equipment on the roof
A structural evaluation of the steel framing system supporting the equipment well
will be assessed since the mechanical equipment has changed throughout the building.
The original equipment well contained the two roof top units and the two condensing
units. Since the redesign of the mechanical equipment, all three air handling units and
both roof top units were removed and replaced with the EPD-18 Semco Unit. The EPD-18
was placed in the equipment well where the two roof top units had been. The two 30 ton
condensing units were also downsized into one 42.5 ton unit. This McQuay condensing
unit was also proposed to be placed in the same area as the existing condensing units.
Because new equipment is being installed in a confined space, serviceability and
spacing requirements must be taken into account before evaluating the support system. If
this was not checked, valuable time and money could be wasted after a redesign of the
steel was undertaken if afterwards it was found out that there was not enough clearance
around the equipment for proper operation or maintenance. The manufacturer of the
equipment has spacing and clearance requirements for operability.
The condensing unit requires a minimum of 4 clearance from each side for
serviceability. The condensing unit will be placed in the center of the area utilized by the
existing units. This area is approximately 24 wide by 20 long; the 24 dimension is the
width of the equipment well. The unit is 7-4 wide by 7-10 long which clearly meets the
minimum 4 clearance distance, when it is placed in the center of the area. Because the
unit is inside the equipment well, it must meet another spacing requirement by the
manufacturer. The space within the equipment well simulates a pit. Stagnant air can be
found in deep pits and circulation problems exist. The unit must not be placed in a pit
where the walls are equal to or taller than the unit itself, unless extra space is given along
the coil side. The unit is 8-4 tall, while the equipment well walls are 9 tall. The
minimum requirement for distance from the pit walls is 6 ft. Again, these two
requirements are met, as long as the unit is placed centrally in the area designated.
The Semco Energy Recovery Unit will also be placed centrally within its designated
space. The space is approximately 24 wide by 41 long. The unit itself is 10-2 wide, 258 long and 8-2 in height. The engineering data contains no spacing requirements
around the unit, but a general rule of thumb is to have spacing around the unit equal to
its width. This is a reasonable assumption, considering the recovery wheels inside span
most of the width and would more than likely be pulled out from the side. Placing the unit
in the center of the space would leave approximately 7 wide space running along the
length of the unit and 8 along its width. Although these limitations of space seem against
standards, the unit will stay in that designated area for the evaluation of the steel
members. One solution to the problem of spacing is to move the unit closer to one wall so
that the serviceability requirement can be met on the opposite side.
13
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Now that the units are set in their designated spaces, an evaluation of the steel
framing system will be undertaken. The comparison of loading on the frame from the
mechanical equipment is given below in Table 1. Although the new equipment is double
the load of the existing equipment, an analysis will be done to size beam and girder
members to withstand the mechanical load, whether it be an increase or reduction in steel.
Existing Equipment Operating Weight
Roof Top Unit One
5,025 lbs
Roof Top Unit Two
2,345 lbs
Air cooled condenser
1,585 lbs
Air Cooled Condenser 1,585 lbs
Total Weight = 9,113 lbs
New Equipment
Semco Unit EPD-18
McQuay air cooled
condenser
Operating Weight
17,500 lbs
3,650 lbs
Total Weight = 21,150 lbs
Table 3. Equipment operating weight in the equipment well
The manual of steel construction using LRFD was used in the sizing of the beams and
girders. Refer to Appendix B for all calculations and drawings of the structural system for
the mechanical well. A distributed area method was undertaken to simplify the design
analysis. All loadings on the building were determined before the calculations took place.
The roof live load is controlled by snow loading, which is 31 psf. A superimposed dead load
was used in this process and was given a value of 25 psf, which includes roofing material,
steel members and ductwork/sprinklers. A safety factor of 1.15 was used in the
calculation of the dead loads. The equipment well walls were estimated at 30 psf for a
screen wall, which is conservative. The walls are composed of hollow structural steel,
CMU block and zinc. All beams considered for the analysis were checked for deflection
against the factor l/360.
There were only three beams which were not analyzed, and they were part of the
wall leading up to the higher roof elevation. They could have been resized, but the
construction methodology used with the beams is unknown. Two beams are placed side by
side along the wall, so there is an uncertainty of the walls load distribution on the side by
side beams.
The beam sizes were able to be reduced, mostly to size W12 X 14. The girders were
able to be downsized as well, reducing their weight by a factor of two. Using the new
beam and girder sizes, a cost savings calculation was performed. A recent article found on
the internet estimated the cost of steel to be $490.00 per ton. After the analysis it was
found that the savings based on the cost of steel were approximately $1,290.00. This is
not a significant cost savings, but the analysis only focused on a combination of fourteen
beams and girders. Please note that only a gravitational analysis was conducted and that
seismic and lateral loads were ignored.
14
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


The Semco unit will need to have a standard supply air and return air opening. A
vertical discharge and return would not work with the configuration of the beams on the
roof. Because the ductwork will discharge horizontally from the unit, it will be exposed to
the elements. From section 15250 of the master specifications dealing with insulation, the
exterior ductwork should be insulated with elastomeric material. Ductwork should have
all butt joints and seams sealed with adhesive. The insulation should be wrapped with
glass mesh and have two coats of sealant on it. Elastomeric material is an acrylic material
used for waterproofing and sealing purposes. It is usually sprayed on and has a rubbery
texture.
A concern about having the equipment on the roof surface is sound distended
throughout the building from the vibration of the equipment traveling throughout the
beams, columns and structural materials of the building. Some steps to take to reduce
noise levels from disturbing the occupants are vibration isolation mounts, concrete pads
and acoustical duct liner.
Vibration isolation mounts can come in a variety of sizes for different applications of
vibration dampening. The units on the roof must have a curb to sit on, but the curb could
be mounted on isolation spring mounts. Housed spring mounts can hold up to 30,000
Figure 4. Housed Spring Mounting, courtesy of Vibration Isolation
pounds and has lateral movement control. The springs can be adjusted to different
loadings for a fail safe design. The housing contains a neoprene snubber which will help
absorb the vibrations before they are passed through the housing and into the beams.
Another solution to the problem of vibration is concrete or equipment pads on which
the equipment is mounted. The large mass of the concrete pads absorb the vibration due
to the mass law. The problem with concrete pads is that they have a very high weight,
which can affect structural members of the building, depending on where it is located.
Equipment pads are made from polyolefin. These pads are extremely lighter than a
concrete pad and can be moved with ease from space to space. The equipment pads are
weather resistant and can allow pipes to run through it by means of drilling.
15
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Acoustical duct liner should be used if noise transmission from the ductwork
interferes with adjacent spaces. For the Lehigh Valley Heritage Center, it should be
placed in the supply and return ductwork below the unit located on the roof. Acoustical
liner must meet requirements for microbial growth, fire resistance, thermal properties and
cleaning maintenance. Because the building has return air plenums, any ductwork
connecting adjacent spaces shall have acoustic insulation to decrease the sound
transmission from one room to the next.
16
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Construction Management
Research on EPS forms for basement walls

EPS forms are becoming widely used in the construction of residential and
commercial buildings. EPS stands for expanded polystyrene, which is a foam-like
material with a high resistance to the passage of heat. Its ability to resist heat transfer
has led to an R-Value of 20. EPS has been used as early as the 1950s for building thermal
control as insulation. Since then, this remarkable material has made its way into the
different areas of construction.
Another common name for EPS is bead boards. EPS comes in the form of small
beads. These beads are placed in a mold and heated, usually by stem, until they become
plastic and take the shape of the mold. The usual molds are block molds after which the
forms can be cut using hot wires or basic jobsite tools such as saws. The forms resemble
Styrofoam, but release no CFS, formaldehyde or toxic materials.
The forms are very light, easily cut, non-deteriorating, non-rotting and inhibit mold
growth and water penetration. The leftover formwork and scrap pieces can be recycled
into new forms as well, so waste can be negligible. Not only does EPS serve as a thermal
insulator, but also as an acoustic insulator. With an attached drywall, the sound class
rating is 48. The forms add to the fire resistance, have a low toxicity smoke development
and flame spread. Concrete can be poured at 0 degrees Fahrenheit without special
chemicals, since the forms contain the heat of hydration given off as the concrete cures;
this also makes the concrete sturdier as it is protected from the elements as it is curing.
Because of the continuous formwork (closed tongue and groove joints), the walls are
airtight, which reduce infiltration. There are several types of formwork made of EPS, all
of which depend on the building applicability. Two common types of forms are flat wall
forms and waffle grid forms. Flat wall forms are the most commonly used, while the
waffle grid forms are an emerging product. The flat wall form is just what the name
implies, two flat pieces of EPS, separated by metal ties. The waffle grid form uses the
structural integrity of reinforced beams and columns to support loading.
EPS forms are most commonly used for concrete wall construction. Forms are made
that are attached together with metal ties that space them from one another. The forms
usually have tongue and groove joints so that they can be stacked one on top of the other
for fast and easy assembly. Rebar is placed horizontally between forms during assembly
and vertically in forms during pouring. There are specific guidelines and instructions for
using these forms during construction. Just like the traditional concrete formwork, EPS
17
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Figure 5, EPS form, courtesy of American Polysteel
forms must be supported by shoring or scaffolding to keep the walls straight during the
placing of the concrete. Also, the formwork must be placed straight to ensure structural
integrity when constructing a wall from the base. Manufactures have made corner pieces
to help speed the process of installation. There is a significant difference in skill level
when it comes to traditional concrete forms and EPS. EPS is designed so that less skill is
involved in using the forms compared to the traditional concrete forms.
Because of the configuration of concrete, steel and formwork, a traditional vibrator
would not effectively compact the concrete. With a simple disk vibrator, one can compact
the concrete by placing the disk up against the formwork. Another option includes placing
the vibrator on the steal itself and let the vibrations travel down the rebar and into the
concrete. It is recommended that the maximum rise of concrete that should be poured in a
section is 4 ft/hr. Blowouts dont usually occur, but if they do, one can cut out the blowout
are and replace it.
Various finishes can be attached to the EPS forms by either means of furring strips
or gluing. Exterior finishes include paint, stucco, siding and brick while sheet rock is the
main interior finish. Towel racks and other small items can be attached directly to the
wall by means of anchors.
The purpose of studying this type of wall system was to see a dual outcome from a
single analysis. An energy impact and time savings in structural work were the two
searched outputs. Information on the internet made the forms out to be a super structure
that could better insulate the building, save time on construction, provide acoustical
privacy and reduce the amount of concrete used in a typical wall section. Although the
first three objectives could be reached, the last was not entirely true. Less concrete
certainly does not make the building any more structurally stable. Although the amount
of concrete for a certain section of the waffle grid form will be less than the same section of
a flat wall form, it does not mean they have the same structural properties.
18
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


In order to determine the appropriateness of this product on the building, some
design data was calculated. The basement walls are not supporting the building itself,
they are only supporting the earth around the building. The steel columns transfer the
building load to the piers on the footings. The design load for soil bearing pressure at this
site in Allentown was 5,000 psf. The basement walls could be treated as simply supported
beams, and to figure out the maximum moment, one would only have to multiply the soil
bearing load with the square of the height of the underground wall and then divide that
number by eight. The maximum height of the basement walls is 18 which generates a
maximum moment of 213.9 ft-kip. According to the design manuals, no size form exceeds
a 10 high ceiling. This is not to say that the forms cannot be used for the building. In
order for the walls to extend beyond a 10 height limitation, a horizontal concrete beam
must span between pilasters. The beam is integrated into the wall with rebar. The beam
acts as a stiffener for the wall to withstand the soil bearing pressure. Unfortunately, no
calculations were made as how to size a beam for the basement walls. Attached in the
structural appendix is a drawing of such a configuration.
Overall, the feasibility of the EPS forms for the basement walls is less than that of
the existing design. The EPS forms have only two benefits during the construction phase.
They can be placed much faster than conventional forms and they remain when the
concrete has set, unlike the conventional forms which must be stripped from the walls.
The cost of the forms is more expensive than traditional building methods. A house built
with the EPS forms usually costs 3%-11% more than a house built with 2x 4 construction
methods. The time factor would not make up for the money spent on the forms. Another
drawback is that the exposed basement walls on the west and south faade of the building
will have to be finished with either brick or stucco, which will add to the cost.
Research on Smart Window Technology

Building lighting loads in buildings account for a large percentage of electricity
consumption and heat generation. Being able to utilize natural daylight to illuminate
interior spaces would reduce electric loads from fixtures and ballasts that would normally
provide lighting. The problem with too much lighting is the amount of fenestration on a
buildings envelope. The larger the amount of fenestration, the more sunlight will enter
the building, but heat is also incorporated with daylight. Large fenestrations are often
associated with heating losses in the winter through the windows to the outside
environment. In todays advanced technological field, many new products and ideas are
making their way into testing facilities and buildings. Finding ways to bring sunlight into
the building without the large thermal loads and still trying to provide enough light to
reduce the energy used by artificial lighting is an ongoing task with many possibilities.
Smart windows are being applied to buildings to study the controllability of natural
light, artificial light, thermal loads and occupant comfort (visually and thermally). There
are a variety of smart windows that all perform the basic approach of privacy and comfort,
19
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


but have very differing technologies associated with them. Photochromatic windows are
controlled by sunlight and become cloudy under a bright sky. Thermochromatic windows
are controlled by temperature, which will change the color of the material in the window.
Electrochromic windows are controlled by an applied voltage, which can darken and
lighten the window by reversing polarity.
Some other types of technologies used in controlling window appearance are
polymer dispersed liquid crystals, suspended particle devices and reflective hydrides.
Polymer dispersed liquid crystals have two stages, opaque and clear. It is mainly used for
privacy than anything else. PDLCs contain liquid crystal droplets in a polymer mixture
which is contained between two transparent conducting materials. The liquid crystals are
randomly scattered throughout the polymer mixture, creating an opaque state, until a
voltage is applied across the conducting materials, the crystals align themselves parallel
to the electric field and the window becomes clear. While in the opaque state, 99% of the
UV rays are prevented from entering the building. The windows consume approximately
5 W/m2. These windows come in a variety of colors and can be applied to mirrors.
Figure 6. PDLC windows, courtesy of HowStuffWorks
Suspended particle devices are light absorbing microscopic particles. When placed
in a liquid suspension film, then placed between two pieces of transparent conductive
objects, the particles randomly align themselves and block light from entering the window.
When a voltage is applied across the two conductive materials, the particles align
themselves parallel with the electric field and the light is able to pass through the window.
The amount of power needed to convert these windows is so small, that a residential house
with these types of windows would use as much power as a small lamp/light for the day.
Once the power is removed the particles realign themselves back to their original state.
Electrified variable tint SPD windows have a fairly quick response rate as well as a large
switchable durability. These windows can control solar light transmittance between 0.1%
and 70%. The average power consumption is less than 5W/ft2.
20
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Figure 7. SPD window, courtesy of HowStuffWorks
Reflective hydrides are films made of nickel-magnesium alloy, which reflect light.
They are powered either by low voltage or by the injection of hydrogen and oxygen gasses
(gas-chromatic technology) which transform the window to a clear state. The difference in
these windows is that they reflect light rather than absorb it. Reflecting light is good, but
not at neighboring buildings which pick up the thermal load. Obviously, these windows
would be used in a non-urban environment.
The type of window proposed to be installed in the Heritage Center is
electrochromic glass manufactured by SAGE Electrochromics, Inc. A ceramic ion
conductor is sandwiched between a counter electrode and an electrochromic electrode.
These layers are then sandwiched between two transparent conductors which are located
on the inside of the glass layers. Multiple layers of ceramic thin films are applied to the
glass where it is fired on to ensure a strong, durable window. These windows consume low
DC voltage to transfer ions from one layer to another, which in turn, tints the window.
Electronic dimmable ballasts can be used to transform AC to DC for the windows. Unlike
SPDs SageGlass cannot become totally opaque, so visibility through the window is never
obstructed. Visible light ranges from 4% to 70% through the window at its darkest and
lightest stages, respectively. In its clearest stage SageGlass blocks 95% of the UV
radiation (99% in its darkest stage), which is helpful in preventing the interior
components (furniture, paintings, tapestries, etc.) of the building from fading. The
windows can be controlled as a functional parameter; a function of direct/total solar
radiation, tonnage, previous space loads or indoor lighting levels. The windows have a
memory associated with them. Unlike the SPDs, these windows will maintain tinted
once the power source is taken away. Various cases ranged from 12-48 hours until the
window went back to its original state.
Electrochromic windows have drawbacks as well. During the cold winter months,
the windows require a longer time to switch than in the warmer, summer months.
Thermal shock is the factor that affects the timing delay. The window is not at the same
temperature everywhere, and if switching occurs too fast, the window could crack or
21
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


shatter. The larger the window, the longer the time it takes to fully change coloration.
Fading of the window color occurs over time as the window appears more yellowish in its
clear state (this is due to the hydrated polymers). Even though tinting capabilities seem
ideal in the hot summer months, the darkening of the windows increases the absorptive
properties. The window temperatures can reach temperatures as high 122 degrees F,
which will, in turn, radiate heat into the cooler building. Cost is the biggest drawback of
the windows. Currently the windows are, on average, $1,000.00/ft2, which corresponds to
the fact that the technology associated with these windows is not well known. If
production and demand significantly increase or if utility companies offer rebates or if
building codes and regulations require such windows in a building, prices will decrease.
An acceptable cost of the windows would be around $100.00/ft2, but even that price is hard
to compete with $20.00/ft2 for a typical quality window.
Figure 8. SHGC vs. VT of SageGlass, courtesy of SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.
SageGlass properties
U-factor (Center of Glass)
Air Gap
Coating Properties
0.33
Argon
Low-e
Table 4. SageGlass properties obtained from SAGE Electrochromics, Inc.
Several studies and experiments were studied using electrochromatic windows in a

typical office space. The study integrated the electrochromatic window controls with the
fluorescent lighting to maintain a set illuminance in the room, monitored by light sensors.
22
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


The electrochromatic windows were actually placed inside of the existing windows in the
office, so a thermal analysis could not be conducted. The windows experienced an
exponential time change; they reached 50% change in 25% of the total time to change
100%. Because of the exponential character of the window, the windows were not able to
keep up with the constantly changing outdoor conditions. The windows averaged 9-26
minutes in changing times, while the outdoor conditions could change in seconds. No
control was possible to block direct sun. The ratio of light on the surfaces in the room
stayed the same, so the problems with glare on computer screens were not solved (image
washout and veiling reflections). Energy savings through lighting were obtained, but as
mentioned above, problems were realized. It was determined that electrochromic windows
cannot control direct sun and daylighting simultaneously. Other analyses to consider are
energy and peak demand costs, effects on mechanical equipment (heating and cooling),
environmental effects, human comfort and operation costs.
Aesthetics is another area where electrochromics might not be compatible. Suppose
a large office building has electrochromic windows, each individually controlled. At times,
the faade of the building would have different patterns of shaded glass. The most feasible
arrangement for any space would be to have several smaller, individually controlled pieces
of glass in one window frame. This would allow the windows to darken in the path of the
sun and allow indirect light in throughout the rest of the window.
Cooling Tower feasibility
Because the building contains an air cooled chiller, the thought of replacing the air
cooled condensers with a cooling tower was considered. Before selecting a tower, a
feasibility study was performed. The current design of the Lehigh Valley Heritage Center
was made with limitations that could not be exceeded and requirements that needed to be
met. The idea of using a cooling tower stemmed from the free cooling cycle it could
perform. The idea of conserving energy is always a thought to be considered. With the
thought of free cooling on the site, a closed type tower was considered.
The first step taken in the feasibility approach was the potential location of the
tower. The existing condensing units are located on the roof, in the equipment well.
Placing a tower on the roof posed several problems. The owner and architect did not want
to see any equipment on the roof; therefore the tower must be located within the
equipment well on the lower roof. If the tower were to be placed in the equipment well, it
would still be seen from the ground level because of its height, approximately 12, while
the well walls are only 9 tall. Another reason against putting it in the well is the fact that
the two roof top units are housed in the equipment well. The fact that the tower is so close
to the roof top units (12) that the exhaust air from the tower could potentially be sucked
into the roof top units. The cooling tower could stay, but the roof top units would have to
move or have their cooling capacity taken care of by an existing air handler. Another
problem is discovered if the tower stays on the roof, and that is the fact that the outdoor
air intake fan for the three air handling units is located on the roof. Again, the chance of
23
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


water from the cooling tower getting in the intake cannot be taken. The outdoor air intake
fan cannot be relocated. The owner and architect do not want any obtrusions on the
faade of the building, unless there is no other possible choice as the case with the exhaust
fan in Shower 102.
Placing the tower off the building and on the site is the second option, but is not
practical. The building site is located in Allentown, Pennsylvania. The concern of the
equipment being vandalized would require it to be placed in a contained perimeter. The
aesthetic concern is also a factor that would keep it from being placed on site. Another
reason is the maintenance of the tower throughout the year and freeze protection in the
winter. The air cooled condensing units are the most feasible outcome and should be kept
in the building design.
24
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Summary and Conclusions:

Summary and Conclusions
Based on the calculations performed through the HAP program, a dedicated outdoor
air system would prove beneficial, both cost wise and quality wise in the Lehigh Valley
Heritage Center. The overall calculated savings was around $77,780 for the first year.
This does not accurately show the true cost savings since ductwork, piping and pumping
costs were not included. Also, the data obtained from RS Means does not give exact
pricing cost for every piece of equipment. The dedicated outdoor air system will provide
the LVHC with a stricter controlled environment and will ensure the proper amount of
ventilation air to the spaces.
The structural analysis of the building showed a cost savings of $1,290.00. Please
note again that the calculations performed did not include seismic or lateral loading. The
roof framing system will hold the newly proposed equipment on it, as the maximum
moment did not exceed that of the beams or girders nor did the deflection due to the live
load exceed l/360. The only concern was not using the dunnage that the design engineer
designed for the equipment, and placing the equipment on the roof. Without proper
acoustical measures and vibration isolation dampers the structural steel skeleton of the
building can propagate sound into and throughout the building.
As far as new technology goes, the electrochromic windows would not be feasible
cost wise or energy wise. The southern faade of the building does not contain a vast
amount of fenestration, and areas that would integrate the windows with the indoor
lighting are only small offices. The majority of the lighting is contained in the galleries,
orientation, corridors and stairwells. These are the areas that need to have special
controls to conserve energy or incorporate natural lighting in the spaces.
EPS forms have a couple drawbacks in the application of the LVHC. The
engineering task involved in designing the concrete beams spanning from pilaster to
pilaster is one drawback (for a mechanical engineer) and the fact that extra material must
be used on the exposed forms on the south and western sides of the building to cover the
forms from any type of vandalism.
25
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


References
2003 RS Means Mechanical Cost Data (2002) RS Means Co. Inc.
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc. 2001
ASHRAE Handbook, Fundamentals. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 2001.
West, Harry H. Fundamentals of Structural Analysis. New York, Wiley and Sons, 1993.
AISC (2001) Manual of Steel Construction: Load and Resistance Factor Design. American
Institute of Steel Construction Inc.
McQuiston, Faye C., Jerald D. Parker, Jeffrey D. Spitler. Heating, Ventilation, and Air
Conditioning: Analysis and Design. New York, Wiley and Sons, 2000.
Mumma, S.A. 2001 Overview of Integrating Dedicated Outdoor Air Systems With Parallel
Terminal Systems ASHRAE Transactions 107(1)
Mumma, S.A. 2001 Dedicated Outdoor Air-Dual Wheel System Control Requirements.
ASHRAE Transactions 107(1)
Bosnor, Kevin. How Smart Windows Work. 14 Jan. 2004
<http://home.howstuffworks.com/smart-window.htm
Lee, E.S, D.L. DiBartolomeo, S.E. Selkowitz. 2000. Electrochromic windows for
commercial buildings:Monitored results from a full-scale testbed, Proc. ACEEE
2000 Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings, Asilomar, CA.
Mumma, S.A. 2001. 14 March 2004. < http://www.doas-radiant.psu.edu/doas.html>
< http://www.sage-ec.com/> for electrochromatic window information
< http://www.reddiform.com> for information of EPS
< http://www.polysteel.com> for information of EPS
< http://www.nfstyro.com/Building_Materials/iceblock.html> for information of EPS
26
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Credits / Acknowledgements:

Acknowledgements
I would like to thank God, for always helping me through any situation
My family, for always pushing me forward
My fellow classmates, for their support and respect
Dustin Wakefield for helping me on my structural
All the Mechanicals
27
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Appendices:
Appendix A
Mechanical:

Boiler Selection
Boiler Selection From Bryan Boilers
Reduction in boiler size, since the Semco Energy Unit (EPD-18) utilizes free heating with
the energy recovery system.
Calculations:
From the HAP output and equipment selection, the heating required for the Fan Coil
Units is 179.9 MBH and the existing panel and fin tube radiators in the lobby and stair
001 is 78.57 MBH.
I will have a preheat coil in the Semco unit on the roof before the enthalpy wheel to
condition outside air if it poses a freezing problem for the enthalpy wheel. For the worse
case scenario, the coil would heat the outside air from 0 to 32 degrees F.
Qpreheat coil = 1.08*scfm*(Tafter preheat Tbefore preheat)
Qpreheat coil = 1.08*(9278 scfm)*(32-0) = 320647.68 Btu = 320.65 MBH
Qboiler = Qfan coil + Qradiator + Qpreheat
Qboiler = 179.9 + 78.57 + 320.65 MBH = 579.12 MBH (No safety factor added since
the preheat coil load is worse case)
From Bryan Boilers, a CL-75 Boiler would be the best choice (from this manufacturer) that
provides hot water, has forced draft (the vents for the boilers must be able to extend to the
roof) and satisfies the heating demand.
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Chiller Selection
Chiller Selection from engineering guide for McQuay Air Conditioning: Air Cooled Scroll
Compressor Chiller
Chose Remote Evaporator Model AM/BM
Locate evaporator on roof where existing evaporators are
From HAP v4.2 output:
41.5 tons required capacity
90F ambient temperature
Cool 99.7 gpm from 54F to 44F
Evaporator fouling factor = 0.0001
384 foot altitude
1. Add 3% to the required capacity for approximate derate: 41.5 x 1.03 = 42.75 tons.
From Table 14 of the engineering guide, an AGZ-045B at the given conditions will
produce 42.5 tons with a unit kW input of 51.7 and a unit EER of 9.9
.
2. Determine derate factors:
Altitude correction from Table 6 of the engineering guide: 0.998 Capacity, 1.009
Power
3. Piping correction:
Assume 1 5/8 suction line based on connection size in Table 10 of the engineering
guide.
(4) 90 Standard ells 4 x 4 ft =16 ft
Plus actual linear feet 65 ft
Total Equivalent Feet 81 ft
Check Table 9 and find that 1 5/8 is maximum size for oil carry.
This means that the 1 5/8 riser will be satisfactory.
The capacity correction factor from Table 12 is 0.980.
4. The corrected capacity of the AGZ is: 42.5 tons x 0.998{altitude} x 0.98{piping} 41.5 tons.
This satisfies the 41.5 ton requirement.
5. Correct the unit power required: 51.7 kW x 1.009{altitude} = 52.2 kW.
6. Calculate the unit EER based on the correct capacity and power:
EER = (41.5 tons x 12,000)/ (52.2 kW x 1,000) = 9.5
7. Determine the evaporator pressure drop. Enter the pressure drop curves (Figure 8) at
99.7 gpm and read up to AGZ 045, read over to pressure drop of 2.6 ft.
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Steam Generator Selection
Steam Generator Selection

Reduction in steam generator size, since the Semco Energy Unit (EPD-18) can control the
humidity levels entering the building through the enthalpy wheel.
Calculations:
From the HAP output, the steam generation rate required for humidification is 47.13
lbs/hr. Keeping the same manufacturer, Nortec, and the same fuel supply, natural gas,
the GS series humidifiers are chosen. The unit will be placed under the Semco unit in the
second floor plenum space.
Nortec GSTC Series
Specification
GS 100
Rated Capacity: lbs/hr
25-105
Input Btu/hr max
140000
Flue Emissions
CO<40 ppm (NO)x <10ppm
Unit rated Amps
2
Voltage/Phase
208-240/1
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Electric Rate
PP&L Electric Utilities Corporation supplies the electricity to the building. The
Lehigh Valley Heritage Center is classified as a GS-3 service building, which means a
large general service at secondary voltage or higher.
Base of 25 kW billed
Minimum Billing Demand = 25 kW
Minimum Distribution Charge = $71.00
Minimum Monthly Capacity and Energy Charge is 25 kW multiplied by the
Demand Step of the Effective Capacity and Energy Charge
Distribution Charge
$2.84 per kW for all kW of the billing kW
0.151 cents per kWH for the first 200 kWH per kW of the billing kW
0.199 cents per kWH for the next 200 kWH per kW of the billing kW
0.144 cents per kWH for all additional kWH
Competitive Transmission Charge
Intangible Transition Charge
Capacity and Energy Charge
$4.10 per kW for all kW of the billing kW
These rates were used in the energy analysis program.
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Gas Rate
UGI Gas Service provides natural gas to the building. Customers purchase gas on a
quarterly basis. The most current gas price obtained was for March 1, 2004, which was
$0.83 per CCF. The price per therm is then:
$0.83/CCF*(10 CCF / 1 MCF)*(1 MCF / 1.027x106 Btu)*(100,000 Btu / 1 therm) =
$0.8082 per therm
From an existing bill, obtained from Mr. Zolomij of the Lehigh Valley Historical
Society, other costs include:
Customer Charge = $8.55
Distribution Charges = $16.63
PA State Tax = 6%
So, a minimum charge of $25.12 was used with $0.8082 per therm plus 6% state
sales tax in the energy analysis.
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option

Semco Packaged Energy Recovery System EPD-18

Supply Air = 9408
Device
Pressure Drop
OA with hood
0.0175
SA
0.055
Damper
0.0825
OA filter
0.35
Enthalpy wheel
0.56
Cooling Coil
0.43
Sensible Wheel
0.49
Casing
0.3
Total
2.285
Return Air = 8408

Device
Pressure Drop
EA with hood
0.013
RA
0.0135
Damper
0.0675
RA filter
0.25
Enthalpy wheel
0.51
Corrected Flow
Fan size
BHP
max HP motor
rpm
wheel effectiveness
Corrected Flow
Fan Size
BHP
max HP motor
rpm
wheel effectiveness
Sensible wheel
Casing
Total
12,566
13
9.133
20
1900
0.82
0.44
0.3
1.594
11,558
13
7.2
20
1830
0.84
amps
SA 20 HP
RA 20 HP
VFD Sens. Wheel
Control Panel
Total FLA
54
54
4.4
0.8
113.2
Circuit Breaker MOCP

amps
Total FLA
25% of Largest Mtr.
Total MCM
113.2
13.5
126.7
Total FLA
75% of Largest Mtr.
Ckt. Bkr. Selection amp
amps
113.2
40.5
153.7
Fan Coil Unit Schedule

York Model#
CFM
gpm Delta P (ft)
Cooling (1000 BTUH)

TH
SH
Watts
Hot Water
Delta P (ft) Heating (1000BTUH)
gpm
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
13YHBC-41
1400
8.6
23.9
41.5
29.5
530
2.9
45.2
44.1
(3x)20YHYB-3
2070
11.3
56.3
43.2
820
16
7.6
135
13YHBC-41
1400
8.6
23.9
41.5
29.5
530
2.9
45.2
44.1
13YHBC-31
1400
7.3
15.3
35.5
26.5
530
3.3
56.9
49.4
4YHBC-31
510
3.2
16.5
13.4
9.5
120
1.4
7.9
21.2
3YHBC-31
310
9.8
6.7
120
0.9
2.6
13.8
4YHBC-31
510
3.2
16.5
13.4
9.5
120
1.4
7.9
21.2
8YHBC-31
870
4.7
7.5
22.5
17
340
2.2
22.2
33.3
5YHBC-41
600
8.3
18
11.8
130
1.4
21.8
6YHBC-4
730
4.8
11.7
23
15.6
240
1.6
10.1
24.4
8YHBC-41
870
5.5
12.6
26.9
18.9
340
1.9
16.4
29.2
8YHBC-31
870
4.7
7.5
22.5
17
340
2.2
22.2
33.3
16YHBC-31
1780
9.6
4.2
48.2
36.8
710
13
7.3
133
13YHBC-31
1400
7.3
15.3
35.5
26.5
530
3.3
56.9
49.4
5YHBC-41
600
8.3
18
11.8
130
1.4
21.8
4YHBC-31
510
3.2
16.5
13.4
9.5
120
1.4
7.9
21.2
4YHBC-31
510
3.2
16.5
13.4
9.5
120
1.4
7.9
21.2
5YHBC-41
600
8.3
18
11.8
130
1.4
21.8
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 2
1-Lobby
Zone 3
1-Reading Room
116
Zone 4
1-Orientation
Zone 5
1-Loading Dock
1-Receiving
1-Shower 102
1-Vestibule
Zone 6
1-Stair 2
2-Stair 2
B-Stair 2
Zone 7
1-Processing
Workroom
1-Archivist
1-Corridor 112
Zone 8
1-Stair 1
2-Stair 1
Zone 9
2-School Program
Zone 10
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
1-Janitor 110
1-Coats 108
1-Storage 107
1-Corridor
1-Locker Vestibule
1-Museum Shop
Zone 11
2-Copy Room
2-Conference Room
2-Processing Room
2-Work Stations
Zone 12
2-Office 205
2-Northern Office
(x4)
2-Directors Office
Zone 13
2-Lunch
2-Western Office
(x8)
Zone 14
2-Main Gallery
2-Gallery
Zone 15
2-Women
2-Men
2-Network
2-West Corridor
2-East Corridor
2-Restroom 204
Zone 16
B-Storage 004
Zone 17
B-Boiler Room
B-Mech 003
B-Mech 006
B-Corridor 005
Zone 18
B-Collection
Storage 001
B-Storage 002
RS Means Mehanical Cost Data 2003

Existing Equipment Costs
Equipment
Boilers
Division #
15510 Heat Generation
Equipment: Boilers and
Accessories
15620 Refrigeration
Equipment: Packaged
Water Chillers
Chiller
15670 Refrigeration
Equipment: Condensing
Condensers Units
Air Handling 15720 HVAC Equipment:
Units
Air Handling Units
Roof Top
Units
15730 HVAC Equipment:

Unitary Air cond. Equip.

Humidity control
Equipment
Duct Heaters Air coils
Steam
Generators
Louver
15850 Air Distribution:

Outlets & inlets
VAV boxes

Duct Accessories
OA fans

Fans
Line #
Description
400 Boilers, Gas 3320 2,000 MBH

Fired
Gross Output
4070 Packaged
chiller, remote A/C
600 Centrifugal/ condenser not incl.,
60 ton
screw/ recip.
0750 Air Cooled,
compressor, std.
controls, 30 ton
2336 Multizone,
100 A/C & Heat 13,200 cfm
0920 Single zone,
CV, 5,000 cfm
2310 Multizone,
3,000 cfm
600 RTU, A/C
5170 30 ton
5150 20 ton
500 Humidifiers 0660 200 lb/hr

700 Coils,
Flanged
3980 36x42
4660 36x36
2540 Electric
600 Louver
operation
2560 Motor
300 Duct
Access.
5710 200 cfm
100 Fans
Material $ Labor $ quantity
Total $
11500
4475
31950
45700
8575
54275
29500
2800
64600
7150
935
8085
6250
600
6850
1625
540
2165
38600
23900
1950
1375
1
1
40550
25275
5575
271
11692
540
650
198
199
1
1
738
849
28
330
14.8
21
1
1
42.8
351
775
53.5
828.5
805
59
1728
5720-30 201-600 cfm

5740-50 601-1,000
cfm
5760-70 1,001-1,500
cfm
5780 1,501+ cfm
860
76
3744
930
1025
107
133
5
7
5185
8106
0530 Direct Drive

5,850 cfm, 24", 1 HP
545
273
818
267832.3
Total :
RS Means Mehanical Cost Data 2003

New Equipment Costs
Equipment
Division #
15510 Heat Generation
Equipment: Boilers and
Accessories
Boiler
15620 Refrigeration
Equipment: Packaged
Water Chillers
Chiller
15670 Refrigeration
Equipment: Condensing
Condensers Units
Semco Unit
15780 HVAC equipment:

Energy Recovery
Steam
Generators
Fan Coil
Units
NA
Humidity control
Equipment
FCU
Line #
Description
400 Boilers, Gas

Fired
3240 765 MBH
600 Centrifugal/
screw/ recip.
4060 40 ton
0750 Air Cooled,
compressor, std.
controls, 30 ton
100 Heat
Recovery
4060-70 10,000Package
20,000 cfm
For EPCH unit (no
sens. wheel)
$4.50/cfm + $31,500
(at 12,600 cfm) =
$88,200
NA
Material $ Labor $ quantity
Total $
5125
2500
7625
32000
5175
37175
11250
973
12223
88200
88200
500 Humidifiers 0600 50 lb/hr
2850
135
2985
200 Fan Coil A/C 3110 1 ton

3120 1.5 ton
3130 2 ton
3140 3 ton
3150-60 3.5-4 ton
3170 5 ton
1470
1750
2100
2415
2660
3080
99.55
108.35
113.3
148.5
157.3
174.9
1 1569.55
7 13008.45
3
6639.9
3
7690.5
3
8451.9
3
9764.7
Total :
195333
Total Savings :
72499.3
Annual Cost Summary

Lehigh County Heritage Center base design
psuae
04/05/2004
04:53AM
Table 1. Annual Costs

Heritage Center
($)
4,717
Component
Air System Fans
Cooling
2,477
Heating
4,638
Pumps
1,404
Cooling Tower Fans

HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
0
13,236
12,429
Electric Equipment
Misc. Electric
695
7,042
Misc. Fuel Use
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
20,166
Grand Total
33,401
Table 2. Annual Cost per Unit Floor Area

Heritage Center
Component
($/ft)
Air System Fans
0.196
Cooling
0.103
Heating
0.193
Pumps
0.058
Cooling Tower Fans
0.000
HVAC Sub-Total
0.550
Lights
0.517
Electric Equipment
0.029
Misc. Electric
0.293
Misc. Fuel Use
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
Grand Total
Gross Floor Area (ft)
0.838
1.389
24055.0
Conditioned Floor Area (ft)

24055.0
Note: Values in this table are calculated using the Gross Floor Area.
Table 3. Component Cost as a Percentage of Total Cost
Heritage Center
Component
(%)
Air System Fans
14.1
Cooling
7.4
Heating
13.9
Pumps
4.2
Cooling Tower Fans
0.0
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
39.6
37.2
Electric Equipment
Misc. Electric
2.1
21.1
Misc. Fuel Use
0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
60.4
Grand Total
100.0
Hourly Analysis Program v.4.2
Page 1 of 1
Annual Energy and Emissions Summary

psuae
04/05/2004
04:53AM

Heritage Center
($)
Component
HVAC Components
Electric
8,598
Natural Gas
4,638
Fuel Oil
Propane
Remote HW
Remote Steam
Remote CW
HVAC Sub-Total
13,236
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
20,166
Natural Gas
Fuel Oil
Propane
Remote HW
Remote Steam
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
20,166
Grand Total
33,401
Table 2. Annual Energy Consumption

Component
Heritage Center
HVAC Components
Electric (kWh)
117,519
Natural Gas (Therm)
5,287
Fuel Oil (na)
Propane (na)
Remote HW (na)
Remote Steam (na)
Remote CW (na)
Non-HVAC Components
Electric (kWh)
275,932
Natural Gas (Therm)
Fuel Oil (na)
Propane (na)
Remote HW (na)
Remote Steam (na)
Totals
Electric (kWh)
Natural Gas (Therm)
Fuel Oil (na)
393,450
5,287
0
Propane (na)
Remote HW (na)
Remote Steam (na)
Remote CW (na)
Page 1 of 3

psuae
04/05/2004
04:53AM
Table 3. Annual Emissions

Component
CO2 (lb)
Heritage Center
0
SO2 (kg)
NOx (kg)

Heritage Center
($/ft)
Component
HVAC Components
Electric
0.357
Natural Gas
0.193
Fuel Oil
0.000
Propane
0.000
Remote HW
0.000
Remote Steam
0.000
Remote CW
0.000
HVAC Sub-Total
0.550
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
0.838
Natural Gas
0.000
Fuel Oil
0.000
Propane
0.000
Remote HW
0.000
Remote Steam
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
0.838
Grand Total
1.389
24055.0

24055.0
Page 2 of 3

psuae
04/05/2004
04:53AM

Heritage Center
Component
(%)
HVAC Components
Electric
25.7
Natural Gas
13.9
Fuel Oil
0.0
Propane
0.0
Remote HW
0.0
Remote Steam
0.0
Remote CW
0.0
HVAC Sub-Total
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
39.6
60.4
Natural Gas
0.0
Fuel Oil
0.0
Propane
0.0
Remote HW
0.0
Remote Steam
0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
60.4
Grand Total
100.0
Page 3 of 3
Annual Component Costs - Heritage Center

psuae
04/05/2004
04:53AM
Air System Fans 14.1%
21.1% Misc. Electric
Cooling 7.4%
2.1% Electric Equipment
Heating 13.9%
Pumps 4.2%
37.2% Lights
1. Annual Costs
Annual Cost
($)
4,717
($/ft)
0.196
Cooling
2,477
0.103
7.4
Heating
4,638
0.193
13.9
Pumps
1,404
0.058
4.2
0.000
0.0
Component
Air System Fans
Cooling Tower Fans

HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
Electric Equipment
Percent of Total
(%)
14.1
13,236
0.550
39.6
12,429
0.517
37.2
695
0.029
2.1
7,042
0.293
21.1
0.000
0.0
20,166
0.838
60.4
Grand Total
33,401
1.389
Note: Cost per unit floor area is based on the gross building floor area.
100.0
Misc. Electric
Misc. Fuel Use
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
Gross Floor Area ....................................... 24055.0 ft

Conditioned Floor Area ............................. 24055.0 ft
Page 1 of 1
Energy Budget by System Component - Heritage Center

psuae
04/05/2004
04:53AM
1. Annual Coil Loads

Component
Cooling Coil Loads
Heating Coil Loads
Load
(kBTU)
777,300
(kBTU/ft)
32.313
491,002
20.412
1,268,301
52.725
2. Energy Consumption by System Component

Site Energy
Component
(kBTU)
Air System Fans
220,192
Site Energy
(kBTU/ft)
9.154
Source Energy
(kBTU)
786,399
Source Energy
(kBTU/ft)
32.692
Grand Total
Cooling
114,933
4.778
410,477
17.064
Heating
528,719
21.980
528,754
21.981
Pumps
65,831
2.737
235,111
9.774
Cooling Towers
0.000
0.000
929,675
38.648
1,960,741
81.511
580,238
24.121
2,072,277
86.148
32,456
1.349
115,913
4.819
328,782
13.668
1,174,222
48.814
0.000
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
941,475
39.138
3,362,412
139.780
Grand Total
1,871,151
77.786
5,323,152
221.291
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
Electric Equipment
Misc. Electric
Misc. Fuel Use
Notes:
1. 'Cooling Coil Loads' is the sum of all air system cooling coil loads.
2. 'Heating Coil Loads' is the sum of all air system heating coil loads.
3. Site Energy is the actual energy consumed.
4. Source Energy is the site energy divided by the electric generating efficiency (28.0%).
5. Source Energy for fuels equals the site energy value.
6. Energy per unit floor area is based on the gross building floor area.
Gross Floor Area ............................................ 24055.0 ft
Conditioned Floor Area .................................. 24055.0 ft
Page 1 of 1
Energy Budget by Energy Source - Heritage Center

psuae
04/05/2004
04:53AM

Component
Cooling Coil Loads
Heating Coil Loads
Load
(kBTU)
777,300
(kBTU/ft)
32.313
491,002
20.412
1,268,301
52.725
2. Energy Consumption by Energy Source

Site Energy
Component
(kBTU)
Site Energy
(kBTU/ft)
Source Energy
(kBTU)
Source Energy
(kBTU/ft)
Grand Total
HVAC Components
Electric
400,973
16.669
1,432,047
59.532
Natural Gas
528,706
21.979
528,706
21.979
0.000
0.000
Fuel Oil
Propane
0.000
0.000
Remote Hot Water
0.000
0.000
Remote Steam
0.000
0.000
Remote Chilled Water
0.000
0.000
929,679
38.648
1,960,752
81.511
HVAC Sub-Total
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
941,478
39.139
3,362,423
139.781
Natural Gas
0.000
0.000
Fuel Oil
0.000
0.000
Propane
0.000
0.000
Remote Hot Water
0.000
0.000
Remote Steam
0.000
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
941,478
39.139
3,362,423
139.781
Grand Total
1,871,157
77.787
5,323,175
221.292
Notes:
Page 1 of 1
Air System Sizing Summary for Air Handling Unit One

Project Name: Lehigh County Heritage Center base design
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM
Air System Information

Air System Name .................... Air Handling Unit One
Equipment Class ........................................... CW AHU
Air System Type .................................................... VAV
Number of zones ............................................................ 5

Floor Area .............................................................. 9140.0 ft
Location .................................. Allentown, Pennsylvania
Sizing Calculation Information

Zone and Space Sizing Method:
Zone CFM ........................... Peak zone sensible load
Space CFM ................... Individual peak space loads
Calculation Months ......................................... Jan to Dec

Sizing Data ..................................................... Calculated
Central Cooling Coil Sizing Data

Total coil load ........................................................ 24.0
Total coil load ...................................................... 287.8
Sensible coil load ................................................ 178.1
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 4596
Max block CFM at Jul 1700 .................................. 4619
Sum of peak zone CFM ....................................... 5084
Sensible heat ratio .............................................. 0.619
ft/Ton .................................................................. 381.1
BTU/(hr-ft) ............................................................ 31.5
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................... 57.59
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM
CFM
gpm
Load occurs at .................................................... Jul 1500

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 85.3 / 69.5
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 48.9 / 47.9
Coil ADP .................................................................... 44.9
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
Resulting RH ................................................................ 45
Design supply temp. .................................................. 55.0
Zone T-stat Check .................................................. 5 of 5
Max zone temperature deviation ................................. 0.0
F
F
F
F
%
F
OK
F
Humidifier Sizing Data

Max steam flow at Jul 1600 ................................. 21.29 lb/hr
Airflow Rate .......................................................... 4613 CFM
Air mass flow ..................................................... 20473.39 lb/hr

Moisture gain ......................................................... .00104 lb/lb
Supply Fan Sizing Data

Actual max CFM at Jul 1700 ................................ 4619 CFM
Standard CFM ...................................................... 4556 CFM
Actual max CFM/ft ............................................... 0.51 CFM/ft
Fan motor BHP ........................................................ 11.80 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 8.80 kW
Outdoor Ventilation Air Data

Design airflow CFM .............................................. 2878 CFM
CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.31 CFM/ft
CFM/person ............................................................. 23.98 CFM/person
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for Air Handling Unit One

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name .................... Air Handling Unit One
Number of zones ............................................................ 5

Floor Area .............................................................. 9140.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
7.8
17.3
33.0
31.6
8.9
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
540
1095
1550
1481
417
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
135
780
120
690
75
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
16.0
3.8
3.0
18.2
4.3
Reheat
Coil
Load
(MBH)
18.2
16.2
4.9
29.2
5.5
Reheat
Coil
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
1.82
1.62
0.49
2.92
0.55
Zone
Htg
Coil
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Zone
Htg
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mixing
Box Fan
Airflow
(CFM)
0
0
0
0
0
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
2700.0
2100.0
2220.0
1610.0
510.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.20
0.52
0.70
0.92
0.82
Zone Terminal Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Space Loads and Airflows
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
B-Storage 004
Zone 2
B-Storage 002
B-Collection Storage 001
Zone 3
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 4
1-Reading Room 116
Zone 5
1-Archivist
1-Processing Workroom
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
7.8
Aug 1700
540
16.0
2700.0
0.20
1
1
1.7
15.6
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
120
975
0.0
3.8
600.0
1500.0
0.20
0.65
1
1
31.9
1.1
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
1498
52
1.9
1.1
2075.0
145.0
0.72
0.36
31.6
Jul 1700
1481
18.2
1610.0
0.92
1
1
3.4
5.5
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
158
259
2.3
2.1
130.0
380.0
1.22
0.68
Page 1 of 1
Air System Sizing Summary for Air Handling Unit Two

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name .................... Air Handling Unit Two
Air System Type ............................................... SZCAV
Number of zones ............................................................ 1

Floor Area .............................................................. 3470.0 ft

Zone CFM ....................... Sum of space airflow rates


Total coil load ........................................................ 10.1
Total coil load ...................................................... 120.9
Sensible coil load .................................................. 73.5
Coil CFM at Aug 1500 .......................................... 1976
Max block CFM .................................................... 1976
ft/Ton .................................................................. 344.3
BTU/(hr-ft) ............................................................ 34.9
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................... 24.20
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM
CFM
gpm
Load occurs at .................................................. Aug 1500

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 87.7 / 71.6
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 52.8 / 51.7
Coil ADP .................................................................... 48.9
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
Resulting RH ................................................................ 51
F
F
F
F
%
F
OK
F
Central Heating Coil Sizing Data

Max coil load ....................................................... 111.8
Coil CFM at Des Htg ............................................ 1976
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 1976
Water flow @ 20.0 F drop .................................. 11.19
MBH
CFM
CFM
gpm
Load occurs at .................................................... Des Htg

BTU/(hr-ft) ................................................................ 32.2
Ent. DB / Lvg DB ............................................. 17.1 / 70.2 F

Max steam flow at Des Htg ................................. 46.08 lb/hr
Airflow Rate .......................................................... 1976 CFM
Air mass flow ....................................................... 8767.81 lb/hr


Actual max CFM ................................................... 1976 CFM
Standard CFM ...................................................... 1948 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 4.60 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 3.43 kW

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.46 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for Air Handling Unit Two

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name .................... Air Handling Unit Two
Air System Type ............................................... SZCAV
Number of zones ............................................................ 1

Floor Area .............................................................. 3470.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
35.8
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1976
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1976
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jul 1600
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
13.5
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
3470.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.57

No Zone Terminal Sizing Data required for this system.
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
2-Gallery
2-Main Gallery
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
10.7
25.1
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
590
1386
6.4
7.2
960.0
2510.0
0.61
0.55
Page 1 of 1
Air System Sizing Summary for Air Handling Unit Three

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name ................. Air Handling Unit Three
Number of zones ............................................................ 2

Floor Area .............................................................. 2640.0 ft



Total coil load .......................................................... 8.8
Total coil load ...................................................... 105.8
Sensible coil load .................................................. 70.7
Coil CFM at Aug 1500 .......................................... 2043
Max block CFM at Sep 1700 ................................ 2050
ft/Ton .................................................................. 299.6
BTU/(hr-ft) ............................................................ 40.1
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................... 21.16
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM
CFM
gpm
Load occurs at .................................................. Aug 1500

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 83.6 / 67.8
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 51.2 / 50.0
Coil ADP .................................................................... 47.5
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
Resulting RH ................................................................ 43
F
F
F
F
%
F
OK
F

Actual max CFM at Sep 1700 .............................. 2050 CFM
Standard CFM ...................................................... 2022 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 3.30 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 2.46 kW

Design airflow CFM ................................................ 960 CFM
CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.36 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for Air Handling Unit Three

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name ................. Air Handling Unit Three
Number of zones ............................................................ 2

Floor Area .............................................................. 2640.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
28.9
14.7
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1358
692
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
840
90
Time
of
Peak
Load
Sep 1700
Jan 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.5
0.0
Reheat
Coil
Load
(MBH)
16.9
1.4
Reheat
Coil
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
1.69
0.14
Zone
Htg
Coil
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
Zone
Htg
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
0.00
0.00
Mixing
Box Fan
Airflow
(CFM)
0
0
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
1665.0
975.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.82
0.71
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Orientation
Zone 2
1-Museum Shop
1-Corridor
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
28.9
Sep 1700
1358
3.5
1665.0
0.82
1
1
1
1
6.6
5.0
1.3
1.8
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
311
235
62
84
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
275.0
300.0
170.0
230.0
1.13
0.78
0.37
0.37
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for Fan Coil Unit

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name ................................... Fan Coil Unit
Equipment Class ................................................ TERM
Air System Type ................................................. 4P-FC
Number of zones ............................................................ 1

Floor Area ................................................................ 585.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
6.4
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
870
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
870
Total
Coil
Load
(MBH)
9.3
Sens
Coil
Load
(MBH)
9.3
Coil
Entering
DB / WB
(F)
78.1 / 70.3
Time
of
Peak
Load
Sep 1200
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
6.2
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
585.0
Zone
CFM/ft
1.49
Terminal Unit Sizing Data - Cooling
Zone Name
Zone 1
Coil
Leaving
DB / WB
(F)
68.1 / 67.3
Water
Flow
@ 10.0 F
(gpm)
1.86
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1500
Terminal Unit Sizing Data - Heating, Fan, Ventilation
Zone Name
Zone 1
HEATING COIL SIZING DATA

Coil
Water
Coil
Ent/Lvg
Flow
Load
DB
@20.0 F
(MBH)
(F)
(gpm)
14.9
60.4 / 76.5
1.49
FAN SIZING DATA

Design
Airflow
(CFM)
870
Fan
Motor
(BHP)
0.402
VENT
Fan
Motor
(kW)
0.300
Design
Airflow
(CFM)
128
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Loading Dock
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
6.4
Sep 1200
870
6.2
585.0
1.49
Page 1 of 1
Air System Sizing Summary for Roof Top Unit One

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name ......................... Roof Top Unit One
Equipment Class ....................................... PKG ROOF
Number of zones ............................................................ 3

Floor Area .............................................................. 3725.0 ft



Total coil load ........................................................ 28.5
Total coil load ...................................................... 341.9
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 7134
Max block CFM at Jun 1500 ................................ 7625
ft/Ton .................................................................. 130.7
BTU/(hr-ft) ............................................................ 91.8
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ...................................... N/A
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 83.5 / 67.1
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 51.8 / 50.6
Coil ADP .................................................................... 48.3
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
Resulting RH ................................................................ 43
F
F
F
F
%
F
OK
F

Actual max CFM at Jun 1500 ............................... 7625 CFM
Standard CFM ...................................................... 7519 CFM
Fan motor BHP ........................................................ 10.00 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 7.46 kW

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.74 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for Roof Top Unit One

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name ......................... Roof Top Unit One
Number of zones ............................................................ 3

Floor Area .............................................................. 3725.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
12.9
18.4
133.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
607
866
6269
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
360
9
2265
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1400
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
4.3
11.7
53.5
Reheat
Coil
Load
(MBH)
10.0
0.0
36.2
Reheat
Coil
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
1.00
0.00
3.62
Zone
Htg
Coil
Load
(MBH)
0.0
11.7
53.5
Zone
Htg
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
0.00
1.17
5.36
Mixing
Box Fan
Airflow
(CFM)
0
0
0
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
680.0
1075.0
1970.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.89
0.81
3.18
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
2-School Program
Zone 2
2-Stair 1
2-East Corridor
Zone 3
1-Lobby
1-Stair 1
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
12.9
Jun 1700
607
4.3
680.0
0.89
1
1
13.3
5.2
Jun 1700
Jul 1700
625
242
10.1
1.6
210.0
865.0
2.98
0.28
1
1
131.9
1.8
Jun 1400
Jul 1700
6191
85
50.7
2.8
1760.0
210.0
3.52
0.41
Page 1 of 1
Air System Sizing Summary for Roof Top Unit Two

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name ......................... Roof Top Unit Two
Number of zones ............................................................ 8

Floor Area .............................................................. 4495.0 ft



Total coil load ........................................................ 12.2
Total coil load ...................................................... 146.0
Coil CFM at Jul 1600 ............................................ 3226
Max block CFM at Jul 1700 .................................. 3374
ft/Ton .................................................................. 369.4
BTU/(hr-ft) ............................................................ 32.5
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ...................................... N/A
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 89.4 / 72.8
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 83.7 / 64.5
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 49.7 / 48.1
Coil ADP .................................................................... 45.9
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
Resulting RH ................................................................ 35
F
F
F
F
%
F
OK
F

Actual max CFM at Jul 1700 ................................ 3374 CFM
Standard CFM ...................................................... 3327 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 7.50 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 5.59 kW

Design airflow CFM ................................................ 764 CFM
CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.17 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for Roof Top Unit Two

Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:47AM

Air System Name ......................... Roof Top Unit Two
Number of zones ............................................................ 8

Floor Area .............................................................. 4495.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
10.3
15.5
16.7
4.3
9.9
7.9
5.4
3.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
483
729
783
202
466
369
252
165
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
75
75
75
15
60
15
60
45
Time
of
Peak
Load
Sep 1300
Sep 1500
Aug 1600
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.9
6.6
6.3
2.8
5.1
2.2
0.7
0.5
Reheat
Coil
Load
(MBH)
5.1
1.2
1.2
3.0
6.0
2.5
1.7
1.3
Reheat
Coil
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
0.51
0.12
0.12
0.30
0.60
0.25
0.17
0.13
Zone
Htg
Coil
Load
(MBH)
0.0
6.6
6.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Zone
Htg
Water
gpm
@ 20.0 F
0.00
0.66
0.63
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Mixing
Box Fan
Airflow
(CFM)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
915.0
495.0
550.0
170.0
440.0
1235.0
385.0
305.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.53
1.47
1.42
1.19
1.06
0.30
0.65
0.54
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
2-Work Stations
2-Copy Room
2-Stair 2
Zone 2
2-Lunch
2-Western Office (x8)
Zone 3
Zone 4
2-Directors Office
Zone 5
2-Northern Office (x4)
Zone 6
2-West Corridor
2-Office 205
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
1
6.1
2.2
2.4
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Sep 1200
285
104
113
0.7
0.3
2.9
400.0
165.0
350.0
0.71
0.63
0.32
1
3
6.6
3.3
Sep 1200
Aug 1600
311
157
2.8
1.3
165.0
110.0
1.89
1.42
3.3
Aug 1600
157
1.3
110.0
1.42
4.3
Jun 1700
202
2.8
170.0
1.19
2.5
Jun 1700
117
1.3
110.0
1.06
1
1
4.4
2.4
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
208
112
1.6
0.3
900.0
180.0
0.23
0.62
Page 1 of 2
Zone Sizing Summary for Roof Top Unit Two

Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name /
Space Name
2-Network
2-Women
2-Men
Zone 7
2-Conference Room
Zone 8
2-Processing Room
04/05/2004
04:47AM
Mult.
1
1
1
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
0.4
0.4
0.4
Time
of
Load
Jul 1700
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
Air
Flow
(CFM)
17
17
17
Heating
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.1
0.1
Floor
Area
(ft)
25.0
65.0
65.0
Space
CFM/ft
0.68
0.26
0.26
5.4
Jul 1700
252
0.7
385.0
0.65
3.5
Jul 1700
165
0.5
305.0
0.54
Page 2 of 2
Annual Cost Summary

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:39AM

LVHC DOAS 45
55
($)
3,944
LVHC DOAS 55
55
($)
3,993
LVHC DOAS 60
60
($)
4,003
LVHC DOAS 65
65
($)
4,012
LVHC DOAS 70
70
($)
3,988
Cooling
8,562
6,062
5,567
5,189
4,956
Heating
4,567
3,915
3,053
2,276
1,661
401
407
402
394
329
Component
Air System Fans
Pumps
Cooling Tower Fans
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
Electric Equipment
Misc. Electric
Misc. Fuel Use
17,474
14,377
13,025
11,871
10,934
13,800
13,982
13,983
13,974
13,855
715
724
725
724
718
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
14,515
14,707
14,708
14,698
14,573
Grand Total
31,989
29,084
27,733
26,569
25,506

LVHC DOAS 45
55
($/ft)
Component
Air System Fans
0.142
LVHC DOAS 55
55
($/ft)
0.144
LVHC DOAS 60
60
($/ft)
0.144
LVHC DOAS 65
65
($/ft)
0.144
LVHC DOAS 70
70
($/ft)
0.144
Cooling
0.308
0.218
0.200
0.187
0.178
Heating
0.164
0.141
0.110
0.082
0.060
Pumps
0.014
0.015
0.015
0.014
0.012
Cooling Tower Fans
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
0.629
0.517
0.469
0.427
0.393
0.497
0.503
0.503
0.503
0.499
Electric Equipment
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.026
0.026
Misc. Electric
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Misc. Fuel Use
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.522
0.529
0.529
0.529
0.524
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
Grand Total
1.151
1.047
0.998
0.956
0.918
27790.0
27790.0
27790.0
27790.0
27790.0

27790.0
27790.0
27790.0
27790.0
27790.0
LVHC DOAS 60
60
(%)
14.4
LVHC DOAS 65
65
(%)
15.1
LVHC DOAS 70
70
(%)
15.6

LVHC DOAS 45
LVHC DOAS 55
55
55
(%)
(%)
Component
Air System Fans
12.3
13.7
Cooling
26.8
20.8
20.1
19.5
19.4
Heating
14.3
13.5
11.0
8.6
6.5
Pumps
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.3
Cooling Tower Fans
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
54.6
49.4
47.0
44.7
42.9
43.1
48.1
50.4
52.6
54.3
Electric Equipment
2.2
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
Misc. Electric
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Misc. Fuel Use
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
45.4
50.6
53.0
55.3
57.1
Grand Total
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
Page 1 of 1
Air System Sizing Summary for 45 55

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 45 55
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft


Cooling Coil Sizing Data

Total coil load ........................................................ 64.1
Total coil load ...................................................... 768.9
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 9408
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................. 153.87
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0 F
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 85.6 / 63.4 F
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 28.1 / 28.1 F
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
gpm
Heating Coil Sizing Data

Max coil load ....................................................... 261.6 MBH
Coil CFM at Mar 1500 .......................................... 9408 CFM
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408 CFM
Water flow @ 20.0 F drop ..................................... N/A
Load occurs at .................................................. Mar 1500

Ent. DB / Lvg DB ............................................. 27.5 / 53.6 F

Airflow Rate .......................................................... 9408 CFM

Ventilation Fan Sizing Data

Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg
Exhaust Fan Sizing Data

Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.34 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for 45 55

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 45 55
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
26.5
132.3
29.1
26.0
7.4
5.4
8.5
15.2
13.0
13.3
17.5
15.9
32.4
32.0
11.4
6.6
6.5
15.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
376
457
857
Total
Coil
Load
(MBH)
20.4
88.4
18.3
11.5
5.9
4.2
7.1
16.3
5.7
11.6
13.0
14.7
32.0
0.0
8.7
0.0
3.5
0.0
Sens
Coil
Load
(MBH)
20.4
88.4
18.3
11.5
5.9
4.2
7.1
16.1
5.7
11.6
13.0
14.7
32.0
0.0
8.7
0.0
3.5
0.0
Coil
Entering
DB / WB
(F)
71.6 / 56.4
71.0 / 52.2
68.7 / 52.4
65.5 / 50.3
71.3 / 57.7
72.1 / 61.6
73.3 / 58.1
77.0 / 64.3
67.0 / 51.1
73.3 / 60.3
71.0 / 55.2
75.5 / 60.7
75.8 / 59.6
0.0 / 0.0
72.1 / 62.3
0.0 / 0.0
68.9 / 60.3
0.0 / 0.0
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1700
Jun 1400
Jul 1700
Sep 1300
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Aug 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
Jan 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.0
50.7
18.2
3.5
7.4
10.8
4.3
12.9
4.3
0.0
2.3
8.2
12.9
13.5
3.5
16.0
16.7
3.8
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
2220.0
1760.0
1610.0
1665.0
870.0
1050.0
575.0
420.0
680.0
1305.0
1255.0
790.0
1045.0
3470.0
1960.0
2700.0
2315.0
2100.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.66
4.15
1.00
0.86
0.48
0.38
0.82
2.01
1.06
0.56
0.77
1.11
1.77
0.51
0.32
0.20
0.20
0.52
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Coil
Leaving
DB / WB
(F)
58.5 / 51.0
59.7 / 47.2
58.0 / 47.7
58.0 / 46.9
58.0 / 52.4
62.1 / 57.9
59.1 / 52.4
59.1 / 57.9
59.6 / 47.8
58.5 / 54.6
58.4 / 49.9
59.7 / 54.8
59.6 / 53.3
0.0 / 0.0
59.1 / 57.6
0.0 / 0.0
61.7 / 57.7
0.0 / 0.0
Water
Flow
@ 10.0 F
(gpm)
4.09
17.69
3.67
2.29
1.18
0.84
1.42
3.26
1.13
2.31
2.61
2.94
6.40
0.00
1.75
0.00
0.69
0.00
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jul 0900
Jun 1500
Jul 0700
Sep 0800
Aug 1000
Aug 1200
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1100
Jan 1300
Jul 1400
Jun 1700
Aug 1500
Des 0000
Jul 1600
Des 0000
Aug 0800
Des 0000

Page 1 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Coil
Water
Coil
Ent/Lvg
Flow
Load
DB
@20.0 F
(MBH)
(F)
(gpm)
9.3
66.2 / 72.2
0.93
77.8
65.6 / 75.6
7.78
27.5
64.0 / 80.0
2.75
15.9
61.9 / 72.3
1.59
8.9
65.2 / 85.1
0.89
11.8
65.6 / 93.4
1.18
5.7
67.0 / 78.5
0.57
12.7
69.3 / 83.5
1.27
9.1
63.0 / 74.8
0.91
2.1
67.3 / 70.0
0.21
6.6
65.8 / 72.2
0.66
9.0
68.1 / 77.7
0.90
14.5
68.9 / 76.2
1.45
37.6
57.1 / 77.1
3.76
5.8
66.4 / 75.0
0.58
29.0 55.8 / 106.2
2.90
18.3 63.2 / 100.7
1.83
20.8
55.8 / 73.6
2.08
FAN SIZING DATA

Design
Airflow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Fan
Motor
(BHP)
0.461
2.299
0.506
0.451
0.131
0.125
0.147
0.265
0.227
0.231
0.305
0.276
0.582
0.556
0.199
0.170
0.144
0.345
VENT
Fan
Motor
(kW)
0.344
1.714
0.378
0.336
0.098
0.093
0.110
0.198
0.169
0.172
0.227
0.205
0.434
0.414
0.148
0.127
0.107
0.257
Design
Airflow
(CFM)
453
2265
690
840
133
105
107
42
360
170
318
120
200
1605
178
540
188
1095
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 2
1-Lobby
Zone 3
1-Reading Room 116
Zone 4
1-Orientation
Zone 5
1-Loading Dock
1-Receiving
1-Shower 102
1-Vestibule
Zone 6
1-Stair 2
2-Stair 2
B-Stair 2
Zone 7
1-Archivist
1-Corridor 112
Zone 8
1-Stair 1
2-Stair 1
Zone 9
2-School Program
Zone 10
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
25.6
0.9
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
1413
51
1.9
1.1
2075.0
145.0
0.68
0.35
132.3
Jun 1400
7305
50.7
1760.0
4.15
29.1
Jul 1700
1609
18.2
1610.0
1.00
26.0
Sep 1300
1434
3.5
1665.0
0.86
1
1
1
1
5.9
0.5
0.2
0.9
Sep 1200
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
328
26
13
50
6.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
585.0
100.0
70.0
115.0
0.56
0.26
0.18
0.43
1
1
1
2.3
2.4
1.3
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Aug 1900
126
133
138
2.1
2.9
5.9
350.0
350.0
350.0
0.36
0.38
0.40
1
1
1
4.8
3.2
0.5
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
267
176
25
2.1
2.3
0.0
380.0
130.0
65.0
0.70
1.36
0.39
1
1
1.8
13.4
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
102
741
2.8
10.1
210.0
210.0
0.49
3.53
13.0
Jun 1700
720
4.3
680.0
1.06
1
1
1.1
1.5
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
62
83
0.0
0.0
170.0
230.0
0.36
0.36
Page 2 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name /
Space Name
1-Janitor 110
1-Coats 108
1-Storage 107
1-Corridor
1-Locker Vestibule
1-Museum Shop
Zone 11
2-Copy Room
2-Conference Room
2-Processing Room
2-Work Stations
Zone 12
2-Office 205
2-Directors Office
Zone 13
2-Lunch
Zone 14
2-Main Gallery
2-Gallery
Zone 15
2-Women
2-Men
2-Network
2-West Corridor
2-East Corridor
2-Restroom 204
Zone 16
B-Storage 004
Zone 17
B-Boiler Room
B-Mech 003
B-Mech 006
B-Corridor 005
Zone 18
B-Storage 002
04/05/2004
04:33AM
Mult.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
0.2
0.4
0.3
3.7
0.4
5.7
Time
of
Load
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Air
Flow
(CFM)
9
21
17
202
22
317
Heating
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Floor
Area
(ft)
60.0
110.0
100.0
300.0
60.0
275.0
Space
CFM/ft
0.14
0.19
0.17
0.67
0.37
1.15
1
1
1
1
2.2
5.5
3.6
6.2
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
124
304
198
343
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.7
165.0
385.0
305.0
400.0
0.75
0.79
0.65
0.86
1
4
1
1.9
2.5
3.9
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
108
138
215
0.3
1.3
2.8
180.0
110.0
170.0
0.60
1.26
1.27
1
8
6.7
3.4
Sep 1200
Aug 1600
368
185
2.8
1.3
165.0
110.0
2.23
1.68
1
1
22.4
9.6
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
1235
531
7.2
6.4
2510.0
960.0
0.49
0.55
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
4.6
5.4
0.4
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
20
20
20
255
297
20
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.6
1.6
0.1
65.0
65.0
25.0
900.0
865.0
40.0
0.31
0.31
0.80
0.28
0.34
0.49
6.6
Aug 1700
540
16.0
2700.0
0.20
1
1
1
1
0.2
1.3
3.4
1.7
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
14
72
280
92
0.6
2.5
11.9
1.7
90.0
785.0
890.0
550.0
0.15
0.09
0.31
0.17
1
1
14.2
1.4
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
975
120
3.8
0.0
1500.0
600.0
0.65
0.20
Page 3 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 55 55
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft



Total coil load ........................................................ 54.3
Total coil load ...................................................... 652.0
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 9408
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................. 130.47
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0 F
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 85.6 / 64.5 F
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 36.6 / 36.7 F
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
gpm

Max coil load ....................................................... 176.2 MBH
Coil CFM at Oct 0600 ........................................... 9408 CFM
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408 CFM
Load occurs at ................................................... Oct 0600

Ent. DB / Lvg DB ............................................. 36.0 / 53.6 F

Airflow Rate .......................................................... 9408 CFM


Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.34 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 55 55
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
26.5
132.3
29.1
26.0
7.4
5.4
8.5
15.2
13.0
13.3
17.5
15.9
32.4
32.0
11.4
6.6
6.5
15.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
376
457
857
Total
Coil
Load
(MBH)
20.4
88.4
18.3
11.5
5.9
4.2
7.1
16.5
5.7
11.6
13.0
14.7
32.0
0.0
9.2
0.0
3.5
0.0
Sens
Coil
Load
(MBH)
20.4
88.4
18.3
11.5
5.9
4.2
7.1
16.1
5.7
11.6
13.0
14.7
32.0
0.0
8.7
0.0
3.5
0.0
Coil
Entering
DB / WB
(F)
71.6 / 58.0
71.0 / 53.9
68.7 / 54.1
65.5 / 52.0
71.3 / 59.2
72.1 / 63.0
73.3 / 59.6
77.0 / 64.4
67.0 / 52.8
73.3 / 61.7
71.0 / 56.8
75.5 / 62.2
75.8 / 61.0
0.0 / 0.0
72.1 / 63.1
0.0 / 0.0
68.9 / 61.8
0.0 / 0.0
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1700
Jun 1400
Jul 1700
Sep 1300
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Aug 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
Jan 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.0
50.7
18.2
3.5
7.4
10.8
4.3
12.9
4.3
0.0
2.3
8.2
12.9
13.5
3.5
16.0
16.7
3.8
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
2220.0
1760.0
1610.0
1665.0
870.0
1050.0
575.0
420.0
680.0
1305.0
1255.0
790.0
1045.0
3470.0
1960.0
2700.0
2315.0
2100.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.66
4.15
1.00
0.86
0.48
0.38
0.82
2.01
1.06
0.56
0.77
1.11
1.77
0.51
0.32
0.20
0.20
0.52
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Coil
Leaving
DB / WB
(F)
58.5 / 52.8
59.7 / 49.1
58.0 / 49.6
58.0 / 48.7
58.0 / 54.1
62.1 / 59.5
59.1 / 54.1
59.1 / 57.9
59.6 / 49.6
58.5 / 56.2
58.4 / 51.7
59.7 / 56.4
59.6 / 54.9
0.0 / 0.0
59.1 / 58.3
0.0 / 0.0
61.7 / 59.2
0.0 / 0.0
Water
Flow
@ 10.0 F
(gpm)
4.09
17.69
3.67
2.29
1.18
0.84
1.42
3.29
1.13
2.31
2.61
2.94
6.40
0.00
1.84
0.00
0.69
0.00
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jul 0900
Jun 1500
Jul 0700
Sep 0800
Aug 1000
Aug 1200
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1100
Jan 1300
Jul 1400
Jun 1700
Aug 1500
Des 0000
Jul 1600
Des 0000
Aug 0800
Des 0000

Page 1 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Coil
Water
Coil
Ent/Lvg
Flow
Load
DB
@20.0 F
(MBH)
(F)
(gpm)
9.3
66.2 / 72.2
0.93
77.8
65.6 / 75.6
7.78
27.5
64.0 / 80.0
2.75
15.9
61.9 / 72.3
1.59
8.9
65.2 / 85.1
0.89
11.8
65.6 / 93.4
1.18
5.7
67.0 / 78.5
0.57
12.7
69.3 / 83.5
1.27
9.1
63.0 / 74.8
0.91
2.1
67.3 / 70.0
0.21
6.6
65.8 / 72.2
0.66
9.0
68.1 / 77.7
0.90
14.5
68.9 / 76.2
1.45
37.6
57.1 / 77.1
3.76
5.8
66.4 / 75.0
0.58
29.0 55.8 / 106.2
2.90
18.3 63.2 / 100.7
1.83
20.8
55.8 / 73.6
2.08
FAN SIZING DATA

Design
Airflow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Fan
Motor
(BHP)
0.461
2.299
0.506
0.451
0.131
0.125
0.147
0.265
0.227
0.231
0.305
0.276
0.582
0.556
0.199
0.170
0.144
0.345
VENT
Fan
Motor
(kW)
0.344
1.714
0.378
0.336
0.098
0.093
0.110
0.198
0.169
0.172
0.227
0.205
0.434
0.414
0.148
0.127
0.107
0.257
Design
Airflow
(CFM)
453
2265
690
840
133
105
107
42
360
170
318
120
200
1605
178
540
188
1095
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 2
1-Lobby
Zone 3
1-Reading Room 116
Zone 4
1-Orientation
Zone 5
1-Loading Dock
1-Receiving
1-Shower 102
1-Vestibule
Zone 6
1-Stair 2
2-Stair 2
B-Stair 2
Zone 7
1-Archivist
1-Corridor 112
Zone 8
1-Stair 1
2-Stair 1
Zone 9
2-School Program
Zone 10
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
25.6
0.9
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
1413
51
1.9
1.1
2075.0
145.0
0.68
0.35
132.3
Jun 1400
7305
50.7
1760.0
4.15
29.1
Jul 1700
1609
18.2
1610.0
1.00
26.0
Sep 1300
1434
3.5
1665.0
0.86
1
1
1
1
5.9
0.5
0.2
0.9
Sep 1200
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
328
26
13
50
6.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
585.0
100.0
70.0
115.0
0.56
0.26
0.18
0.43
1
1
1
2.3
2.4
1.3
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Aug 1900
126
133
138
2.1
2.9
5.9
350.0
350.0
350.0
0.36
0.38
0.40
1
1
1
4.8
3.2
0.5
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
267
176
25
2.1
2.3
0.0
380.0
130.0
65.0
0.70
1.36
0.39
1
1
1.8
13.4
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
102
741
2.8
10.1
210.0
210.0
0.49
3.53
13.0
Jun 1700
720
4.3
680.0
1.06
1
1
1.1
1.5
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
62
83
0.0
0.0
170.0
230.0
0.36
0.36
Page 2 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name /
Space Name
1-Janitor 110
1-Coats 108
1-Storage 107
1-Corridor
1-Locker Vestibule
1-Museum Shop
Zone 11
2-Copy Room
2-Conference Room
2-Processing Room
2-Work Stations
Zone 12
2-Office 205
2-Directors Office
Zone 13
2-Lunch
Zone 14
2-Main Gallery
2-Gallery
Zone 15
2-Women
2-Men
2-Network
2-West Corridor
2-East Corridor
2-Restroom 204
Zone 16
B-Storage 004
Zone 17
B-Boiler Room
B-Mech 003
B-Mech 006
B-Corridor 005
Zone 18
B-Storage 002
04/05/2004
04:33AM
Mult.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
0.2
0.4
0.3
3.7
0.4
5.7
Time
of
Load
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Air
Flow
(CFM)
9
21
17
202
22
317
Heating
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Floor
Area
(ft)
60.0
110.0
100.0
300.0
60.0
275.0
Space
CFM/ft
0.14
0.19
0.17
0.67
0.37
1.15
1
1
1
1
2.2
5.5
3.6
6.2
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
124
304
198
343
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.7
165.0
385.0
305.0
400.0
0.75
0.79
0.65
0.86
1
4
1
1.9
2.5
3.9
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
108
138
215
0.3
1.3
2.8
180.0
110.0
170.0
0.60
1.26
1.27
1
8
6.7
3.4
Sep 1200
Aug 1600
368
185
2.8
1.3
165.0
110.0
2.23
1.68
1
1
22.4
9.6
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
1235
531
7.2
6.4
2510.0
960.0
0.49
0.55
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
4.6
5.4
0.4
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
20
20
20
255
297
20
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.6
1.6
0.1
65.0
65.0
25.0
900.0
865.0
40.0
0.31
0.31
0.80
0.28
0.34
0.49
6.6
Aug 1700
540
16.0
2700.0
0.20
1
1
1
1
0.2
1.3
3.4
1.7
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
14
72
280
92
0.6
2.5
11.9
1.7
90.0
785.0
890.0
550.0
0.15
0.09
0.31
0.17
1
1
14.2
1.4
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
975
120
3.8
0.0
1500.0
600.0
0.65
0.20
Page 3 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 60 60
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft



Total coil load ........................................................ 49.7
Total coil load ...................................................... 596.9
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 9408
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................. 119.44
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0 F
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 85.7 / 65.6 F
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 41.4 / 41.4 F
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
gpm

Max coil load ....................................................... 180.3 MBH
Coil CFM at May 0600 ......................................... 9408 CFM
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408 CFM
Load occurs at .................................................. May 0600

Ent. DB / Lvg DB ............................................. 40.6 / 58.6 F

Airflow Rate .......................................................... 9408 CFM


Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.34 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 60 60
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
26.5
132.3
29.1
26.0
7.4
5.4
8.5
15.2
13.0
13.3
17.5
15.9
32.4
32.0
11.4
6.6
6.5
15.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
376
457
857
Total
Coil
Load
(MBH)
22.8
100.5
22.0
15.9
6.6
4.8
7.6
16.9
7.6
12.7
14.7
15.3
33.1
7.5
10.9
0.0
4.5
0.0
Sens
Coil
Load
(MBH)
22.8
100.5
22.0
15.9
6.6
4.8
7.6
16.3
7.6
12.5
14.7
15.3
33.1
7.5
9.7
0.0
4.5
0.0
Coil
Entering
DB / WB
(F)
73.1 / 60.0
72.6 / 56.2
70.8 / 56.6
68.4 / 54.9
72.9 / 61.3
73.4 / 64.8
74.4 / 61.4
77.3 / 64.5
69.5 / 55.5
74.5 / 63.2
72.6 / 58.9
76.2 / 63.8
76.3 / 62.6
62.4 / 51.5
73.5 / 64.0
0.0 / 0.0
70.9 / 63.8
0.0 / 0.0
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1700
Jun 1400
Jul 1700
Sep 1300
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Aug 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
Jan 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.0
50.7
18.2
3.5
7.4
10.8
4.3
12.9
4.3
0.0
2.3
8.2
12.9
13.5
3.5
16.0
16.7
3.8
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
2220.0
1760.0
1610.0
1665.0
870.0
1050.0
575.0
420.0
680.0
1305.0
1255.0
790.0
1045.0
3470.0
1960.0
2700.0
2315.0
2100.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.66
4.15
1.00
0.86
0.48
0.38
0.82
2.01
1.06
0.56
0.77
1.11
1.77
0.51
0.32
0.20
0.20
0.52
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Coil
Leaving
DB / WB
(F)
58.5 / 54.4
59.7 / 50.9
58.0 / 51.3
58.0 / 50.6
58.0 / 55.7
62.1 / 60.9
59.1 / 55.7
59.1 / 57.9
59.6 / 51.4
58.5 / 57.4
58.4 / 53.3
59.7 / 57.9
59.6 / 56.5
58.4 / 49.8
59.1 / 58.2
0.0 / 0.0
61.7 / 60.7
0.0 / 0.0
Water
Flow
@ 10.0 F
(gpm)
4.57
20.10
4.40
3.19
1.32
0.96
1.53
3.37
1.52
2.53
2.95
3.06
6.62
1.50
2.19
0.00
0.89
0.00
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jul 0900
Jun 1500
Jul 0700
Sep 0800
Aug 1000
Aug 1200
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1100
Jan 1300
Jul 1400
Jun 1700
Aug 1500
Aug 1500
Jul 1600
Des 0000
Aug 0800
Des 0000

Page 1 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Coil
Water
Coil
Ent/Lvg
Flow
Load
DB
@20.0 F
(MBH)
(F)
(gpm)
6.9
67.7 / 72.2
0.69
65.7
67.1 / 75.6
6.57
23.9
66.1 / 80.0
2.39
11.4
64.9 / 72.3
1.14
8.2
66.8 / 85.1
0.82
11.2
66.9 / 93.4
1.12
5.2
68.1 / 78.5
0.52
12.5
69.6 / 83.5
1.25
7.1
65.5 / 74.8
0.71
1.2
68.4 / 70.0
0.12
4.9
67.4 / 72.2
0.49
8.4
68.8 / 77.7
0.84
13.5
69.4 / 76.2
1.35
29.0
61.6 / 77.1
2.90
4.8
67.8 / 75.0
0.48
26.2 60.8 / 106.2
2.62
17.3 65.3 / 100.7
1.73
15.0
60.8 / 73.6
1.50
FAN SIZING DATA

Design
Airflow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Fan
Motor
(BHP)
0.461
2.299
0.506
0.451
0.131
0.125
0.147
0.265
0.227
0.231
0.305
0.276
0.582
0.556
0.199
0.170
0.144
0.345
VENT
Fan
Motor
(kW)
0.344
1.714
0.378
0.336
0.098
0.093
0.110
0.198
0.169
0.172
0.227
0.205
0.434
0.414
0.148
0.127
0.107
0.257
Design
Airflow
(CFM)
453
2265
690
840
133
105
107
42
360
170
318
120
200
1605
178
540
188
1095
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 2
1-Lobby
Zone 3
1-Reading Room 116
Zone 4
1-Orientation
Zone 5
1-Loading Dock
1-Receiving
1-Shower 102
1-Vestibule
Zone 6
1-Stair 2
2-Stair 2
B-Stair 2
Zone 7
1-Archivist
1-Corridor 112
Zone 8
1-Stair 1
2-Stair 1
Zone 9
2-School Program
Zone 10
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
25.6
0.9
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
1413
51
1.9
1.1
2075.0
145.0
0.68
0.35
132.3
Jun 1400
7305
50.7
1760.0
4.15
29.1
Jul 1700
1609
18.2
1610.0
1.00
26.0
Sep 1300
1434
3.5
1665.0
0.86
1
1
1
1
5.9
0.5
0.2
0.9
Sep 1200
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
328
26
13
50
6.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
585.0
100.0
70.0
115.0
0.56
0.26
0.18
0.43
1
1
1
2.3
2.4
1.3
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Aug 1900
126
133
138
2.1
2.9
5.9
350.0
350.0
350.0
0.36
0.38
0.40
1
1
1
4.8
3.2
0.5
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
267
176
25
2.1
2.3
0.0
380.0
130.0
65.0
0.70
1.36
0.39
1
1
1.8
13.4
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
102
741
2.8
10.1
210.0
210.0
0.49
3.53
13.0
Jun 1700
720
4.3
680.0
1.06
1
1
1.1
1.5
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
62
83
0.0
0.0
170.0
230.0
0.36
0.36
Page 2 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name /
Space Name
1-Janitor 110
1-Coats 108
1-Storage 107
1-Corridor
1-Locker Vestibule
1-Museum Shop
Zone 11
2-Copy Room
2-Conference Room
2-Processing Room
2-Work Stations
Zone 12
2-Office 205
2-Directors Office
Zone 13
2-Lunch
Zone 14
2-Main Gallery
2-Gallery
Zone 15
2-Women
2-Men
2-Network
2-West Corridor
2-East Corridor
2-Restroom 204
Zone 16
B-Storage 004
Zone 17
B-Boiler Room
B-Mech 003
B-Mech 006
B-Corridor 005
Zone 18
B-Storage 002
04/05/2004
04:33AM
Mult.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
0.2
0.4
0.3
3.7
0.4
5.7
Time
of
Load
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Air
Flow
(CFM)
9
21
17
202
22
317
Heating
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Floor
Area
(ft)
60.0
110.0
100.0
300.0
60.0
275.0
Space
CFM/ft
0.14
0.19
0.17
0.67
0.37
1.15
1
1
1
1
2.2
5.5
3.6
6.2
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
124
304
198
343
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.7
165.0
385.0
305.0
400.0
0.75
0.79
0.65
0.86
1
4
1
1.9
2.5
3.9
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
108
138
215
0.3
1.3
2.8
180.0
110.0
170.0
0.60
1.26
1.27
1
8
6.7
3.4
Sep 1200
Aug 1600
368
185
2.8
1.3
165.0
110.0
2.23
1.68
1
1
22.4
9.6
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
1235
531
7.2
6.4
2510.0
960.0
0.49
0.55
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
4.6
5.4
0.4
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
20
20
20
255
297
20
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.6
1.6
0.1
65.0
65.0
25.0
900.0
865.0
40.0
0.31
0.31
0.80
0.28
0.34
0.49
6.6
Aug 1700
540
16.0
2700.0
0.20
1
1
1
1
0.2
1.3
3.4
1.7
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
14
72
280
92
0.6
2.5
11.9
1.7
90.0
785.0
890.0
550.0
0.15
0.09
0.31
0.17
1
1
14.2
1.4
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
975
120
3.8
0.0
1500.0
600.0
0.65
0.20
Page 3 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 65 65
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft



Total coil load ........................................................ 44.6
Total coil load ...................................................... 535.3
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 9408
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................. 107.13
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0 F
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 85.8 / 66.7 F
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 46.4 / 46.2 F
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
gpm

Max coil load ....................................................... 180.2 MBH
Coil CFM at May 1000 ......................................... 9408 CFM
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408 CFM
Load occurs at .................................................. May 1000

Ent. DB / Lvg DB ............................................. 45.6 / 63.6 F

Airflow Rate .......................................................... 9408 CFM


Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.34 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 65 65
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
26.5
132.3
29.1
26.0
7.4
5.4
8.5
15.2
13.0
13.3
17.5
15.9
32.4
32.0
11.4
6.6
6.5
15.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
376
457
857
Total
Coil
Load
(MBH)
25.2
112.5
25.7
20.4
7.6
5.8
8.2
17.3
9.5
14.4
16.4
16.3
34.1
16.0
12.8
2.5
6.2
5.5
Sens
Coil
Load
(MBH)
25.2
112.5
25.7
20.4
7.3
5.3
8.2
16.5
9.5
13.4
16.4
15.9
34.1
16.0
10.6
2.5
5.5
5.5
Coil
Entering
DB / WB
(F)
74.7 / 62.2
74.1 / 58.6
73.0 / 59.2
71.4 / 57.9
74.5 / 63.1
74.7 / 65.8
75.6 / 63.4
77.5 / 64.7
72.0 / 58.3
75.6 / 64.0
74.3 / 61.2
76.8 / 64.7
76.9 / 64.4
66.9 / 55.3
74.9 / 64.8
65.8 / 54.6
73.0 / 65.3
65.8 / 54.6
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1700
Jun 1400
Jul 1700
Sep 1300
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Aug 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
Jan 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.0
50.7
18.2
3.5
7.4
10.8
4.3
12.9
4.3
0.0
2.3
8.2
12.9
13.5
3.5
16.0
16.7
3.8
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
2220.0
1760.0
1610.0
1665.0
870.0
1050.0
575.0
420.0
680.0
1305.0
1255.0
790.0
1045.0
3470.0
1960.0
2700.0
2315.0
2100.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.66
4.15
1.00
0.86
0.48
0.38
0.82
2.01
1.06
0.56
0.77
1.11
1.77
0.51
0.32
0.20
0.20
0.52
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Coil
Leaving
DB / WB
(F)
58.5 / 56.3
59.7 / 52.9
58.0 / 53.3
58.0 / 52.6
58.0 / 56.9
62.1 / 61.2
59.1 / 57.5
59.1 / 57.9
59.6 / 53.4
58.5 / 57.4
58.4 / 55.3
59.7 / 58.6
59.6 / 58.3
58.4 / 51.8
59.1 / 58.2
61.4 / 52.8
61.7 / 61.0
61.0 / 52.7
Water
Flow
@ 10.0 F
(gpm)
5.05
22.52
5.14
4.08
1.51
1.15
1.64
3.47
1.90
2.89
3.28
3.27
6.83
3.21
2.56
0.50
1.25
1.11
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jul 0900
Jun 1500
Jul 0700
Sep 0800
Aug 1000
Aug 1200
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1100
Jan 1300
Jul 1400
Jun 1700
Aug 1500
Aug 1500
Jul 1600
Aug 0700
Aug 0800
Jan 1700

Page 1 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Coil
Water
Coil
Ent/Lvg
Flow
Load
DB
@20.0 F
(MBH)
(F)
(gpm)
4.5
69.3 / 72.2
0.45
53.6
68.7 / 75.6
5.37
20.2
68.2 / 80.0
2.02
6.9
67.8 / 72.3
0.69
7.4
68.4 / 85.1
0.75
10.6
68.2 / 93.4
1.07
4.6
69.3 / 78.5
0.46
12.3
69.8 / 83.5
1.23
5.2
68.0 / 74.8
0.52
0.3
69.6 / 70.0
0.03
3.2
69.0 / 72.2
0.32
7.7
69.4 / 77.7
0.77
12.4
69.9 / 76.2
1.24
20.5
66.2 / 77.1
2.05
3.9
69.2 / 75.0
0.39
23.3 65.8 / 106.2
2.33
16.3 67.4 / 100.7
1.63
9.2
65.8 / 73.6
0.92
FAN SIZING DATA

Design
Airflow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Fan
Motor
(BHP)
0.461
2.299
0.506
0.451
0.131
0.125
0.147
0.265
0.227
0.231
0.305
0.276
0.582
0.556
0.199
0.170
0.144
0.345
VENT
Fan
Motor
(kW)
0.344
1.714
0.378
0.336
0.098
0.093
0.110
0.198
0.169
0.172
0.227
0.205
0.434
0.414
0.148
0.127
0.107
0.257
Design
Airflow
(CFM)
453
2265
690
840
133
105
107
42
360
170
318
120
200
1605
178
540
188
1095
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 2
1-Lobby
Zone 3
1-Reading Room 116
Zone 4
1-Orientation
Zone 5
1-Loading Dock
1-Receiving
1-Shower 102
1-Vestibule
Zone 6
1-Stair 2
2-Stair 2
B-Stair 2
Zone 7
1-Archivist
1-Corridor 112
Zone 8
1-Stair 1
2-Stair 1
Zone 9
2-School Program
Zone 10
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
25.6
0.9
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
1413
51
1.9
1.1
2075.0
145.0
0.68
0.35
132.3
Jun 1400
7305
50.7
1760.0
4.15
29.1
Jul 1700
1609
18.2
1610.0
1.00
26.0
Sep 1300
1434
3.5
1665.0
0.86
1
1
1
1
5.9
0.5
0.2
0.9
Sep 1200
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
328
26
13
50
6.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
585.0
100.0
70.0
115.0
0.56
0.26
0.18
0.43
1
1
1
2.3
2.4
1.3
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Aug 1900
126
133
138
2.1
2.9
5.9
350.0
350.0
350.0
0.36
0.38
0.40
1
1
1
4.8
3.2
0.5
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
267
176
25
2.1
2.3
0.0
380.0
130.0
65.0
0.70
1.36
0.39
1
1
1.8
13.4
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
102
741
2.8
10.1
210.0
210.0
0.49
3.53
13.0
Jun 1700
720
4.3
680.0
1.06
1
1
1.1
1.5
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
62
83
0.0
0.0
170.0
230.0
0.36
0.36
Page 2 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name /
Space Name
1-Janitor 110
1-Coats 108
1-Storage 107
1-Corridor
1-Locker Vestibule
1-Museum Shop
Zone 11
2-Copy Room
2-Conference Room
2-Processing Room
2-Work Stations
Zone 12
2-Office 205
2-Directors Office
Zone 13
2-Lunch
Zone 14
2-Main Gallery
2-Gallery
Zone 15
2-Women
2-Men
2-Network
2-West Corridor
2-East Corridor
2-Restroom 204
Zone 16
B-Storage 004
Zone 17
B-Boiler Room
B-Mech 003
B-Mech 006
B-Corridor 005
Zone 18
B-Storage 002
04/05/2004
04:33AM
Mult.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
0.2
0.4
0.3
3.7
0.4
5.7
Time
of
Load
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Air
Flow
(CFM)
9
21
17
202
22
317
Heating
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Floor
Area
(ft)
60.0
110.0
100.0
300.0
60.0
275.0
Space
CFM/ft
0.14
0.19
0.17
0.67
0.37
1.15
1
1
1
1
2.2
5.5
3.6
6.2
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
124
304
198
343
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.7
165.0
385.0
305.0
400.0
0.75
0.79
0.65
0.86
1
4
1
1.9
2.5
3.9
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
108
138
215
0.3
1.3
2.8
180.0
110.0
170.0
0.60
1.26
1.27
1
8
6.7
3.4
Sep 1200
Aug 1600
368
185
2.8
1.3
165.0
110.0
2.23
1.68
1
1
22.4
9.6
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
1235
531
7.2
6.4
2510.0
960.0
0.49
0.55
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
4.6
5.4
0.4
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
20
20
20
255
297
20
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.6
1.6
0.1
65.0
65.0
25.0
900.0
865.0
40.0
0.31
0.31
0.80
0.28
0.34
0.49
6.6
Aug 1700
540
16.0
2700.0
0.20
1
1
1
1
0.2
1.3
3.4
1.7
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
14
72
280
92
0.6
2.5
11.9
1.7
90.0
785.0
890.0
550.0
0.15
0.09
0.31
0.17
1
1
14.2
1.4
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
975
120
3.8
0.0
1500.0
600.0
0.65
0.20
Page 3 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 70 70
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft



Total coil load ........................................................ 39.1
Total coil load ...................................................... 468.8
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 9408
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................... 93.81
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0 F
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 85.8 / 67.9 F
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 51.4 / 50.9 F
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
gpm

Max coil load ....................................................... 180.9 MBH
Coil CFM at Jun 0600 .......................................... 9408 CFM
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408 CFM
Load occurs at .................................................. Jun 0600

Ent. DB / Lvg DB ............................................. 50.6 / 68.6 F

Airflow Rate .......................................................... 9408 CFM


Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP .......................................................... 5.48 BHP

Fan motor kW ............................................................ 4.09 kW
Fan static ................................................................... 2.00 in wg

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.34 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ................................................ 70 70
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
26.5
132.3
29.1
26.0
7.4
5.4
8.5
15.2
13.0
13.3
17.5
15.9
32.4
32.0
11.4
6.6
6.5
15.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
376
457
857
Total
Coil
Load
(MBH)
29.1
124.6
29.4
24.9
9.1
6.9
9.3
17.8
11.4
16.4
18.3
17.7
36.4
24.6
14.8
5.4
8.4
11.4
Sens
Coil
Load
(MBH)
27.7
124.6
29.4
24.9
8.0
5.9
8.8
16.8
11.4
14.3
18.1
16.6
35.2
24.6
11.6
5.4
6.5
11.4
Coil
Entering
DB / WB
(F)
76.2 / 64.0
75.7 / 61.2
75.1 / 61.9
74.3 / 61.0
76.1 / 64.2
76.1 / 66.7
76.7 / 64.5
77.8 / 64.9
74.5 / 61.2
76.8 / 64.8
75.9 / 63.6
77.5 / 65.2
77.4 / 64.8
71.5 / 59.2
76.3 / 65.8
70.8 / 58.7
75.0 / 66.7
70.8 / 58.7
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1700
Jun 1400
Jul 1700
Sep 1300
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Aug 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
Jan 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.0
50.7
18.2
3.5
7.4
10.8
4.3
12.9
4.3
0.0
2.3
8.2
12.9
13.5
3.5
16.0
16.7
3.8
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
2220.0
1760.0
1610.0
1665.0
870.0
1050.0
575.0
420.0
680.0
1305.0
1255.0
790.0
1045.0
3470.0
1960.0
2700.0
2315.0
2100.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.66
4.15
1.00
0.86
0.48
0.38
0.82
2.01
1.06
0.56
0.77
1.11
1.77
0.51
0.32
0.20
0.20
0.52
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Coil
Leaving
DB / WB
(F)
58.5 / 57.3
59.7 / 55.2
58.0 / 55.5
58.0 / 54.8
58.0 / 56.9
62.1 / 61.2
59.1 / 58.0
59.1 / 57.9
59.6 / 55.6
58.5 / 57.4
58.4 / 57.2
59.7 / 58.6
59.6 / 58.4
58.4 / 54.1
59.1 / 58.2
61.4 / 55.1
61.7 / 61.0
61.0 / 54.9
Water
Flow
@ 10.0 F
(gpm)
5.82
24.93
5.87
4.98
1.81
1.39
1.86
3.56
2.28
3.27
3.67
3.54
7.28
4.92
2.96
1.07
1.68
2.28
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jul 0900
Jun 1500
Jul 0700
Sep 0800
Aug 1000
Aug 1200
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1100
Dec 1300
Jul 1400
Jun 1700
Aug 1500
Aug 1500
Jul 1600
Aug 0700
Aug 0800
Jan 1700

Page 1 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Coil
Water
Coil
Ent/Lvg
Flow
Load
DB
@20.0 F
(MBH)
(F)
(gpm)
1.5
70.7 / 71.6
0.15
41.6
70.2 / 75.6
4.16
16.5
70.4 / 80.0
1.65
2.3
70.7 / 72.3
0.23
6.7
70.0 / 85.1
0.67
10.1
69.5 / 93.4
1.01
3.9
70.3 / 78.2
0.39
12.1
70.0 / 83.5
1.21
3.3
70.5 / 74.9
0.34
0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.00
1.5
70.7 / 72.1
0.15
7.1
70.1 / 77.8
0.71
11.3
70.5 / 76.2
1.14
11.9
70.7 / 77.1
1.19
3.0
70.6 / 75.0
0.30
20.4 70.8 / 106.2
2.04
15.3 69.4 / 100.7
1.53
3.4
70.8 / 73.6
0.34
FAN SIZING DATA

Design
Airflow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
417
396
469
843
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
457
1095
Fan
Motor
(BHP)
0.461
2.299
0.506
0.451
0.131
0.125
0.147
0.265
0.227
0.231
0.305
0.276
0.582
0.556
0.199
0.170
0.144
0.345
VENT
Fan
Motor
(kW)
0.344
1.714
0.378
0.336
0.098
0.093
0.110
0.198
0.169
0.172
0.227
0.205
0.434
0.414
0.148
0.127
0.107
0.257
Design
Airflow
(CFM)
453
2265
690
840
133
105
107
42
360
170
318
120
200
1605
178
540
188
1095
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 2
1-Lobby
Zone 3
1-Reading Room 116
Zone 4
1-Orientation
Zone 5
1-Loading Dock
1-Receiving
1-Shower 102
1-Vestibule
Zone 6
1-Stair 2
2-Stair 2
B-Stair 2
Zone 7
1-Archivist
1-Corridor 112
Zone 8
1-Stair 1
2-Stair 1
Zone 9
2-School Program
Zone 10
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
25.6
0.9
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
1413
51
1.9
1.1
2075.0
145.0
0.68
0.35
132.3
Jun 1400
7305
50.7
1760.0
4.15
29.1
Jul 1700
1609
18.2
1610.0
1.00
26.0
Sep 1300
1434
3.5
1665.0
0.86
1
1
1
1
5.9
0.5
0.2
0.9
Sep 1200
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
328
26
13
50
6.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
585.0
100.0
70.0
115.0
0.56
0.26
0.18
0.43
1
1
1
2.3
2.4
1.3
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Aug 1900
126
133
138
2.1
2.9
5.9
350.0
350.0
350.0
0.36
0.38
0.40
1
1
1
4.8
3.2
0.5
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
267
176
25
2.1
2.3
0.0
380.0
130.0
65.0
0.70
1.36
0.39
1
1
1.8
13.4
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
102
741
2.8
10.1
210.0
210.0
0.49
3.53
13.0
Jun 1700
720
4.3
680.0
1.06
1
1
1.1
1.5
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
62
83
0.0
0.0
170.0
230.0
0.36
0.36
Page 2 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name /
Space Name
1-Janitor 110
1-Coats 108
1-Storage 107
1-Corridor
1-Locker Vestibule
1-Museum Shop
Zone 11
2-Copy Room
2-Conference Room
2-Processing Room
2-Work Stations
Zone 12
2-Office 205
2-Directors Office
Zone 13
2-Lunch
Zone 14
2-Main Gallery
2-Gallery
Zone 15
2-Women
2-Men
2-Network
2-West Corridor
2-East Corridor
2-Restroom 204
Zone 16
B-Storage 004
Zone 17
B-Boiler Room
B-Mech 003
B-Mech 006
B-Corridor 005
Zone 18
B-Storage 002
04/05/2004
04:33AM
Mult.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
0.2
0.4
0.3
3.7
0.4
5.7
Time
of
Load
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Air
Flow
(CFM)
9
21
17
202
22
317
Heating
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Floor
Area
(ft)
60.0
110.0
100.0
300.0
60.0
275.0
Space
CFM/ft
0.14
0.19
0.17
0.67
0.37
1.15
1
1
1
1
2.2
5.5
3.6
6.2
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
124
304
198
343
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.7
165.0
385.0
305.0
400.0
0.75
0.79
0.65
0.86
1
4
1
1.9
2.5
3.9
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
108
138
215
0.3
1.3
2.8
180.0
110.0
170.0
0.60
1.26
1.27
1
8
6.7
3.4
Sep 1200
Aug 1600
368
185
2.8
1.3
165.0
110.0
2.23
1.68
1
1
22.4
9.6
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
1235
531
7.2
6.4
2510.0
960.0
0.49
0.55
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
4.6
5.4
0.4
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
20
20
20
255
297
20
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.6
1.6
0.1
65.0
65.0
25.0
900.0
865.0
40.0
0.31
0.31
0.80
0.28
0.34
0.49
6.6
Aug 1700
540
16.0
2700.0
0.20
1
1
1
1
0.2
1.3
3.4
1.7
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
14
72
280
92
0.6
2.5
11.9
1.7
90.0
785.0
890.0
550.0
0.15
0.09
0.31
0.17
1
1
14.2
1.4
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
975
120
3.8
0.0
1500.0
600.0
0.65
0.20
Page 3 of 3
Air System Sizing Summary for Final System Conf.

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ......................... Final System Conf.
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft



Total coil load ........................................................ 41.5
Total coil load ...................................................... 498.3
Coil CFM at Jul 1500 ............................................ 9408
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408
Water flow @ 10.0 F rise ................................... 99.70
Tons
MBH
MBH
CFM
CFM

OA DB / WB ..................................................... 90.0 / 73.0 F
Entering DB / WB ............................................ 88.3 / 68.7 F
Leaving DB / WB ............................................. 51.0 / 50.8 F
Bypass Factor .......................................................... 0.100
gpm

Max coil load ....................................................... 151.3 MBH
Coil CFM at Jun 0600 .......................................... 9408 CFM
Max coil CFM ....................................................... 9408 CFM
Load occurs at .................................................. Jun 0600

Ent. DB / Lvg DB ............................................. 50.3 / 65.4 F

Airflow Rate .......................................................... 9408 CFM


Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP ........................................................ 18.10 BHP

Fan motor kW .......................................................... 13.50 kW

Standard CFM ...................................................... 9278 CFM
Fan motor BHP ........................................................ 18.10 BHP

Fan motor kW .......................................................... 13.50 kW

CFM/ft .................................................................. 0.34 CFM/ft
Page 1 of 1
Zone Sizing Summary for Final System Conf.

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Air System Name ......................... Final System Conf.
Number of zones .......................................................... 18

Floor Area ............................................................ 27790.0 ft


Zone Sizing Data
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Maximum
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
26.5
132.3
29.1
26.0
7.4
5.4
8.5
15.2
13.0
13.3
17.5
15.9
32.4
32.0
11.4
6.6
6.5
15.5
Design
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
510
396
510
870
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
510
1095
Minimum
Air
Flow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
510
396
510
870
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
510
510
857
Total
Coil
Load
(MBH)
28.1
126.0
28.4
24.0
8.4
6.6
8.9
17.0
10.9
15.8
17.6
17.1
35.4
23.5
14.3
4.6
8.0
10.5
Sens
Coil
Load
(MBH)
26.8
126.0
28.4
24.0
7.9
5.6
8.6
16.1
10.9
13.8
17.4
16.0
34.2
23.5
11.1
4.6
6.2
10.5
Coil
Entering
DB / WB
(F)
75.6 / 63.8
75.9 / 61.2
74.6 / 61.7
73.7 / 60.8
75.4 / 65.2
75.4 / 66.5
75.9 / 64.7
77.2 / 65.1
73.7 / 60.9
76.1 / 64.6
75.3 / 63.4
76.9 / 65.0
76.9 / 64.7
70.9 / 59.0
75.6 / 65.6
70.0 / 58.4
74.5 / 67.1
70.0 / 58.4
Time
of
Peak
Load
Aug 1700
Jun 1400
Jul 1700
Sep 1300
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Aug 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
Jan 1700
Maximum
Heating
Load
(MBH)
3.0
50.7
18.2
3.5
7.4
10.8
4.3
12.9
4.3
0.0
2.3
8.2
12.9
13.5
3.5
16.0
16.7
3.8
Zone
Floor
Area
(ft)
2220.0
1760.0
1610.0
1665.0
870.0
1050.0
575.0
420.0
680.0
1305.0
1255.0
790.0
1045.0
3470.0
1960.0
2700.0
2315.0
2100.0
Zone
CFM/ft
0.66
4.15
1.00
0.86
0.59
0.38
0.89
2.07
1.06
0.56
0.77
1.11
1.77
0.51
0.32
0.20
0.22
0.52
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
Coil
Leaving
DB / WB
(F)
58.5 / 57.4
59.7 / 55.2
58.0 / 55.6
58.0 / 54.8
60.9 / 59.9
62.1 / 61.3
60.1 / 59.0
59.8 / 58.7
59.6 / 55.6
58.5 / 57.4
58.4 / 57.2
59.7 / 58.6
59.6 / 58.4
58.4 / 54.1
59.1 / 58.2
62.1 / 55.3
63.0 / 62.3
61.0 / 54.9
Water
Flow
@ 10.0 F
(gpm)
5.63
25.22
5.68
4.81
1.68
1.33
1.79
3.41
2.17
3.16
3.53
3.42
7.09
4.71
2.86
0.92
1.60
2.11
Time
of
Peak
Load
Jul 0900
Jun 1500
Jul 0700
Sep 0800
Aug 1200
Aug 1200
Jun 1700
Jun 1600
Jun 1100
Dec 1300
Jul 1400
Jun 1700
Aug 1500
Aug 1500
Jul 1600
Aug 0800
Aug 0900
Jan 1700

Page 1 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
Zone 8
Zone 9
Zone 10
Zone 11
Zone 12
Zone 13
Zone 14
Zone 15
Zone 16
Zone 17
Zone 18
04/05/2004
04:33AM

Coil
Water
Coil
Ent/Lvg
Flow
Load
DB
@20.0 F
(MBH)
(F)
(gpm)
2.7
70.2 / 71.9
0.27
43.9
70.8 / 76.5
4.39
17.5
69.8 / 80.0
1.75
3.3
70.2 / 72.3
0.33
7.4
69.5 / 83.0
0.74
10.4
68.8 / 93.4
1.04
4.2
69.6 / 77.4
0.42
12.7
69.5 / 83.2
1.27
3.8
69.8 / 74.8
0.39
0.0
0.0 / 0.0
0.00
2.2
70.0 / 72.2
0.22
7.7
69.5 / 77.7
0.77
12.3
70.0 / 76.2
1.23
13.0
70.2 / 77.1
1.30
3.4
69.9 / 75.0
0.34
15.4
70.0 / 96.9
1.54
15.8
68.7 / 97.9
1.58
4.2
70.0 / 73.6
0.42
FAN SIZING DATA

Design
Airflow
(CFM)
1465
7305
1609
1434
510
396
510
870
720
733
969
876
1850
1766
632
540
510
1095
Fan
Motor
(BHP)
0.671
3.353
0.671
0.671
0.134
0.161
0.134
0.402
0.134
0.268
0.402
0.456
0.939
0.671
0.134
0.161
0.161
0.134
VENT
Fan
Motor
(kW)
0.500
2.500
0.500
0.500
0.100
0.120
0.100
0.300
0.100
0.200
0.300
0.340
0.700
0.500
0.100
0.120
0.120
0.100
Design
Airflow
(CFM)
453
2265
690
840
133
105
107
42
360
170
318
120
200
1605
178
540
188
1095
Zone Name /
Space Name
Zone 1
1-Archive Storage
1-Negative Storage
Zone 2
1-Lobby
Zone 3
1-Reading Room 116
Zone 4
1-Orientation
Zone 5
1-Loading Dock
1-Receiving
1-Shower 102
1-Vestibule
Zone 6
1-Stair 2
2-Stair 2
B-Stair 2
Zone 7
1-Archivist
1-Corridor 112
Zone 8
1-Stair 1
2-Stair 1
Zone 9
2-School Program
Zone 10
1-Mens Room
1-Womens Room
Mult.
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
Time
of
Load
Air
Flow
(CFM)
Heating
Load
(MBH)
Floor
Area
(ft)
Space
CFM/ft
1
1
25.6
0.9
Jul 1700
Aug 1700
1413
51
1.9
1.1
2075.0
145.0
0.68
0.35
132.3
Jun 1400
7305
50.7
1760.0
4.15
29.1
Jul 1700
1609
18.2
1610.0
1.00
26.0
Sep 1300
1434
3.5
1665.0
0.86
1
1
1
1
5.9
0.5
0.2
0.9
Sep 1200
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
401
32
16
61
6.2
0.0
0.0
1.2
585.0
100.0
70.0
115.0
0.69
0.32
0.22
0.53
1
1
1
2.3
2.4
1.3
Sep 1200
Sep 1200
Aug 1900
126
133
138
2.1
2.9
5.9
350.0
350.0
350.0
0.36
0.38
0.40
1
1
1
4.8
3.2
0.5
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
Jan 1700
290
192
28
2.1
2.3
0.0
380.0
130.0
65.0
0.76
1.48
0.43
1
1
1.8
13.4
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
105
765
2.8
10.1
210.0
210.0
0.50
3.64
13.0
Jun 1700
720
4.3
680.0
1.06
1
1
1.1
1.5
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
62
83
0.0
0.0
170.0
230.0
0.36
0.36
Page 2 of 3

Project Name: L
Prepared by: psuae
Zone Name /
Space Name
1-Janitor 110
1-Coats 108
1-Storage 107
1-Corridor
1-Locker Vestibule
1-Museum Shop
Zone 11
2-Copy Room
2-Conference Room
2-Processing Room
2-Work Stations
Zone 12
2-Office 205
2-Directors Office
Zone 13
2-Lunch
Zone 14
2-Main Gallery
2-Gallery
Zone 15
2-Women
2-Men
2-Network
2-West Corridor
2-East Corridor
2-Restroom 204
Zone 16
B-Storage 004
Zone 17
B-Boiler Room
B-Mech 003
B-Mech 006
B-Corridor 005
Zone 18
B-Storage 002
04/05/2004
04:33AM
Mult.
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cooling
Sensible
(MBH)
0.2
0.4
0.3
3.7
0.4
5.7
Time
of
Load
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Air
Flow
(CFM)
9
21
17
202
22
317
Heating
Load
(MBH)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Floor
Area
(ft)
60.0
110.0
100.0
300.0
60.0
275.0
Space
CFM/ft
0.14
0.19
0.17
0.67
0.37
1.15
1
1
1
1
2.2
5.5
3.6
6.2
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
124
304
198
343
0.3
0.7
0.5
0.7
165.0
385.0
305.0
400.0
0.75
0.79
0.65
0.86
1
4
1
1.9
2.5
3.9
Jul 1700
Jun 1700
Jun 1700
108
138
215
0.3
1.3
2.8
180.0
110.0
170.0
0.60
1.26
1.27
1
8
6.7
3.4
Sep 1200
Aug 1600
368
185
2.8
1.3
165.0
110.0
2.23
1.68
1
1
22.4
9.6
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
1235
531
7.2
6.4
2510.0
960.0
0.49
0.55
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.4
0.4
0.4
4.6
5.4
0.4
Jul 1600
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1600
Jul 1700
Jul 1700
20
20
20
255
297
20
0.1
0.1
0.0
1.6
1.6
0.1
65.0
65.0
25.0
900.0
865.0
40.0
0.31
0.31
0.80
0.28
0.34
0.49
6.6
Aug 1700
540
16.0
2700.0
0.20
1
1
1
1
0.2
1.3
3.4
1.7
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
Aug 1700
Aug 1700
15
80
312
102
0.6
2.5
11.9
1.7
90.0
785.0
890.0
550.0
0.17
0.10
0.35
0.19
1
1
14.2
1.4
Jan 1700
Jan 1700
975
120
3.8
0.0
1500.0
600.0
0.65
0.20
Page 3 of 3
Annual Cost Summary

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:43AM

LVHC DOAS Final
($)
8,267
Component
Air System Fans
Cooling
4,918
Heating
2,029
Pumps
48
Cooling Tower Fans

HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
0
15,261
13,588
Electric Equipment
Misc. Electric
704
2,929
Misc. Fuel Use
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
17,221
Grand Total
32,482

LVHC DOAS Final
Component
($/ft)
Air System Fans
0.298
Cooling
0.177
Heating
0.073
Pumps
0.002
Cooling Tower Fans
0.000
HVAC Sub-Total
0.549
Lights
0.489
Electric Equipment
0.025
Misc. Electric
0.105
Misc. Fuel Use
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
Grand Total
0.620
1.169
27790.0

27790.0
LVHC DOAS Final
Component
(%)
Air System Fans
25.4
Cooling
15.1
Heating
6.2
Pumps
0.1
Cooling Tower Fans
0.0
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
47.0
41.8
Electric Equipment
2.2
Misc. Electric
9.0
Misc. Fuel Use
0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
53.0
Grand Total
100.0
Page 1 of 1

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:43AM

LVHC DOAS Final
($)
Component
HVAC Components
Electric
13,233
Natural Gas
2,028
Fuel Oil
Propane
Remote HW
Remote Steam
Remote CW
HVAC Sub-Total
15,261
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
17,221
Natural Gas
Fuel Oil
Propane
Remote HW
Remote Steam
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
17,221
Grand Total
32,482
Table 2. Annual Energy Consumption

Component
LVHC DOAS Final
HVAC Components
Electric (kWh)
178,345
Natural Gas (Therm)
2,180
Fuel Oil (na)

Propane (Therm)
0
19
Remote HW (na)
Remote Steam (na)
Remote CW (na)
Non-HVAC Components
Electric (kWh)
231,726
Natural Gas (Therm)
Fuel Oil (na)
Propane (Therm)
Remote HW (na)
Remote Steam (na)
Totals
Electric (kWh)
Natural Gas (Therm)
Fuel Oil (na)
410,071
2,180
0
Propane (Therm)
19
Remote HW (na)
Remote Steam (na)
Remote CW (na)
Page 1 of 3

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:43AM
Table 3. Annual Emissions

Component
CO2 (lb)
LVHC DOAS Final

0
SO2 (kg)
NOx (kg)

LVHC DOAS Final
($/ft)
Component
HVAC Components
Electric
0.476
Natural Gas
0.073
Fuel Oil
0.000
Propane
0.000
Remote HW
0.000
Remote Steam
0.000
Remote CW
0.000
HVAC Sub-Total
0.549
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
0.620
Natural Gas
0.000
Fuel Oil
0.000
Propane
0.000
Remote HW
0.000
Remote Steam
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
0.620
Grand Total
1.169
27790.0

27790.0
Page 2 of 3

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:43AM

LVHC DOAS Final
Component
(%)
HVAC Components
Electric
Natural Gas
40.7
6.2
Fuel Oil
0.0
Propane
0.0
Remote HW
0.0
Remote Steam
0.0
Remote CW
0.0
HVAC Sub-Total
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
47.0
53.0
Natural Gas
0.0
Fuel Oil
0.0
Propane
0.0
Remote HW
0.0
Remote Steam
0.0
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
53.0
Grand Total
100.0
Page 3 of 3
Annual Component Costs - LVHC DOAS Final

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:43AM
9.0% Misc. Electric

2.2% Electric Equipment
Air System Fans 25.4%
41.8% Lights
Cooling 15.1%
Heating 6.2%
Pumps 0.1%
1. Annual Costs
Annual Cost
($)
8,267
($/ft)
0.298
Percent of Total
(%)
25.4
Cooling
4,918
0.177
15.1
Heating
2,029
0.073
6.2
Component
Air System Fans
Pumps
Cooling Tower Fans
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
Electric Equipment
48
0.002
0.1
0.000
0.0
15,261
0.549
47.0
13,588
0.489
41.8
704
0.025
2.2
2,929
0.105
9.0
0.000
0.0
17,221
0.620
53.0
Grand Total
32,482
1.169
Note: Cost per unit floor area is based on the gross building floor area.
100.0
Misc. Electric
Misc. Fuel Use
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
Gross Floor Area ....................................... 27790.0 ft

Conditioned Floor Area ............................. 27790.0 ft
Page 1 of 1
Energy Budget by System Component - LVHC DOAS Final

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:43AM

Component
Cooling Coil Loads
Heating Coil Loads
Load
(kBTU)
929,407
(kBTU/ft)
33.444
403,459
14.518
1,332,866
47.962
2. Energy Consumption by System Component

Site Energy
Component
(kBTU)
Air System Fans
379,633
Site Energy
(kBTU/ft)
13.661
Source Energy
(kBTU)
1,355,832
Source Energy
(kBTU/ft)
48.789
8.157
809,583
29.132
Grand Total
Cooling
226,683
Heating
219,948
7.915
219,965
7.915
2,189
0.079
7,819
0.281
Pumps
Cooling Towers
0.000
0.000
828,453
29.811
2,393,198
86.117
623,869
22.449
2,228,104
80.176
32,328
1.163
115,459
4.155
134,454
4.838
480,191
17.279
0.000
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
790,651
28.451
2,823,754
101.610
Grand Total
1,619,104
58.262
5,216,952
187.728
HVAC Sub-Total
Lights
Electric Equipment
Misc. Electric
Misc. Fuel Use
Notes:
Page 1 of 1
Energy Budget by Energy Source - LVHC DOAS Final

L
psuae
04/05/2004
04:43AM

Component
Cooling Coil Loads
Heating Coil Loads
Load
(kBTU)
929,407
(kBTU/ft)
33.444
403,459
14.518
1,332,866
47.962
2. Energy Consumption by Energy Source

Site Energy
Component
(kBTU)
Site Energy
(kBTU/ft)
Source Energy
(kBTU)
Source Energy
(kBTU/ft)
21.897
2,173,259
78.203
Grand Total
HVAC Components
Electric
608,513
Natural Gas
218,020
7.845
218,020
7.845
0.000
0.000
1,921
0.069
1,921
0.069
0.000
0.000
Fuel Oil
Propane
Remote Hot Water
Remote Steam
0.000
0.000
Remote Chilled Water
0.000
0.000
828,454
29.811
2,393,201
86.117
HVAC Sub-Total
Non-HVAC Components
Electric
790,649
28.451
2,823,747
101.610
Natural Gas
0.000
0.000
Fuel Oil
0.000
0.000
Propane
0.000
0.000
Remote Hot Water
0.000
0.000
Remote Steam
0.000
0.000
Non-HVAC Sub-Total
790,649
28.451
2,823,747
101.610
Grand Total
1,619,103
58.262
5,216,947
187.728
Notes:
Page 1 of 1
Appendix B
Structural:

Structural Calculations
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Structural Detail
Jarod F. Stanton
Mechanical Option


Jfs 173 Report Final

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Deskripsi Asli:

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Jfs 173 Report Final

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Owner/Occupant: The Lehigh County Historical Society

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Summary and Conclusions

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center is being constructed in Allentown,

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Figure 1. Walnut Street (North) Elevation, courtesy of The Lehigh

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Figure 2. Hickory Street (South) Elevation, courtesy of the

Figure 3. Penn Street (West) Elevation, courtesy of The

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Cooling Tower Fans

Misc. Fuel Use

Table 1. Existing Condition Operating Cost

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Table 2. Annual Costs for test temperatures of DOAS

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Total Weight = 21,150 lbs

Table 3. Equipment operating weight in the equipment well

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Figure 4. Housed Spring Mounting, courtesy of Vibration Isolation

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Research on EPS forms for basement walls

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Figure 5, EPS form, courtesy of American Polysteel

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Research on Smart Window Technology

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Figure 6. PDLC windows, courtesy of HowStuffWorks

The Pennsylvania State University

The Lehigh Valley Heritage Center

Figure 7. SPD window, courtesy of HowStuffWorks