HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Page 1 of 33
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
PREPARED BY:
Robert Desautels
Subcontractor Level III
APPROVED BY
DATE: 2011/01/20
ISSUE: 2
REVISION: 8
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 2 of 33
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 3 of 33
DEMONSTRATION STATEMENT
WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROCEDURE NUMBER NDEMP H-10 HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED BY A.S.M.E. Sect. V, EDITION
2010 AND THIS PROCEDURE HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED AS
REQUIRED BY T-150 OF THE SAME SECTION.
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Page 4 of 33
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
REVISION TABLE
ISSUE
DATE
PROCEDURE
1 REVISION 0
Oct.16th. 1995
NDE-MP-H-10
SUBJECT
NUMBER
DATE
REVISION
14/9/01
11/01/05
03/04/05
06/03/13
06/11/27
N.D.E.
Q.A.
ENG.
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
07/12/31
2010/8/3
Page 5 of 33
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 6 of 33
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ________________________________________________2
DEMONSTRATION STATEMENT _______________________________________________3
REVISION TABLE ____________________________________________________________4
TABLE OF CONTENTS ________________________________________________________6
1.0
INTRODUCTION _______________________________________________________7
2.0
SCOPE ________________________________________________________________7
3.0
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS _________________________________________7
4.0
EQUIPMENT___________________________________________________________8
5.0
PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION __________________________________________8
6.0
GENERAL _____________________________________________________________8
7.0
SURFACE PREPARATION AND CLEANING _______________________________9
8.0
EXAMINATION MEDIUM ______________________________________________10
9.0
CALIBRATION ________________________________________________________10
10.0 PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION _________________________________________12
11.0 MAGNETIZATION _____________________________________________________12
12.0 MAGNETIC FIELD ADEQUACY AND DIRECTION_________________________13
13.0 LIGHTING FOR NON-FLUORESCENT PARTICLES. _______________________13
14.0 DEFINITION OF INDICATIONS_________________________________________14
15.0 INTERPRETATION ____________________________________________________14
16.0 EVALUATION OF INDICATIONS ________________________________________15
17.0 RECORDING OF INDICATIONS _________________________________________15
18.0 REPAIRS _____________________________________________________________16
19.0 RECORDS ____________________________________________________________16
20.0 DEMAGNETIZATION AND POST CLEANING _____________________________17
FIGURE 1 __________________________________________________________________18
MT-1 TECHNIQUE YOKE___________________________________________________19
APPENDIX 1 ________________________________________________________________20
APPENDIX 2 ________________________________________________________________21
APPENDIX 3 ________________________________________________________________23
APPENDIX 4 ________________________________________________________________24
APPENDIX 5 ________________________________________________________________25
APPENDIX 6A_______________________________________________________________27
APPENDIX 6B_______________________________________________________________28
APPENDIX 7 ________________________________________________________________30
APPENDIX 8 ________________________________________________________________31
EXHIBIT 1__________________________________________________________________32
EXHIBIT 2__________________________________________________________________33
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
1.0
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 7 of 33
INTRODUCTION
The following Magnetic Particle Examination Procedure, using dry powder
method with Yoke instrument is written in accordance to the requirements of
A.S.M.E. Sect. V, Article 7.
The Procedure conforms to the requirements of the following Codes : A.S.M.E.
Sect. I, A.S.M.E. Sect. VIII, A.S.M.E. B31.1 and A.S.M.E. B31.3.
The applicable edition and addendum to the Code in this entire procedure are listed on
page 2 , certification statement
2.0
3.0
SCOPE
2.1
This procedure along with the accompanying sketches describes the technique
used for the Magnetic Particle Examination of Welding and Weld preparations
using the dry powder method. Magnetization shall be achieved by means of a
AC/DC Yoke.
2.2
This procedure shall be used on ferromagnetic material only of any thickness, size
or shape to detect surface or near surface discontinuities of a round linear or crack
like nature.
2.3
PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS
3.1
Personnel performing magnetic particles as per this procedure shall be certified in
accordance with SNT-TC-1A Edition accepted to the current governing section of
ASME code.
3.2
3.3
The following documents shall be available on the Q.C. file for each technician.
1)
Training certificate
2)
Certificate of qualification
3)
Annual eye tests
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 8 of 33
All test reports relating the complete magnetic particles examination and results
must be signed by a qualified technician Level II.
4.0
EQUIPMENT
4.1
Parker AC/DC Yoke, model B100,
The above equipment may be used for this method of examination. Should other
equipment be used it will be detailed in a supplementary procedure.
5.0
PROCEDURE QUALIFICATION
When procedure qualification is specified, a change of a requirement in Table T-721
identified as an essential variable from the specified value, or range values, shall require
requalification of the written procedure. A change of a requirement identified as a
nonessential variable from the specified value, or range of values, does not require
requalification of the written procedure. All changes of essential or nonessential variable
from the value, or range of values, specified by the written procedure shall require revision
of, or an addendum to, the written procedure.
6.0
GENERAL
6.1
The sensitivity of the method is greatest for surface discontinuities and diminishes
rapidly with depth below the surface.
6.2
One hundred percent (100%) of the surface of the finished welds shall be
examined. Components sections (other than welds) shall be examined as required
by the governing Code section, and/or customer specifications.
6.3
6.4
Whichever technique is used to produce the magnetic flux in the part, maximum
sensitivity will be to linear discontinuities oriented perpendicular to the lines of
flux. For optimum effectiveness in detecting all types of discontinuities, each
area should be examined at least twice, with the lines of flux during one
examination approximately perpendicular to the lines of flux during the other.
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Page 9 of 33
7.0
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
7.2
7.3
Detergent
Organic solvents
Descaling solutions
Paint removers
Vapor degreasing
Sand and grid blasting
Mechanical brushing and/or grinding
7.4
If coating is left on the part in the area being examined, it must be demonstrated
that indications can be detected through the existing coating thickness applied.
When AC yoke technique is used on ferretic coated material a procedure shall be
written according to appendix 1 of art. 7 of ASME code Section V.
7.5
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 10 of 33
8.0
9.0
If nonmagnetic coating is left on the part in the area being examined, it shall be
demonstrated that indications can be detected through the existing maximum
coating thickness applied.
EXAMINATION MEDIUM
8.1
The dry particles may be applied on the surface to be examined, by spraying or
dusting from bulb applicators
8.2
Excess of dry particle shall be removed with a light air steam from a bulb or
serine providing low pressure dry air. The current shall be maintained while
removing the excess of particles
8.3
The color of the particles shall provide adequate contrast with the background of
the surface being examined.
8.4
Ardrox particles shall be used in the red colors. The color given the better contrast
shall be chosen.
8.5
8.6
Magnetic Particle examination shall not be done on the surface of parts whose
temperature exceeds 600oF (315oC).
8.7
CALIBRATION
9.1
The calibration of the equipment shall be carried out annually, after major
equipment repairs or whenever and equipment has been damaged. Equipment has
not been in use for a year or more, a check shall be done to the first use.
9.2
For the calibration, each alternating current electromagnetic yoke shall have a
lifting power of at least 10 lb at the maximum pole spacing that will be used (in
no case more than 10 inches).
9.3
The DC Yoke shall have a lifting power of at least 40 lbs at the maximum pole
spacing that will be used (in no case more than 10 inches).
9.4
Each weight shall be weighed with a scale from a reputable manufacturer and
stencilled with the applicable nominal weight prior first use. A weight needs only
to be verified against damage in a manner that could have caused potential loss of
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
material.
Note: Calibration procedure H-10-1 Appendix 1.
Page 11 of 33
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Page 12 of 33
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
10.0
PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION
10.1 Before the magnetic particle examination is conducted, a check of the
examination surface shall be conducted to locate any discontinuity surface
openings which may not attack and hold magnetic particles because of their
width.
11.0
MAGNETIZATION
11.1 This procedure shall be used on ferromagnetic material only of any thickness, size
or shape to detect surface or near surface discontinuities of a round linear or crack
like nature.
11.2
11.3
11.4
11.5
The examination shall be carried out in two directions on each area; in the second
examination, the line of magnetic flux shall be approximately perpendicular to
those used for the first examination in that area. A different means of magnetizing
may be used for the second examination.
11.6
Coverage shall be such that the area being examined will ensure 100% overlap or
total coverage at the established test sensitivity.
11.7
The minimum pole spacing shall be 3 inches and the maximum shall be the pole
spacing used for the calibration, but in no case more than 8 inches.
11.8
Examination shall be carried out under adequate lighting conditions. The area of
interest shall be visually examined after each magnetizing sequence.
11.9
The calibration of the equipment shall be carried out as per article 7.0 of this
procedure.
Acier
PROCEDURE
HASON
Steel
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
12.0
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 13 of 33
12.2
Multidirectional Magnetisation
Multidirectional magnetisation technique is not permitted
13.0
A minimum light intensity of 100 fc. or (1000 LX) is required to ensure adequate
sensitivity during the examination and evaluation of indications.
13.2
For the Yoke technique the Parker model 300 with Y300 Parker Probe light shall
be used. (See Appendix 7)
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
14.0
15.0
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 14 of 33
DEFINITION OF INDICATIONS
14.1
14.2
14.3
14.4
False indications False indications are not the results of magnetic forces.
Examples are; particles held mechanically or by gravity in shallow depressions or
particles held by rust or scale on the surface.
INTERPRETATION
15.1
15.2
Interpretation shall be carried out to identify the locations of indications and the
character of the indication (see art. 15.0 of this procedure)
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
16.0
17.0
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 15 of 33
EVALUATION OF INDICATIONS
16.1
16.2
16.3
RECORDING OF INDICATIONS
17.1
17.2
Acier
PROCEDURE
HASON
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Steel
18.0
19.0
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 16 of 33
REPAIRS
18.1
If grinding is used to remove the defect then dressing shall be performed to ensure
no notches, crevices or corners exist and that a good surface contour is
maintained.
18.2
18.3
18.4
Upon completion, all repair areas shall be re-examined in accordance with this
procedure.
RECORDS
19.1
When an inspection and test plan is being used to control the work, the Magnetic
Particle Examination shall be verified on the Weld Joint Status Quality
Assurance list and the appropriate operation on the Inspection and Test Plan shall
be stamped to verify the date of the acceptance and the inspector who performed
the examination
An N.D.E. report shall be issued when the Magnetic Particle Examination reveals
a discontinuity which requires further rework and/or repair. The inspection report
shall include the following;
1.
2.
3.
Medium used
4.
5.
6.
7.
Lighting equipment
8.
9.
MT procedure reference
Acier
PROCEDURE
HASON
Steel
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
10.
Identification of component
11.
12.
Record indications
13.
14.
Results of examination
15.
16.
Page 17 of 33
20.0
When Work Plans or a Weld Joint Status list are not being used to control the
work, the N.D.E. report will be issued recording the Magnetic particle
Examination results.
Copies of all N.D.E. reports will become part of the history document for the item
being examined.
20.2
20.3
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Page 18 of 33
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
FIGURE 1
MAGNETIC PARTICLE FIELD INDICATOR
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 19 of 33
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
APPENDIX 1
Page 20 of 33
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 21 of 33
APPENDIX 2
ACCEPTANCE STANDARD FOR PRESSURE VESSEL (SECT. VIII)
A)
Evaluation of indication
An indication is the evidence of a mechanical imperfection. Only indications which have
dimensions greater than 1/16 in. shall be considered relevant.
B)
(a)
A linear indication is one having a length greater than three times the width.
(b)
A rounded indication is one of circular or elliptical shape with the length equal to or less
than three times the width.
(c)
Acceptance standards
These acceptance standards shall apply unless other more restrictive standards are specified for
specific materials or applications within division
All surfaces to be examined shall be free of:
a)
b)
c)
d)
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Page 22 of 33
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
APPENDIX 2 (cont'd)
ACCEPTANCE STANDARD FOR PRESSURE VESSEL (SECT. VIII Div. 1
AND API 650)
D)
E)
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 23 of 33
APPENDIX 3
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR POWER PIPING AND BOILERS
B31.1 AND A.S.M.E. SECTION I
Evaluation of indications
1)
2)
3)
4)
An indication of a discontinuity may be larger than the discontinuity that causes it;
however, the size of the indication and not the size of the discontinuity is the basis of
acceptance or rejection.
Acceptance Standards
The following relevant indications are unacceptable;
a)
b)
c)
d)
Acier
PROCEDURE
HASON
Steel
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 24 of 33
APPENDIX 4
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
ASME SECT. VIII DIV. 2
Evaluation of indications
Indications will be revealed by retention of magnetic particles. All such indications are not necessarily
imperfections, however, since excessive surface roughness, magnetic permeability variations (such as at
the edge of heat affected zones, etc.) may produce similar indications.
An indication is the evidence of a mechanical imperfection. Only indications which have any dimension
greater 1/16 in. (1.6 mm) shall be considered relevant.
(a) A linear indication is one having a length greater than three times the width.
(b) A rounded indication is one of circular or elliptical shape with a length equal to or less than three
times its width.
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS
These acceptance standards shall apply unless other more restrictive standards are specified for specific
materials or applications within Division 2.
All surfaces to be examined shall be free of:
(a) relevant linear indications;
(b) relevant rounded indications greater than 3/16 in. (5.0 mm) ;
(c) four or more relevant rounded indications in a line separated by 1/16 in. (1.6 mm) or less, edgeto-edge.
Acier
PROCEDURE
HASON
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Steel
Page 25 of 33
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
APPENDIX 5
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS ASME / ANSI B31.3
Table K341.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for Welds
Criteria (A-E) for Types of Welds, and for Required
Examination Methods (Note (1))
Methods
Type of
Imperfection
(4))
100%
Connection
Visual
Radiography
Type of Weld
Girth
Longitudinal
Groove
Branch
Filet
(Note (3) )
(Note
Crack
Lack of Fusion
Incomplete penetration
Internal porosity
--
N/A
Slag inclusion or
elongated indication
--
N/A
Undercutting
Surface porosity or
Exposed slag inclusion
--
N/A
Surface finish
--
Reinforcement or
Internal protrusion
X
-F
F
F
GENERAL NOTE: X = required examination; N/A = not applicable; -- = not required
Acier
PROCEDURE
HASON
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Steel
Page 26 of 33
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Measure
Extent of imperfection
Size and distribution of internal porosity
Slag inclusion or elongated indication
Individual length
Individual width
Cumulative length
Depth of surface concavity
E
Surface roughness
B46.1)
F
Height of reinforcement or internal protrusion
Reinforcement
(Note (6)) in any plane through the weld shall
Protrusion
Be within the limits of the applicable height
________________________________________
Value in the tabulation at the right. Weld metal
Shall be fused with and merge smoothly into
The component surfaces.
External Weld
or internal Weld
13 (1/2)
> 13 (1/2) and 51 (2)
> 51
1.5 (1/16)
3 (1/8)
4 (5/32)
Notes:
(1) Criteria given are for required examination. More stringent criteria may be specified in the
engineering design.
(2) Longitudinal welds include only those permitted in paras. K302.3.4 and K305. The radiographic
criteria shall be met by all welds.
(3) Filet welds include only those permitted in para. 311.22.5(b).
(4) Branch connection welds include only those permitted in para. K328.5.4.
(5) Where two limiting values are given, the lesser measured value governs acceptance Tw is the
nominal wall thickness of the thinner of two components joined by a butt weld.
(6) For groove welds, height is the lesser of the measurements made from the surfaces of the adjacent
components. For filet welds, height is measured from the theoretical throat; internal protrusion
does not apply. Required thickness tw shall not include reinforcement or internal protrusion.
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 27 of 33
APPENDIX 6A
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR C.S.A W59 CLAUSE 11
Welds that are subject to magnetic particle testing in addition to visual inspection shall have no
cracks and shall be unacceptable if porosity or fusion-type discontinuities that are 2.5 mm or
larger in greatest dimensions exceed the following limits in size or frequency of occurrence :
(a)
Any such individual discontinuities having its greatest dimension larger than twothirds the joint or weld throat thickness involved, except that, regardless of joint
or weld throat thickness, no such discontinuity shall be larger than 20 mm in
greatest dimension ;
(b)
Any group of such discontinuities in line where the sum of the greatest dimension
of all such discontinuities is larger that "t" ("t" being the weld throat thickness
involved) in a length of 6t, and if the space between each pair of adjacent
discontinuities. When the length of the weld being examined is less than 6t, the
permissible sum of the greatest dimensions of all such discontinuities shall be
proportionately less than t;
(c)
Any such discontinuity closer than 3 times its greatest dimension to the end of a
groove welded joint carrying primary tensile stress or to the edge of a transverse
weld ;
(d)
Independent of the requirements of Items (a), (b) and (c) the sum of the greatest
dimension of scattered porosity and fusion-type discontinuities less than 2.5 mm
in greatest dimension shall not exceed 10 mm in any linear 25 mm of weld.
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 28 of 33
APPENDIX 6B
ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS FOR C.S.A. W59 CLAUSE 12
Welds that are subject to magnetic particle testing in addition to visual inspection shall have no
cracks and shall be unacceptable if porosity or fusion-type defects exceed the following limits in
size or frequency of occurrence:
(a)
For welds subject to tensile stress under any conditions of loading, the greatest
dimension of any porosity1 or fusion-type defect2 that is 2 mm or larger in its
greater dimension shall not exceed the size indicated in figure 12-5 under the
dimension of defect "B", for the effective throat thickness or weld size involved.
The distance from any porosity or fusion-type defect described above to another
such defect, to an edge, of to any intersecting weld shall not be less than the
minimum clearance allowed "C" indicated by figure 12-5 for the size of defect
under examination ;
Porosity signifies gas pockets and similar generally globular-type voids.
Fusion-type defect signifies slag inclusions, incomplete fusion, inadequate
penetration, and similar generally elongated defects in weld fusion.
(b)
For welds subject to compressive stress only and specifically indicated as such in
the detail drawings, the greatest dimension of fusion-type defect that is 2 mm or
larger in greatest dimension shall not exceed the size "B" nor shall the space
between adjacent defects be less than the minimum clearance allowed "C"
indicated by figure 12-6 for the size of defect under examination;
(c)
For welds subject to shear stress only the greatest dimension of fusion-type defect
that is 2 mm or larger in greatest dimension shall not exceed the size "B" nor shall
that space between adjacent defects be less than the minimum clearance allowed
"C" indicated by figure 12-6 for the size of defect under examination.
(d)
The limitation given by figure 12-5 and 12-6 for 40 mm joint or weld throat
thickness shall apply to all joints or weld throats of greater thickness;
(e)
Independent of the requirements of Items (a), (b) and (c), the sum of the greatest
dimensions of porosity and fusion-type defects less than 2 mm in greatest
dimension shall not exceed 10 mm in any linear 25 mm of weld.
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 29 of 33
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 30 of 33
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 31 of 33
Acier
PROCEDURE
HASON
Steel
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
Page 32 of 33
EXHIBIT 1
I AM HEREBY APPOINTING
ROBERT DESAUTELS
From
LABORATOIRE D'ESSAIS MEQUALTECH INC.
AS ASNT-SNT-TC-1A LEVEL III FOR THE TRAINING
AND QUALIFICATION OF OUR NDE PERSONAL IN
THE FOLLOWING METHODS:
Acier
HASON
Steel
PROCEDURE
NDE-MP H-10
Issued
Date
01/09/14
Revision
Date
2011/01/20
Lanoraie, Qc,
J0K 1E0
EXHIBIT 2
MAGNETIC PARTICLE REPORT
Page 33 of 33