UNCLASSED
NSOELOGY
H THE
THE STUDY OF HEAT-SCRN INFUARED MO T TO
HU FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIV
FOR ADHESION OF PRO
T ENRUI ET AL 15 OCT 86
LRIGHT-PATTE SON AF OH
F T-I'RT7222_86F/G
14/2
1
N
MEuN
IIIIIIIIIIII
W.2?
11111L2
I'll1.
I-
FTD-ID (RS)T-0722-86
Ln
M-
QTI
am
Lamm~0
08
FTD-
ID(RS)T-0722-86
HUMAN TRANSLATION
FTD-ID(RS)T-0722-86
15 Oct 86
English pages:
Source:
24
NTTS
DlC
U')armi
Requester: FTD/TQTA
Approved for public release; Distribution unlimited.
Just if:
By-______
Di Stri 1,t
h
Availabilitv C,;des
Avail 111,.j/or
a
tIcw
Dist
FTD-
ID(RS)T-0722-86
PREPARED BY:
TRANSLATION DIVISION
FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIVISION
WPAFB, OHIO.
Date
15 October
o:j
19
86
Special
GRAPHICS DISCLAIMER
All figures, graphics, tables, equations, etc. merged into this
translation were extracted from the best quality copy available.
I. Preface
this kind of defect, then either due to the method itself or certain
limitations on its scope of application, it is difficult to satisfy
the demands of inspection for quality of the adhesion of the propellant
to the envelope.
researching the application of new technologies such as laser fullout, heat-scan infrared, etc. to solve the testing problem of the
quality of the adhesion of the propellant to the envelope.
the
Using
The key to using the infrared technology to conduct NDT inspection of an object is that there must be heat flow in the object and
that the surface temperature distribution of the object must be obtained.
the object, then since there is difference between the thermal characteristics of the part with the defect and those of the part without
the defect, there will be temperature disturbance at the location
of the defect, and thus there will be certain changes in the temperature distribution appearing on the surface of the object.
Therefore,
This
ii --=======---=.=====
~
i i ~,,, l,--'
,."
'!
Mlhl~i~iiili~
"
...
IiERiMU
radiation heat source and is synchronized with the heat source temperature of
intensity and the sensor are set in the moving coordinate system
(4
y, z).
Fig. 1.
(x, y,
z),
OtT
2+
WT
k c
(1)
is the thermal diffusion
-t'
(2)
T(x,y,z,)
y, z),
32T
OT
(3)
[1]
-0
T = T,+
where r=(
2 +y 2 +z 2
90
C- 2a .eC
[2]
- r[ 2') +
a
(4 )
xkr
Obvious-
ly,
T=T(q,k,av ,r,h)
(5)
ot
and k,
(5) that:
(3)
Ot
no change
AT=o
For object material with defects
properties
Then,
(6)
(or nonuniform),
(7)
It can be seen from the above analysis that when using the heatscan method to measure the surface temperature distribution of the
and the sacnning speed v are constant, then the sensor cannot
defects.
parameters
in
(or nonuniformity).
2xzc:
(8)
_j(T
Zradiation.
(8) that:
That is,
(9)
-8
-2
d=5,669606x10- Wm- .K
-4
-
(10)
etc.
Similarly, from Equation (8) the Wayne's shift law can be obtained:
'=''-"(I11
That is, the maximum wavelength Am shifts toward short wave direction
as temperature T increases.
For
ordinary object under 300- 400 K, there will be radiation with maximum
wavelength of 8"-l14/Am radiated from its surface.
inspection.
In the
i
spiral scan-heating by the heat input source and spiral scan-detection
by the sensor.
the signal processing circuit to drive the recording pen and the
temperature distribution on the surface of the propellant is iecorded
synchronously on the cylindrical recorder.
Fig. 2.
Uit
(2)
(5V
(4)(14)
(15)
(11)
'4~
-J
U.
A;7
Propellant I:
There
2
and
15x15 mm
testing.
Testing parameters:
the scan-
the distance (axial) between the centers of the converging lamp and
sensor=16 mm;
Testing results:
The
The loca-
flaws
recogni-
tion.
Propellant II:
envelope thickness was 0.8 mm (soft) with smooth surface, yet certain
local areas were not very smooth.
10
Testing parameters:
The diameter of the converging focus light spot was 4 6 mm; the scanning speed:
the distance between the centers of the converging lamp and sensor=
=1C mm;
C-,
Cr2
---
Fig. 4.
Key:
(1) Location setter
Fig. 5.
the envelope
11
area C.
The
testing.
is determined
<6 mm.
(i.e.,
the
ture gradient at parts with defects, which is also bad for testing.
Too small a heat spot will also cause detection sensitivity to drop
12
significantly.
(Figs. 6, 7) of
under 50C.
Ii
10
3.
Si
3)0
....
(11, 10"
-
IN
$2"
32W
4'*5
3*$I*(2
V.14
v.15't
I'
I*
3"
SW
ql
8e
*e
:1
us
i/
No. 2 propellant
Fig. 7.
outer surface t'-x relation-
curves
(1) Room temperature:
Key:
(2) volt.
ship curves
(1) Room temperature:
Key:
100 C; (2) volt.
10C;
It can be shown from the above analysis that the amount of heat
input to the propellant surface is related to scanning speed, therefore
it must be properly selected.
13
2. Scanning Velocity
surface and the heat source sensor velocity v2 along the axial
direction, i.e.,
V =Vl1+V 2
2 + v 2
2
Since v 2 <t v I, VIV 1 =2400 mm/min, i.e., the linear speed of a certain
point on the propellant surface can be treated as the heat scanning
speed.
3. Time Lag
The time
Figure 8 is the
It can
be seen from the figure that for every defect there is an optimum
testing time lag 6 topi and the temperature difference detected
at this time will be a maximum, thus the highest testing sensitivity.
Therefore, the testing time lag should be selected as close to
the optimum time lag as possible during testing in order to obtain
the highest testing sensitivity.
15
... .. ... . .
~mSON(2)
No
ITa
the testing
It can be seen from Formula (10) that if the specific radioactivity E at various points on the propellant surface is different,
then under the same temperature there will be different radiation
energy at various points on the propellant surface.
Thus, there
are very easily drowned by this kind of "noise" and this creates
difficulties in analyzing defects from the heat-scan diagrams.
16
Efforts
should be expended to make the specific radioactivity on the propellant surface uniform for the benefit of analyzing defects.
In order to recognize
propellant surface
The estab-
lishment of this relationship is based on a large number of experiments and anatomical verifications.
there
propellant and the envelope, the measured propellant surface temperature between the space of the heat source and the sensor will be
uniform everywhere and the temperature distribution curve will be
17
the defects are generally classified into two types, based on their
heat conduction characteristics:
i.e.,
rate at the place with the defect is smaller than at the place without defect;
i.e.,
rate at the place with defect is larger than that at the place without defect; in other words, the heat resistance at the place with
defect is smaller.
The temperature
The temperature
18
(1)
(2)
Fig. 9.
Actually since the shape and size of defects are all different,
the measured testing signals are somewhat different from the typical
curve shown in Fig. 9 (c) and they must be carefully recognized
in actual testings.
The electromagnetic type recording pen and the sensor move synchronously along the propellant axes, thus the recording pen will record
synchronously on the recording paper the propellant surface temperature distribution scan-measured by the sensor.
The
It can be seen from the above analysis that the shape of the
defect signal on the heat-scan diagram is a S-shape curve (or reversed
S-shape).
Since the shape and size of the defect are complex and
the axial direction is represented by a and that in the circumferential direction by b, the area of defect is:
S=a.b
(13)
(14)
20
in
interface
then:
(15)
b=k 2 .21
where k 2
tion.
(14)
(15)
where G=kl*k
(16)
In Fig. 4 of
measurement.
result.
VI. Conclusions
Using the Type HT-I Infrared NDT Machine, which adopts the heatscan infrared NDT technology, to conduct inspection for adhesion
separation of certain propellants of rocket motors from the envelope
is an effective method.
convenient operation, safety and reliability, high sensitivity, semiautomatic testing, direct recording, easy flaw recognition, accurate
location determination, etc.
detected was 5 x 5 mm 2
Since the shape and size of defect are related to the property
and condition of the defect, the recognition of defect flaws requires
further accumulation of experience and establishment of flaw recognition standards.
Our gratitude:
this paper between his busy schedules and proposed valuable opinions.
We hereby express our deepest appreciation.
22
REFERENCES
(1) AD299230.
(2) Arnold W.Schultz.
Testing U.S.A.
An
19.
23
Nondestruction
Ihis patper infrcduces tasic principles of heent-scczn inlrAcd NDT 3rd desribes
the
method
and
the
results
Cf the
aprliaticrn!
cf
Ile
F1-c.
Irfried
NDT Machine Type lIT-1 to the inspectin for adhesion o! the prc4peIlant of
the rocket nictor to th~e envelop. The seection of the test~nj',; Pari.neters and the
relations among them are analyzed and discussed. The metho.'s of re-osnition. location an~d evaluat'on of the defcci signal are proposed. This m-thod cani con~ ciiently and rapidly evaluate the quality of the adhesion of the prc-peI!ant to the
rrce~trt yroduction
envelgp and has Pt Eu~dng significarce fcr the e'hoIvof
24
DISTRIBUTION LIST
DISTR13UTION DIRECT Td RECIPIEZ n
ORCANIZATION
A 205 WHTC
A210 DHAAC
*C513
MICROFICHE
I
1
5314
DITS-2C
C0W'3
CSOO
C509
C510
US AMI IA
TRADOC
BALLISTIC UIS LAS1
I.
I.
3.&T LABS/AV&ADCO(
AI.ADC0K
C53 5 AVRADCOM/TSARCOM
I
I
I
C539 TIASAM
C591 FSTC
C619 MIA REDSTONE
1.
9404 AEDC/DOF
408 ANT.
410 ADIIND
E429 WDIND
P005 DOE/ISA/DDI
P050 CLA/OCR/ADD/SD
A11T/LDE
1
11
I.
I.
C0I
LLML/Code L-389
NASAl NST-J443
NSA/ 1213I/TDL2
ASDlFrD/IQIA
FTD-ID( RS )T-0722-86