Sarah OConnor
EXSS330
Dr. Hall
31 October 2016
OConnor 2
of OA, as determined by radiographic analysis. (contemporary graft options, page 13).
Immediately following surgery, studies have shown that there is less pain and swelling which can
help increase the rate of recovery (acceleratephysicaltherapy.com). In addition, there is less
anterior knee pain, and less stiffness. Because there is not significant trauma (from the surgery)
to the anterior knee, range of motion also returns sooner. Most pros are considerations for postoperative situations.
With pros, there are also cons that should be considered when looking at procedure
options. One drawback of the HT graft is the decreased strength of the hamstrings after the
surgery. With decreased strength of hamstrings, internal rotation and flexion of the knee are also
impaired. With that being said, it is not a recommended procedure for high-level athletes.
Another drawback is the nature of the graft could require a second surgery after an extended
amount of time. The graft requires a lot of hardware (screws and washers) which after time,
could cause problems in which they would need to be removed. Also, the graft is susceptible to
stretching which would also cause future problems. When compared to BPTB grafts, the
recovery time is longer. Since there is not and bone to bone healing, the HT graft will take a
longer time to become rigid (acceleratephysicaltherapy.com). However, comparing the laxity of
BPTB and HT grafts, there was virtually no difference between the two.
OConnor 3
Works Cited
http://www.arlingtonortho.com/conditions/knee/knee-acl-reconstruction-with-hamstring/
http://acceleratephysicaltherapy.com/2014/11/18/the-pros-and-cons-of-a-hamstring-tendon-graftfor-acl-reconstruction-2/
Contemporary Graft Options in
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Nima Mehran, MD, MS,* Jack G. Skendzel, MD, Bryson P. Lesniak, MD, and Asheesh Bedi,
MD,