Fig. 1
We assume:
i1=i2=ia/2, i3=i4=ib/2, i5=i6=ic/2
r k=r for k=1,,6
1
2
d
d
r
d (31)
k
k1
k2
kn
2 2 r d 12 2 d 13 d 14 2 d 15 d 16
Bring
0
1
1
1
i b ln
i c ln
i a ln
1/ 2
1/ 2
1/ 2
2
( r d 12 )
( d 13 d 14 )
(d 15 d 16 )
Define:
Geometric Mean Radius (GMR) of bundle
Rb=(rd12)1/2
Geometric Mean Distance (GMD)
between phase positions
o From phase a to phase b
D1b=(d13d14)1/2 (D2)1/2=D
o From phase a to phase c
D1c=(d15d16)1/2 (D2)1/2=D
Substituting D into the last expression for 1
2
0
1
1
1
i b ln i c ln
i a ln
2
Rb
D
D
(1)
0
2
i a ln
1
1
ln i b i c
Rb
D
(2)
0
i
1
1
D
i a ln 0 a ln
i a ln
2
Rb
D
2
Rb
0 ia
i
D
D
ln
2 0 a ln
2 ( i a / 2) Rb
2
Rb
0 ia
D
ln
2
Rb
l1 0 ia
D
ln
2
2
Rb
D
l l l
ln
(3)
2 R
0
Fig. 2
We observe that as b gets large, the bundle
begins to take on the configuration of a
circle, with all current flowing at the
circumference. A hollow conductor!!!! So
the denominator Rb tends from r (for the
case of b=1) to the radius of the circle
comprised by the bundle as b gets large.
Exercise 1:
6
Fig. 3
3.0 Transposition
From structural point of view, it is more
economic to arrange the phases of a
transmission line in a vertical or horizontal
configuration, as shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4
These and other arrangements are not
symmetric like the equilateral configuration
is. This means that la=lb=lc is not valid. If
you have such an arrangement, and you
apply balanced voltages to the sending end
of this transmission line, and connect it to a
balanced load, you will not see a balanced
10
1 (1)
a (a2 ) (a3 )
3
(3)
where the overbar indicates average and
the nomenclature , k=1,2,3, is the flux
linkages computed for phase a when
located at position k.
2. Currents are balanced, i.e., ia+ib+ic=0.
3. The line is bundled.
a
(k )
a
(5)
2
R
d
d , k=1,2,3
0
(k )
a
(k )
ab
(k )
ac
12
1/ 2
r d12d13
r d12d13d14
1/ 3
1 (1 )
a (a2 ) (a3 )
3
1 0
1
1
1
ib ln (1) ic ln (1)
ia ln
3 2
Rb
d ab
d ac
ia ln
1
1
1
ib ln ( 2 ) ic ln ( 2 )
Rb
d ab
d ac
ia ln
1
1
1
ib ln ( 3 ) ic ln ( 3 )
Rb
d ab
d ac
(6)
1 0
3 2
3ia ln
1
Rb
1
1
1
ib ln (1) ln ( 2 ) ln ( 3 )
d ab
d ab
d ab
(7)
1
1
1
ic ln (1) ln ( 2 ) ln ( 3 )
d ac
d ac
d ac
1
1
1
1
i ln
i ln
3i ln
3 2
R
d d d
d d d (8)
Now bring the 1/3 into the logarithms:
a
13
(1) ( 2 ) ( 3 )
ab ab ab
(1) ( 2 ) ( 3 )
ac ac ac
0
2
1
1
ib ln
(
1
)
(
2
(3)
Rb
d ab d ab ) d ab
(9)
Note that d d d d d d because this is just
the product of the distances between the
positions.
a
(1)
ab
( 2)
ab
i a ln
( 3)
ab
(1)
ac
So we define:
(1) ( 2 ) ( 3 )
Dm d ab
d ab d ab
1/ 3
( 2) ( 3)
d ac(1)d ac
d ac
(2)
ac
1/ 3
ic ln
( 1)
ac
d ac( 2 ) d
( 3) 1/ 3
ac
(3)
ac
1/ 3
(10)
(11)
2
R
D
D
But ia=-(ib+ic), so that eq. (11) becomes:
1
1
i i i ln 1 i ln 1 (12)
ln
i ln
2
R
D
2
R
D
ln
(14)
i
2
R
where
Dm is the GMD between phase positions
Rb is the GMR of the bundle
0
0 a
m
b
m
b
14
Note that
if the phase configuration is equilateral,
then Dm=D
if the conductor is not bundled, then Rb=r
We will skip section 3.6. You should take
EE 455 to learn about getting inductance for
the unbalanced line.
15