0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
20 tayangan1 halaman
The petitioner union Volkschel Labor Union disaffiliated from the respondent federation Associated Labor Union for Metal Workers in 1976. The respondent companies sought legal advice from the Bureau of Labor Relations on whether to continue deducting union dues for the respondent federation from employees' wages following the disaffiliation. The Bureau initially ruled the disaffiliation was valid but employees should still pay dues to the respondent federation. On appeal, the Bureau reversed its decision and recognized the petitioner union's disaffiliation. The court ultimately held that the disaffiliation was valid, the companies did not have to continue deducting dues for the respondent federation, and the respondent federation was not entitled to payments from the petitioner union's members after disaffiliation
Deskripsi Asli:
Labor Law II
Judul Asli
Forth Batch- Volkschel Labor Union v. Bureau of Labor Relations
The petitioner union Volkschel Labor Union disaffiliated from the respondent federation Associated Labor Union for Metal Workers in 1976. The respondent companies sought legal advice from the Bureau of Labor Relations on whether to continue deducting union dues for the respondent federation from employees' wages following the disaffiliation. The Bureau initially ruled the disaffiliation was valid but employees should still pay dues to the respondent federation. On appeal, the Bureau reversed its decision and recognized the petitioner union's disaffiliation. The court ultimately held that the disaffiliation was valid, the companies did not have to continue deducting dues for the respondent federation, and the respondent federation was not entitled to payments from the petitioner union's members after disaffiliation
The petitioner union Volkschel Labor Union disaffiliated from the respondent federation Associated Labor Union for Metal Workers in 1976. The respondent companies sought legal advice from the Bureau of Labor Relations on whether to continue deducting union dues for the respondent federation from employees' wages following the disaffiliation. The Bureau initially ruled the disaffiliation was valid but employees should still pay dues to the respondent federation. On appeal, the Bureau reversed its decision and recognized the petitioner union's disaffiliation. The court ultimately held that the disaffiliation was valid, the companies did not have to continue deducting dues for the respondent federation, and the respondent federation was not entitled to payments from the petitioner union's members after disaffiliation
Bureau of Labor Relations, Associated labor Union for Metal,
Workers, DMG, Inc., Peoples Car, Inc., Karbayan Inc., and RTC Trading, Inc., Facts of the Case: The petitioner was once affiliated with the Associated Labor Union for Metal Workers(ALUMETAL). On August 1, 975, both unions, using the name Volkschel Labor Union Associated Labor Union for Metal Workers, jointly entered into a CBA with the respondent companies. One of the subject of which allows payroll deductions of Union membership dues and such special assessments fees or fines as may be duly authorized by the Union. That the deductions shall be transmitted in two portions one for the fund of the local union and the other half for the ALUMETAL Regional Office. On March 10, 1976, a majority of petitioners members decided to disaffiliate from the respondent federation in order to operate on its own as an independent labor group. Later a resolution was adopted and signed by petitioners members revoking the check off authorization in favor of the ALUMETAL and notices thereof were served in ALUMETAL and respondent companies. Confronted with the predicament of whether or not to continue deducting from employees' wages and remitting union dues to respondent, ALUMETAL which wrote respondent companies advising them to continue deducting union dues and remitting them to said federation, respondent companies sought the legal opinion of the respondent Bureau as regards the controversy between the two unions. On November 11, 1976, Med-Arbiter Eduvalla rendered a resolution which in effect found the disaffiliation legal but at the same time gave the opinion that, petitioners members should continue paying their due to ALUMRTAL in the concept of agency fees. Both petitioner and respondent ALUMETAL appealed to the Director of respondent Bureau. Petitioner' contended that the Med-Arbiter's opinion to the effect that petitioner's members remained obligated to pay dues to respondent ALUMETAL was inconsistent with the dispositive finding that petitioner's disaffiliation from ALUMETAL was valid. ALUMETAL, on the other hand, assailed the Resolution in question asserting that the disaffiliation should have been declared contrary to law. On January 25, 1977, respondent Bureau, through its Acting Director, Francisco L. Estrella, REVERSED the Med-Arbiter's Resolution., and declared that the Bureau recognized "the continued affiliation of Volkschel Labor Union with the Associated Labor Union for Metal Workers." Issue: 1. Whether or not the petitioner unions disaffiliation from respondent federation valid? 2. Whether or not the respondent companies have the right to effects union dues collection despite revocation by the employees of the check-off authorization? 3. Whether or not the respondent federation is entitled to union dues payments from the petitioner unions members not withstanding their disaffiliation from the said federation? Held: 1. Yes. The right of a local union to disaffiliate from its mother union is well-settled. Local union, being a separate and voluntary association, is free to serve the interest of all its members including to disaffiliate when circumstances warrant. This rights if consistent with the Constitutional guarantee of freedom of association. 2. No. The obligation of the respondent companies to deduct and remit dues to ALUMETAL is conditioned on the individual check-off authorization of the petitioners members. ALUMETAL is entitled to received the dues from the respondent companies as long as petitioner union is affiliated with it and respondent companies are authorized by their employees(members of petitioner union) to deduct the union dues. Without said affiliation, the employer has no link to the mother union. The obligation of an employee to pay union dues is coterminous with his affiliation or membership. The employees check off authorization, even if declared irrevocable, is good only as long as they remain members of the union concerned. A contract between an employer and the parent organization as a bargaining agent for the employees if terminated by the disaffiliation of the local of which the employees are members. 3. No. Respondent federation is not entitled to the union dues payments from the petitioners members. The obligation of an employee to pay union dues is coterminous with his affiliation or membership. The employees check off authorization, even if declared irrevocable, is good only as long as they remain members of the union concerned
A Simple Guide for Drafting of Conveyances in India : Forms of Conveyances and Instruments executed in the Indian sub-continent along with Notes and Tips
Starting Your Career as a Photo Stylist: A Comprehensive Guide to Photo Shoots, Marketing, Business, Fashion, Wardrobe, Off Figure, Product, Prop, Room Sets, and Food Styling