I. INTRODUCTION
Induction motors (IM) are imposing themselves as a
reliable and more economical choice in a large range
of applications. In industry they present an important
factor of control especially for autonomous electrical
traction; however the motor drive losses minimization
is important for two reasons: economical saving and
reduction of environmental pollution. The very
extensive use of induction motor implies that if losses
in IM drives can be reduced by just a few percent, it
will have a major impact on the total electrical energy
consumption [2-5], then each 1% improvement in
motor efficiency could result in savings of over $l
Billion per year in energy costs, 6-10 million tons
(5.4-9.1 million tonnes) less per year of combusted
coal and approximately 15-20 million tons (13.6-18.1
million tonnes) less carbon dioxide released into the
atmosphere [1].
In high dynamic performances, control schemes
used in industrial applications like vector control and
direct torque control, the flux is usually maintained
constant equal to its nominal value; in this situation
the induction motor runs efficiently around the
nominal operating point [2- 3]. When the load is
reduced considerably, the losses are greatly increased
and the electrical energy consumption is then highly
affected [3-6].
The key to solve this problem and to reduce the IM
losses is to obtain an optimum balance between
copper and iron losses.
R
disd M dFrd
M
fs
+ -w sL i + Frd -w F (1)
s L rq
dt Lr dt s s sq Lr
r
disq M dFrq
Rfs
M
+ -wssLs isd + Frq -ws Frd (2)
dt Lr dt
Lr
Lr
Rr + R fr
+
L
r
dF
Frd -wrF + rd (3)
rq
dt
Rr + R fr
M
V = R'fr - isq +
rq
Lr
Tr
Where:
dF
Frq - wrFrd + rq (4)
dt
R s' = R
V = R'fr - i
rd
Tr sd
+ R
fs
+1
437
'
fr
= R
sr
Lr
and
, Tr =
sr +1
Rr
fr
ir
Rr
Ploss =
(5)
Rr
(1 + s r ) 2
[ ( i m r - i s d ) 2 + i 2sq ]
sLs
Rs
k h w e F 2 + k e w e2 F 2 (7a)
R
T
r
e
+ Rs +
(11)
2
p(1-s ) Li
1
+
s
s
m
(
)
Rs + Rfs im2
(6)
P fe =
Ir
Vs
d(q)PI
SpeedPI
Rr/g
w
Rfs /1+sr)
usqref
Isqref
wref
I
(1-s)Ls
(10)
P jr =
3 M
p
F r i sq
2 Lr
Te =
-M
.
M
usdref
IM
Inverter
Iopt
Isq
GA
3/2
Te
optim
fe
= I
2
m
fs
(1 + s
)2
Where :
R fs = A f s + B f s2
(7c)
Where, A and B are constants and fs is stator current
frequency
As a reasonable approximation, the mechanical losses
are dependent on the rotor speed.
Pm = k m w r2
(8)
= (- M
L r ) i sq and i d r = 0
In steady state, the operating losses of the machine
can be expressed from (1) to (4) as follows:
iq r
(7b)
(9)
/ im
(12)
Then the solution of equation (12) returns the
optimal magnetizing current (flux) which improves
the motor efficiency.
1/ 2
i
= k
opt
(13)
438
Tem
From the motor
Fitness
Losses Evaluation
for each flux value
Criteria Satisfied
(Generation=Max
Generation)
Application of the
Yes best chromosome
(Iopt) to the motor
To the
motor
No
Generation
+1
st
Selection to create 1 generation
Cross Over
Mutate
Classification of
Obtained Solution
Where:
k o p t = A / [ n p (1 - s ) L s ]1 / 2
A = [[(Rs + Rr ) / (sr +1)2 +sr Rfs / (1+sr )]/ (Rs + Rfs )]1/2
As one can see this method can minimize losses in
steady state only.
IV.
SIMULATION RESULTS
w=157rad/s ; Tl=7Nm
1
RCGA
Fmin
FOC
Efficiency (pu)
0.8
w=157rad/s; Tl=0.25T
1.5
F lu xe s (w b )
FOC
switchingfrom
Fmin
to RCGA
0.5
switchingfrom
FOC
toFmin
Fmin
RCGA
0.6
0.4
-0.5
0
3
Time (s)
0.2
Tl=1. 75T
1 60
3
Time(s)
1 40
6
S pe e d (rad / s)
0
0
1.5
1 00
80
60
40
1
FOC
Fmin
0.5
0.5
1 .5
Tim e (s)
2.5
Fird
Firq
-0.5
0
3
Time (s)
1
0.8
0.6
0.8
Switch from
Fmin to
RCGA
0.7
0.4
E ffic ie n c y( p u )
E ffic ie n c y (p u )
Fmi n
FOC
GA' s
20
RCGA
0.2
Switch from
FOC toFmin
0
0
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
w=
5 0a
r /d s
0.5
3
Time (s)
0.4
0.1
0
Z oo m
0.2
E f ci ei ncy ( pu)
F lu x e s (w b )
1 20
0.3
0.2
0.1
00.04 0.0 6 0.0 8
0.5
.01 0.12 0. 14 0. 16 0. 18
Loa d(pu)
Lo ad ( pu )
0.2
RCG A
Fm in
FO C
1 .5
440
0.12
Mutual inductance
M
0.443 H
Stator and rotor self inductance
Ls = Lr 0.47
H
Inertia
J
0.06
SI
Viscous friction coefficient
f
0.00
SI
Rated Load torque
TL
7
N.m
VIII.
0.8
0.7
Efficiency (pu)
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
w=157 r ad/s
0.7
0.6
E f i cie ncy (pu)
0.2
Zoom
0.1
FOC
Fmi n
RCGA
0.5
FOC
Fmin
RCGA
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
0.5
0
0.04 0.06 0.08
0.1
0.1 2 0. 14 0. 16 0. 18
Lo ad(pu)
0.2
1.5
Load (pu)
VI.
CONCLUSION
APPENDIXE
Table I.
GENETIC ALGORITHMS PARAMETERS
Parameters
Population size
Crossoer probability
Mutate probability
Maximum generation number
Values
20
0.75
0.01
20
REFERENCES
441