Anda di halaman 1dari 5

LAMPIRAN / ATTACHMENT

RUBRIK TUGASAN / ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS


KOD KURSUS / COURSE CODE: DMED1083
SEMESTER / SEMESTER: September 2016

Criteria

1.Introduction:
- Overall Introduction to
the planning of research
-Importance of planning
before doing research

No introduction.

Low

Fair

Above average

Excellent

Marks

A reasonable
introduction to
the topic
covering:
*Average
discussion on
why planning is
necessary in
research
*Fairly clear
explanation on
terms and
concepts
*Insufficient
explanation of the
scope of the
assignment

A good
introduction to
the topic and
covering on:
*Satisfactory
explanation on
why planning is
necessary in
research
*Clear
explanation on
terms and
concepts
*Adequate
explanation of the
scope of the
assignment

Very good
introduction to the
topic covers:
*Excellent opening;
good explanation on
why planning is
necessary in research
*Very clear
explanation on
terms and concepts
*Well defined scope
of the assignment.

5%

Very brief
introduction to
the topic:
*Lacking in
discussion why
planning is
necessary in
research
*Vague
explanation on
terms and
concepts.
*Not addressing
the scope of the
assignment

2.Body of Essay
Step 1: Choosing a

A.

topic
B.

How do you
evaluate that a topic is
researchable?
How you formulate your
research problem?

- No discussion
on steps and
sources you
chosen in:*Choosing a
specific problem
by identifying a
broad problem
that are mostly
closed to your
interest with a
good statement
of problem

C.

No discussion
Step 2: Developing a
research question and
hypothesis?

- Incomplete
discussion on
steps and sources
you chosen in :* Choosing a
specific problem
by identifying a
broad problem
that are mostly
closed to your
interest with
good statement of
problem

- Brief discussion
on steps and
sources you
chosen in* Choosing a
specific problem
by identifying a
broad problem
that are mostly
closed to your
interest with
Good statement
of problem

-Reasonably
good discussion
on steps and
sources you
chosen in:
*: Choosing a
specific problem
by identifying a
broad problem
areas that are
mostly closed to
your interest with
a good statement
of problem.

-Well presented with


excellent discussion
all of the steps and
sources you chosen
in:* Choosing a
specific problem by
identifying a broad
problem areas that
are mostly closed to
your interest with
good statement of
problem.

10%

Vague discussion
of demonstrating
exemplary,
critical
knowledge
and application in
presenting clear
interrogative
statements to be
answered by
the research.

Brief discussion
of demonstrating
exemplary,
critical
knowledge
and application in
presenting clear
interrogative
statements to be
answered by
the research.

Reasonable good
discussion
of demonstrating
exemplary,
critical
knowledge
and application in
presenting clear
interrogative
statements to be
answered by
the research.

Excellent discussion
of demonstrating
exemplary, critical
knowledge
and application in
presenting clear
interrogative
statements to be
answered by
the research.

10%

Step 3: Effective planning


of the research a. Writing a
research proposal - prepare
a framework of writing
proposal.

b. Creating a research plan


(time frame of 3 months).
(cth: gantt chart)

No Discussion
on Research
framework
consisting topic,
question/
problem,
primary sources,
secondary
sources,
methods chosen
and why you
choose it and the
limitations.

No research
plan

Vague discussion
on Research
Framework
consisting topic,
question/problem,
primary sources,
secondary
sources, methods
chosen and why
you choose it and
the limitations.

Brief Discussion
on Research
framework
consisting topic,
question/problem,
primary sources,
secondary
sources, methods
chosen and why
you choose it and
the limitations.

Reasonably good
discussion on
Research
framework
consisting topic,
question/problem
primary sources,
secondary
sources, methods
chosen and why
you choose it and
the limitations.

Excellent discussion
on Research
Framework
consisting topic,
question/problem,
,primary sources,
secondary sources,
methods chosen and
why you choose it
and the limitations.

Vague research
plan:-not describing in
chronological
order and without
detailed specific
steps to carry out
the research
-time frame not
equal to 3 months

Incomplete
research plan
*not describing in
chronological
order with
detailed specific
steps to carry out
the research
-time frame of
more than 3
months

Reasonable good
research plan
describe in
chronological
order with
detailed specific
steps to carry out
the research
-time frame of 3
months

Excellent research
plan:
-describe in
chronological order
with detailed
specific steps to
carry out the
research
-time frame of 3
months
-

40%

Step 4: Proper organisation


in conducting your
research:a.Role of supervisor
b, Undertaking a literature
review
c. Collecting data
d. Pilot study
e.Dealing with problem(s)

No discussion
on a proper
organisation in
conducting
research.
-No relevant
examples given.

No or incorrect
conclusions.
3. Summary - Opinion on
the justifications and
students own opinion is
clear and evident. Essay
well concluded.

Vague discussion
on the
organisation in
conducting
research.
-examples given
not very relevant.

Irrelevant
discussion on the
organisation in
conducting
research.
-examples are
given but lack
relevant facts..

-Serious
- Moderately
deficiencies in
presented
support for stated conclusion based
No
discussion.
on the discussion
recommendation -Weak
presented.
s provided.
recommendations - Fair
provided.
recommendations
No opinion
-No opinion
made.
stated.
stated
- Opinion stated
and presented.

Reasonably good
discussion on the
proper
organisation in
conducting
research.
-examples are
quite relevant and
based on facts.

- Good
conclusions
derive from the
discussion
presented above.
- Adequate
recommendations
but with limited
further
deliberations.
- Opinion
presented fairly
well.

Detailed and
excellent discussion
on a proper
organisation in
conducting research.
-examples are
relevant, good and
based on facts.

Complete and
excellent conclusion
which includes:
- Insightful and
sound discussion.
- Good
recommendations for
further deliberations.
- Own opinion well
presented

TOTAL

30%

5%

100%

END OF MARKING SCHEME