Anda di halaman 1dari 4

FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI DAN PEMAPARAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN

FUNDAMENTAL
Judul Penelitian

Bidang Penelitian
Perguruan Tinggi
Fakultas / Jurusan
Ketua Peneliti
a. Nama Lengkap
b.NIDN
c. Jabatan
Fungsional
Anggota Peneliti

: .....................................................................................................................
.............................
........................................................................................................................
............................
........................................................................................................................
............................
: ............................................................................................................
: ............................................................................................................
: ............................................................................................................
:
:
:
:

....................................................................................
.......................................
..............................................................
........... orang
: ............. tahun

Lama Penelitian
Keseluruhan
Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1
a. Diusulkan ke Dikti
b. Direkomendasikan
c. Dana dari instansi lain
No

: Rp. ......................
: Rp. ......................
: Rp. ...................... / in kind : ..................................................

Kriteria Penilaian

1.

Masalah yang Diteliti

2.

Orientasi Penelitian

3.

Metode Penelitian

4.

Luaran Penelitian

5.

Kelayakan Sumber Daya

Indikator Penilaian

Bobot (%)

Kontribusi pada IPTEKSSOSBUD


Tinjauan pustaka
Perumusan masalah
Makna Ilmiah
Orisinalitas
Kemutakhiran
Pola pendekatan ilmiah
Kesesuaian metode
Publikasi ilmiah
Teori/hipotesis baru
Metode baru
Informasi/desain baru
Peneliti
Peralatan
Rencana jadwal
Rencana biaya

Jumlah

Skor

Nilai

15

30
15
30

10
100

Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7


= Sangat baik)
Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai :
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
........
..,...2012
Penilai,

FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI DAN PEMAPARAN PROPOSAL PENELITIAN


HIBAH BERSAING
Judul Penelitian/

Bidang Penelitian
Perguruan Tinggi
Fakultas / Jurusan
Ketua Peneliti
a. Nama Lengkap
b.NIDN
c. Jabatan
Fungsional
Anggota Peneliti

: .................................................................................................................
.............................
...................................................................................................................
............................
...................................................................................................................
............................
: ............................................................................................................
: ............................................................................................................
: ............................................................................................................
:
:
:
:

....................................................................................
.......................................
..............................................................
........... orang
: ................. tahun

Lama Penelitian
Keseluruhan
Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1
a. Diusulkan ke Dikti
b. Direkomendasikan
c. Dana dari instansi lain
No

: Rp. ......................
: Rp. ......................
: Rp. ...................... / in kind : ..................................................

Kriteria Penilaian

Indikator Penilaian

Bobot
(%)

Perumusan masalah

- Ketajaman perumusan
masalah
- Tujuan Penelitian

15

Luaran (Proses & Produk):


- Pengembangan IPTEKSSOSBUD
- Menunjang
pembangunan
- Pengembangan institusi

Pentingnya penelitian yang


Direncanakan

35

Tinjauan pustaka

Metode Penelitian

Kelayakan :
- Jadwal
- Personalia
- Biaya
- Sarana dan prasarana

Studi pustaka/ kemajuan


yang telah dicapai dan studi
pendahuluan
Desain dan ketepatan metode
penelitian
- Biodata
- Rincian anggaran
- Dukungan & sarana
penunjang
Jumlah

Skor

Nilai

15
20

15

100

Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7


= Sangat baik)
Nilai = Bobot x Skor
Komentar Penilai :
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................

................................................................................................................................................................
........
..,...2012
Penilai,

FORMULIR DESK EVALUASI PROPOSAL PENELITIAN


STRATEGIS NASIONAL
Judul Penelitian

Tema

Perguruan Tinggi

..

Fakultas / Jurusan

Ketua Peneliti

..

a. Nama Lengkap

: ..............................................................................................................

b. NIDN

: ..............................................................................................................

c. Jabatan Fungsional

: ..............................................................................................................

Anggota Peneliti
: ......................................................................................
: .......................................
: ..............................................................
: ........... orang
Waktu Penelitian Keseluruhan
: .................... tahun
Biaya Penelitian Tahun ke 1
a. Diusulkan ke Dikti

: Rp. .....................

b. Direkomendasikan

: Rp. ......................

Biaya Dari Institusi Lain


No

: Rp. ..................... / in kind : ....................................................


Kriteria Penilaian

Bobot (%)

Tingkat kestrategisan dan skala permasalahan yang


ingin diatasi program penelitian yang diusulkan
Manfaat penelitian yang dapat diterapkan untuk
memecahkan isu strategis
Keutuhan peta jalan (road map) penelitian

4.

Rekam jejak (track record) tim peneliti dan kelayakan


sumber daya lain

20

5.

Keterlibatan mitra

15

1
2

Jumlah

Skor

Nilai

20
25
20

100

Keterangan : Skor: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 (1 = Buruk; 2 = Sangat kurang; 3 = Kurang; 5 = Cukup; 6 = Baik; 7


= Sangat baik)
Nilai = Bobot x Skor

Komentar Penilai :
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................ ...............
................................................................................................................................................................
.......
..,...2012
Penilai,