Molding, Blow
Molding, and Foam
Molding-The Shortest
Way to Mold Design*
ABSTRACT
One of the basic prerequisites for rational and
high quality production of plastic parts is a tool layout tailored to the production process. To date, both
design and construction have generally been based
on values acquired by experience. This first, necessitates highly qualijied personnel and second, involves what is frequently time consuming and costly
finishing work. Experience acquired so far with
computer-aided layout of injection molds shows that
even a designer with little experience reaches the
target more quickly and more reliably. At the same
time he is able to draw on the results of intricate
calculation and simulation methods which he was
unable to apply in the past for reasons of time alone,
This paper thus sets out the possibilities currently
open and the experience available for computer-aided
*The studies presented in this report were made possible through the
financial support received from the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Industrieller Forschungsvereinigungen e.V. (AIF) [Work Group of Industrial Research Associations, a registered organization (AIF)] and the Deutsche Forschungsvereinigung (DFG) [German Research Association (DFG)] for which we
express our thanks. We thank the companies Hasco, BASF, Bayer and CWH
for supporting our work with test materials. We received valuable encouragement and suggestions in discussions with members of the Expert Advisory
Groups for Blow Molding, Design and Injection Molding and with member
companies of the IKV Support Association.
1. WHAT IS COMPUTER-AIDED
MOLD DESIGN?
1.1. Introduction
In plastics fabrication, in the injection molding,
blow molding, and foam molding fields, the design
of the shaping molds is of critical importance for product quality and efficient processing. In most cases,
mold quality is responsible for the economics of the
entire process. Cycle times, for example, are determined primarily by mold temperature control (cooling
time). The quality of the molded parts is determined
primarily by the mold even though constant machine
conditions, achievable through improved machine
building technology and the use of process control
systems combined with uniform material properties.
certainly are also an essential prerequisite.
Frequently, production problems are traceable to
molds which either show signs of premature wear or
cause processing difficulties because of poor thermal
and rheological design, or else are characterized by
operating tolerances which are too close for the machine with its constant machine parameters to guarantee (Figure 1).
Delays in production start-up are due to the long
time required for mold design and construction and,
especially, to very frequently required mold corrections which, in the last analysis, are attributable to
faulty mold design.
Moreover, because of the ever increasing size of
100
VOL. 5 , NO. 2
FIGURE 1
Effects of mold
design on
subsequent
processes.
Delays
Mold layout
and
hrterr"ptr0"S
desfgn
C"C* m e
Mold Wear
Conecuve measures
FIGURE 2
Functions in a
split mold.
Mem !unctions
Spwelgats
Mold cavw
Temperature control
\Mom
I'
-.Gurdmg
L%moldmg--
0
0
transler
and cenfenng
cooling
demolding
The most important parts of a mold, for accomplishing these primary goals, consist of the:
0
0
0
0
sprue, gate
mold cavity
temperature control system
demolding system
shrinkage corrections
rigidities
position of the mold separation line
position of the connections and ejectors
weld lines
vents
Spruetgate:
0
0
0
0
Temperature control:
0
0
0
uniformity
constancy of temperature level
short cooling time
Demolding system:
0
0
0
FIGURE 3
Main steps of
mold design.
0
0
$
0
0
102
FIGURE 4
Steps of mold
design during
dimensioning
phase.
FIGURE 5
Comparison of
different types o
computers.
Deskton comnuter
104
FIGURE 6
Menu (index field
of programs).
FIGURE 7
Selection of
target values.
Foam Molding
Injection Molding
Mold-filling characteristics
Injection pressure requirements
Heat generation and distribution
Melt strain
Mechanical strength
FIGURE 8
Developed view of
a molded cup.
106
VOL. 5,NO. 2
FIGURE 9
Filling pattern of a
molded cup.
FIGURE 10
Segmentation of a
molded cup.
I
,11111
107
Material: polypropylene
Melt temperature: 230C
Mold wall temperature: 50C
Filling time: 0.5 s
The calculation differentiates among different individual flow paths: In the case of the cup molding,
one of these flow paths reaches to the edge of the
body and three flow paths are in the handle region.
For the flow path in the body, computation gave the
following information:
Tem-
True
Flow
Row
Pressure
Pressure
per-
Dissi-
Shear
Shear
Seg-
Site
Time
Needed
Gradient
aNre
pation
Rate
Slress
ment
(mm)
(s)
(bar)
(barim)
(C)
(C)
(11s)
(Pa)
2782.4
226.0
4.7
858.4
107401
2829.3
2909.5
223.5
197.7
0.9
10.2
858.6
583.6
109211
112307
~~
I Disk
2Plate
24.5
28.5
0.0633
0.0849
3 Disk
73.5
0.3838
61.9
73.2
201.1
4Plate
78.5
0.4240
216.1
3023.4
193.3
1.2
576.3
116704
5 Plate
84.5
0.4781
234.0
3024.6
188.3
1.5
513.6
116749
108
True
Tem-
Flow
Flow
Pressure
Ressure
pera-
Dissi-
Shear
Shear
Seg-
Site
Time
Needed
Gradient
Iure
pation
Rate
Smss
ment
(mm)
(s)
(bar)
(barim)
CC)
(C)
(lis)
(Pa)
1D
24.5
0.0633
61.9
2782.4
226.0
4.7
585.4
I0740 I
2P
28.5
0.0849
73.2
2829.3
223.5
0.9
858.6
109211
3D
73.5
0.3838
201.1
2909.5
197.7
10.2
583.6
112307
4P
78.5
0.4240
216.1
3023.4
193.3
1.2
576.3
116704
5P
84.5
0.4781
234.0
3024.6
188.3
1.5
513.6
I 16749
6P
89.5
0.4823
262.2
5628.0
190.0
2.3
5531.3
217243
7P
94.5
0.4856
292.0
5922. I
191.8
2.4
7018.2 228593
nP
99.5
0.4887
322.0
5961.6
193.6
2.4
7522.3
2301 16
9P
104.5
0.4919
351.2
5823. I
195.4
2.4
22471 1
I0 P
109.5
0.4%8
377.3
5203.7
196.6
2.1
7166.3
4805. I
II P
114.5
0.4989
409.1
6320.0
198.7
2.6
10571.2
243950
12 P
117.0
0.5oOO
425.0
6343.4
199.7
1.3
11011.7
244854
200862
VOL. 5, NO. 2
Tem-
Flow
Flow
Pressure
Pressure
pera-
Dissi-
Shear
Seg-
Site
Time
Needed
Gradient
ture
pation
Rate
ment
(mm)
(S)
(bar)
(barlm)
("C)
("C)
(11s)
I D
24.5
0.0621
62.3
2795 6
226.2
4.7
875.2
107909
2P
28.5
0.0833
73 6
2841.5
223.7
0.9
875.4
109680
3D
73.5
0.3765
201.8
2912.0
198.5
10.2
595.1
112402
4P
15.5
0.3922
207.7
2985.6
196.4
0.5
581.6
I15245
5P
84.5
0.4741
234.2
3005.0
188.8
2.2
509.1
115991
FIGURE 11
Change in weld
line position by
changing the
wall thickness.
On slow injection, the material undergoes fast cooling during mold filling. The viscosity and, hence,
the pressure required increase
On very fast injection, frictional losses are very
high. These losses are reflected in higher pressure
requirements. This effect is greater than the drop
in required pressure as a result of reduced viscosity
resulting from the higher temperature. For very low
filling times, the pressure requirement increases
p O h p , 9 ~ S
3M =
,
3 =
=
250%
yI%
05s
FIGURE 12
Reduction in filling
pressure by
wall-thickness
optimization.
lborl
109
300
FIGURE 14
Balancing.
Batancmg
Gates
8de-by-srde
runners
Hot-runner
systems
Before
-
Balancng
E-
FIGURE 15
Balancing a runner
system for two
different moldings.
lower viscosity
nearly pressure-free mold filling
different Reynolds number range
complicated reaction kinetics
After
Balancing
FIGURE 16
Flow front variation
in horizontal mold
position.
Expenmenla
111
FIGURE 17
Photograph of a
bumper.
preshaping
parison formation
molding and
cooling
will continuously yield, for example, a part of reproducible length, thickness and specified peripheral
thickness distribution.
Thus, the design of parison head and nozzle involves consideration of flow processes which-superposed by elongation processes in the thermoplastic
material-cannot be compared directly with the flow
in injection molding. These flow processes require the
application of computation methods used in the extrusion field.
In blow molding, computation methods are currently available for two basic problem areas, i.e., the
melt flow in the diversion head and the actual formation of the parison at and beyond the nozzle outiet.7-9
By use of these computation methods, it is possible
to determine the velocity, temperature, and pressure
relationships in the flow channel and, in addition, to
obtain information about the local elastic deformations
in the melt. This is important, on the one hand, in
carrying out a flow optimization for the channel and,
on the other, in determining from the elastically stored
deformations the swelling potential of the melt at the
nozzle exit.
Figure 19 exemplifies the elastic deformations determined for a spider head along the melt flow path
and the dependence of the deformations on the nozzle
slit width. From the flow condition at the nozzle exit
VOL. 5, NO. 2
FIGURE 18
Constructed filling
pattern.
In mold design, a tailored layout of the temperaturecontrol system is frequently not possible because of
lack of time. The time required can be markedly reduced, however, even by use of pocket calculator
programs. lo
The cost savings achieved by omitting thermal design, however, are more than offset by the cost paid
in terms of loss of molding quality and long cycle
times. Whereas a good temperature control design is
difficult to quantify with respect to molding quality,
the following expression can be used in terms of cooling time:
ADVANCES IN POLYMER TECHNOLOGY
CT
tk/s2
[s/mm2]
where
C,
tK = cooling time
wall thickness
~~
RGURE 19
Mean elastic
deformations along
flow channel
(velocity profile).
50
100
YU
150
I =
200
250 mm 300
In addition to the geometric dimensions of the cooling channels and their location, specific requirements
placed on the temperature-controlsystem (e.g., a temperature controller) are calculated. These include the
temperature of the cooling medium, pressure drop and
capacity requirements.
Moreover, thermal design makes it possible to obtain insight into external mold temperatures and heat
given off to the environment. An accurate calculation
can be made, however, only after the mold dimensions
have been established. Because these dimensions are
obtained only as a result of mechanical design and
after a selection of standard components, this heat at
first can only be estimated. As an additional step the
thermal behavior of the mold at startup and during
process interruptions can be studied. The individual
steps in temperature-control design are as follows
(Figure 21):
1. Cooling Time Calculation. If polymer characteristics, melt temperature, and the maximum wall
thickness of the molding are known, it is possible to
calculate the minimum required, i.e., economically
optimal, cooling time. Cooling the molding in a shorter
time would produce too low a wall temperature and
thus poor surface quality.
2. Heat Balance. During the cooling time, energy
must be removed from the polymer in the form of
heat absorbed by the mold. In addition, heat exchange
with the environment occurs and at first must be estimated. Because the sum of the heat fluxes in the
VOL. 5 , NO. 2
FIGURE 20
Top: Mandrel
holder region of
diversion head in a
blow molding
machine. The figure
shows a quarter
segment of the
mandrel holder and
mandrel holderving
and staggered
spider legs (left)
and of the FEM
structure [of the
flow path] with 130
elements and 846
nodes (right). I, II
and 111 identify the
planes that were
investigated.
Bottom: Effect of
changes in
geometry in the
mandrel holder
region on velocity
distribution in the
polymer melt
(HDPE). Top:
Section along line
1-1 of the depicted
geometry. Bottom:
Changed geometry
of section 1-1.
FIGURE 21
Thermal design.
Thermal Design
Temperalure of
cooling channel
Coolmg bme calculatron
Locatmn 01
cwlmg channels
Heat balance
Pressure dmp
calculation
Cwlmg throughout
Heal exchange
wrfh the envwnmenl
Turbulent llow
Rough layout of
c w h g System
Segmenred
layout
I
bmulalmn calculabon
116
Local
Temooral
VOL. 5, NO. 2
plate, and the calculations are first carried out for this
plate.'*
For more complicated moldings with comers and
ribs, etc., this method is reasonable as an approximation which can serve as a basis for more accurate
temperature-control design, but it is not sufficient.
Higher accuracy can be achieved by dividing the
molding into several regions (segments) that influence
each other only slightly.I3 Each of these segments
contains a cooling element (cooling channel, cold finger, etc.) and is characterized by the shape of the
molding region to be cooled. The following is taken
into account:
Different molding thicknesses requiring different
degrees of heat exchange
The change in coolant temperature in the cooling
system. In view of the uniformity criterion, this
change is slight, but-as will be shown in the following section-it is clearly discernible
Different types of segments, e.g., comers, core
regions, and round molding regions
Different cooling elements. For example, one segment could contain a drilled baffle plate, the next
segment a tubular cold finger, and another segment
may be cooled by means of a single or double-coil
cold finger
Difference in heat exchange. For example, the core
regions give off less heat to the environment than
do mold cavity regions
Division into segments thus offers a substantially
more accurate design. The assumption that the segments do not influence each other, however, gives
rise to errors. The computer simulation makes it possible to quantify these errors, because the mold is
considered as a whole. Hence, the computer simulation is eminently suited for checking and optimization.
2.2.2. Layout of Cooling Systems
The results of thermal design will be explained by
the following example of a simple molding (Figure
22).
The results of design for a simplified molding are
as follows: The cooling time calculation gives for a
polystyrene molding a minimum cooling time of 26.3
s at a melt temperature of 230C, mold wall temperature of 40C, and a mean demolding temperature of
80C. Determining for the cooling time is, in this case,
the thickest molding region. With a down time of 5
117
FIGURE 22
Layout of a cooling
system for a
simplified molding.
+
I
1.4
a ,v
I
l 3
+
I
i.4
T27
I
k2+7u4+
k7A
I
27
All messvremems,n mm
~~~~
FIGURE 23
Segmented layout
of a m l i n a system.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
11
12
31
30.5
38.5
31
28
21
26
25
31.5
30.5
22.5
21.5
Coolant
temperature
at segment
outlet ("C)
Cooling channel
wall temperature
20.4
20.8
21.2
21.6
22.0
22.4
22.8
23.2
23.6
24.0
24.4
24.8
25.8
26.2
21.0
27.3
21.4
27.8
28.2
28.6
29.3
29.1
29.9
30.3
("C)
FIGURE 24
Optimization of the
cooling system.
0 =98 W / m z . K /
-.?TK = 25 "C
Step size = 20 mm
Grid dimensions
80 x 80
No. of cycles: 5
.,
+..
...........
c*+
*.
AW
= 50 W / m . K
uw
= 15 m m V s
AF
= 0.3 W / m . K
uF
=0,08 m m V s
ZOOC
=200oc
:KO=
3Fo
t,< = 9 s
fN
= 4s
I.
~~
FIGURE 25
Variation of mold
temperature with
time.
f-g
Center of
mold,
\
adiabatic
.._
..
Q,...................
o.......
1'
0
50
L
.E
.
E
Time (s)
72
Time (s)
72
119
FIGURE 26
Nonuniform
temperature profile
in corners.
8 W/dK
FIGURE 27
Segmentation of a
corner.
Q2
b, ~ / 2
bl
2 * b2 ~ / 2 s2/4 2(b2
~/4)
= 0.5
120
bl
b2
for
< bZ
VOL. 5 , NO. 2
where
Qi
bi
width of segment i
bi
s = molding thickness
w w 2
U =I * R
A8
Q * WW
where
width of segment i
=
1
27rLh
0.077 + ln(b21d)
ln(b,Id)
2
For given q and bi and known diameters, it is possible to calculate the required distance b2 by means
of computer programs for segmented layout.
For the region of practical importance, distance b2
can be described by an approximated solution:
bl/d = 214
U = potential difference
I = current
resistance
A 8 = temperature difference
bl/al = 0.514
b2 - 33.7 mm - 2d (1.43
Q = heat flux
WW = heat resistance
For the same temperature difference between the
wall of the molding and the wall of the cooling channel
in two segments, we have
121
FIGURE 28
Improvement of
uniformity in
corners.
3,,=20 "C
QF0=2oo0c
9j-i = 25C
3" =2O0C
tK=9S
t N = 4s
FIGURE 29
Asymmetric
temperature
distribution in
a molding.
QE = maximum
demolding
temperature;
QW = mean mold
wall temperature.
where
5
qw
FIGURE 30
Corrected molding
thickness.
Relamsh,p
Bsse-load cnse
' I -"
123
The preceding design criteria show that mold components must be dimensioned not for a requisite strength
but for permissible deformation. To this end, the designer has at his disposal for the preliminary calculation of deformation several calculation methods which
124
undeformed
FIGURE 32
Deformation of the
cavity under clamp
force and pressure
load by FEM.
L m
because-in the broadest sense-these forces are frictional in nature. In the above expressions,
F = demolding force
=
coefficient of friction
125
C'JCAD
N = normal force
= contact pressure
PF
k4-4
0
0
0
0
The effect of the factors influencing the melt temperature, mold wall temperature, stress-relaxation,
molding wall thickness, internal molding radius, and
cooling time on radial stress u,can thus be determined
by computer.
From this radial stress and the static coefficient of
friction, the demolding force can be calculated. To
be able to estimate the number of ejection pins, in
addition to the demolding force, it is also necessary
to know the load-bearing capacity of the plastic at
demolding. Information concerning this subject can
be found in Ref. 2.
The serial results can also be applied to rectangular
sleeves. In this case, the main stress-building process
occurs during the cooling as a result of hindered longitudinal shrinkage. As was shown for the cylindrical
sleeve, the tangential stress-like the stress in the side
walls of rectangular sleeves-is largely independent
of the radius. Hence, for the rectangular sleeve, too,
the stress may be expected to be independent of sleeve
length.
As shown in Ref. 22, the formula
126
VOL. 5, NO. 2
TABLE I
Calculated Deformations
Deformation
Element
Type of Load
(mm)
Mold plate
Support bar
Support column
Platen
0.09315
0.02857
0.12126
0.08724
FIGURE 34
Undeformed
structure of a
quarter of a plate.
FIGURE 35
Deformed quarter
of a plate.
FIGURE 36
Test mold.
3. COMPILATION OF PRODUCTION
DOCUMENTS-CAD
FIGURE 37
Deformation of the
plate along sections
A and B.
w,
3(
l
3.1. A CAD Work Station
= 0.5 mm
128
Fsec.
= 1 7mm
The computers needed for the design tasks discussed in the foregoing, i.e., mold layout and dimensioning, must have sufficient storage capacity,
data processing speed, and standard peripherals such
as an alphanumeric terminal, a printer, and corresponding storage capability. For design purposes,
however, a purely numerical data display is often not
sufficiently informative. The linking of such CAE programs with a graphic data processing system offers
additional advantages. These linked systems can provide computer-aided solutions for the best-known design task, namely, the compilation of production documents. This type of system has come to be known
as CAD, and it is capable of preparing engineering
drawings, parts lists, flow charts, purchase order lists,
etc.
sec 9
FIGURE 38
Arrangement of
peripheral units of a
CAD work station
for injection mold
design.
computer
a
PTOtter
FIGURE 39
Drawing of a
molding.
Molding
130
VOL. 5, NO. 2
MoMing
SeleClion
of mold plete
after /eying out the
cooling system
selection of
pleren
Sel9Clion
moving
pletens
Of
completion Of
drawing on the
side of moving
oleten
...
..
131
FIGURE 40
Drawing with
standard mold
components.
FIGURE 41
Mold drawing
before the
introduction of
details.
132
FIGURE 42
Example of a
detailed drawing of
an individual part
produced with the
aid of a computer.
133
FIGURE 43
Isotherms in the
mold after several
cycles.
after 1 cycle
r
A w = 50 W / m K
uW =
15 m m 2 / s
A,
= 0'3 W / m K
aF
=0,08 m m 2 / s
8 W/m2K
= 98 W/m2K
= 25
OC
= 20G
--
9,c=
9"
zu "C
= 20
OC
Grid: 80x80
Step size: 2mm
Thus, a programmable pocket calculator should suffice for minor calculation tasks, e.g., determining the
filling pressure for simple injection-molded parts or
the minimum required cooling time. To solve such
problems, an investment of ca. lo00 German marks
(DM) is required, and the calculation time is of the
order of a few minutes. Because the operation of these
calculators is based on the manufacturers programming commands, the various individual programs for
rheological, thermal, or mechanical design obtainable, for example, from IKV or from various raw
material producers must be adapted to each particular
calculator.
A similar situation exists with respect to the nextlarger class of computers, the desktop computer. At
a cost of about 2000-30,000 DM, these computers
offer greater convenience, for example, video screen
display, data storage capacity, and computation speed,
so that, for example, filling studies can be performed
by dividing the moldings into simplified basic elements. To this end, data processing times of up to
several hours must be expected.
Fast calculation of comprehensive tasks, the buildup
of large data banks and the simultaneous linking of
several work stations to one computer are possible
only with larger computers. In addition to a core memory of 2-3 Mbytes, external data storage on disk or
magnetic tape devices is feasible. These systems cost
at least 50,000-100,000 DM. With such systems it is
possible to use a wide range of commercially available
off-line software. At the present time, only a small
number of available program packages are suitable for
mold design. In the area of injection molding, for
example, MOLDFLOW and Cornell University offer
programs for rheological design. These software packages, can be used only against payment of relatively
high user fees or are sold as a turnkey system in
conjunction with a computer system. An important
criterion is also that rheological, thermal, and mechanical mold design, as in the CADMOULD program developed at IKV, can be carried out within a
closed system.
Note also that users of finite elements programs
should have access to computer systems that are at
least in this size class. In future years, FEM programs
will certainly find wider use because more convenient
input and output programs that will improve the handling of FEM will then become available. Hence,
when buying a computer, one should at least make
sure it has adequate enlargement potential.
The linking of computation and drawing programs
can-as shown in the preceding sections-be a particularly useful aid in support of the designers work.
136
NOMENCLATURE
Symbol
Meaning
A,
aF
aw
=
=
b
bi
CT
d
E
f
I
=
=
=
-
VOL. 5 , NO. 2
AP
Q
QK
QKS
QL
QTM
Qu
9W
qk
R
r
S
t
tK
U
V
ww
a9P
4s
QE
6FU
6 U
QTK
6 W
6w.o
Aw
AF
ur
segment length
flow length
pressure
pressure loss
heat flux
convective heat flux
heat flux from polymer
radiant heat flux
heat flux to the cooling medium
heat flux to the environment
heat flux on the outside
convective heat flow on the inside
resistance
radius of flow cross-section
wall thickness of molding (true)
corrected wall thickness
time
cooling time
potential difference
volume flow rate
heat resistance
heat transfer coefficient
temperature
temperature difference
maximum demolding temperature
temperature of molded part
temperature of surroundings
temperature at cooling channel wall
mean mold wall temperature
wall temperature
thermal conductivity of mold construction material
thermal conductivity of the molded part
radial stress
tangential stress
diameter
REFERENCES
1. U. Lichius, doctoral dissertalion, RWTH [Technical University of
Rhein-Westfalen] Aachen, 1983.
2. H. Bangert, doctoral dissertation, RWTH Aachen, 1981.
3. G. Menges and P. Mohren, Anleitung fur den Bau von Spritzgiesswerkzeugen [Guide to the Construction of Injection Molds], Carl Hanser
Verlag, Munich, 1974.
137