0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
103 tayangan2 halaman
The document discusses a shanti patha, or invocation of peace, that is specific to the Shukla Yajur Veda. It notes that this shanti patha will be different from previous Upanishads because it belongs to the Shukla Yajur Veda tradition. It then provides the text of the shanti patha itself in Devanagari script and mentions that the meaning of the shanti patha is obscure and open to interpretation. It proceeds to provide one interpretation, explaining that the first two sentences refer to the oneness or unity of the individual self and the universal self, with both being infinite or whole.
The document discusses a shanti patha, or invocation of peace, that is specific to the Shukla Yajur Veda. It notes that this shanti patha will be different from previous Upanishads because it belongs to the Shukla Yajur Veda tradition. It then provides the text of the shanti patha itself in Devanagari script and mentions that the meaning of the shanti patha is obscure and open to interpretation. It proceeds to provide one interpretation, explaining that the first two sentences refer to the oneness or unity of the individual self and the universal self, with both being infinite or whole.
The document discusses a shanti patha, or invocation of peace, that is specific to the Shukla Yajur Veda. It notes that this shanti patha will be different from previous Upanishads because it belongs to the Shukla Yajur Veda tradition. It then provides the text of the shanti patha itself in Devanagari script and mentions that the meaning of the shanti patha is obscure and open to interpretation. It proceeds to provide one interpretation, explaining that the first two sentences refer to the oneness or unity of the individual self and the universal self, with both being infinite or whole.
since it belongs to , it will have a pata which will be
different from all the previous , because all the previous we
saw, were not . TF we have got a pata, which we all know because, we use it at the end of every class. . It is , . For both and . But the only the difference is being the it will be chanted at the beginning. And TF you should be careful I start with and close my eyes and open. Swamiji has finished. TF dont think so. Here : will be the beginning of the class and of course at the end also. We will chant. TF we will start the text with . I will read. You can repeat after me. SHANTI PATA
You will find the very pata of the is very obscure to find the meaning. And if you give the literal translation, it will run as this is . That is . means whole. Careful that is whole. This whole. From that whole, this whole originated. When you remove whole from the whole, whole remains. This will be the running translation and what remains will not be whole. At the end of the pata , in your head hole will remain. Nothing will be meaningful. The very apta is obscure. 2 ,3 interpretations are given. I will try to give one interpretation. So the first 2 sentences talk about - . : .: means that is , infinite or whole. - refers to this is also , or infinite. And if is also , is also
equating them together you can say, TF , and , are one and the same. Both being infinite. What will be the difference between this infinite and that infinite? Infinite can be only one.